[Bug 1748057] Request for branching to epel-8

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748057 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Link ID||Red Hat Bugzilla 1663063

[Bug 1748057] Request for branching to epel-8

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748057 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[EPEL-devel] XML::Feed.pm perl on CentOS 7

I'm looking for CPAN's XML::Feed.pm for perl 5 for centos 7 via yum but not finding anything for it (e.g. perl-XML-Feed.noarch) in the repositories. I have the base, epel, extras, and updates repositories available. $ yum -q search all XML-Feed Warning: No matches found for: XML-Feed $ grep

Re: Fedora Samba DC for what purpose it is released in Fedora ?

On Mon, 02 Sep 2019, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 9:25 PM Robert Marcano wrote: On 9/2/19 4:52 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 3:33 PM Alexander Bokovoy wrote: >> >> On Mon, 02 Sep 2019, Dario Lesca wrote: >>> Il giorno lun, 02/09/2019 alle 11.26

[Bug 1748169] New: perl-MCE-1.847 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748169 Bug ID: 1748169 Summary: perl-MCE-1.847 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-MCE Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

Re: Fedora Workstation and disabled by default firewall

On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 12:26 AM John Harris wrote: > There is not a single service in Fedora that is broken by the firewall > running. You simply have to open the port before it can be accessed from a > remote system, which is by design. Basic access control, a security feature. Exactly.

Re: skychart package updates broken after module retirement

On Sunday, September 1, 2019 2:54:32 AM MST Mattia Verga via devel wrote: > Recently, I requested to retire Skychart module and this has been done > in F31 and F32: > https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8640 > > Now I'm trying to push an update to Skychart classic RPMs, Koji shows it > as tagged

Re: Intention to retire Release Notes RPM

On Monday, August 5, 2019 4:42:31 AM MST Martin Kolman wrote: > On Sat, 2019-08-03 at 03:45 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > > > On Sat, Aug 3, 2019 at 3:10 AM Brian (bex) Exelbierd > > wrote: > > > > > Hi All, > > > > > > Barring objection, I plan to retire the release notes package from > > >

Re: Debates/back and forths

On Sunday, September 1, 2019 6:22:04 AM MST Gerald B. Cox wrote: > John you're comparing apples and oranges. One is active the other is > passive. One uses your space allocation the other doesn't. Sorry, what? What space allocation? If you're talking about emails, my Maildir hasn't reached a

Re: Better interactivity in low-memory situations

On Tuesday, August 20, 2019 10:48:06 PM MST John Harris wrote: > On Sunday, August 18, 2019 4:33:47 AM MST Gordan Bobic wrote: > > > On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 10:36 AM wrote: > > > > > This seems like a distraction from the real goal here, which is to > > > ensure Fedora remains responsive under

Re: Fedora Workstation and disabled by default firewall

On Sunday, September 1, 2019 4:13:10 AM MST mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote: > On Sat, Aug 31, 2019 at 6:37 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia > wrote: > > > If 30 years in DevOps and system security in both large and small > > networks count for anything, this makes *complete* sense. The > > distinction between

[Bug 1747726] perl-Git-Repository-1.324 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1747726 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #4 from

Re: Fedora Samba DC for what purpose it is released in Fedora ?

On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 9:25 PM Robert Marcano wrote: > > On 9/2/19 4:52 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 3:33 PM Alexander Bokovoy > > wrote: > >> > >> On Mon, 02 Sep 2019, Dario Lesca wrote: > >>> Il giorno lun, 02/09/2019 alle 11.26 -0400, Robert Marcano ha scritto: >

[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Modularity Team (weekly)

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: Modularity Team (weekly) on 2019-09-03 from 15:00:00 to 16:00:00 UTC At fedora-meetin...@irc.freenode.net The meeting will be about: Meeting of the Modularity Team. More information available at: [Modularity Team

