On Wed, 13 Sep 2023, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 7:02 PM Steven A. Falco wrote:
On 9/13/23 05:23 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
Right. And I want to stress we are not dropping support for X11
applications. Anything running as an X client in a desktop should work
as it has before.
I'm
On Wed, 13 Sep 2023, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 13. 09. 23 5:03, Scott Talbert wrote:
Hi all,
Hi Scott.
First, is it possible to use this macro if the pyproject.toml isn't in the
root directory of the package? There doesn't seem to be an option to
specify a path, so I tried cd'ing
Hi all,
First, is it possible to use this macro if the pyproject.toml isn't in the
root directory of the package? There doesn't seem to be an option to
specify a path, so I tried cd'ing into a path and running it, but it
seemed to run into an odd error like it was trying to include my
On Mon, 28 Aug 2023, Mark E. Fuller wrote:
Hi all,
I'm trying to unretire golang-github-google-renameio-2 and have completed a
re-review.
However, since the package still exists in F37 and F38, the process for
getting the F39 and rawhide branches "back" and getting control of the
package
On August 12, 2023 11:17:14 AM EDT, "Mark E. Fuller"
wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>In order to update go-task, I need to unretire branches for F39 and Rawhide of
>https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-github-google-renameio-2 (and then
>update the package)
>
>It's not clear to me how to proceed
On Fri, 4 Aug 2023, Susi Lehtola wrote:
Hi,
it's been a while since I did active Python packaging. However, one of my
packages, python-qcelemental, https://github.com/MolSSI/QCElemental, has
switched over from setup.py to
$ python -m pip install qcelemental
I did not see anything in the
On Tue, 25 Jul 2023, Scott Talbert wrote:
libotf was just bumped from libotf.so.0 to libotf.so.1.
$ dnf repoquery --whatrequires 'libotf.so.0()(64bit)' --disablerepo='*'
--enablerepo=rawhide
emacs-1:28.2-6.fc39.x86_64
emacs-lucid-1:28.2-6.fc39.x86_64
libotf-devel-0:0.9.13-22.fc38.x86_64
m17n
On Tue, 25 Jul 2023, Scott Talbert wrote:
libotf was just bumped from libotf.so.0 to libotf.so.1.
$ dnf repoquery --whatrequires 'libotf.so.0()(64bit)' --disablerepo='*'
--enablerepo=rawhide
emacs-1:28.2-6.fc39.x86_64
emacs-lucid-1:28.2-6.fc39.x86_64
libotf-devel-0:0.9.13-22.fc38.x86_64
m17n
libotf was just bumped from libotf.so.0 to libotf.so.1.
$ dnf repoquery --whatrequires 'libotf.so.0()(64bit)' --disablerepo='*'
--enablerepo=rawhide
emacs-1:28.2-6.fc39.x86_64
emacs-lucid-1:28.2-6.fc39.x86_64
libotf-devel-0:0.9.13-22.fc38.x86_64
m17n-lib-tools-0:1.8.2-1.fc39.x86_64
Please
On Wed, 19 Jul 2023, Jerry James wrote:
Finally, a replacement for the existing cvc4 package:
cvc5: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2223012
I'm happy to take cvc5, since I just packaged it for Debian a little while
back. But yeah, it would be nice to have a working
> On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 10:45 PM Eric Sandeen wrote:
>
> But that still raises the question - why does it look like this
> started to happen pretty suddenly around June 30?
> The list of updates that were applied to builders in that timeframe
> doesn't raise any alarm bells (except maybe the
On Fri, 16 Jun 2023, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 16. 06. 23 17:16, Scott Talbert wrote:
On Fri, 16 Jun 2023, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Hi, I have the python-qcengine package, which is not rebuilt by python
3.12 yet.
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-qcengine
Hello. This is waiting
On Fri, 16 Jun 2023, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Hi, I have the python-qcengine package, which is not rebuilt by python 3.12
yet.
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-qcengine
Hello. This is waiting for:
python-qcelemental
python-pint
Which is waiting for:
python-matplotlib
On Sat, 3 Jun 2023, Brad Bell wrote:
I am getting the error message below in response to a `fedpkg mockbuild`
command. What am I doing wrong ?
fedpkg mockbuild
... snip ...
