Re: modularity: (my) expectations vs. reality

Hello Langdon, On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 11:42 PM, Langdon White wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 2:40 PM Michal Novotny wrote: > >> I would like to publicly note that I had completely different idea about >> this project first time I have

[389-devel] Re: future of lib389 - seperate or merged?

> > -- Merging lib389 to 389-ds-base > > One proposal is to merge them. We would mix in lib389 and the > dirsrvtests into lib389 tests. It is often the case that lib389's > features are bound tightly to a version of directory server. Hi all, This seems to be the most popular answer right now

Platform Python changes and python3dist tags

Hi, I was just trying to build a new package in Rawhide that built fine a few days ago. The failure seems to be occurring because the python3 setuptools_scm module isn't being found. I'm using the new pythonXdist tags: BuildRequires: %{py2_dist py pytest setuptools_scm} BuildRequires:

Re: Schedule for Wednesday's FPC Meeting (2017-08-23 17:00 UTC)

On Tue, 2017-08-22 at 21:41 -0400, James Antill wrote: > Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC > meeting Thursday at 2017-08-23 17:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-2 on Wednesday, even. > irc.freenode.net. > > Local time information (via. uitime): > >

Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2017-08-23 17:00 UTC)

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC meeting Thursday at 2017-08-23 17:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-2 on irc.freenode.net. Local time information (via. uitime): = Day: Wednesday = 2017-08-23 10:00 PDT US/Pacific 2017-08-23

Re: [modularity] Guidelines & Process

Owen Taylor wrote: > My particular interest is in what I consider the simplest use case - > taking an existing leaf-node application (desktop or otherwise), creating > a module that only includes that application and is not meant for building > on top of, and creating a container or flatpak out of

[Bug 1483566] perl-MooX-Options-4.103 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1483566 --- Comment #5 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- hotness's scratch build of perl-MooX-Options-4.103-1.el7.src.rpm for rawhide completed

[Bug 1483566] perl-MooX-Options-4.103 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1483566 Upstream Release Monitoring changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 1483566] perl-MooX-Options-4.103 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1483566 --- Comment #4 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Created attachment 1316887 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1316887=edit [patch] Update to 4.103 (#1483566) -- You are

[Bug 1484170] New: perl-Config-Model-Tester-3.002 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1484170 Bug ID: 1484170 Summary: perl-Config-Model-Tester-3.002 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Config-Model-Tester Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

Re: [DONE] Mass package change (python2- binary package renaming)

python-basemap seems wrong... There's now a python3-basemap and a python2-basemap-examples but no python2-basemap. ;( Also, I'd like to very much thank you for doing this work. :) It's great to get done, it's great to do it quickly and I know it's a lot of hard work to script and build things.

Fedora Rawhide-20170822.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Server dvd i386 Workstation live i386 Server boot i386 Kde live i386 Failed openQA tests: 27/126 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20170821.n.0): ID: 133158 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso base_services_start URL:

Re: modularity: (my) expectations vs. reality

On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 08:37:59PM +0200, Michal Novotny wrote: > My idea was that the project will target runtime rather than > build-time and will try to provide a set of packages that would be > able to e.g. spawn and run an httpd stack almost at one command. I think what you describe is

Re: modularity: (my) expectations vs. reality

On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 2:40 PM Michal Novotny wrote: > I would like to publicly note that I had completely different idea about > this project first time I have encountered it at the last Flock. > > My idea was that the project will target runtime rather than build-time > and

Re: [modularity] Guidelines & Process

On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 9:53 AM Owen Taylor wrote: > Hi Langdon, > > Thanks for all the work that went into the process and guidelines! > > My particular interest is in what I consider the simplest use case - > taking an existing leaf-node application (desktop or otherwise),

[Bug 1481915] perl-Text-Fuzzy-0.27 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481915 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Text-Fuzzy-0.27-1.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-76a36d95cf -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1481915] perl-Text-Fuzzy-0.27 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481915 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Text-Fuzzy-0.27-1.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-4fc72f83be -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1469110] perl-Text-Fuzzy-0.26 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1469110 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Text-Fuzzy-0.27-1.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-76a36d95cf -- You are receiving this mail

