On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 2:00 AM Panu Matilainen wrote:
> The problem with /usr/something is that the rpmdb is not specific to
> /usr contents at all, and unlike any other content in there, so putting
> it there just *feels so wrong*. That's what /state or /sysimage or, as
> we now have, /var
On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 1:36 AM Panu Matilainen wrote:
>
> > So by moving the rpmdb to /usr, it's basically saying that `rpm --import`
> > should change.
>
> This doesn't seem to be documented as a dependency of this move...
>
Added.
On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 02:53:52PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
> Should /usr be independently portable? And is that with a version
> matched /opt, or can there be mix and match revisions of /usr and
> /opt?
We have three similar locations: /usr (system vendor tree),
/usr/local (admin non-packages
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-35-20220111.0):
ID: 1100793 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
On 1/11/22 17:18, Colin Walters wrote:
On Tue, Jan 11, 2022, at 4:00 AM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
The point was though, that the rpmdb is not at all the only data of this
kind and so having a dedicated home makes sense.
You mentioned dnf/yum/PackageKit data; there's two kinds of that. One
On 1/12/22 10:45, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 2:00 AM Panu Matilainen wrote:
The problem with /usr/something is that the rpmdb is not specific to
/usr contents at all, and unlike any other content in there, so putting
it there just *feels so wrong*. That's what /state or
On 1/12/22 11:05, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 02:53:52PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
Should /usr be independently portable? And is that with a version
matched /opt, or can there be mix and match revisions of /usr and
/opt?
We have three similar locations: /usr
On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 11:24:49AM +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> On 1/12/22 11:05, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> >On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 02:53:52PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
> >>Should /usr be independently portable? And is that with a version
> >>matched /opt, or can there be mix and
On 1/12/22 11:53, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 11:24:49AM +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
On 1/12/22 11:05, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 02:53:52PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
Should /usr be independently portable? And is that with a
At the request of the current qatzip package maintainer, Zheng Ma, I
have sponsored Xinghong as a co-maintainer.
Welcome to Fedora!
Regards,
Ben Beasley
On 1/6/22 21:12, Chen, Xinghong wrote:
Hello all:
I’m Xinghong from the Intel NPG-QAT team. I'm very interested in
becoming a Fedora
Hi Aleksei,
that's awesome news! Thanks for the continous work you do.
--
Jan Staněk
Software Engineer, Red Hat
jsta...@redhat.com irc: jstanek
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
On Wed, Jan 12, 2022, at 4:05 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 02:53:52PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
>> Should /usr be independently portable? And is that with a version
>> matched /opt, or can there be mix and match revisions of /usr and
>> /opt?
>
> We have
This is a bit of tangent, but if I am not mistaken, I can create RPMs to
manage content of my home directory. How folks envision this would work
in the context of this proposal? But I also wonder if this is something
considered by e.g. systemd-homed.
I am asking this question, because move of
On Wed, Jan 12, 2022, at 4:24 AM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
>
> Oh, right. More hidden agenda behind this thing. When looking at it with
> these glasses on, it explains quite a few things about the change
> proposal, such as completely ignoring the fact that nearly all packages
> put something
Thanks so much for your hard work.
-Joe
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
V Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 08:18:39AM -0700, Orion Poplawski napsal(a):
> I need some Xorg help on epel9. I'm not able to get it load a "dummy"
> config that works on Fedora/epel8. Difference in the log is:
>
Wasn't the dummy driver removed from Xorg (not built by Fedora) in favour of
Xvfb?
--
Trelby works perfectly with the new version.
--
Gwyn Ciesla
she/her/hers
in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love
-d. bowie
Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Tuesday, January 11th, 2022
On Wed, Jan 12, 2022, at 4:04 AM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
>
> Here seems to be another SMALL undocumented dependency of this change:
> completing the /usrmove thing to cover the whole world including /opt,
> /etc, /var, and presumably /boot as well because packages put stuff in it.
There are
I have reported this here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2039869
Vít
Dne 05. 01. 22 v 11:30 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a):
On Tue, Jan 04, 2022 at 12:25:36PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2022-01-04 at 14:57 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
One of the packages which
On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 04:20:31PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek:
>
> > Traditionally, packages installed all kinds of files all over the place.
> > But we're slowly and painfully moving towards the model where:
> > 1. packages are only allowed to install under
I need some Xorg help on epel9. I'm not able to get it load a "dummy"
config that works on Fedora/epel8. Difference in the log is:
- = good (rawhide)
+ = bad (epel9)
_XSERVTransmkdir: ERROR: euid != 0,directory /tmp/.X11-unix will not
be created.
