On 5/14/21 2:50 PM, Martin Kolman wrote:
On Thu, 2021-05-13 at 20:09 +0200, Peter Boy wrote:
We discussed that in the Fedora Server Edition Working Group and
opted to leave it as is for the Server installation iso. A lot of
servers are running in a protected environment. And there are
On 5/11/21 2:06 AM, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
eseyman commented on the pull-request: `Move Apache handler ro sub-packages`
that you are following:
``
Thank you for this PR, Jikta. I've been meaning to work on this since the next
version of Bugzilla will require PSGI and having handlers in their
On 4/30/21 3:21 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 10:09:12PM +0200, Martin Kolman wrote:
Now fast forward to today, it's 2021, any use cases that needed
password based root login via SSH had 2 more years to migrate while the
amount of password guessing attacks certainly
On 4/13/21 12:26 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Hijacking this thread originally about
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Autoconf_271
What is the current thinking in Fedora about always running
"autoreconf -i" during builds that use autotools?
IMO, it's naive wishful thinking, applicable
On 12/9/20 12:33 PM, Jaroslav Prokop wrote:
Hello,
On 09/12/2020 12:12, Christoph Karl wrote:
Hello!
On 09.12.20 04:26, Sergio Belkin wrote:
How does this (https://blog.centos.org/2020/12/future-is-centos-stream/)
affect Fedora?
I think Fedora now needs some kind of LTS.
At least I was
On 11/20/20 5:26 PM, Ben Cotton wrote:
The pulseaudio package will be uninstalled and pipewire-pulse will be installed.
>
pipewire-pulse does not yet implement all the features of pulseaudio
but it is expected that
comparable functionality will be implemented later. Most notable
features that
On 10/19/20 6:47 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
The issue is that while 'moore's' law was no longer doubling every 18months
it was still working and tasks had to be rewritten to work with more
cores/threads/etc. As that happened the software's need for more CPU power
has increased to the point
On 8/13/20 3:17 PM, Fabio Valentini wrote:
On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 3:15 PM Ralf Corsepius wrote:
Hi,
A f33 build job, I launched a couple of hours ago, seems to hang on s390
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=49204466
What am I supposed to do?
Ralf
Wait. It's
Hi,
A f33 build job, I launched a couple of hours ago, seems to hang on s390
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=49204466
What am I supposed to do?
Ralf
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an
On 7/1/20 6:10 PM, Solomon Peachy wrote:
On Wed, Jul 01, 2020 at 05:19:01PM +0200, Roberto Ragusa wrote:
I'm currently using BIOS, grub, grub2 basically everywhere, even on
fresh new machines,
This won't be the case for much longer; Intel will finally drop CSM
("BIOS") support this year.
On 6/30/20 3:34 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
Given Hans proposal [1] introduced systemd/grub2/Gnome upstream changes
it beg the question if now would not be the time to stop supporting
booting in legacy bios mode and move to uefi only supported boot which
has been available on any common
On 2/20/20 8:04 PM, Mohan Boddu wrote:
Hi all,
It has been brought to our attention that release freezes starting at
00:00 UTC has been confusing for a lot of people. So, we decided to
change it to 14:00 UTC.
This longs for an explanation.
I fail to understand why 14:00 UTC should be less
On 12/17/19 5:14 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2019-12-17 at 10:43 +0100, Kamil Paral wrote:
On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 2:31 AM Adam Williamson
wrote:
On Mon, 2019-12-16 at 16:52 -0700, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
I've offered to take on responsibility for these tests in this thread,
and
On 11/7/19 2:34 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 07. 11. 19 13:59, Felix Schwarz wrote:
Am 07.11.19 um 13:01 schrieb Petr Viktorin:
If this took you by surprise, don't panic. It's possible to change the
default. Let us know and we'll work things out.
Somehow I feel like I don't understand the
On 11/5/19 9:41 PM, Alex Scheel wrote:
IMO, without a resolution in Fedora we'll never get one in RHEL.