ERROR: Mock config 'epel-9-x86_64' not found, see errors above.
Here is my system information:
git branch
* epel9
On Fri, 26 May 2023, Brad Bell wrote:
uname -a
Linux fedora 6.2.15-200.fc37.x86_64 #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Thu May 11
15:56:33 UTC 2023 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
mock --version
3.5
git branch
* epel9
f37
f38
rawhide
dnf info fedpkg
... snip ...
Name : fedpkg
Version
On Fri, 26 May 2023, Richard Shaw wrote:
On a side note I love the packager dashboard!
I noticed that OpenColorIO builds in rawhide were failing[1] and took a look
at the logs and the errors seem to be around doxygen:
In file included
On Mon, 17 Apr 2023, Steve Dickson wrote:
Hello,
I'm getting a very strange mock error [1] on a package [2]
that was recently ported to python 3.
The package builds fine locally... only fails in a
scratch build... and that function that the error is c
complaining about does not exist in the
On Tue, 7 Mar 2023, Betty Liu wrote:
Hi, I'm a beginner at fedora packaging and following the guide in the
documentation.
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/
I'm using CentOS stream 8 and I've downloaded the source code of yellow. In the
same directory, I've made the
On Wed, 22 Feb 2023, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
Julian Sikorski wrote:
FTBFS bug was filed against mame [1]. Unfortunately, the corresponding
build [2] has already been deleted. This is not ideal from maintainer
perspective as it effectively is a bug with no info provided whatsoever.
Not to
Hi all,
Just a heads-up, I'm planning to retire wxGTK3 (wxWidgets 3.0) on March 1.
(I was hoping to do it before F38 branched, but that didn't happen.)
wxWidgets 3.0 is no longer maintained and 3.2 is now the current stable
version. Almost all Fedora packages have been migrated to wxWidgets
On Thu, 9 Feb 2023, Ian McInerney via devel wrote:
On Thu, Feb 9, 2023 at 2:30 PM Scott Talbert wrote:
On Wed, 8 Feb 2023, Brandon Nielsen via devel wrote:
> On 2/8/23 9:30 PM, Reon Beon via devel wrote:
>> wxGTK should have that...
>
> It should,
On Wed, 8 Feb 2023, Brandon Nielsen via devel wrote:
On 2/8/23 9:30 PM, Reon Beon via devel wrote:
wxGTK should have that...
It should, and they fixed it, but the fix never made it to the 3.1.X series
as far as I can tell. 3.2.1 in F37 at least builds, but for some reason
liblibnyquist.so
This is a non-responsive maintainer check for andymenderunix (Andy
Mender). Does anyone know how to contact Andy?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2166645
Thanks,
Scott
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
swt2c commented on the pull-request: `Rebuild with wxWidgets 3.2` that you are
following:
``
Thanks! BTW, I haven't tested this with slic3r yet. My rawhide VM is
segfaulting on boot. :(
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Wx-GLCanvas/pull-request/2
swt2c commented on the pull-request: `Rebuild with wxWidgets 3.2` that you are
following:
``
@churchyard this can be merged + built now.
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Wx-GLCanvas/pull-request/2
___
swt2c commented on the pull-request: `Rebuild with wxWidgets 3.2` that you are
following:
``
@spot , Can you please build this in rawhide now?
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Wx/pull-request/2
___
perl-devel
swt2c commented on the pull-request: `Rebuild with wxWidgets 3.2` that you are
following:
``
> I manually applied this, since it went out of sync with the mass rebuild.