-X.Org X Server 1.20.14
+X.Org X Server
* Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek:
> Traditionally, packages installed all kinds of files all over the place.
> But we're slowly and painfully moving towards the model where:
> 1. packages are only allowed to install under /usr, /var, and /etc.
>(Or under /opt, but I'd want to move that to
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2022-01-13 17:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.libera.chat.
Local time information (via. uitime):
= Day: Thursday ==
2022-01-13 09:00 PST US/Pacific
2022-01-13
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 1/15 (aarch64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20220106.0):
ID: 1101169 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1101169
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64)
(Tests
So as I already mentioned, the following fails:
~~~
$ ./miniruby -I./lib -I. -I.ext/common ./tool/runruby.rb --extout=.ext
-- --disable-gems "./test/runner.rb" --ruby="./miniruby -I./lib -I.
-I.ext/common ./tool/runruby.rb --extout=.ext -- --disable-gems"
--excludes-dir=./test/excludes
I wish I had answers for you.
Nevertheless, I'd help if I knew how to debug the detached children
after fork, because they are failing earlier then the main process. I
was using `set follow-fork-mode child` but that does nothing :/
I think that exec or fork is the culprit, in some way.
Vít
On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 2:04 AM Panu Matilainen wrote:
>
> On 1/12/22 10:45, Chris Murphy wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 2:00 AM Panu Matilainen wrote:
> >> For many practical purposes it's probably just rearranging the chairs,
> >> but a separate top-level directory describing the *system*
Hi, Everyone.
My name is Ali Erdinc Koroglu and I'm a senior linux software engineer on Linux
OS Systems Engineering at Intel.
On daily basis I'm working to provide packages with the latest software
performance optimizations and features enabled for
Intel platforms on CentOS Stream, Fedora and
On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 06:57:34PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Package (co)maintainers Status
> Change
>
> python-selenium mrunge, orphan
On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 7:03 AM Colin Walters wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2022, at 4:05 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 02:53:52PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
> >> Should /usr be independently portable? And is that with a version
> >> matched /opt, or can
On 1/12/22 08:18, devel@lists.fedoraproject.org wrote:
I need some Xorg help on epel9. I'm not able to get it load a "dummy"
config that works on Fedora/epel8. Difference in the log is:
- = good (rawhide)
+ = bad (epel9)
_XSERVTransmkdir: ERROR: euid != 0,directory /tmp/.X11-unix will not
On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 2:07 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 02:53:52PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
> > Should /usr be independently portable? And is that with a version
> > matched /opt, or can there be mix and match revisions of /usr and
> > /opt?
>
> We have
On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 3:54 AM Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 1:36 AM Panu Matilainen wrote:
> >
> > > So by moving the rpmdb to /usr, it's basically saying that `rpm --import`
> > > should change.
> >
> > This doesn't seem to be documented as a dependency of this move...
> >
On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 2:57 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 3:54 AM Chris Murphy wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 1:36 AM Panu Matilainen wrote:
> > >
> > > > So by moving the rpmdb to /usr, it's basically saying that `rpm
> > > > --import` should change.
> > >
> > >
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20220111.n.1
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20220112.n.1
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 10
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 96
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 444.03 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0
On 13. 01. 22 1:50, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 06:57:34PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Package (co)maintainers Status
Change
python-selenium
Greetings,
I'm Garry Williams and I recently retired from a software development
job and now want to spend more time contributing to Fedora.
My developer experience started in the late sixties with IBM S/370
Assembler. I had various jobs programming and software support of IBM
MVT and MVS
No missing expected images.
Compose PASSES proposed Rawhide gating check!
All required tests passed
Failed openQA tests: 8/228 (x86_64), 21/159 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20220111.n.1):
ID: 1101830 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso gedit
URL:
Jan 12, 2022 8:38:22 PM Garry T. Williams :
> Greetings,
>
> I'm Garry Williams and I recently retired from a software development
> job and now want to spend more time contributing to Fedora.
>
> My developer experience started in the late sixties with IBM S/370
> Assembler. I had various
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2039712
Bug ID: 2039712
Summary: perl-Net-SNMP for EPEL 9
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel9
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Net-SNMP
Assignee: spo...@gmail.com
Reporter:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2032424
Xavier Bachelot changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||2030297
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2039735
Bug ID: 2039735
Summary: Please branch and build perl-Module-Build-Deprecated
for EPEL 9
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel9
Status: NEW
Component:
I think this makes perfect sense. It would be generally helpful for the
reasons stated, and it’s hard to imagine any cases in which it could be
harmful.
– Ben
On 1/10/22 07:55, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Hello Pythonistas.