And? Why should Fedora care about RHEL?
I for one consider RHEL not to be its partner, but it to be an
initiative to gradually push Fedora out of this planet.
Ralf
On 10/8/19 8:03 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Mon, Oct 07, 2019 at 04:34:28PM -0400, Scott Talbert wrote:
On Mon, 7 Oct 2019, Richard Shaw wrote:
I am in the midst of updating the freecad package in two major ways:
Qt4 -> Qt5 (via PySide -> PySide2, which also facilitates moving
On 10/7/19 10:23 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
I am in the midst of updating the freecad package in two major ways:
Qt4 -> Qt5 (via PySide -> PySide2, which also facilitates moving from
Python 2 to 3)
and
Coin3 -> Coin4 (Which requires several other packages move to Coin4)
I have been working with
On 9/18/19 12:11 PM, Kalev Lember wrote:
On 9/18/19 10:29, Petr Pisar wrote:
On 2019-09-18, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
- package perl-libs-4:5.28.2-439.module_f31+6019+b24e098f.x86_64 is
excluded
Funnily DNF finds out that you could actually get that package satisfied
if you enabled
On 9/17/19 4:04 PM, Mohan Boddu wrote:
Since this is a Beta release, we expect that you may encounter bugs or
missing features. To report issues encountered during testing, contact the
Fedora QA team via the mailing list or in #fedora-qa on Freenode.
Some not so pleasant results:
# dnf
On 9/13/19 1:34 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Just FTR, this was brought up already:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/2V2RRTT7DTHWANFHL6YBVM7RILCWDGGT/
Understood - Give me a ping when Fedora has a usable infrastructure again.
I'll suspend all
Hi,
Apparently mock-build roots for fedora-31-i386 currently are broken:
# mock -r fedora-31-i386 --init
INFO: mock.py version 1.4.16 starting (python version = 3.7.4)...
Start: init plugins
INFO: selinux disabled
Finish: init plugins
Start: run
Start: clean chroot
Finish: clean chroot
Start:
On 8/19/19 10:50 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
This seems to repeat every 6 months: rawhide mock is broken on stable
Fedora, people are scrambling to install the right gpg keys, dnf reports
unsigned packages.
The same applies to f31.
The f31 repos are not in place, the mock-configs
On 7/22/19 8:51 PM, Ben Cotton wrote:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/x86-64_micro-architecture_update
After preliminary discussions with CPU vendors, we propose AVX2 as the
new baseline. AVX2 support was introduced into CPUs from 2013 to
2015. See
On 6/21/19 7:26 PM, Ben Cotton wrote:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Stop_Building_i686_Kernels
== Summary ==
Stop building i686 kernels, reduce the i686 package to a
kernel-headers package that can be used to build 32bit versions of
everything else.
How does this affect the i386 as
On 6/3/19 7:05 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
Some people don't see any problem with this, personally it drives me
crazy and I wish it were policy that *every* retired package must be
obsoleted. But it isn't.
I am quite shocked to hear this from you. I wouldn't have expected this
attitude from you.
On 5/1/19 2:24 AM, Ian Kent wrote:
On Tue, 2019-04-30 at 17:29 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 01:12:43PM -0400, Robert Marcano wrote:
On 4/30/19 11:45 AM, David Howells wrote:
Hi,
I need to install a directory (/afs) that will be a mountpoint that a
systemd
On 3/19/19 11:01 AM, Stelian Iancu wrote:
On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 7:35 AM Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
* Sérgio Basto [19/03/2019 00:03] :
I though it was just one person which decide orphan his 259 packages
Mikolaj is the last actif member of the Java SIG.
And who is guilty for this?