>
> I did notice that wxWidgets 3.2 doesn't seem to be in rawhide yet, you might
> want to make sure you get that in there
swt2c commented on the pull-request: `Rebuild with wxWidgets 3.2` that you are
following:
``
This depends on
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Alien-wxWidgets/pull-request/2
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Wx/pull-request/2
swt2c commented on the pull-request: `Rebuild with wxWidgets 3.2` that you are
following:
``
This depends on https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Wx/pull-request/2
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Wx-GLCanvas/pull-request/2
swt2c opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Wx-GLCanvas` that
you are following:
``
Rebuild with wxWidgets 3.2
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Wx-GLCanvas/pull-request/2
___
perl-devel mailing
swt2c opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Alien-wxWidgets`
that you are following:
``
Rebuild with wxWidgets 3.2
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Alien-wxWidgets/pull-request/2
___
perl-devel
swt2c opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Wx` that you are
following:
``
Rebuild with wxWidgets 3.2
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Wx/pull-request/2
___
perl-devel mailing list --
On Thu, 22 Dec 2022, Ian McInerney via devel wrote:
On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 1:55 PM Richard Shaw wrote:
I just had a chance to check out a bug[1] recently submitted
against trustedqsl and it appears that a new version of wxGTK
with a SONAME bump was built for f37+ but not
On Thu, 22 Dec 2022, Richard Shaw wrote:
I just had a chance to check out a bug[1] recently submitted against
trustedqsl and it appears that a new version of wxGTK with a SONAME bump was
built for f37+ but not all dependencies rebuilt.
I'm not too worried about trustedqsl since I'm about to
On Sun, 27 Nov 2022, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
Scott Talbert wrote on 2022/11/24 2:23:
Hi all,
In order to fix some incompatibilities with wxWidgets wxGLCanvas (which is
currently built with OpenGL EGL support) and several package users which
are expecting OpenGL GLX support, I need to rebuild
Hi all,
In order to fix some incompatibilities with wxWidgets wxGLCanvas (which is
currently built with OpenGL EGL support) and several package users which
are expecting OpenGL GLX support, I need to rebuild wxWidgets with a
different configuration option. Unfortunately, this results in an
> I just upgraded my system to Fedora 37 and noticed that the package "hackrf"
> was
> still from Fedora 36. I found a failed build from the f37-rebuild, dated
> 2022-07-21 [1].
> It apparently failed on aarch64, but the logs are long gone - at least I
> don't see
> them on koji.
>
> I tried
On Sat, 12 Nov 2022, Sergey Mende wrote:
Hi,
during development of my own project I hit the bug in `gdb` that is already
fixed upstream but not backported to rawhide yet.
I did a backport and ready to submit a PR. What is the right way to proceed:
a) just file a PR;
b) open a bug in bugzilla,
On Thu, 10 Nov 2022, Ben Beasley wrote:
In one week (2022-11-17), or slightly later, I will update python-pytest-bdd
from version 5.0.0 to version 6.1.1[1] in Rawhide. This will bring
significant API-breaking changes[2] from 5.x.
The sole dependent package, jrnl, does not support version 6.x
This is a non-responsive maintainer check for mikedep333 (Michael
DePaulo). Does anyone know how to contact this maintainer?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2134659
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe
This is a non-responsive maintainer check for ivazquez (Ignacio
Vazquez-Abrams). Does anyone know how to contact this user?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2134660
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe
This is a non-responsive maintainer check for volter (Volker Fröhlich).
Does anyone know how to contact this user?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2134665___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email
This a non-responsive maintainer check for wolfy (manuel wolfshant).
Does anyone know how to contact this maintainer?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2134664
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an
On 2022-10-02 20:07, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
Hi,
with the wxWidgets 3.2.0 release, there is now finally a wxQt backend
available. Are there any plans yet to package that?
I don't have any current plans to package it. Though the wxQt port
exists, as far as I can see, it isn't as well
On Tue, 16 Aug 2022, Steven A. Falco wrote:
On 8/16/22 09:29 AM, Steven A. Falco wrote:
On 8/15/22 08:38 PM, Scott Talbert wrote:
On Sat, 13 Aug 2022, Steven A. Falco wrote:
On 8/12/22 11:35 AM, Steven A. Falco wrote:
On 8/12/22 11:00 AM, Scott Talbert wrote:
On Fri, 12 Aug 2022, Steven
On Mon, 15 Aug 2022, Scott Talbert wrote:
On Mon, 15 Aug 2022, Scott Talbert wrote:
On Mon, 15 Aug 2022, Martin Gansser wrote:
Sorry i ment F36/F37.
You didn't answer whether you see the same problem on F38. Have you tried
it there?