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing: Age URL 10 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-fabd190d13 clamav-0.101.4-1.el8 The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing geos-3.7.2-1.el8 libgeotiff-1.5.1-1.el8

[Bug 1747549] perl-PPIx-Regexp-0.067 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1747549 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- perl-PPIx-Regexp-0.067-1.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[Bug 1747170] perl-Date-Manip-6.78 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1747170 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #2 from

[389-devel] 389 DS nightly 2019-09-03 - 95% PASS

https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2019/09/03/report-389-ds-base-1.4.1.6-20190902git0a34389.fc30.x86_64.html ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: Fedora Samba DC for what purpose it is released in Fedora ?

On 9/2/19 4:52 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 3:33 PM Alexander Bokovoy wrote: On Mon, 02 Sep 2019, Dario Lesca wrote: Il giorno lun, 02/09/2019 alle 11.26 -0400, Robert Marcano ha scritto: I switched to run Samba DCs on a container with non Fedora / RHEL / CentOS

[Bug 1747549] perl-PPIx-Regexp-0.067 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1747549 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #4 from

[Bug 1747079] perl-File-Next-1.18 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1747079 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #4 from

[Bug 1746257] Upgrade perl-File-Next to 1.18

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1746257 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #2 from

powertop vs upower, troubleshooting battery remaining

This is an hp spectre running Fedora 30 Workstation. On Fedora 29, there was fairly close agreement between powertop and upower and the time estimates were sane. Something's wonky on Fedora 30 and I'm not sure where to begin troubleshooting, although I posted a message on the upstream powertop

Re: Sponsorship request

On 03. 09. 19 0:33, Fabio Valentini wrote: I can't sponsor you since I'm not a member of the required account group I think it's time you become a member of the required account group. -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ devel

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 32 Python 3.8 rebuilds have started in a side tag

On 02. 09. 19 18:58, Mat Booth wrote: On Fri, 23 Aug 2019 at 17:39, Miro Hrončok > wrote: On 23. 08. 19 17:15, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > Dne 23. 08. 19 v 17:05 Kaleb Keithley napsal(a): >> >> >> On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 1:23 PM Miro Hrončok

[389-devel] Review reminder :)

https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/50571 https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/50577 Thanks! -- Sincerely, William ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: skychart package updates broken after module retirement

On 9/1/19 2:54 AM, Mattia Verga via devel wrote: > Recently, I requested to retire Skychart module and this has been done > in F31 and F32: > https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8640 > > Now I'm trying to push an update to Skychart classic RPMs, Koji shows it > as tagged both in F30-updates-testing

[389-devel] Re: Docker releases of 389

> On 3 Sep 2019, at 00:19, Matus Honek wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 3:43 AM William Brown wrote: >> >> Hey all, >> >> RC images have been pushed: https://hub.docker.com/r/389ds/dirsrv > > First, I'm not with processes on Docker Hub, so please bear with me... > :) I don't see a

Permission denied for relation pull_requests

What's this all about (seen after doing a git push to gap-pkg-hecke)? $ git push Enumerating objects: 9, done. Counting objects: 100% (9/9), done. Delta compression using up to 8 threads Compressing objects: 100% (4/4), done. Writing objects: 100% (5/5), 690 bytes | 690.00 KiB/s, done. Total 5

Re: Sponsorship request

On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 9:45 PM David Kaufmann wrote: > > Hi! > > I'm looking for a sponsor to get rss2email back into fedora (it's > orphaned and retired right now, as it's been FTBFS too long) > > I've already got the package reviewed (bug 1740389), but forgot the > FE-NEEDSPONSOR dependency, so

nbconvert 5.6.0

I am unable to build nbconvert because of build failures. Can someone please take a look at the build log and help me update this? Build log - https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=37430133 Thanks, Mukundan. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: inotify-tools with dead upstream cannot be fixed in Fedora

On Sun, Sep 01, 2019 at 09:33:29PM +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > Hi, > > Fix stack overflow in: `inotifytools_replace_filename` > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1741472 > > Not sure how to fix this crashing bug. Upstream is dead while Fedora package > maintainer requires to

Re: Fedora Samba DC for what purpose it is released in Fedora ?