I
On 3/26/19 5:44 PM, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
$ rpm --showrc | egrep -e "popd|pushd"
This scriptlet of yours isn't posix compliant, either.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On 3/5/19 9:08 AM, Adam Samalik wrote:
On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 10:26 PM Michael Cronenworth wrote:
On 3/4/19 3:04 AM, Petr Šabata wrote:
You can view them as virtual repositories with dependencies. I
think that might be the simplest way to put it.
You can try playing with fedmod to generate
Hi,
when "git push"ing updates to Fedora's git, I am currently encountering
this kind of tracebacks:
$ git push
Total 0 (delta 0), reused 0 (delta 0)
remote: Emitting a message to the fedmsg bus.
remote: * Publishing information for 1 commits
remote: Traceback (most recent call last):
remote:
On 2/28/19 6:55 PM, Kalev Lember wrote:
On 2/28/19 18:05, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 28. 02. 19 16:55, Adam Williamson wrote:
More generally, the *flood* of Python 2 dep issues here is something I
was definitely concerned about with the Python 2 retirement policy
explicitly deciding not to say
On 2/12/19 8:22 AM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 11:19 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
I'm curious: What happens to modules when a package's master branch
gets retired?
Nothing. Modules will continue to exist and will continue to be
delivered to users.
Actually, I consider ant
On 1/8/19 6:51 PM, Tim Landscheidt wrote:
Petr Šabata wrote:
Adding
BuildRequires: glibc-all-langpacks
to all the *.specs obviously fixes this issue. However, I doubt this is
right, because I think these warnings originate from some rpm-internal
scripts and not from the packages.
I suspect
Hi,
ATM, many (all?) of my perl packages raise several warnings of the kind
below, when building them in mock:
...
perl: warning: Setting locale failed.
perl: warning: Please check that your locale settings:
LANGUAGE = (unset),
LC_ALL = (unset),
LANG = "en_US.UTF-8"
Hi,
I am facing a weird problem with creating a new user account:
Create a new user:
# adduser -m tester
Trying to change his passwd:
# passwd tester
Changing password for user tester.
At this point, passwd hangs and doesn't do anything.
I am not getting the "usual" passwd-prompt.
What's
On 11/28/18 4:37 PM, Robert Marcano wrote:
On 11/28/18 11:20 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
# ls -l /etc/nsswitch.conf
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 29 Nov 18 04:58 /etc/nsswitch.conf ->
/etc/authselect/nsswitch.conf
My clean F29 installation had no such symbolic link, has to "authselect
On 11/28/18 3:45 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Richard W. M. Jones:
Trying to track down a bug in IPP printing
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1653276).
We're down a rabbit hole where it seems that in Fedora 29
/etc/nssswitch.conf ought to be a symlink. This machine has been
On 11/27/18 9:16 AM, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
Because if we keep "no breaking updates in stable" policy, then Fedora
won't be "first anymore".
Users perceive your "first" as unstable and unreliable. There are plenty
of examples of how e.g. FC30 was broken and still is.
One such example is you
On 11/14/18 4:08 PM, Gerald Henriksen wrote:
On Wed, 14 Nov 2018 06:12:11 +0100, you wrote:
We, as a distro, just take a different approach.
To be bleeding edge requires to have releases often.
Such a bleeding edge distro that it took 4 years for Swift to arrive,
or still trying to get rid
On 07/23/2018 08:01 AM, Jan Synacek wrote:
I got several FTBFS bug reports, the logs of which look like this:
+ make 'CFLAGS=-O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security
-Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -fexceptions
-fstack-protector-strong -grecord-gcc-switches
On 07/20/2018 03:58 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
On Fri, Jul 20, 2018, 15:27 Kevin Kofler wrote:
Igor Gnatenko wrote:
No one promised that I'm going to fix 100% of packages, I've fixed around
2k packages. What my regex couldn't catch -- please send me list of
packages, I will analyze them and
On 07/21/2018 11:02 AM, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
On Sat, Jul 21, 2018 at 10:28 AM Julian Sikorski wrote:
This means that build failed on checking for gcc. There are some packages
where it checks for both gcc and g++ and then fails, but there are packages
where it fails after first.