Never mind - I tried it there and do observe
On Mon, 15 Aug 2022, Scott Talbert wrote:
On Mon, 15 Aug 2022, Martin Gansser wrote:
Sorry i ment F36/F37.
You didn't answer whether you see the same problem on F38. Have you tried it
there?
Never mind - I tried it there and do observe the same problem.
Scott
On Sat, 13 Aug 2022, Steven A. Falco wrote:
On 8/12/22 11:35 AM, Steven A. Falco wrote:
On 8/12/22 11:00 AM, Scott Talbert wrote:
On Fri, 12 Aug 2022, Steven A. Falco wrote:
It turns out that there is a bug in wxPython whereby it installs an
error handler that should not be installed
On Mon, 15 Aug 2022, Martin Gansser wrote:
Sorry i ment F36/F37.
You didn't answer whether you see the same problem on F38. Have you tried
it there?
Scott
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On Mon, 15 Aug 2022, Martin Gansser wrote:
Hi,
since i started guayadeque to compile with wxsqlite3-4.8.2-5.fc36.x86_64 and
wxGTK-3.1.5-6.fc36.x86_64 compile, the program starts on F37/F38 with the
following error message:
../src/generic/imaglist.cpp(44): assert "m_size != wxSize(0, 0)"
On Sat, 13 Aug 2022, Orion Poplawski wrote:
Can anyone tell me why python-astroid gets built as "UNKNOWN" on EPEL9?
Executing(%generate_buildrequires): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.mum5to
+ umask 022
+ cd /builddir/build/BUILD
+ cd astroid-2.12.1
+ echo pyproject-rpm-macros
+ echo python3-devel
On Fri, 12 Aug 2022, Steven A. Falco wrote:
It turns out that there is a bug in wxPython whereby it installs an error
handler that should not be installed by a library [1]. KiCad can work
around that by adding a compile flag to disable its own error handler [2].
Credit to Ian for
On Tue, 9 Aug 2022, Steven A. Falco wrote:
On 8/9/22 06:00 PM, Scott Talbert wrote:
On Tue, 9 Aug 2022, Steven A. Falco wrote:
On 8/9/22 05:06 PM, Scott Talbert wrote:
On Tue, 9 Aug 2022, Steven A. Falco wrote:
On 8/9/22 02:25 PM, Steven A. Falco wrote:
On 8/9/22 01:09 PM, Scott Talbert
On Tue, 9 Aug 2022, Steven A. Falco wrote:
On 8/9/22 05:06 PM, Scott Talbert wrote:
On Tue, 9 Aug 2022, Steven A. Falco wrote:
On 8/9/22 02:25 PM, Steven A. Falco wrote:
On 8/9/22 01:09 PM, Scott Talbert wrote:
Hi,
Upstream wxPython has finally made a new release and this involves
On Tue, 9 Aug 2022, Steven A. Falco wrote:
On 8/9/22 02:25 PM, Steven A. Falco wrote:
On 8/9/22 01:09 PM, Scott Talbert wrote:
Hi,
Upstream wxPython has finally made a new release and this involves
migrating to wxWidgets 3.2.0 at the same time. I'm planning to build the
new wxPython
Hi,
Upstream wxPython has finally made a new release and this involves
migrating to wxWidgets 3.2.0 at the same time. I'm planning to build the
new wxPython in Rawhide after F37 branch (although could put it in F37
later).
For those packages that use both wxPython and wxWidgets (I *think*
On Mon, 25 Jul 2022, Scott Talbert wrote:
At long last wxWidgets 3.2.0 has been released and I'm getting it into
Rawhide. This comes with an soname bump (but this should be the last one as
3.2.x should now be ABI stable).
NOTE: users of wxWidgets 3.0 (wxGTK3 package) are now strongly
On Tue, 26 Jul 2022, Steven A. Falco wrote:
At long last wxWidgets 3.2.0 has been released and I'm getting it into
Rawhide. This comes with an soname bump (but this should be the last one
as 3.2.x should now be ABI stable).