On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 3:33 PM Alexander Bokovoy wrote: > > On Mon, 02 Sep 2019, Dario Lesca wrote: > >Il giorno lun, 02/09/2019 alle 11.26 -0400, Robert Marcano ha scritto: > >> I switched to run Samba DCs on a container with non Fedora / RHEL / > >> CentOS provided RPMs. > > > >Thank Robert for

Re: Unresponsive Maintainer: Chitlesh Goorah

Hi Alain, Great to see there is some interest in the Electronics Lab Spin! Can you reach out to Chitlesh and see if he is willing to give up his spot as the maintainer of the group so that the spin can get the maintenance it needs? If I don't hear from him in a week, I'll just continue through

Re: Unresponsive Maintainer: Chitlesh Goorah

Hi Geoffrey I am Alain, FAS: avigne, a micro-electronic engineer, mainly interested in CAD/EDA tools. I started my journey to become a Fedora packager with this spin in mind (+ introducing another PCB tool: pcb-rnd) I have been in contact with Chitlesh, and also with Kiara, who both stepped down

Sponsorship request

Hi! I'm looking for a sponsor to get rss2email back into fedora (it's orphaned and retired right now, as it's been FTBFS too long) I've already got the package reviewed (bug 1740389), but forgot the FE-NEEDSPONSOR dependency, so I'm looking for a sponsor via this list. Technically this is also

[Bug 1748104] Please build perl-XML-SAX-Writer for EPEL-8

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748104 Paul Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1748039 Referenced Bugs:

[Bug 1748039] Please build perl-Test-XML for EPEL 8

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748039 Paul Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Depends On|

Re: Fedora Samba DC for what purpose it is released in Fedora ?

On Mon, 02 Sep 2019, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 1:56 PM Alessio wrote: On Mon, Sep 2, 2019, 5:16 PM Dario Lesca wrote: After few minutes almost everything work well, except for a thing ... all windows PC cannot access to others windows PC. Wait. I'm not an expert.

[Bug 1748104] New: Please build perl-XML-SAX-Writer for EPEL-8

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748104 Bug ID: 1748104 Summary: Please build perl-XML-SAX-Writer for EPEL-8 Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel7 Status: NEW Component: perl-XML-SAX-Writer Assignee:

Re: Fedora Samba DC for what purpose it is released in Fedora ?

On Mon, 02 Sep 2019, Dario Lesca wrote: Il giorno lun, 02/09/2019 alle 11.26 -0400, Robert Marcano ha scritto: I switched to run Samba DCs on a container with non Fedora / RHEL / CentOS provided RPMs. Thank Robert for reply. Then why don't release samba compiled with Heimdal kerberos? Just

Re: Fedora Samba DC for what purpose it is released in Fedora ?

On Mon, 02 Sep 2019, Dario Lesca wrote: In Fedora Server there is a suit of package named samba and samba-dc* These package, with some other, are useful to make Fedora an Active Directory Domain Controller. I have decide tu use it into a little lan and convert old samba NT 4 Style into AD-DC

Re: Fedora Samba DC for what purpose it is released in Fedora ?

On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 1:56 PM Alessio wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 2, 2019, 5:16 PM Dario Lesca wrote: >> >> >> After few minutes almost everything work well, except for a thing ... >> all windows PC cannot access to others windows PC. > > > Wait. I'm not an expert. Said that, are we sure that the

Re: Fedora Samba DC for what purpose it is released in Fedora ?

On Mon, Sep 02, 2019 at 05:14:35PM +0200, Dario Lesca wrote: > a) For what purpose it's released Fedora Samba MIT-KERBEROS DC? This is for FreeIPA interoperability, described at https://www.freeipa.org/page/IPA_and_AD This is enabled because: 1) FreeIPA is important part of Fedora

Re: Fedora Samba DC for what purpose it is released in Fedora ?