On 06/14/2018 03:02 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
On 06/14/2018 03:42 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
I know we never manage to motivate many people to vote, but 86 votes
is really
low, even for us:(
Yes, I was checking out the voter count on other pollings and the
turnout is around 100.
On 06/04/2018 11:28 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
On 06/04/2018 10:50 AM, Guido Aulisi wrote:
It should, because -march=x86-64 implies just SSE2 and FXSR, and Xeon MP
supports both. But the intent is what the subject says: i686 binaries
are for running legacy software on x86-64 systems, and
On 05/16/2018 05:02 PM, David Kaspar [Dee'Kej] wrote:
Hello people,
I would like to know if you know about any service / tool / application
that still relies on NIS domain to be set in Fedora?
So far, I know only about SSSD/FreeIPA relying on it. Does anybody know
anything else? All replies
On 03/23/2018 12:23 PM, Petr Viktorin wrote:
tl;dr: Unless someone steps up to maintain Python 2 after 2020, we need
to start dropping python2 packages now.
Bummer - I am speechless.
Python 2.7 will reach end of upstream support on 1st of January, 2020,
after almost 10 years (!) of volunteer
On 03/22/2018 11:32 AM, Matěj Cepl wrote:
On 2018-03-22, 06:51 GMT, Till Maas wrote:
I orphaned josm (https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/josm), the
java openstreetmap editor on request by the original
maintainer. Please adopt it. It needs to be updated regularly
to follow the current
On 03/03/2018 12:19 PM, Christian Dersch wrote:
Hi,
try qhull-devel instead of pkgconfig(qhull), afaik there was a change in
qhull package some days ago.
No. The change you are referring to happened in April 2016!
Ralf (Fedora qhull packager)
___
On 02/28/2018 05:43 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2018-02-28 at 12:14 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 02/27/2018 07:27 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 12:16 PM, Adam Williamson
<adamw...@fedoraproject.org <mailto:adamw...@fedoraproject.org>> wrote:
Once
On 03/01/2018 11:33 AM, Paul Howarth wrote:
On Thu, 1 Mar 2018 11:17:18 +0100
Petr Pisar <ppi...@redhat.com> wrote:
On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 09:38:08AM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
Hi,
perl-Plack fails to build in rawhide with
this error[1]
Sorry, of course this was perl-Server-S
Hi,
perl-Plack fails to build in rawhide with
this error[1]
...
+ /usr/bin/perl Build.PL --installdirs=vendor
Can't locate ExtUtils/CBuilder.pm in @INC (you may need to install the
ExtUtils::CBuilder module) (@INC contains:
/builddir/build/BUILD/Server-Starter-0.34/_build/lib
On 02/28/2018 11:28 AM, Rafal Luzynski wrote:
28.02.2018 09:33 Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le mercredi 28 février 2018 à 00:11 -0500, Orcan Ogetbil a écrit :
Shouldn't we consider having -devel packages Require gcc or gcc-c++?
What good is a header package without a
On 02/28/2018 12:21 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 28.2.2018 v 12:14 Ralf Corsepius napsal(a):
On 02/27/2018 07:27 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 12:16 PM, Adam Williamson
<adamw...@fedoraproject.org <mailto:adamw...@fedoraproject.org>> wrote:
Once again, fo
On 02/28/2018 02:41 AM, Richard Shaw wrote:
On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 6:47 PM, Kevin Kofler > wrote:
Richard Shaw wrote:
> Is it time to update the packaging guidelines to enforce setting a
> "%global sover " and using it in
On 02/27/2018 07:27 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 12:16 PM, Adam Williamson
> wrote:
Once again, folks, *please* announce your soname bumps, and co-ordinate
rebuilds. (In fact it looks like Zdenek is the
On 02/19/2018 11:27 AM, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Mon, 2018-02-19 at 09:02 +, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 19/02/18 08:30, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
On Mon, 2018-02-19 at 09:12 +0100, Guido Aulisi wrote:
amsynth has been fixed in all supported branches.
