Fedora-36-20220504.1 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 5/229 (x86_64), 6/161 (aarch64) ID: 1254529 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso gnome_text_editor URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1254529 ID: 1254564 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso apps_startstop URL:

Re: New version of mkksiso could use some testing

On Wed, May 04, 2022 at 12:07:36PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Wed, May 4, 2022 at 11:38 AM Brian C. Lane wrote: > > > > After the recent discussions about xorriso I realized that I could > > vastly simplify mkksiso, AND make it work as a normal user :) So I did. > > > > The PR is here: > >

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 37 Boost 1.78 rebuilds starting in a side tag

On 04. 05. 22 1:34, Thomas Rodgers wrote: We are starting the rebuilds for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/F37Boost178 in the f37-boost side tag. If your package depends on Boost, or just if you see a "Rebuilt for Boost 1.78" commit

[Bug 2081712] perl-Sys-Virt-8.3.0 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2081712 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Status|NEW

[EPEL-devel] Re: RHEL 9 packages available in EPEL 9 (in different versions as well)

On Wed, May 4, 2022 at 4:00 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 04. 05. 22 15:40, Troy Dawson wrote: > > I just want to make sure that you are querying RHEL 9.0 and not 9.1. > > Well, I was querying 9.1, so you have a point. However, with 9.0 it is almost > the same: > > $ comm -12 <(repoquery -q >

[EPEL-devel] Re: RHEL 9 packages available in EPEL 9 (in different versions as well)

On 04. 05. 22 15:40, Troy Dawson wrote: I just want to make sure that you are querying RHEL 9.0 and not 9.1. Well, I was querying 9.1, so you have a point. However, with 9.0 it is almost the same: $ comm -12 <(repoquery -q --repo=RHEL9.0-{BaseOS,AppStream,CRB,HighAvailability} -a | pkgname

[EPEL-devel] Re: CentOS Stream 8 and 9 - KDE un-updateable for a week

On Wed, 4 May 2022 at 15:31, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Wed, 2022-05-04 at 20:25 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > dnf --enablerepo=epel-next-testing --whatprovides "libpoppler-qt5.so*" > nothing ?!? > > > I missed repoquery word . > > dnf --enablerepo=epel-next-testing repoquery --whatprovides >

[EPEL-devel] Re: CentOS Stream 8 and 9 - KDE un-updateable for a week

On Wed, 2022-05-04 at 20:25 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: > dnf --enablerepo=epel-next-testing --whatprovides "libpoppler- > qt5.so*" > nothing  ?!? I missed repoquery word . dnf --enablerepo=epel-next-testing repoquery --whatprovides "libpoppler-qt5.so*" nothing  ?!? btw in Fedora 35  dnf

[EPEL-devel] Re: CentOS Stream 8 and 9 - KDE un-updateable for a week

On Wed, 2022-05-04 at 08:01 -0700, Troy Dawson wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 9:31 AM Troy Dawson > wrote: > > During the past week qt5 was updated on CentOS Stream 8 and 9 to > > version 5.15.3.  This caused updates to break for KDE users running > > CentOS Stream 8 and 9.  The epel 8 and 9

License change: python-starlette is just “BSD” again

With release 0.20.0, the bundled subset of pep562 is removed upstream, and the License field changes back to just “BSD”. On 4/23/22 20:33, Ben Beasley wrote: In release 0.19.1, python-starlette adds one Python module under the MIT license (bundling a subset of python-pep562, which I have

Re: fedpkg sources - downloading unused source files: opt-in/opt-out

Ondrej Nosek kirjoitti 4.5.2022 klo 18.01: Hi all, A few months ago fedpkg introduced a change which avoids downloading source files (from dist-git) that are not used in the specfile and therefore downloading them would be wasting of resources and time. The original request was opened here [1]

Re: How to find out whether a package is used

On 04/05/2022 17:19, Milan Crha wrote: is there a way to figure out whether a package is used by any user? No. My idea is to remove the evolution-mapi package. It is kept alive upstream for users connecting to very old Microsoft Exchange servers in the Evolution. Just orphan it. If someone

Re: New version of mkksiso could use some testing

On Wed, May 4, 2022 at 11:38 AM Brian C. Lane wrote: > > After the recent discussions about xorriso I realized that I could > vastly simplify mkksiso, AND make it work as a normal user :) So I did. > > The PR is here: > https://github.com/weldr/lorax/pull/1228 > > It only depends on xorriso and