NOTE: users of wxWidgets 3.0 (wxGTK3 package) are now strongly
At long last wxWidgets 3.2.0 has been released and I'm getting it into
Rawhide. This comes with an soname bump (but this should be the last one
as 3.2.x should now be ABI stable).
NOTE: users of wxWidgets 3.0 (wxGTK3 package) are now strongly encouraged
to move their packages to use
On Tue, 21 Jun 2022, Ron Olson wrote:
Hey all-
Koschei is sending me an email warning me that Nethack builds started to
fail in Rawhide[1], but it seems that it successfully built after that, so
why is it still sending the emails? Is there something I have to acknowledge
or clear to make the
On Fri, 10 Jun 2022, Dominik Mierzejewski wrote:
Hi, Scott.
On Friday, 10 June 2022 at 16:43, Scott Talbert wrote:
Hi,
I'm updating wxGTK to 3.1.7 in Rawhide - this involves an soname bump.
I've created side tag f37-build-side-54462 to perform the build with its
dependencies.
I've built
On Fri, 10 Jun 2022, Steven A. Falco wrote:
On 6/10/22 10:43 AM, Scott Talbert wrote:
Hi,
I'm updating wxGTK to 3.1.7 in Rawhide - this involves an soname bump.
I've created side tag f37-build-side-54462 to perform the build with its
dependencies.
I've built wxGTK, CubicSDR and audacity
Hi,
I'm updating wxGTK to 3.1.7 in Rawhide - this involves an soname bump.
I've created side tag f37-build-side-54462 to perform the build with its
dependencies.
I've built wxGTK, CubicSDR and audacity in the side tag.
@rathann, can you please build wxmacmolplt in the f37-build-side-54462
On Tue, 12 Apr 2022, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
Hi, Scott.
On Tuesday, 12 April 2022 at 05:38, Scott Talbert wrote:
I'm in the process of updating wxGTK to 3.1.6 in Rawhide. This comes with
an soname bump. I've built wxGTK 3.1.6 in a side tag, f37-build-side-52676.
Thanks
Hello,
I'm in the process of updating wxGTK to 3.1.6 in Rawhide. This comes with
an soname bump. I've built wxGTK 3.1.6 in a side tag, f37-build-side-52676.
The dependent packages are:
CubicSDR -> already rebuilding in side tag
audacity -> already rebuilding in side tag
wxmacmolplt -> needs
On Tue, 22 Mar 2022, Paul DeStefano wrote:
Greetings. I just joined devel, following directions I found on how to
become maintainer of an orphaned package. I'm interested in helping
resurrect 'remind', last packaged for F29. I've been using it, ran into
a problem, needed a newer version,
On Mon, 14 Mar 2022, Felix Schwarz wrote:
Hi,
I have submitted a review request [1] which passed ("fedora-review +") but
somehow the package git repo was not created. For Fedora packages this
happens pretty quickly after approval.
Any idea who I should ping about this?
Felix
[1]
On Thu, 3 Mar 2022, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On Thu, 3 Mar 2022 at 11:07, Scott Talbert wrote:
On Thu, 3 Mar 2022, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> OK with some help from Miro on the python team, I was able to
use the
> scripts they use regularly to lis
On Thu, 3 Mar 2022, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
OK with some help from Miro on the python team, I was able to use the
scripts they use regularly to list what dependency problems they have with
soon to be orphaned packages. I have included the entire report as an
attachment as its big, but the
On Wed, 2 Mar 2022, Steven A. Falco wrote:
I just tried to connect to copr [1] with firefox, and got a "Did Not Connect:
Potential Security Issue" error.
And apparently copr uses HSTS, so I cannot override it. Is anyone else
having the problem?
[1]
On Fri, 21 Jan 2022, Felix Schwarz wrote:
Does anyone have any experience with using Fedora's MinGW stack to
cross-compile Python wheels for Windows?
I'm using the mingw stack to cross-compile a Windows binary which shipped as
part of an otherwise platform neutral Python wheel. The main
Hi all,
Does anyone have any experience with using Fedora's MinGW stack to
cross-compile Python wheels for Windows?