On Mon, Sep 2, 2019, 5:16 PM Dario Lesca wrote: > > After few minutes almost everything work well, except for a thing ... > all windows PC cannot access to others windows PC. > Wait. I'm not an expert. Said that, are we sure that the cause is krb MIT? Also on the samba ml it seems a

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 31 Beta Freeze

Nicolas Mailhot via devel wrote: > 2. However the IETF explicitely forbid it when defining the ISO 8501 > subset allowed on the Internet > > RFC 3339> Although ISO 8601 permits the hour to be "24", this profile of > ISO > RFC 3339> 8601 only allows values between "00" and "23" for the hour in >

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 32 Python 3.8 rebuilds have started in a side tag

On Fri, 23 Aug 2019 at 17:39, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 23. 08. 19 17:15, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > > > Dne 23. 08. 19 v 17:05 Kaleb Keithley napsal(a): > >> > >> > >> On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 1:23 PM Miro Hrončok >> > wrote: > >> > >> On 15. 08. 19 0:18, Miro Hrončok

Unresponsive Maintainer: Chitlesh Goorah

Hi devel-list, I am trying to contact Chitlesh Goorah [0], as he is the maintainer of the Fedora Electronics Lab Spin [1]. The spin desperately needs some love and maintenance. Does anyone know how to contact him? I have reached out to him three times in total, once in 2016, and again twice in

[Bug 1744678] [RFE] Can perl-Linux-Pid be branched for EPEL8

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1744678 Xavier Bachelot changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from

Re: Fedora Samba DC for what purpose it is released in Fedora ?

On 9/2/19 11:58 AM, Dario Lesca wrote: Il giorno lun, 02/09/2019 alle 11.26 -0400, Robert Marcano ha scritto: I switched to run Samba DCs on a container with non Fedora / RHEL / CentOS provided RPMs. Thank Robert for reply. Then why don't release samba compiled with Heimdal kerberos? I was

Re: Fedora Samba DC for what purpose it is released in Fedora ?

Il giorno lun, 02/09/2019 alle 11.26 -0400, Robert Marcano ha scritto: > I switched to run Samba DCs on a container with non Fedora / RHEL / > CentOS provided RPMs. Thank Robert for reply. Then why don't release samba compiled with Heimdal kerberos? Just change a flag in build time, and all

Re: Fedora Workstation and disabled by default firewall

On 8/28/19 1:01 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Tue, 2019-08-27 at 15:06 +0200, Jiri Eischmann wrote: >> mcatanz...@gnome.org píše v Út 27. 08. 2019 v 15:07 +0300: >>> On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 4:22 AM, John Harris >>> wrote: No, that is not how this works, at all. First, let's go ahead and

Re: Fedora Samba DC for what purpose it is released in Fedora ?

On 9/2/19 11:14 AM, Dario Lesca wrote: In Fedora Server there is a suit of package named samba and samba-dc* These package, with some other, are useful to make Fedora an Active Directory Domain Controller. I have decide tu use it into a little lan and convert old samba NT 4 Style into AD-DC

Fedora Samba DC for what purpose it is released in Fedora ?

In Fedora Server there is a suit of package named samba and samba-dc* These package, with some other, are useful to make Fedora an Active Directory Domain Controller. I have decide tu use it into a little lan and convert old samba NT 4 Style into AD-DC (classicupdate). After few minutes almost

[Bug 1748057] New: Request for branching to epel-8

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748057 Bug ID: 1748057 Summary: Request for branching to epel-8 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-LDAP Assignee: jples...@redhat.com

Re: f32/rawhide, nothing provides module(platform:f31)