Re: [modularity] Guidelines & Process

On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 5:23 AM Petr Pisar wrote: > On 2017-08-21, Langdon White wrote: > > [2]: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Module:Review_Process > > I don't understand purpose of this paragraph: > > > As a Contributor, you should only be

[Bug 1479680] perl-Time-OlsonTZ-Download-0.006 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1479680 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Time-OlsonTZ-Download-0.006-2.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. --

[Bug 1477175] fusioninventory-agent-2.3.21 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1477175 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA

[Bug 1477136] perl-No-Worries-1.5 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1477136 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA

Re: Old updates in F26 testing

Bojan Smojver wrote: > Was just curious, anyone understands why there are so many obsolete > updates in F26 testing repository? For example, there is firefox 54.0 > from June, other stuff back from April etc. I think one intention of keeping stuff in testing (for at least little while) is to

modularity: (my) expectations vs. reality

I would like to publicly note that I had completely different idea about this project first time I have encountered it at the last Flock. My idea was that the project will target runtime rather than build-time and will try to provide a set of packages that would be able to e.g. spawn and run an

Old updates in F26 testing

Was just curious, anyone understands why there are so many obsolete updates in F26 testing repository? For example, there is firefox 54.0 from June, other stuff back from April etc. -- Bojan ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To

[Bug 1482299] perl-SOAP-Lite-1.22 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1482299 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[Bug 1484066] $daemon_group in /etc/amavisd/amavisd.conf doesn' t set the daemon group

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1484066 --- Comment #1 from Juan Orti --- That will be because the user and group is enforced in the service unit. I'll check it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[389-devel] [Review Request] - Setup Test

Hello, I have made changes in setup test suit and uploaded patch on ticket [1]. Please review. Thanks, Amita [1]. https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/47840 ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: retired packages in rawhide/f27

On 08/22/2017 02:30 AM, Petr Pisar wrote: > On 2017-08-22, Honggang LI wrote: >> hi, >> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1404043#c41 >> libibcm, libibumad, libibverbs, librdmacm and ibacm had been replaced by >> the new rdma-core package. Those five packages are

[Bug 1483775] perl-DateTime-1.44 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1483775 Paul Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In

[Bug 1483775] perl-DateTime-1.44 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1483775 --- Comment #3 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- pghmcfc's perl-DateTime-1.44-1.fc27 completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=960037 -- You are receiving this mail

pghmcfc pushed to perl-DateTime (f27). "Update to 1.44 (..more)"

From f164fe190f68af4f49c59721956789ab9da1e796 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Howarth Date: Aug 22 2017 15:19:39 + Subject: Update to 1.44 - New upstream release 1.44 - Added a stringify() method, which does exactly the same thing as stringification overloading

pghmcfc pushed to perl-List-MoreUtils (f27). "Update to 0.423 (..more)"

From 75fd7441074b6dafce1cd8b952f3b75db1425579 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Howarth Date: Aug 22 2017 15:06:17 + Subject: Update to 0.423 - New upstream release 0.423 - Sync version with List::MoreUtils::XS - Add some new functions: qsort (XS only), binsert,

pghmcfc pushed to perl-DateTime (master). "Update to 1.44 (..more)"

From f164fe190f68af4f49c59721956789ab9da1e796 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Howarth Date: Aug 22 2017 15:19:39 + Subject: Update to 1.44 - New upstream release 1.44 - Added a stringify() method, which does exactly the same thing as stringification overloading

pghmcfc pushed to perl-List-MoreUtils (master). "Update to 0.423 (..more)"

From 75fd7441074b6dafce1cd8b952f3b75db1425579 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Howarth Date: Aug 22 2017 15:06:17 + Subject: Update to 0.423 - New upstream release 0.423 - Sync version with List::MoreUtils::XS - Add some new functions: qsort (XS only), binsert,