On 02/17/2018 11:15 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
Bodhi currently provides "batched updates" [1] which lump updates of
packages that are not marked urgent into a single batch, released once
per week. This means that after an update has graduated from testing,
it may be delayed up to a
IMO, bikesheding and stylishness with any actual usefulness.
If you really want to enforce this, make it a feature request for f30
and have FESCO vote on it.
Ralf
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email
On 02/11/2018 08:40 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Richard Shaw wrote:
$ fedpkg request-branch
Could not execute request_branch: The "token" value must be set under the
"fedpkg.pagure" section in your "fedpkg" user configuration
WTF?! So, instead of going to a web interface and making the change
On 02/09/2018 09:18 AM, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
I've went and fixed 493 packages (listed below). If it broke something, please
let me know. I checked diff briefly and don't think that I broke anything…
Did you ask FESCO? If not you, have abused
On 02/06/2018 09:05 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
On 02/06/2018 09:02 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Tue, Feb 06, 2018 at 08:49:53AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
On 02/06/2018 08:38 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
binutils 2.30 has been out for about a week. Will we get it in
Rawhide soon? It
On 01/30/2018 11:16 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 11:11:02AM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 01/30/2018 10:00 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
On 01/30/2018 09:54 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
annobin.spec now uses:
%undefine _annotated_build
so at least the circular dependency
On 01/30/2018 10:00 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
On 01/30/2018 09:54 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
annobin.spec now uses:
%undefine _annotated_build
so at least the circular dependency is no longer there. You still
have to remember to rebuild it when a new version of GCC comes out
however
On 01/29/2018 04:45 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 03:55:53PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
On 01/29/2018 03:43 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Is https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Annobin (no user-visible
improvements, only yet another global distrowide size increase)
On 01/26/2018 08:13 AM, Philip Kovacs wrote:
I'm getting:
configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables
This is exactly what I get.
Having a look into the corresponing config.log gives the error related
annobin, I was referring to.
Ralf
On 01/26/2018 08:05 AM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 01/25/2018 10:50 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
Digging into details led me to this error:
...
cc1: error: fail to initialize plugin
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/7/plugin/annobin.so
annobin: conftest.c: Error: plugin built for compiler version
Hi,
ATM all rawhide builds are failing for me, because autoconf's tests for
CC are failing.
Digging into details led me to this error:
...
cc1: error: fail to initialize plugin
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/7/plugin/annobin.so
annobin: conftest.c: Error: plugin built for compiler version
On 12/18/2017 09:42 PM, Gerald B. Cox wrote:
Mozilla has already admitted they made a mistake and removed Looking
Glass from the
Fx Studies. I believe they understand the situation quite well. It's
not helpful to beat
a dead horse.
Do you think it's a dead horse? I don't.
Actually, I
On 12/02/2017 02:35 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Vít Ondruch wrote:
This is big and old-school hammer. If you did "git cherry-pick" instead,
you could get most of the changes you did in master without the
branches. Also, merging means that you get into older (or EPEL) branches
stuff like changelogs
On 12/04/2017 10:33 AM, Giovanni wrote:
On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 10:20:13AM +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
* rust-parallel
* parallel-rust
* parallel-rs
I vote parallel-rust. It's very clear where it comes from.
This choice is probably an interesting one: it would mark some sort of best
practice
On 10/13/2017 07:11 PM, nicolas.mail...@laposte.net wrote:
Which all means our release planning is too focused on Gnome and not enough
thought is put into the roadmap of major non-Gnome desktop apps such as Firefox
or Libreoffice. I'd argue that this kind of Firefox change is way more
On 09/22/2017 01:07 PM, Petr Pisar wrote:
On 2017-09-22, Ralf Corsepius <rc040...@freenet.de> wrote:
How to build a sub tree of packages in fc27, when the root of this tree
changed SONAME?
