https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2020/09/16/report-389-ds-base-1.4.4.4-20200915git1a9fae6.fc32.x86_64.html
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 5/181 (x86_64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-33-20200914.n.0):
ID: 667299 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso install_default_upload
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/667299
ID: 667302 Test: x86_64
OLD: Fedora-33-20200914.n.0
NEW: Fedora-33-20200915.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 53
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 12
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 864.67 MiB
Size of dropped packages:670.30 KiB
On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 11:47 PM Kevin Kofler wrote:
> There still exist connections as slow as 33 kbps.
And no doubt you can find people still using 300 baud
TI Silent 700 terminals. However, the global internet
speed tests show that the numbers are much higher
on average, and we should
On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 7:57 PM Kevin Kofler wrote:
>
> Daniel Pocock wrote:
> > One issue I've come across is that a btrfs filesystem can only be used
> > on hosts with the same page size as the host that created the filesystem
>
> Ewww! That alone should disqualify btrfs as a default file
On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 6:35 PM Michel Alexandre Salim
wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2020-09-15 at 14:10 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > On Tue, 2020-09-15 at 13:46 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > >
> > > The compat- prefix is no longer allowed. Instead we should be using
> > > versioned package names.
> >
> >
On 9/15/20 4:46 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
There still exist connections as slow as 33 kbps. At that speed, 142 MB take
at least 10 hours to download (probably more because 1 data byte takes more
than 8 raw bits to transfer and because the theoretical speed cannot always
be sustained). Depending on
Daniel Pocock wrote:
> One issue I've come across is that a btrfs filesystem can only be used
> on hosts with the same page size as the host that created the filesystem
Ewww! That alone should disqualify btrfs as a default file system!
Why does a file system depend on the kernel page size? The
Frantisek Zatloukal wrote:
> Saving 142 MBs isn't going to make a huge difference in download times
> (disclaimer: I don't know how is the internet connection
> speed in other areas, I have not that fast connection of 200mbps down
> (slowest possible in my area), so 142 MB saving would make
Kamil Paral wrote:
> Each image is downloaded just once, but installed 1+ times.
Most end users install the image exactly once.
Kevin Kofler
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On Tue, 2020-09-15 at 14:10 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Tue, 2020-09-15 at 13:46 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> >
> > The compat- prefix is no longer allowed. Instead we should be using
> > versioned package names.
>
> Why?
> The "compat-" prefix clearly indicated the .so was provided
>
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
3 of 43 required tests failed
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 20/181 (x86_64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20200913.n.0):
ID:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1879289
Bug ID: 1879289
Summary: perl-ExtUtils-Install-2.18 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-ExtUtils-Install
Keywords: FutureFeature,
On Tue, 15 Sep 2020 at 12:04, Charalampos Stratakis
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've got some packages that I do not have any use for anymore and I'd like
> to give them away. If noone wants them I'll retire and orphan them in ~ a
> week.
>
> python-bna: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-bna
>
>
On Tue, 2020-09-15 at 21:45 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 15. 09. 20 20:47, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 2:41 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > There is a Fedora Python Classroom Lab:
> > >
> > > https://labs.fedoraproject.org/python-classroom/
> > >
> >
On 15. 09. 20 20:47, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 2:41 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
Hello,
There is a Fedora Python Classroom Lab:
https://labs.fedoraproject.org/python-classroom/
It has a GNOME based live / installable option. It has the default GNOME desktop
background.
What are
On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 2:41 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> There is a Fedora Python Classroom Lab:
>
> https://labs.fedoraproject.org/python-classroom/
>
> It has a GNOME based live / installable option. It has the default GNOME
> desktop
> background.
>
> What are the necessary steps to
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20200913.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20200915.n.1
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 10
Added packages: 42
Dropped packages:5
Upgraded packages: 179
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 50.36 MiB
Size of dropped packages
Hello,
There is a Fedora Python Classroom Lab:
https://labs.fedoraproject.org/python-classroom/
It has a GNOME based live / installable option. It has the default GNOME desktop
background.