[Bug 1484066] New: $daemon_group in /etc/amavisd/amavisd.conf doesn' t set the daemon group

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1484066 Bug ID: 1484066 Summary: $daemon_group in /etc/amavisd/amavisd.conf doesn't set the daemon group Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: amavisd-new

pghmcfc uploaded DateTime-1.44.tar.gz for perl-DateTime

a256efc26ad1f2859f3371b70e5edd0d962d2c19c54b746178e3945b1dc665621d09b7ac6be279c7e92b8aa91763c5df2d8ccbca1832ba69ac810feb8533ca71 DateTime-1.44.tar.gz

Re: COPR strategy

On Tuesday, August 22, 2017 5:03:06 PM CEST Michal Novotny wrote: > On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 4:40 PM, Kamil Dudka wrote: > > On Tuesday, August 22, 2017 1:51:44 PM CEST Michal Novotny wrote: > > > Hey Kamil, > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 12:07 PM, Kamil Dudka

Re: COPR strategy

On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 4:40 PM, Kamil Dudka wrote: > On Tuesday, August 22, 2017 1:51:44 PM CEST Michal Novotny wrote: > > Hey Kamil, > > > > On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 12:07 PM, Kamil Dudka wrote: > > > On Tuesday, August 22, 2017 9:04:24 AM CEST Matthias

pghmcfc uploaded List-MoreUtils-0.423.tar.gz for perl-List-MoreUtils

f88e683ce50c4e0e0df9731af9ace3be7ddfd7477292ec14ae4d013d99408c87073f3abdd893e8a90638db936da2d58d6fa588e55d89b8087b2005909154d686 List-MoreUtils-0.423.tar.gz

Re: 'No More Alphas': wiki revision drafts

On 08/22/2017 07:34 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 07:18:04PM +0530, Sudhir D wrote: On a slightly different thought, if we run all existing Alpha criteria tests in rawhide, we can then probably look at existing Alpha blocker as Branch blocker.. i.e, we don't branch unless

Modularity Working Group IRC Meeting Minutes (2017-08-22)

=== == #fedora-meeting-3: Meeting of the Modularity Working Group (once every two weeks) === == Meeting started by nils at 14:00:19 UTC.

Re: COPR strategy

On Tuesday, August 22, 2017 1:51:44 PM CEST Michal Novotny wrote: > Hey Kamil, > > On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 12:07 PM, Kamil Dudka wrote: > > On Tuesday, August 22, 2017 9:04:24 AM CEST Matthias Runge wrote: > > > - the ability to directly upload srpms; that is, one can store

Re: 'No More Alphas': wiki revision drafts

On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 07:18:04PM +0530, Sudhir D wrote: > On a slightly different thought, if we run all existing Alpha > criteria tests in rawhide, we can then probably look at existing > Alpha blocker as Branch blocker.. i.e, we don't branch unless the > blockers are fixed and thereby keeping

Re: [modularity] Guidelines & Process

Hi Langdon, Thanks for all the work that went into the process and guidelines! My particular interest is in what I consider the simplest use case - taking an existing leaf-node application (desktop or otherwise), creating a module that only includes that application and is not meant for

Re: 'No More Alphas': wiki revision drafts

On 08/03/2017 05:46 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: * My proposal for 'what do we do about release criteria / validation' is basically: the 'Fedora 27 Alpha Release Criteria' page gets renamed 'Basic Release Criteria' (note: not versioned, I don't think it should be), and we document that *all*

Re: f27 builds in COPR fail without logs

On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 3:53 PM, Michal Novotny wrote: > Eventually, a new version should pop up here: > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/?packages=mock > > You can give it Karma when it appears so that it reaches Fedora repos a bit > faster. Oh, I had never given much