In rawhide, if you want a longer time isolation, you ask relengs for
a sige tag, you do all
On 09/22/2017 09:32 AM, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 22/09/17 08:03, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
I am trying to build a chain of packages in a build override?
I.e. a series of packages: A->B->C
I set up a build override for A, and B built successfully. Now, I
would have expect building C to pickup
Hi,
I am trying to build a chain of packages in a build override?
I.e. a series of packages: A->B->C
I set up a build override for A, and B built successfully. Now, I would
have expect building C to pickup B from the A-override.
This does not seem to apply. C fails to build, apparently
Hi,
I am going to update OpenSceneGraph from 3.4.0 to 3.4.1 on rawhide (for
now).
This will be accompanied with SONAME bumps of various shared libs
supplied by OpenSceneGraph and thus will require rebuilds of several
packages depending on these libs. I intend to take care of these and to
On 09/20/2017 10:16 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
I just ran:
koji untag-pkg f28-pending k3d-0.8.0.6-9.fc28; koji tag-pkg
f28-pending k3d-0.8.0.6-9.fc28
>> and you'll see now it's tagged into f28
Thanks, this seems to have done it.
Though *-9.fc28 doesn't seem to have landed in rawhide, I see
Hi,
For ca. 3 weeks (or more) buildsys nags me with warning mails on k3d:
...
k3d has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
k3d-0.8.0.6-8.fc28.x86_64 requires libMagick++-7.Q16HDRI.so.3()(64bit)
...
Due to these, I bumped k3d's NEVR to k3d-0.8.0.6-9 and built it for
rawhide
On 09/02/2017 12:14 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
On 09/01/2017 01:13 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
FESCo decided at today's meeting that 7 should not go to F27 (unless it
can be made parallel installable and not used by anything release-
blocking by default), and to go into F28 there must be a
On 08/28/2017 04:35 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1482798
(Bug 1482798 - Illegal instruction in SHA1_Update() when used by chronyd)
That's definitely a bug for F27.
nss-softok is broken in similar ways on fedora-26-i686
Ralf
On 07/12/2017 03:44 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 08:44:02AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 01:20:58PM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
The fact that i686 kernels continue to work in general is basically luck.
You probably will deny
On 08/19/2017 01:36 PM, Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
Hello,
When packaging Golang librairies we often use development snapshots instead of
releases. In such case there is two conflicting guidelines regarding
versionning:
- the "main" Guidelines that says the version should be
MMDD
Cf:
On 08/18/2017 08:23 AM, Jan Kurik wrote:
On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 3:17 PM, Benson Muite
wrote:
Is it possible for the people who are running and have not answered
interview questions for the blog or have an informative profile to do so?
Voting is not limited to
On 08/16/2017 05:50 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On 16 August 2017 at 03:38, Till Maas > wrote:
Am 15. August 2017 15:47:49 MESZ schrieb Jan Kurik
>:
>I am personally not
On 08/06/2017 05:38 PM, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote:
Am 06.08.2017 um 17:28 schrieb mcatanz...@gnome.org:
Hi,
Since yesterday I'm getting a huge number of messages about broken
dependencies in packages that I don't care about. Anybody else
experiencing this?
Seems I'm being aliased to, at
On 07/21/2017 11:09 AM, Patrick マルタインアンドレアス Uiterwijk wrote:
Hi,
I seem to be unable to upload a new tarball for freefem++:
$ fedpkg new-sources freefem++-3.56.tar.gz
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/fedora/client/bodhi.py:48:
DeprecationWarning: fedora.client.bodhi has been deprecated.
Hi,
I seem to be unable to upload a new tarball for freefem++:
$ fedpkg new-sources freefem++-3.56.tar.gz
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/fedora/client/bodhi.py:48:
DeprecationWarning: fedora.client.bodhi has been deprecated. Please use
bodhi.client.bindings instead.