Scott
___
python-devel mailing list -- python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On Tue, 11 Jan 2022, Steven A. Falco wrote:
Hi all,
This is mostly targeted at maintainers (bcc'd in case not subscribed to
Fedora devel) of packages that depend on wxPython (aka python3-wxpython4).
TL;DR: if your package uses python3-wxpython4, please test it with the
python3-wxpython4
Hi all,
This is mostly targeted at maintainers (bcc'd in case not subscribed to
Fedora devel) of packages that depend on wxPython (aka python3-wxpython4).
TL;DR: if your package uses python3-wxpython4, please test it with the
python3-wxpython4 from this COPR [1] and provide me any feedback,
On Sun, 26 Dec 2021, Barry Scott wrote:
On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 5:16 AM Barry Scott
wrote:
I have added a patch for the spec file for
python-tzlocal.spec
that allows the 4.1 release to build.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1993583
I can raise a PR
On Fri, 17 Dec 2021, Michael Schwendt wrote:
Does anyone know how to contact them? Direct email and bug reports have
had no response.
His twitter profile points at a few contact options as a last resort.
https://twitter.com/bpepple
Sorry, I don't use Twitter. If someone wants to reach out
Hi,
This is a non-responsive maintainer check for bpepple.
gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free has FTBFS in Rawhide for ~1 month. I
submitted a PR with a fix on Nov 22, but there has been zero response:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free/pull-request/7
On Sun, 12 Dec 2021, Steven A. Falco wrote:
I also noticed that python3-wxpython4 appears to require the 3.0 branch, so
that might be what is causing both 3.0 and 3.1 of wxGTK to be dragged in:
$ rpm -q --requires python3-wxpython4
...
libwx_baseu-3.0.so.0()(64bit)
...
Is there a version of
Hi @eclipseo,
Looks like jpegxl soname was bumped, breaking a bunch of stuff:
2021-11-21 20:20:51
Package resolution failed
Problem: package gd-2.3.3-3.fc36.x86_64 requires
libavif.so.12()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
- package graphviz-2.49.3-2.fc36.x86_64
On Fri, 12 Nov 2021, Martin Stransky wrote:
Hi folks,
I was told that people were having trouble with Firefox/HW
acceleration/VA-API setup on Fedora so I put some info at wiki at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Firefox_Hardware_acceleration
Along these lines, I am experiencing a pretty
On Fri, 22 Oct 2021, Peter Kotvan wrote:
Hello folks!
I'd like to package the autorandr project for Fedora. This would be my
first python package so I'd like to ask some questions.
Firstly the project already contains a spec file. However I'm not sure
whether it could be used without any
I'm orphaning poco: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/poco
I'm not sure why I picked it up originally - I don't use it. It currently
FTBFS in rawhide due to OpenSSL 3.0 (and can't be fixed easily by going
back to OpenSSL 1.1 because one of its other BR's requires OpenSSL 3.0).
Nothing in
On Mon, 16 Aug 2021, Brian C. Lane wrote:
There's a bug with pycdlib that has been fixed upstream. I've been
trying to get the author/maintainer's attention but to no avail.
I've even made and tested a PR for it here:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-pycdlib/pull-request/2
This
On Sun, 15 Aug 2021, Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote:
I am trying to update spyder on rawhide and F35. The main issue I have is
that pyqt requirements are strict. From the setup file,
'pyqt5<5.13',
'pyqtwebengine<5.13',
Fedora has 5.15.x. If I relax QT versions, built and launch spyder, I get
On Sun, 15 Aug 2021, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to update spyder on rawhide and F35. The main issue I have is
that pyqt requirements are strict. From the setup file,
'pyqt5<5.13',
'pyqtwebengine<5.13',
Fedora has 5.15.x. If I relax QT versions, built and launch spyder, I get
this
On Wed, 4 Aug 2021, Steven A. Falco wrote:
I decided to file a bug here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1988466
I also saw a similar issue and added a comment here:
https://github.com/wxWidgets/Phoenix/issues/1963
Yeah, I'll try to look into it later today.