What are the necessary steps to use the Fedora's default background?
(Both on the live system and on
On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 2:29 PM Michael Catanzaro wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 1:46 pm, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > openssl1.0
>
> It reached EOL in December 2019. Probably time to remove it from Fedora?
>
Ideally, yes, but I think some things still use it, and I think it
tracks the RHEL 7
On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 1:46 pm, Neal Gompa wrote:
openssl1.0
It reached EOL in December 2019. Probably time to remove it from Fedora?
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876156
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Module-Starter-1.77-1. |perl-Module-Starter-1.77-1.
On Tue, 2020-09-15 at 13:46 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 1:36 PM Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
> > On Tue, 2020-09-15 at 19:26 +0200, Tomas Mraz wrote:
> > > I've submitted a new compat-openssl11 package for review but it was
> > > pointed out to me that according to the new
On Tue, 2020-09-15 at 13:46 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 1:36 PM Nathanael D. Noblet
> > My 2 cents would be consistency. If others disagree, perhaps
> > compat-
> > openssl10 should be renamed to compat-openssl1.0 and obsolete the
> > old
> > compat-openssl10? Its annoying
FYI, we've managed to narrow down the issue to this:
https://github.com/xianyi/OpenBLAS/issues/2839
On Tue, 15 Sep 2020 at 12:22, Iñaki Ucar wrote:
>
> I found that this may be a packaging issue in openblas. What I did was
> to download the source distribution, then
>
> $ tar xf
On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 1:36 PM Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2020-09-15 at 19:26 +0200, Tomas Mraz wrote:
> > I've submitted a new compat-openssl11 package for review but it was
> > pointed out to me that according to the new format of the naming for
> > compat packages it should be
On Tue, 2020-09-15 at 19:26 +0200, Tomas Mraz wrote:
> I've submitted a new compat-openssl11 package for review but it was
> pointed out to me that according to the new format of the naming for
> compat packages it should be named openssl1.1. However there already
> is
> a compat-openssl10
On 15. 09. 20 19:26, Tomas Mraz wrote:
What is more important? Consistency between those two compat packages
or strictly following the naming rules for the new package?
Why not both? I.e. renaming compat-openssl10 to openssl1.0 while packaging
openssl1.1?
Note that I've always considered
On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 1:27 PM Tomas Mraz wrote:
>
> Hi Fedora developers,
>
> we need to introduce temporarily a compat package for OpenSSL as it is
> going to be rebased to the 3.0 version in Rawhide once the 3.0 release
> is stable.
>
> The 3.0 version should not break API from the 1.1.1, it
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876160
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-List-AllUtils-0.18-1.f |perl-List-AllUtils-0.18-1.f
Hi Fedora developers,
we need to introduce temporarily a compat package for OpenSSL as it is
going to be rebased to the 3.0 version in Rawhide once the 3.0 release
is stable.
The 3.0 version should not break API from the 1.1.1, it just breaks the
ABI, so rebuilds should be quite easy. Of course
Hi Tom,
On Tuesday, September 15, 2020 4:49:48 AM PDT Tom Yates wrote:
> Hello. I'm Tom Yates, I've been using free software since the late '80s,
> and Red Hat since RHL 4.2 (ie, the late '90s). Because I'm really that
> ancient, I fairly extensively use RCS (a very old revision control system)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876156
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1879217
Bug ID: 1879217
Summary: perl-IO-Socket-IP-0.41 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-IO-Socket-IP
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 10:53:10AM +0200, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> Hi, we ship epelplayground-8-x86_64.cfg file in mock-core-configs so users can
> reproduce builds locally with mock. Initially the configuration worked, but
> it
> has been failing for quite some time now. Dnf isn't able to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870746
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870754
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
11 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-2390c71f9c
chromium-85.0.4183.83-1.el8
7 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-0214580ca4
mbedtls-2.16.8-1.el8
4
On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 09:42:36AM -0700, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> I wonder if these are two separate concerns though? I agree that being
> able to indicate a package should always be branched would be great,
> but... epel-sig / epel-wranglers might not find a package relevant in a
> new
This is the second draft. It has added a section in the developer
section saying to clean your packages up when you are done playing and
testing them.