Re: fedpkg sources - downloading unused source files: opt-in/opt-out

On 04. 05. 22 17:21, Petr Pisar wrote: V Wed, May 04, 2022 at 03:14:24PM -, Artur Frenszek-Iwicki napsal(a): For me personally, opt-out would be better, since the logic is right most of the time. And doesn't break it, in the rare cases, building packages in Koji? When a source package is

Re: fedpkg sources - downloading unused source files: opt-in/opt-out

On Wed, 2022-05-04 at 17:01 +0200, Ondrej Nosek wrote: > Hi all, > > A few months ago fedpkg introduced a change which avoids downloading > source files (from dist-git) that are not used in the specfile and > therefore downloading them would be wasting of resources and time. > The original

Fedora-Rawhide-20220504.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Minimal raw-xz armhfp Compose PASSES proposed Rawhide gating check! All required tests passed Failed openQA tests: 10/231 (x86_64), 21/161 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20220503.n.0): ID: 1253787 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso

libgps soname bump (gpsd-3.24)

libgps from the gpsd package had an API and ABI break. As usual, the following packages need to be rebuilt: collectd direwolf foxtrotgps marble plasma-workspace vfrnav viking I tried to rebuild them locally. It seems only direwolf needs a new patch. The direwolf-gpsapi12 patch needs to be

New version of mkksiso could use some testing

After the recent discussions about xorriso I realized that I could vastly simplify mkksiso, AND make it work as a normal user :) So I did. The PR is here: https://github.com/weldr/lorax/pull/1228 It only depends on xorriso and implantisomd5 so I may also split it out into a subpackage so you

Re: fedpkg sources - downloading unused source files: opt-in/opt-out

V Wed, May 04, 2022 at 03:14:24PM -, Artur Frenszek-Iwicki napsal(a): > For me personally, opt-out would be better, since the logic is right most of > the time. > And doesn't break it, in the rare cases, building packages in Koji? When a source package is built in Koji, sources are

How to find out whether a package is used

Hi, is there a way to figure out whether a package is used by any user? I know with mirrors it's basically impossible to know whether it had been downloaded at all, but I do not know whether there can be involved other techniques to figure it out, batter than dropping a package and wait

Re: fedpkg sources - downloading unused source files: opt-in/opt-out

For me personally, opt-out would be better, since the logic is right most of the time. That being said, how about adding a value for this in $HOME/.config/rpkg/fedpkg.conf? That way, you have some default value, which can be overridden by the config, which in turn can be overridden by the

REMINDER: Fedora Linux 36 Final Go/No-Go meeting tomorrow

Hi everyone, The Fedora Linux 36 Final Go/No-Go meeting[1] is scheduled for Thursday 5 May at 1700 UTC in #fedora-meeting. At this time, we will determine the status of the F36 Final for the 10 May target date #3[2]. For more information about the Go/No-Go meeting, see the wiki[3]. [1]

[Test-Announce] REMINDER: Fedora Linux 36 Final Go/No-Go meeting tomorrow

Hi everyone, The Fedora Linux 36 Final Go/No-Go meeting[1] is scheduled for Thursday 5 May at 1700 UTC in #fedora-meeting. At this time, we will determine the status of the F36 Final for the 10 May target date #3[2]. For more information about the Go/No-Go meeting, see the wiki[3]. [1]

[Bug 2081143] perl-Hash-Merge-Simple for EPEL 9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2081143 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #3 from

[EPEL-devel] Re: CentOS Stream 8 and 9 - KDE un-updateable for a week

On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 9:31 AM Troy Dawson wrote: > During the past week qt5 was updated on CentOS Stream 8 and 9 to version > 5.15.3. This caused updates to break for KDE users running CentOS Stream 8 > and 9. The epel 8 and 9 packages affected are being rebuilt at this time. > We expect

fedpkg sources - downloading unused source files: opt-in/opt-out

Hi all, A few months ago fedpkg introduced a change which avoids downloading source files (from dist-git) that are not used in the specfile and therefore downloading them would be wasting of resources and time. The original request was opened here [1] and implemented here [2]. The logic is part

[Bug 1970389] Upgrade perl-Net-Telnet-Cisco to 1.12

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1970389 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE

[Bug 1942850] Upgrade perl-File-Touch to 0.12

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1942850 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|---