In case anyone
On Fri, 30 Jul 2021, Scott Talbert wrote:
On Fri, 30 Jul 2021, Steven A. Falco wrote:
I decided to file a bug here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1988466
I also saw a similar issue and added a comment here:
https://github.com/wxWidgets/Phoenix/issues/1963
Yeah, I'll try
On Fri, 30 Jul 2021, Steven A. Falco wrote:
I decided to file a bug here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1988466
I also saw a similar issue and added a comment here:
https://github.com/wxWidgets/Phoenix/issues/1963
Yeah, I'll try to look into it later today.
Scott
On Fri, 23 Jul 2021, Scott Talbert wrote:
Per the Fedora 35 schedule[1] we will start a mass rebuild for Fedora 35
on Jul 21st, 2021. We will run a mass rebuild for Fedora 35 for the
changes listed in:
https://pagure.io/releng/issues?status=Open=mass+rebuild
The mass rebuild will be done
On Fri, 23 Jul 2021, Fabio Valentini wrote:
Per the Fedora 35 schedule[1] we will start a mass rebuild for Fedora 35
on Jul 21st, 2021. We will run a mass rebuild for Fedora 35 for the
changes listed in:
https://pagure.io/releng/issues?status=Open=mass+rebuild
The mass rebuild will be done in
On Wed, 23 Jun 2021, Miro Hrončok wrote:
%pyproject_buildrequires works and generates requirements on python3dist(sip)
and python3dist(pyqt-builder) \o/
%pyproject_buildrequires -r doesn't work. It says:
ValueError: build backend cannot provide build metadata
(incl. runtime requirements)
On Wed, 21 Jul 2021, Tomas Hrcka wrote:
Hi all,
Per the Fedora 35 schedule[1] we will start a mass rebuild for Fedora 35
on Jul 21st, 2021. We will run a mass rebuild for Fedora 35 for the
changes listed in:
https://pagure.io/releng/issues?status=Open=mass+rebuild
The mass rebuild will be
On Mon, 12 Jul 2021, Richard Shaw wrote:
Currently I can't use my Fedora login on release-monitoring.org...
Error: There was an error during authentication 'Authentication process
canceled', please check the provided url.
Is this a known problem?
It just worked for me, so doesn't seem to be
On July 5, 2021 6:11:07 PM EDT, "Miro Hrončok" wrote:
>On 05. 07. 21 16:58, Scott Talbert wrote:
>> On Mon, 21 Jun 2021, Scott Talbert wrote:
>>
>>>> Just a heads-up, I've been working on converting packages from sip
>4 to sip
>>>> 5 in Raw
On Mon, 21 Jun 2021, Scott Talbert wrote:
Just a heads-up, I've been working on converting packages from sip 4 to sip
5 in Rawhide. (sip is the Python bindings generation system used by PyQt
and wxPython.)
I'm planning on opening pull requests against the affected packages soon.
Please DO
On Thu, 24 Jun 2021, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
Hello team,
I am not sure why Blender failed to build recently. It seems some changes in
the repository affect the buildand
I am unable to find the cause. Can someone investigate please?
The build in question is on
On Wed, 16 Jun 2021, Scott Talbert wrote:
Just a heads-up, I've been working on converting packages from sip 4 to sip 5
in Rawhide. (sip is the Python bindings generation system used by PyQt and
wxPython.)
I'm planning on opening pull requests against the affected packages soon.
Please DO
On Wed, 16 Jun 2021, Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote:
Hi,
Just a heads-up, I've been working on converting packages from sip 4 to
sip 5 in Rawhide. (sip is the Python bindings generation system used by
PyQt and wxPython.)
I see we have Qt6, but not PyQt6, in Fedora 34. Is this what's
Hi,
Just a heads-up, I've been working on converting packages from sip 4 to
sip 5 in Rawhide. (sip is the Python bindings generation system used by
PyQt and wxPython.)
I'm planning on opening pull requests against the affected packages soon.
Please DO NOT merge these PRs yet - they need to
On Sun, 30 May 2021, Artur Frenszek-Iwicki wrote:
Long story short: I have a Python package ("cozy") which built fine in koji, but failed to build
locally - or rather, it built fine, but then caused pytest-3 to crash. After a bit of fiddling, I managed to
nail this down to having
1 - 100 of 271 matches
Mail list logo