Edit's are still welcome, but I think it covers everything that has
been discussed and approved.
This will be published about the same time that
On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 09:42:36AM -0700, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> I wonder if these are two separate concerns though? I agree that being
> able to indicate a package should always be branched would be great,
> but... epel-sig / epel-wranglers might not find a package relevant in a
> new
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876273
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876124
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876160
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1879188
Bug ID: 1879188
Summary: perl-Search-Elasticsearch-7.30 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Search-Elasticsearch
Keywords:
On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 20:25:18 +0530, Sumantro Mukherjee wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 7:15 PM Leonardo Rossetti wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> I would like to present a Kubernetes Development SIG.
>
>
> I would love to be a part of the group!
+1, mostly as a user :)
--
Thanks,
On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 7:15 PM Leonardo Rossetti
wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I would like to present a Kubernetes Development SIG.
>
> I initially thought of an "operator SIG" but I think a wider SIG about
> programming components and services with Kubernetes APIs and internal
> components made
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876460
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #7 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878992
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878775
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #2 from
I just rebuilt unbound into that tag.
Tried build of getdns and fstrm packages, but they are blocked by
missing libavahi rebuild [1]. It is dragged in by doxygen used during
the build. Feel free to send copy to me once avahi is rebuilt.
Petr
1.
On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 10:24 PM Michael Catanzaro
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We currently have a bug where the Online Accounts page in initial setup
> is nonfunctional. [1] This doesn't violate any current release
> criterion, but surely we don't want to release with a broken initial
> setup experience.
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/9320
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
virt-df lists disk usage of guests without needing to install any
software inside the
On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 9:44 AM Leonardo Rossetti wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> I would like to present a Kubernetes Development SIG.
>
> I initially thought of an "operator SIG" but I think a wider SIG about
> programming components and services with Kubernetes APIs and internal
> components made
On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 02:52:14PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-3f6760cc65 again ...
>
> I cannot push this to stable, at least, not through the web UI.
> The button does nothing.
Meanwhile the command line hangs for a long time and then
On 15. 09. 20 15:52, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-3f6760cc65 again ...
I cannot push this to stable, at least, not through the web UI.
The button does nothing.
$ bodhi updates request FEDORA-2020-3f6760cc65 stable
Traceback (most recent call
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-3f6760cc65 again ...
I cannot push this to stable, at least, not through the web UI.
The button does nothing.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog:
Hello all,
I would like to present a Kubernetes Development SIG.
I initially thought of an "operator SIG" but I think a wider SIG about
programming components and services with Kubernetes APIs and internal
components made more sense (inspired by the "Programming Kubernetes" book).
I am using
On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 1:53 AM Pavel Raiskup wrote:
>
> Hi, we ship epelplayground-8-x86_64.cfg file in mock-core-configs so users can
> reproduce builds locally with mock. Initially the configuration worked, but
> it
> has been failing for quite some time now. Dnf isn't able to
Hi,
On 9/14/20 5:05 PM, Fabio Valentini wrote:
On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 10:04 PM Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 9/11/20 6:08 PM, Fabio Valentini wrote:
I can try to come up with a list of often-used-but-simple-to-maintain
Java packages?
Yes that sounds great. I would be happy to pick up a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1879100
Bug ID: 1879100
Summary: Please build an EPEL8 build for
perl-File-Find-Rule-Age
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel8
Status: NEW
Component:
pipsi: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/pipsi
A wrapper around virtualenv and pip which installs scripts provided by python
packages into separate virtualenvs to shield them from your system and each
other.