DeprecationWarning)
On 07/11/2017 11:03 PM, Justin Forbes wrote:
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 3:43 PM, Matthew Miller
wrote:
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 10:26:03PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
I ran into this unannounced change:
On 07/13/2017 06:30 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 10:22 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 07/12/2017 09:14 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 10:03 PM, Chris Murphy
wrote:
-rw-rw-r--. 1 chris chris
On 07/13/2017 06:14 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 10:03 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
-rw-rw-r--. 1 chris chris unconfined_u:object_r:user_home_t:s0
53190 Jul 12 19:26 kernel-4.11.10-300.fc26.x86_64.rpm
kernel-4.11.10-300.fc26.x86_64.rpm: data
On 07/12/2017 01:39 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 12.07.2017 um 13:24 schrieb Ralf Corsepius:
On 07/12/2017 11:57 AM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
On Wednesday, 12 July 2017 at 02:06, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
Considering that SSE2 was introduced
On 07/11/2017 10:43 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 10:26:03PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
I ran into this unannounced change:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Stop_Building_i686_Kernels
If this is accepted, all x86 hardware on which Fedora can run will
support SSE2,
On 07/12/2017 12:16 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
I still have my N270 netbook, but I guess even more people still have
Z6xx-based devices. Still, they're over 7 years old at this point.
The N270s are still supported by Windows 10.
Furthermore: Linux (thus Fedora) has always one
On 07/12/2017 11:57 AM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
On Wednesday, 12 July 2017 at 02:06, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
Considering that SSE2 was introduced by Intel in 2001 and AMD caught up
with it in 2003, I'd be +1 (with my FESCo hat on) to requiring
On 07/11/2017 10:57 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 4:41 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
wrote:
On Tuesday, 11 July 2017 at 22:26, Florian Weimer wrote:
I ran into this unannounced change:
On 07/03/2017 04:02 PM, Michal Schorm wrote:
Nope.
MariaDB is a drop-in replacement. In version 5.5.
What you wrote is an API change
=> MariaDB is not a drop-in replacement for MySQL anymore.
The "many ṕackages requiring changes" you mentioned furtherly manifest this.
Ralf
On 07/03/2017 03:12 PM, Michal Schorm wrote:
Hello everybody!
Since MariaDB 10.2 is finally stable and I resolved all issues that
blocked it for Fedora, I'd like to propose an update for Rawhide.
Current version of MariaDB: 10.1.24
Update planned to: 10.2.6 (or newer)
*This change
On 06/01/2017 08:21 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 06/01/2017 06:28 AM, rawh...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
According to the schedule [1], Fedora 26 Candidate Beta-1.4 is now
available for testing.
Trying Fedora-Workstation-netinst-i386-26_Beta-1.4.iso on an older
i686-netbook fails
On 06/01/2017 08:30 AM, Christian Dersch wrote:
What is "an older i686-netbook"?
It's a 2008's Medion Akoya E1210 (To Germans, aka "The Aldi-Netbook"), a
rebranded variant of the MSI Wind U100 in a grub/BIOS-multiboot
configuration:
With Fedora 25:
# cat /proc/cpuinfo
model name :
On 06/01/2017 06:28 AM, rawh...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
According to the schedule [1], Fedora 26 Candidate Beta-1.4 is now
available for testing.
Trying Fedora-Workstation-netinst-i386-26_Beta-1.4.iso on an older
i686-netbook fails with this:
...
[Failed] Failed to start Switch Root
See
On 04/28/2017 01:32 PM, Milan Crha wrote:
On Fri, 2017-04-28 at 12:33 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
These 2 build jobs (launched by me) seem to be hanging and don't seem
to be wanting to finish (or fail) for 3 days (for reasons unknown to
me):
Hi,
it looks like it got stuck after
1 - 100 of 1068 matches
Mail list logo