Dne 02. 09. 19 v 14:25 Petr Pisar napsal(a): > The point is that the one who designed these rules forgot that people > will want to upgrade from an unsupported stream to a supportrf one. And > that the upgrade should be silent and automatic for cases when a user Negative sir. As I stated the

Re: libexempi SONAME bump in rawhide

On Mon, Sep 02, 2019 at 04:08:03PM +0200, Nikola Forr? wrote: > On Fri, 2019-08-30 at 20:09 +, Debarshi Ray wrote: > > Were you looking for a go ahead to rebuild the affected packages in > > Fedora proper? In that case, you have my whole hearted appreciation > > for taking care of the eog and

Fedora 31 compose report: 20190902.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-31-20190901.n.0 NEW: Fedora-31-20190902.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:1 Dropped images: 1 Added packages: 1 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 0 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 4.88 MiB Size of dropped packages:0 B Size

Re: Fedora Workstation and disabled by default firewall

On 8/27/19 3:25 AM, John Harris wrote: > On Monday, August 26, 2019 7:25:27 AM MST Iñaki Ucar wrote: >> On Mon, 26 Aug 2019 at 15:25, Robert Marcano >> wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 8/26/19 9:07 AM, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote: >>> Well the thing is, blocknig ports tends to break

[Bug 1748039] Please build perl-Test-XML for EPEL 8

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748039 Jan Pazdziora changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1744683 Referenced Bugs:

[Bug 1744683] [RFE] EPEL8 branch for perl-SOAP-Lite

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1744683 Jan Pazdziora changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1748037, 1748038, 1748039 ---

[Bug 1748038] Please build perl-XML-Parser-Lite for EPEL 8

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748038 Jan Pazdziora changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1744683 Referenced Bugs:

[Bug 1748038] New: Please build perl-XML-Parser-Lite for EPEL 8

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748038 Bug ID: 1748038 Summary: Please build perl-XML-Parser-Lite for EPEL 8 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-XML-Parser-Lite Assignee:

[Bug 1748039] New: Please build perl-Test-XML for EPEL 8

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748039 Bug ID: 1748039 Summary: Please build perl-Test-XML for EPEL 8 Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel8 Status: NEW Component: perl-Test-XML Assignee: p...@city-fan.org

Re: libexempi SONAME bump in rawhide

On Fri, 2019-08-30 at 20:09 +, Debarshi Ray wrote: > Thanks for the heads-up! > > Were you looking for a go ahead to rebuild the affected packages in > Fedora proper? In that case, you have my whole hearted appreciation > for taking care of the eog and tracker-miners rebuilds. :) I would

[Bug 1744683] [RFE] EPEL8 branch for perl-SOAP-Lite

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1744683 Jan Pazdziora changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1744711 Referenced Bugs:

[Bug 1744711] [RFE] EPEL8 branch of perl-IO-SessionData

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1744711 Jan Pazdziora changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1744683 Referenced Bugs:

[Bug 1744361] Please build perl-MIME-tools for EPEL 8

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1744361 Jan Pazdziora changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1744683 Referenced Bugs:

[Bug 1744683] [RFE] EPEL8 branch for perl-SOAP-Lite

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1744683 Jan Pazdziora changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1744361 --- Comment #2 from Jan

[Bug 1747726] perl-Git-Repository-1.324 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1747726 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED --- Comment #3 from

Fedora-31-20190902.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 31/142 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-31-20190901.n.0): ID: 440045 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso support_server URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/440045 ID: 440047 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso

Re: Is Modularity (MBS) dead?

On 2019-09-01, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > Being one of the biggest users of Modularity (more than 25 modules) > I'm surprised that: > > 1) Many builds are stuck for more than half a month > (https://mbs.fedoraproject.org/module-build-service/1/module-builds/5639, > 13 Aug) Simply resubmit the build.