Re: Outdated clamav database in Taskotron

> > > > So maybe the ClamAV definitions should be treated similarly? In > > > a separate package which gets updated on a regular interval to pull in > > > the latest data? > > > > > > > That would be the best solution here, yes. Could someone please file an > RFE > > against clamav? > Done: > >

mock or dnf or fedora-review tries to install a binary of a package it is test-building

I don't know what component to file this bug under ... When running ‘fedora-review -b 1477363’, it fails to test build the package in mock. The errors in root.log are peculiar: > DEBUG util.py:450: Package ocaml-4.04.2-4.fc27.x86_64 is already installed, > skipping. > DEBUG util.py:450:

ppisar pushed to perl-PDL-Graphics-PLplot (master). "Does not work with hardended Perl 5.26.0 (bug #1459590)"

From fffcf65337d85605142c8ad543537734fe64e196 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Petr Písař Date: Aug 22 2017 13:00:18 + Subject: Does not work with hardended Perl 5.26.0 (bug #1459590) --- diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore deleted file mode 100644 index cfd7ef8..000

[Bug 1459590] perl-PDL-Graphics-PLplot FTBFS with Perl 5.26.0

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1459590 --- Comment #3 from Petr Pisar --- Retiring suffers from this server flaw . -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

ppisar pushed to perl-PDL-Graphics-PLplot (f27). "Does not work with hardended Perl 5.26.0 (bug #1459590)"

From fffcf65337d85605142c8ad543537734fe64e196 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Petr Písař Date: Aug 22 2017 13:00:18 + Subject: Does not work with hardended Perl 5.26.0 (bug #1459590) --- diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore deleted file mode 100644 index cfd7ef8..000

[Bug 1459590] perl-PDL-Graphics-PLplot FTBFS with Perl 5.26.0

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1459590 --- Comment #2 from Petr Pisar --- There was help from upstream and I don't know where the problem is and how to fix it. This package will be removed from Fedora distribution. -- You are receiving this mail because: You

Re: f27 builds in COPR fail without logs

Eventually, a new version should pop up here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/?packages=mock You can give it Karma when it appears so that it reaches Fedora repos a bit faster. On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 2:41 PM, Alexander Ploumistos < alex.ploumis...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks Michal. Is

Re: New copr-frontend release

Hey Kevin, On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 2:03 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Michal Novotny wrote: > > - Batch package rebuilding ("Rebuild all" button in Packages view) so > > that you can rebuild all your packages in the new chroots. > > Unfortunately, this feature is less

Re: f27 builds in COPR fail without logs

Thanks Michal. Is there someplace I should monitor to know when the f27 mock will be available? ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: autoconf-archive suddenly gone in EPEL 7

> On 22. Aug 2017, at 12:53, Vascom wrote: > > As you can see here > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/autoconf-archive/commits/epel7 > autoconf-archive removed from EPEL7 because it must be included in main > CentOS repos. Thanks for the pointer. Unfortunately this new

Re: New copr-frontend release

Michal Novotny wrote: > - Batch package rebuilding ("Rebuild all" button in Packages view) so > that you can rebuild all your packages in the new chroots. Unfortunately, this feature is less useful than I had expected, it does not work for uploaded SRPMs or SRPMs fetched from URLs. In that

Re: rdma -devel packages missing (?) on f27/armv7hl, builds failing

Ahem.. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1483278 -Yanko On Tue, 2017-08-22 at 13:55 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > Dne 22.8.2017 v 13:45 Kaleb S. KEITHLEY napsal(a): > > Also rdma-core hasn't been built for f28 yet! > > It was build prior branching, wasn't it? > > V. >

Re: rdma -devel packages missing (?) on f27/armv7hl, builds failing

Dne 22.8.2017 v 13:45 Kaleb S. KEITHLEY napsal(a): > Also rdma-core hasn't been built for f28 yet! It was build prior branching, wasn't it? V. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: COPR strategy

Hey Kamil, On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 12:07 PM, Kamil Dudka wrote: > On Tuesday, August 22, 2017 9:04:24 AM CEST Matthias Runge wrote: > > - the ability to directly upload srpms; that is, one can store spec > > files etc. on the local machine. I'm undecided, if integrating a >

Re: rdma -devel packages missing (?) on f27/armv7hl, builds failing

switching to rdma-core-devel also fails. because according to https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=953605 there are no armv7hl rpms built. Probably due to the # 32-bit arm is missing required arch-specific memory barriers, ExcludeArch: %{arm} in its .spec file Which

Re: COPR strategy

Hello Mikolaj, On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 11:29 AM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: > On 08/22/2017 11:17 AM, Michal Novotny wrote: > >> - it would be great, if there is a possibility to trigger rebuilds on > >> dependent packages, like rebuild required packages after ABI bump. > >>

Re: one concrete idea for fedora

On Mon, 2017-08-21 at 19:41 -0700, stan wrote: > On Mon, 21 Aug 2017 18:19:09 +0100 > Sérgio Basto wrote: > > > and How I create one boot.iso (or netinstall iso ) ?  > > I haven't actually done this, and you will probably get better > responses on the users or test lists, but

Re: f27 builds in COPR fail without logs

Hello Alexander, you haven't missed anything. It is just that there hasn't been mock release yet with f27 configs added. It is in upstream already but not yet released. If it is not in Fedora until the end of the week, then we can probably temporarily provide our own substitute repo configs.

Re: rdma -devel packages missing (?) on f27/armv7hl, builds failing

Dne 22.8.2017 v 12:48 Peter Robinson napsal(a): > On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 11:36 AM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY > wrote: >> I've built glusterfs previously on F27 with these same Build-Requires. Same >> package & same .spec build on F28 and F26. >> >> While trying to build a new

Re: autoconf-archive suddenly gone in EPEL 7

As you can see here https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/autoconf-archive/commits/epel7 autoconf-archive removed from EPEL7 because it must be included in main CentOS repos. вт, 22 авг. 2017 г. в 13:43, Benjamin Kircher : > Hi, > > please correct me if I am wrong or if

Re: rdma -devel packages missing (?) on f27/armv7hl, builds failing

On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 11:36 AM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: > > I've built glusterfs previously on F27 with these same Build-Requires. Same > package & same .spec build on F28 and F26. > > While trying to build a new version for the last 24 hours I keep hitting > this: > > ...

autoconf-archive suddenly gone in EPEL 7

Hi, please correct me if I am wrong or if this isn't the right list. One of my packages needs autoconf-archive.noarch for building on CentOS 7 but the build fails because autoconf-archive is not available in EPEL 7 anymore. yum search autoconf-archive reveals nothing. Have I missed

rdma -devel packages missing (?) on f27/armv7hl, builds failing

I've built glusterfs previously on F27 with these same Build-Requires. Same package & same .spec build on F28 and F26. While trying to build a new version for the last 24 hours I keep hitting this: ... DEBUG util.py:439: No matching package to install: 'libibverbs-devel' DEBUG

f27 builds in COPR fail without logs

Hello, For the past hour or so, I've been trying to rebuild my copr packages for f27 and rawhide. While there were some hiccups with rawhide, e.g. not finding mirrors to download packages, after resubmitting them a couple of times, all builds were successful. On the other hand, f27 builds fail as

Re: COPR strategy

On Tuesday, August 22, 2017 9:04:24 AM CEST Matthias Runge wrote: > - the ability to directly upload srpms; that is, one can store spec > files etc. on the local machine. I'm undecided, if integrating a > distgit on copr would solve any issues or would introduce more, like > diverging specs.

Re: retired packages in rawhide/f27

On 2017-08-22, Honggang LI wrote: > hi, > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1404043#c41 > libibcm, libibumad, libibverbs, librdmacm and ibacm had been replaced by > the new rdma-core package. Those five packages are sub-packages of the > new rdma-core package. > > I

Re: COPR strategy

On 08/22/2017 11:17 AM, Michal Novotny wrote: >> - it would be great, if there is a possibility to trigger rebuilds on >> dependent packages, like rebuild required packages after ABI bump. >> > > Right, this would be a nice option. I could imagine this being implemented > as a configurable

[Bug 1481324] devel subpackage: dependencies correction

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481324 --- Comment #23 from Tomasz Kłoczko --- Thank you :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list --

Re: Nonresponsive maintainer: attempting to contact kanarip

On 27 June 2017 at 12:40, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > > Dne 27.6.2017 v 10:41 Jeroen van Meeuwen (Kolab Systems) napsal(a): > > On Fri, 2017-06-23 at 11:39 +0100, James Hogarth wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> Has anyone heard from kanarip or able to contact him? > >> > > Most people do

Re: [modularity] Guidelines & Process

On 2017-08-21, Langdon White wrote: > [2]: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Module:Review_Process I don't understand purpose of this paragraph: > As a Contributor, you should only be creating modules out of > pre-existing software in the Fedora RPM repositories which

Re: COPR strategy

Hello Matthias, On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 9:04 AM, Matthias Runge wrote: > On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 05:17:56AM +0200, Michal Novotny wrote: > > Hello, > > > > we will have soon a planning meeting that should determine a more > long-term > > strategy and bring us to a team

ppisar pushed to perl (master). "Formalize profile descriptions"

From f2f23e0d98951fa5ad1b20927ba8de0f4e567116 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Petr Písař Date: Aug 22 2017 08:56:40 + Subject: Formalize profile descriptions --- diff --git a/perl.yaml b/perl.yaml index f83059a..d80b274 100644 --- a/perl.yaml +++ b/perl.yaml @@ -26,12

[Bug 1481324] devel subpackage: dependencies correction

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481324 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In

ppisar pushed to perl-Module-CoreList (f25). "5.20170821 bump"

From 27cc5ebd69a4b9b6acdf47f4816479d830bd2cce Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Petr Písař Date: Aug 22 2017 08:22:51 + Subject: 5.20170821 bump --- diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index b747c7b..c6418c5 100644 --- a/.gitignore +++ b/.gitignore @@ -42,3 +42,4 @@

ppisar pushed to perl-Module-CoreList (f26). "5.20170821 bump"

From 30ffbc5d7c22e3d68f8cfd590500858210d4d8b3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Petr Písař Date: Aug 22 2017 08:22:10 + Subject: 5.20170821 bump --- diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index b747c7b..c6418c5 100644 --- a/.gitignore +++ b/.gitignore @@ -42,3 +42,4 @@

ppisar pushed to perl-Module-CoreList (f27). "5.20170821 bump"

From 7e696792bbf5369c045e1d5af383bd830679c75e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Petr Písař Date: Aug 22 2017 08:19:19 + Subject: 5.20170821 bump --- diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index b747c7b..c6418c5 100644 --- a/.gitignore +++ b/.gitignore @@ -42,3 +42,4 @@

ppisar pushed to perl-Module-CoreList (master). "5.20170821 bump"

From 7e696792bbf5369c045e1d5af383bd830679c75e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Petr Písař Date: Aug 22 2017 08:19:19 + Subject: 5.20170821 bump --- diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index b747c7b..c6418c5 100644 --- a/.gitignore +++ b/.gitignore @@ -42,3 +42,4 @@

ppisar uploaded Module-CoreList-5.20170821.tar.gz for perl-Module-CoreList

e5b1eb3bee5cc7d50f3bf21699c840c7b1fbea283affac5c79c8c31167b226d7fa76e3b885810e427ea976633ec0c223320f2b57e9a1bcd1fdc6d8256d6a551f Module-CoreList-5.20170821.tar.gz

ppisar pushed to perl (f27). "Fix unreliable Time-HiRes tests"

From 2510e877e65e7a207b2d3b692896b9e3231c0737 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Petr Písař Date: Aug 22 2017 07:54:15 + Subject: Fix unreliable Time-HiRes tests --- diff --git a/perl-5.26.0-Time-HiRes-Fix-unreliable-t-usleep.t-and-t-utime.t.patch

ppisar pushed to perl (f27). "Do not require $Config{libs} providers by perl-devel package (..more)"

From 5fbdf1697c92caf5eea8b51fd294773c6c76767f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Petr Písař Date: Aug 22 2017 08:01:03 + Subject: Do not require $Config{libs} providers by perl-devel package This reverts: commit f2346c87463c84069c6b5c5887edd0c8987736dd Author: Petr Písař

ppisar pushed to perl (f27). "Link libresolv.patch to a bug report"

From b2681c65784f6027c98ac86e74e14d5f855f8110 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Petr Písař Date: Aug 17 2017 06:07:10 + Subject: Link libresolv.patch to a bug report --- diff --git a/perl.spec b/perl.spec index 94b042d..28ab3a9 100644 --- a/perl.spec +++ b/perl.spec @@

ppisar pushed to perl (master). "Fix unreliable Time-HiRes tests"

From 2510e877e65e7a207b2d3b692896b9e3231c0737 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Petr Písař Date: Aug 22 2017 07:54:15 + Subject: Fix unreliable Time-HiRes tests --- diff --git a/perl-5.26.0-Time-HiRes-Fix-unreliable-t-usleep.t-and-t-utime.t.patch

ppisar pushed to perl (master). "Do not require $Config{libs} providers by perl-devel package (..more)"

From 5fbdf1697c92caf5eea8b51fd294773c6c76767f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Petr Písař Date: Aug 22 2017 08:01:03 + Subject: Do not require $Config{libs} providers by perl-devel package This reverts: commit f2346c87463c84069c6b5c5887edd0c8987736dd Author: Petr Písař

[Bug 1483773] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.32 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1483773 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.32-1.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-8b4b3e1443 -- You are receiving

[Bug 1483773] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.32 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1483773 --- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System --- perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.32-1.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-059c90f4f7 -- You are receiving

jplesnik pushed to perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases (f25). "3.32 bump"

From b1032172f310b3b2e1755d6cbf0bfc967cc564f2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Aug 22 2017 07:45:54 + Subject: 3.32 bump --- diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index 4ca7a50..f24fb25 100644 --- a/.gitignore +++ b/.gitignore @@ -73,3 +73,4 @@

[Bug 1483773] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.32 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1483773 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED

jplesnik pushed to perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases (f26). "3.32 bump"

From 889c1bcdc21d69142b62b3d7faeefcc4c029f7ea Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Aug 22 2017 07:42:37 + Subject: 3.32 bump --- diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index 4ca7a50..f24fb25 100644 --- a/.gitignore +++ b/.gitignore @@ -73,3 +73,4 @@

jplesnik pushed to perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases (f27). "3.32 bump"

From cacf0645570a89db180571261d640ebdac96a662 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Aug 22 2017 07:33:38 + Subject: 3.32 bump --- diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index 4ca7a50..f24fb25 100644 --- a/.gitignore +++ b/.gitignore @@ -73,3 +73,4 @@

[Bug 1483762] Rebase from upstream required

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1483762 --- Comment #2 from maria...@tuxette.fr --- Updates are avalaible in testing repository https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/?packages=fusioninventory-agent https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1477175 If you

jplesnik pushed to perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases (master). "3.32 bump"

From cacf0645570a89db180571261d640ebdac96a662 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Aug 22 2017 07:33:38 + Subject: 3.32 bump --- diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index 4ca7a50..f24fb25 100644 --- a/.gitignore +++ b/.gitignore @@ -73,3 +73,4 @@

jplesnik uploaded CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.32.tar.gz for perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases

7e4525bb15a2609093d819c64f58851d26a91376b5cefe47b35eb96e4b8ea59bee393d984b15431a929f2f93fd34da84e3bf7ddc2890ec6457013527009ebff5 CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.32.tar.gz

[Bug 1483762] Rebase from upstream required

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1483762 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppi...@redhat.com

  1   2   >