The project https://github.com/mitsuhiko/pipsi/ is not maintained anymore
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Wednesday at 14:00UTC in #fedora-meeting-2 on
irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2020-09-16 14:00 UTC'
Links to all issues to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876460
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-492e6416b1 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-492e6416b1
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876460
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
Hello. I'm Tom Yates, I've been using free software since the late '80s,
and Red Hat since RHL 4.2 (ie, the late '90s). Because I'm really that
ancient, I fairly extensively use RCS (a very old revision control system)
and am posting with a view to becoming co-maintainer for an RCS package in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876460
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Link ID|
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 7/7 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
Hey all,
Just wanted to inform you that memcached and libmemcached
are rebuilt in the side tag. So maintainers of dependent packages
(gearmand, Io-language, php-pecl-memcached) can proceed with
their build.
Regards.
On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 11:17 AM Ondřej Lysoněk wrote:
> (maintainers of
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876460
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppi...@redhat.com
--- Comment #5 from
I found that this may be a packaging issue in openblas. What I did was
to download the source distribution, then
$ tar xf openblas-0.3.10.tar.gz
$ cd OpenBLAS-0.3.10
$ make USE_THREAD=1 USE_OPENMP=1
$ CMD='octave -H -q --no-window-system --no-site-file --eval
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1879033
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
Hello,
I've got some packages that I do not have any use for anymore and I'd like to
give them away. If noone wants them I'll retire and orphan them in ~ a week.
python-bna: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-bna
This is a Python library of Battle.net Authenticator routines, which
On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 11:18:04AM +0200, Bohdan Khomutskyi wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> Thanks for sharing your ideas and comments about this change.
>
> Thanks to Mohan Boddu, I got RawHide DVD and netinstall images of
> RawHide with the optimization features enabled. Those test composes
> are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1879033
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876460
--- Comment #4 from Petr Pisar ---
This could be triggered by a "Fix setting a non-blocking mode in
IO::Socket::UNIX" patch I applied from upstream to perl in Fedora ≥ 33.
Previously, setting a blocking mode for UNIX sockets in Perl was
Hello everyone,
Thanks for sharing your ideas and comments about this change.
Thanks to Mohan Boddu, I got RawHide DVD and netinstall images of
RawHide with the optimization features enabled. Those test composes are
available at the following locations:
(maintainers of dependent packages in BCC)
Hi,
libevent will be rebased to 2.1.12 in Rawhide. The new version
includes a soname bump. Rebuilds of libevent and dependent packages
will happen in side tag 'f34-build-side-30069'.
Due to the nature of the dependency tree, we can't simply build all
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878992
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #1 from
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20200914.0):
ID: 665791 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1879033
Bug ID: 1879033
Summary: perl-XML-LibXML-2.0206 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-XML-LibXML
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878992
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
Hi, we ship epelplayground-8-x86_64.cfg file in mock-core-configs so users can
reproduce builds locally with mock. Initially the configuration worked, but it
has been failing for quite some time now. Dnf isn't able to --installroot:
No matches found for the following disable plugin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876460
--- Comment #3 from Ondřej Lysoněk ---
(In reply to Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) from comment #2)
> Well, It seems like I'm assignee by miss-take on this package,
>
> Free free to maintain, rebuild anything, specially take-over the package.
On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 08:54:57AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 11:52:03AM -0700, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> > There are several changes we can make to both streamline the process,
> > and not increase the maintenance burden on the (other) maintainers of
> > these
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1874449
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Upgrade perl-Type-Tiny to |Upgrade perl-Type-Tiny to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878992
Bug ID: 1878992
Summary: Upgrade perl-Test-MockModule to 0.174.0
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Test-MockModule
Assignee: spo...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878987
Bug ID: 1878987
Summary: Upgrade perl-Crypt-SMIME to 0.27
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Crypt-SMIME
Assignee: steve.tray...@cern.ch
88 matches
Mail list logo