[Bug 1747170] perl-Date-Manip-6.78 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1747170 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED --- Comment #1 from

Re: f32/rawhide, nothing provides module(platform:f31)

On 2019-09-02, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > Whatever you set in the defaults, DNF ignores that on the update. > > https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-module-defaults/blob/master/f/libgit2.yaml > https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-module-defaults/blob/f31/f/libgit2.yaml > It's not that DNF was ignoring

Re: Intention to retire Release Notes RPM

Closing the loop: This package has been retired via `fedpkg retire` in f31 and rawhide. regards, bex On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 10:43 PM Brian (bex) Exelbierd wrote: > Hi All, > > Barring objection, I plan to retire the release notes package from > Fedora on or after August 9, 2019. The package

Re: swap on ZRAM, zswap, and Rust was: Better interactivity in low-memory situations

- Original Message - > From: "Chris Murphy" > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > > Sent: Friday, August 30, 2019 9:55:52 PM > Subject: swap on ZRAM, zswap, and Rust was: Better interactivity in > low-memory situations > > Hi, > This is yet another follow-up for this

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20190902.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20190901.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20190902.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 1 Added packages: 12 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 54 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 99.59 MiB Size of dropped packages:0

Fedora-Rawhide-20190902.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 10 of 45 required tests failed, 6 results missing openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Unsatisfied gating requirements that could not be mapped to openQA tests: FAILED:

[Bug 1747549] perl-PPIx-Regexp-0.067 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1747549 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2019-497b4dea59 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-497b4dea59 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[Bug 1747549] perl-PPIx-Regexp-0.067 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1747549 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2019-0cb94dfc85 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-0cb94dfc85 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[Bug 1747549] perl-PPIx-Regexp-0.067 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1747549 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In Version|

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 12:02 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: (snip) > stewardship-sig: logback, gpars, groovy, gmavenplus-plugin I submitted a new build for maven yesterday which removes its dependency on logback, which in turn also means we no longer depend on gpars, groovy, or gmavenplus-plugin.

Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Note: If

Re: GNOME 3.33.92 megaupdate

I don't think it's that late for FE for F31 Beta, but this is something we can discuss on our meeting tomorrow. CCing Adam. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 31 Beta Freeze

Le 2019-08-31 10:44, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek a écrit : (I asked a few people what 24:00 means to them, and after getting a few strange looks and answers, To be fair: 1. ISO 8501 allows writing 24:00 Wikipedia> Midnight is a special case and may be referred to as either "00:00" or

GNOME 3.33.92 megaupdate

Hi all, I've requested a side tag from releng to build 3.33.92 and 3.34.x updates for F31. Once we have the side target, please use it for 3.33.92 builds and I'll pick them up for the next megaupdate for Bodhi. I'll run point on getting most of the builds done. I suspect 3.33.92 is too late for

[Bug 1543336] please provide missing Fedora 27 Perl modules

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1543336 --- Comment #22 from Paul Howarth --- All current Fedora releases have a CryptX-based version of Net-SSH-Perl now, though most of the ECC-related functionality is missing as it was stripped out of perl-CryptX. Would that be OK for you if it

[Bug 1747079] perl-File-Next-1.18 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1747079 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED --- Comment #3 from

[Bug 1746257] Upgrade perl-File-Next to 1.18

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1746257 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED --- Comment #1 from

Re: f32/rawhide, nothing provides module(platform:f31)

Well, Whatever you set in the defaults, DNF ignores that on the update. https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-module-defaults/blob/master/f/libgit2.yaml https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-module-defaults/blob/f31/f/libgit2.yaml On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 9:08 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > Dne 30. 08. 19 v

Re: f32/rawhide, nothing provides module(platform:f31)

Dne 30. 08. 19 v 18:25 Adam Williamson napsal(a): > Not. If you're getting it on an installed system that you're upgrading, Yes. > you probably need to manually switch the libgit2 module from the 0.27 > stream to the 0.28 stream, that should clear it up. No. 0.27 is the platform default on F30.