When we invented the %pyproject_buildrequires BuildRequires generator,
it
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2037854
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Doc Type|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2039721
Bug ID: 2039721
Summary: perl-App-Cme-1.036 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-App-Cme
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2038201
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2039821
Bug ID: 2039821
Summary: Please branch and build perl-Test-Identity for EPEL 9
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel9
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Test-Identity
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2039823
Bug ID: 2039823
Summary: Please branch and build perl-Struct-Dumb for EPEL 9
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Struct-Dumb
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2039819
Bug ID: 2039819
Summary: Please branch and build perl-Curses for EPEL 9
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel9
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Curses
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2039735
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|jples...@redhat.com,|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2039817
Bug ID: 2039817
Summary: Please branch and build perl-Glib for EPEL 9
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel9
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Glib
Assignee: spo...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2039824
Bug ID: 2039824
Summary: Please branch and build perl-Heap for EPEL 9
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel9
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Heap
Assignee: jples...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2039718
Bug ID: 2039718
Summary: Please branch and build perl-Mojolicious for EPEL 9
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel9
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Mojolicious
Assignee:
Am 10.01.22 um 13:55 schrieb Miro Hrončok:
Hence, I propose we make the -r flag the default. In case some package needs to
opt-out for legitimate reasons, a new flag would exist to disable it (most
likely -R).
+1
Felix
___
python-devel mailing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2039821
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2038201
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-b599a9b4c5 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-b599a9b4c5
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2037854
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-b1ddb746d8 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-b1ddb746d8
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2037854
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2038201
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-File-Find-Iterator-0.4
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2039823
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2039824
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2039821
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2039735
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2039824
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Doc Type|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2039823
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Doc Type|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031539
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2034172
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036507
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033349
Bug 2033349 depends on bug 2034172, which changed state.
Bug 2034172 Summary: EPEL9 branch of perl-File-Find-Rule-Perl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2034172
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036663
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-IO-CaptureOutput-1.110
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2034173
Bug 2034173 depends on bug 2034172, which changed state.
Bug 2034172 Summary: EPEL9 branch of perl-File-Find-Rule-Perl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2034172
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036500
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036900
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036491
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036508
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036506
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036661
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Scope-Upper-0.33-1.el9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033349
Bug 2033349 depends on bug 2036225, which changed state.
Bug 2036225 Summary: Please branch and build perl-Test-Portability-Files for
EPEL-9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036225
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036498
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Parallel-Iterator-1.00
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036225
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2032430
Bug 2032430 depends on bug 2036501, which changed state.
Bug 2036501 Summary: Please branch and build perl-Object-Accessor for EPEL-9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036501
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036504
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2032430
Bug 2032430 depends on bug 2036922, which changed state.
Bug 2036922 Summary: Please branch and build perl-Devel-Refcount for EPEL 9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036922
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036922
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Devel-Refcount-0.10-27
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036496
Bug 2036496 depends on bug 2036491, which changed state.
Bug 2036491 Summary: Please branch and build perl-Test-Refcount for EPEL-9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036491
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2037737
Tom "spot" Callaway changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2035273
--- Comment #10 from Tomas Hoger ---
Two additional small corrective fixes amending fixes linked from comment 5
above:
https://github.com/andk/cpanpm/commit/7d4d5e32bcd9b75f7bf70a395938a48ca4a06d25
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
4 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-af51ba0333
wordpress-5.1.12-1.el7
2 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-568a1eb67d
btrbk-0.31.3-1.el7
The following builds have been
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036511
Bug 2036511 depends on bug 2036504, which changed state.
Bug 2036504 Summary: Please branch and build perl-Exporter-Tidy for EPEL-9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036504
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031799
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036126
Bug 2036126 depends on bug 2036118, which changed state.
Bug 2036118 Summary: Please branch and build perl-XML-XPathEngine for EPEL-8
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036118
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036509
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1811577
Bug 1811577 depends on bug 2036118, which changed state.
Bug 2036118 Summary: Please branch and build perl-XML-XPathEngine for EPEL-8
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036118
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036123
Bug 2036123 depends on bug 2036118, which changed state.
Bug 2036118 Summary: Please branch and build perl-XML-XPathEngine for EPEL-8
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036118
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036118
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036122
Bug 2036122 depends on bug 2036118, which changed state.
Bug 2036118 Summary: Please branch and build perl-XML-XPathEngine for EPEL-8
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036118
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036125
Bug 2036125 depends on bug 2036118, which changed state.
Bug 2036118 Summary: Please branch and build perl-XML-XPathEngine for EPEL-8
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036118
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036494
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036665
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2039824
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from
1 - 100 of 106 matches
Mail list logo