[Bug 2078251] perl-Text-Bidi-2.16 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2078251 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Text-Bidi-2.16-1.fc37 |perl-Text-Bidi-2.16-1.fc37

[Bug 2081541] Please branch and build perl-List-Compare for epel8 and epel9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2081541 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #2 from

[Bug 2081541] Please branch and build perl-List-Compare for epel8 and epel9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2081541 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-EPEL-2022-9532cf2c41 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-9532cf2c41 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are

[EPEL-devel] Re: RHEL 9 packages available in EPEL 9 (in different versions as well)

Hi Miro, Thank you for looking into this. One thing to keep in mind is that what is in CentOS Stream 9 right now, is going into RHEL 9.1, so some of this won't be in epel9 for another 6-7 months. I've noticed that in your query's you do a RHEL9 query. Where is that coming from? I just want to

[EPEL-devel] Re: RHEL 9 packages available in EPEL 9 (in different versions as well)

On Wed, 4 May 2022 at 08:55, Miro Hrončok wrote: > Hello EPEL. > > I have just found out that the pybind11 component from c9s / RHEL 9 CRB > has > been built in EPEL 9 in different version: > > > > Do I understand correctly that this is still *not* allowed? If so, what > can we > do to

[Bug 2078251] perl-Text-Bidi-2.16 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2078251 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Text-Bidi-2.16-1.fc37 |perl-Text-Bidi-2.16-1.fc37

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20220504.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20220503.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20220504.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 125 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 140 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 49.37 MiB Size of dropped packages

[Bug 2081712] New: perl-Sys-Virt-8.3.0 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2081712 Bug ID: 2081712 Summary: perl-Sys-Virt-8.3.0 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Sys-Virt Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

[EPEL-devel] RHEL 9 packages available in EPEL 9 (in different versions as well)

Hello EPEL. I have just found out that the pybind11 component from c9s / RHEL 9 CRB has been built in EPEL 9 in different version: $ repoquery -q --repo=c9s-crb-source pybind11 pybind11-0:2.6.2-3.el9.src pybind11-0:2.6.2-4.el9.src $ repoquery -q --repo=RHEL9-CRB-source pybind11

Re: F37 Proposal: Strong crypto settings: phase 3, forewarning 1/2 (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Wed, May 4, 2022 at 12:52 PM Vít Ondruch wrote: > > Dne 04. 05. 22 v 9:32 Alexander Sosedkin napsal(a): > > On Wed, May 4, 2022 at 12:43 AM David Woodhouse wrote: > >> On Mon, 2022-05-02 at 19:33 +0200, Clemens Lang wrote: > >>> This is the reason why the proposal contains extensive methods

Re: F37 Proposal: Strong crypto settings: phase 3, forewarning 1/2 (System-Wide Change proposal)

Dne 04. 05. 22 v 9:32 Alexander Sosedkin napsal(a): On Wed, May 4, 2022 at 12:43 AM David Woodhouse wrote: On Mon, 2022-05-02 at 19:33 +0200, Clemens Lang wrote: This is the reason why the proposal contains extensive methods to test whether things are going to break by modifying the

Fedora-Cloud-34-20220504.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 1/8 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20220502.0): ID: 1253708 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1253708 Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64)

Fedora-36-20220504.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 4/229 (x86_64), 6/161 (aarch64) ID: 1253312 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso gnome_text_editor URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1253312 ID: 1253347 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso apps_startstop URL:

[Bug 2081210] perl-PDL-2.079 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2081210 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Link ID||Github |

Re: F37 Proposal: Strong crypto settings: phase 3, forewarning 1/2 (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Wed, May 4, 2022 at 12:43 AM David Woodhouse wrote: > > On Mon, 2022-05-02 at 19:33 +0200, Clemens Lang wrote: > > This is the reason why the proposal contains extensive methods to test > > whether things are going to break by modifying the crypto-policy or using > > bpftrace. Unfortunately

Re: F37 Proposal: Strong crypto settings: phase 3, forewarning 1/2 (System-Wide Change proposal)

On 5/3/22 18:41, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Mon, 2022-05-02 at 19:33 +0200, Clemens Lang wrote: >> This is the reason why the proposal contains extensive methods to test >> whether things are going to break by modifying the crypto-policy or using >> bpftrace. Unfortunately there are hundreds of

[Bug 2081541] Please branch and build perl-List-Compare for epel8 and epel9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2081541 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED