On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 6:06 AM Michal Schorm wrote:
>
> This is what confused me:
> My profile is names after my email address.
> So I entirely ignored the button "add new email address", because I
> thought it must be obvious for the service.
Ah, right. Glad it works now!
>
> Works fine,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1680269
Robin Lee changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing
chirp-20190304-1.el7
php-horde-Horde-Imap-Client-2.29.17-1.el7
Details about builds:
chirp-20190304-1.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2019
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
80 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-b7556983e8
tomcat-7.0.92-1.el6
11 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-26a7e6e4e8
koji-1.16.2-1.el6
11
This is what confused me:
My profile is names after my email address.
So I entirely ignored the button "add new email address", because I
thought it must be obvious for the service.
Works fine, thanks for the clarification!
For the second part:
seems fixed now. It was 100% reproducible for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1679579
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.9 |perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.9
On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 4:26 PM Michal Schorm wrote:
>
> Any idea how to use it?
>
> The: https://src.fedoraproject.org/settings#nav-basic-tab
> has an option to change the avatar.
> That will redirect me to: https://www.libravatar.org/account/login/
>
> I have an image uploaded in:
On Tue, 2019-03-05 at 00:03 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> The following list of builds has "Ran 0 tests in 0.000s" in their
> build log.
>
> It usually indicates a "Potemkin %check" [0] with python setup.py
> test without
> actual tests.
>
> [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Potemkin_village
I
On Mon, 2019-03-04 at 08:47 +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 04. 03. 19 v 7:36 Richard W.M. Jones napsal(a):
> > Why is the --setopt parameter needed? Couldn't that be based on
> > $releasever?
>
> For the record - we are speaking about:
>
> --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f30
>
> I
> On 5 Mar 2019, at 08:30, Mark Reynolds wrote:
>
>
> On 2/22/19 11:46 AM, Mark Reynolds wrote:
>> I want to start a brief discussion about a major problem we have backend
>> transaction plugins and the entry caches. I'm finding that when we get into
>> a nested state of be txn plugins and
The following list of builds has "Ran 0 tests in 0.000s" in their build log.
It usually indicates a "Potemkin %check" [0] with python setup.py test without
actual tests.
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Potemkin_village
Maintainers by package:
5minute jhutar pmoravco
On 2/22/19 11:46 AM, Mark Reynolds wrote:
I want to start a brief discussion about a major problem we have
backend transaction plugins and the entry caches. I'm finding that
when we get into a nested state of be txn plugins and one of the later
plugins that is called fails then while we
On Monday, March 04 2019, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 04. 03. 19 v 7:36 Richard W.M. Jones napsal(a):
>> Why is the --setopt parameter needed? Couldn't that be based on
>> $releasever?
>
> For the record - we are speaking about:
>
> --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f30
>
> I spoke to DNF
Minutes:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2019-03-04/fesco.2019-03-04-15.00.html
Minutes (text):
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2019-03-04/fesco.2019-03-04-15.00.txt
Log:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1685255
Daniel Berrange changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
On 3/4/19 3:04 AM, Petr Šabata wrote:
You can view them as virtual repositories with dependencies. I
think that might be the simplest way to put it.
You can try playing with fedmod to generate your modulemd file or
you can just write it from scratch; it's not all that complicated.
Why should
On 3/1/19 8:25 AM, Richard Shaw wrote:
Not replying to anyone in particular but just a nit for me...
I've been a Fedora packager for probably 10 years now (need to check!) but I
*STILL* don't really understand modules other than at a high level (it lets you
use dependencies that aren't
On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 11:36 AM Ken Dreyer wrote:
>
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 1, 2019, 8:26 AM Richard Shaw wrote:
>>
>> Not replying to anyone in particular but just a nit for me...
>>
>> I've been a Fedora packager for probably 10 years now (need to check!) but I
>> *STILL* don't really understand
On Mon, Mar 04, 2019 at 10:11:27AM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On 3/4/19 12:47 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 04, 2019 at 09:40:32AM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> >> Also, how are the mass rebuilds envisioned?
> >
> > Just as anyone would: by opting-out of gating.
> > Maybe that
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1685255
Bug ID: 1685255
Summary: perl-Sys-Virt-5.1.0 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Sys-Virt
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
On 3/4/19 12:47 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 04, 2019 at 09:40:32AM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>> Also, how are the mass rebuilds envisioned?
>
> Just as anyone would: by opting-out of gating.
> Maybe that term is overloaded. The way I see it there are two ways to opt-out:
> -
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1679579
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
On 3/4/19 6:32 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> Is anyone else experiencing this? I did a speed test on my Xfinity and
> it doesn't appear to be on my end.
>
> I'm getting about 100-200kB/s uploads... On larger projects that's
> very painful.
Yes, same here.
Greetings,
Christian
Is anyone else experiencing this? I did a speed test on my Xfinity and it
doesn't appear to be on my end.
I'm getting about 100-200kB/s uploads... On larger projects that's very
painful.
Thanks,
Richard
___
devel mailing list --
Rex Dieter wrote:
> Continuing work in master branch (aka fc31)
The bulk of this work is now complete, sans a handful of leaf packages.
Feel free to poke me if additional help is needed for those.
work in f30-kde koji target will continue
-- Rex
Due to scheduling conflicts we estimate that attendance at the
Modularity Team Meeting would be low, so we've decided to cancel it.
Unless something unexpected happens, the regular meeting schedule will
resume next week.
Nils
--
Nils Philippsen"Those who would give up Essential Liberty to
Hi all,
It's GNOME 3.31.92 release this week. We have a f30-gnome side tag as
usual; if you are helping with builds please do F30 builds with 'fedpkg
build --target f30-gnome'. I'll collect all the builds from the side tag
and submit a megaupdate to Bodhi later this week.
It's also F30 Beta
A quick heads up that the F30 Beta freeze starts tonight.
--
Kalev
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
On Fri, Mar 1, 2019, 8:26 AM Richard Shaw wrote:
> Not replying to anyone in particular but just a nit for me...
>
> I've been a Fedora packager for probably 10 years now (need to check!) but
> I *STILL* don't really understand modules other than at a high level (it
> lets you use dependencies
Any idea how to use it?
The: https://src.fedoraproject.org/settings#nav-basic-tab
has an option to change the avatar.
That will redirect me to: https://www.libravatar.org/account/login/
I have an image uploaded in: https://www.libravatar.org/accounts/profile/
But I found no way to somehow
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1685192
Bug ID: 1685192
Summary: LWP::Authen::Negotiate fails to authenticate to Red
Hat SSO web server because if missing mutual
authentication
Product: Fedora
On ma, 04 maalis 2019, Sundeep Anand wrote:
On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 5:28 PM Alexander Bokovoy
>Transtats is now running at https://transtats.fedoraproject.org
>*mkvtoolnix* page:
>https://transtats.fedoraproject.org/packages/view/mkvtoolnix
How can I modify the definition of a package I added
On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 5:28 PM Alexander Bokovoy
wrote:
> On ma, 04 maalis 2019, Sundeep Anand wrote:
> >On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 8:13 PM Sundeep Anand wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 6:34 PM Sundeep Anand
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi Dominik,
> >>>
> >>> Thank you so much trying that
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684273
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #1 from
On 04. 03. 19 13:14, Vascom wrote:
Hi and welcome.
I am sorry but you can't became fedora maintainer with already existing package.
You should suggest new package for that.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers
That's not entirely true. See
Hi and welcome.
I am sorry but you can't became fedora maintainer with already existing package.
You should suggest new package for that.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers
Also you can send Pull Requests or talk with python-pycxx maintainer directly.
пн, 4
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684873
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
Fixed In
On ma, 04 maalis 2019, Sundeep Anand wrote:
On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 8:13 PM Sundeep Anand wrote:
On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 6:34 PM Sundeep Anand wrote:
Hi Dominik,
Thank you so much trying that out. Actually, to get stats saved for a
package, the package is to be added in Transtats,
* Florian Weimer:
> On 07/17/2018 04:08 PM, Kamil Dudka wrote:
>> On Tuesday, July 17, 2018 2:24:04 PM CEST Matus Honek wrote:
>>> Florian is right, the idea is to make changes to the source code
>>> (probably a downstream patch will be needed) such that the threaded
>>> library will be built
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684873
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
I see the same messages and its from a mock build.
How does this relate to upgrades?
Barry
> On 27 Feb 2019, at 11:30, Lukas Ruzicka wrote:
>
> Why people disable the repo, I do not know. I might have a slight notion.
>
> However, you cannot upgrade from Fedora 29 to Fedora 30 with Modular
I have become the new maintainer for the pysvn package on Fedora.
I am the upstream developer for a number of projects including:
* pysvn - https://pysvn.sourceforge.io/
* pycxx - http://cxx.sourceforge.net/
* Barry's Emacs - http://barrys-emacs.org/
* SCM workbench -
On Sun, Mar 03, 2019 at 11:45:31AM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 01. 03. 19 22:19, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > '''The CI system, the tests and the decision on which tests are used
> > to gate upon are out of scope for the present document.'''
>
> This is both good (specifying explicitly what is this
On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 3:17 PM Sundeep Anand wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> Happy to announce that Transtats[1] (v0.1.6) is now deployed in
> production[2].
> Please follow quick writeup[3] for getting started.
>
Just to update: latest release *0.7.0* has been deployed in production.
Major changes
On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 8:13 PM Sundeep Anand wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 6:34 PM Sundeep Anand wrote:
>
>> Hi Dominik,
>>
>> Thank you so much trying that out. Actually, to get stats saved for a
>> package, the package is to be added in Transtats, 'mkvtoolnix'
>> So, dry run of jobs
On Mon, Mar 4, 2019, 11:41 Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> On Monday, March 4, 2019 11:21:05 AM CET Petr Šabata wrote:
> > I suggested to drop the modular repo from the mock config to get
> > an environment similar to what we have in koji.
>
> It is disabled here anyways:
>
On Monday, March 4, 2019 11:21:05 AM CET Petr Šabata wrote:
> I suggested to drop the modular repo from the mock config to get
> an environment similar to what we have in koji.
It is disabled here anyways:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/mock/commit/
On Mon, 4 Mar 2019 at 05:22, Adam Samalik wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 11:13 AM Pavel Raiskup wrote:
>>
>> On Monday, March 4, 2019 10:46:45 AM CET Petr Šabata wrote:
>> > On Mon, Mar 04, 2019 at 10:22:05AM +0100, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
>> > > On Monday, March 4, 2019 10:01:14 AM CET Petr
On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 11:13 AM Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> On Monday, March 4, 2019 10:46:45 AM CET Petr Šabata wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 04, 2019 at 10:22:05AM +0100, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > > On Monday, March 4, 2019 10:01:14 AM CET Petr Šabata wrote:
> > > > Replying in general.
> > > >
> > > >
On Mon, Mar 04, 2019 at 11:11:48AM +0100, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> On Monday, March 4, 2019 10:46:45 AM CET Petr Šabata wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 04, 2019 at 10:22:05AM +0100, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > > On Monday, March 4, 2019 10:01:14 AM CET Petr Šabata wrote:
> > > > Replying in general.
> > > >
>
On Mon, Mar 4, 2019, 11:12 Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> On Monday, March 4, 2019 10:46:45 AM CET Petr Šabata wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 04, 2019 at 10:22:05AM +0100, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > > On Monday, March 4, 2019 10:01:14 AM CET Petr Šabata wrote:
> > > > Replying in general.
> > > >
> > > > While
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684855
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-CPAN-2.25-1.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-18a6610255
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684855
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-CPAN-2.25-1.fc31 |perl-CPAN-2.25-1.fc30
--
You are
On Monday, March 4, 2019 10:46:45 AM CET Petr Šabata wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 04, 2019 at 10:22:05AM +0100, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > On Monday, March 4, 2019 10:01:14 AM CET Petr Šabata wrote:
> > > Replying in general.
> > >
> > > While it's never been entirely the same, I'd also like our mock
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684855
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
On Mon, Mar 04, 2019 at 10:22:05AM +0100, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> On Monday, March 4, 2019 10:01:14 AM CET Petr Šabata wrote:
> > Replying in general.
> >
> > While it's never been entirely the same, I'd also like our mock configs
> > to be as close to koji environment as possible. In the current
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Monday at 15:00UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2019-03-04 15:00 UTC'
Links to all issues to
On Monday, March 4, 2019 10:01:14 AM CET Petr Šabata wrote:
> Replying in general.
>
> While it's never been entirely the same, I'd also like our mock configs
> to be as close to koji environment as possible. In the current
> situation that would mean no modules being available.
I don't
+1, I agree with proposed text.
On 2/28/19 10:56 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> I just realized I only responded to Zdenek the other day. Re-sending
> my response now.
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 9:13 AM Zdenek Dohnal wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> comments are in the text:
>>
>> On 2/11/19 9:17 PM,
On Fri, Mar 01, 2019 at 08:25:32AM -0600, Richard Shaw wrote:
> Not replying to anyone in particular but just a nit for me...
>
> I've been a Fedora packager for probably 10 years now (need to check!) but
> I *STILL* don't really understand modules other than at a high level (it
> lets you use
Replying in general.
While it's never been entirely the same, I'd also like our mock
configs to be as close to koji environment as possible. In the
current situation that would mean no modules being available.
Once/if we proceed with one of the
modules-in-the-non-modular-buildroot proposals, I
On Mon, Mar 04, 2019 at 09:40:32AM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> Dne 02. 03. 19 v 8:09 Adam Williamson napsal(a):
> > On Fri, 2019-03-01 at 16:19 -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
> >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GatingRawhideSinglePackageUpdates
> >>
> >> == Summary ==
> >> We want to gate
Dne 02. 03. 19 v 8:09 Adam Williamson napsal(a):
> On Fri, 2019-03-01 at 16:19 -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GatingRawhideSinglePackageUpdates
>>
>> == Summary ==
>> We want to gate packages on test results before they can land in
>> rawhide. This will reduce
On Sat, Mar 02, 2019 at 01:36:10PM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On 3/1/19 1:19 PM, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GatingRawhideSinglePackageUpdates
> >
> ...snip...
>
> > # Add tests to a package you maintain in Fedora using the [[
> > CI/Quick_Start_Guide ]]
On Sat, Mar 02, 2019 at 03:05:56PM -0600, Ken Dreyer wrote:
>On Fri, Mar 1, 2019, 3:20 PM Ben Cotton <[1]bcot...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> ** infrastructure: deploy the new version of bodhi and the new koji
> plugin
>
>What's the new Koji plugin?
Good catch, this is a left over
On Mon, Mar 04, 2019 at 08:56:26AM +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 04. 03. 19 v 7:30 Richard W.M. Jones napsal(a):
> > Bonus question: Are "Problem 1" (etc) in each section of the error
> > message supposed to relate to each other in some way? Or is the
> > second list a new list of problems?
66 matches
Mail list logo
