[Bug 1925453] Upgrade perl-IO-Interactive to 1.023

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1925453 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-9a8c12d672 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing

[Bug 1925321] perl-File-Path-Tiny-1.0 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1925321 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #2 from

[Bug 1925453] Upgrade perl-IO-Interactive to 1.023

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1925453 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #6 from

[Bug 1925453] Upgrade perl-IO-Interactive to 1.023

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1925453 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-d2889f585c has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing

[Bug 1925450] Upgrade perl-DBIx-Admin-TableInfo to 3.04

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1925450 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-fe331fb2ca has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing

[Bug 1925321] perl-File-Path-Tiny-1.0 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1925321 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-6a0e0ff598 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing

[Bug 1925450] Upgrade perl-DBIx-Admin-TableInfo to 3.04

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1925450 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #4 from

[Bug 1925453] Upgrade perl-IO-Interactive to 1.023

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1925453 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-EPEL-2021-414bf334ea has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here:

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing: Age URL 11 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-b68969af8c chromium-88.0.4324.96-1.el8 10 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-403074b7e0 seamonkey-2.53.6-1.el8 8

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 49 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-4a9fc09599 openjpeg2-2.3.1-10.el7 12 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-e06cd0281c zabbix30-3.0.31-1.el7 11

[EPEL-devel] Proposal: EPEL9 timeline

This is a proposal. It's mainly writing down what I think most of us agreed on at last weeks EPEL Steering Committee meeting. Feel free to continue to discuss and/or have ideas. I've been asked by a couple places what the plans were, so I'm writing it here. Overall Plan: - epel-next is an epel

nb pushed to perl-Encode-IMAPUTF7 (epel8). "- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_28_Mass_Rebuild (..more)"

Notification time stamped 2021-02-05 21:40:39 UTC From e6957e3841181ffa4b0b9dbb256b95796ecd3dd3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Fedora Release Engineering Date: Feb 08 2018 20:54:48 + Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_28_Mass_Rebuild Signed-off-by: Fedora Release

nb pushed to perl-Encode-IMAPUTF7 (epel8). "- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_33_Mass_Rebuild (..more)"

Notification time stamped 2021-02-05 21:40:39 UTC From 5be1c0c2e40925969ac90452973e2d4d786664dc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Fedora Release Engineering Date: Jul 28 2020 15:25:17 + Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_33_Mass_Rebuild Signed-off-by: Fedora Release

nb pushed to perl-Encode-IMAPUTF7 (epel8). "Perl 5.32 rebuild"

Notification time stamped 2021-02-05 21:40:39 UTC From a6be3135949216cfa58d566999361feb753c0900 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Jun 23 2020 08:12:24 + Subject: Perl 5.32 rebuild --- diff --git a/perl-Encode-IMAPUTF7.spec b/perl-Encode-IMAPUTF7.spec index

nb pushed to perl-Encode-IMAPUTF7 (epel8). "- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_32_Mass_Rebuild (..more)"

Notification time stamped 2021-02-05 21:40:39 UTC From afb44d7d3207a52f60ef6df79aa20886c29f33ca Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Fedora Release Engineering Date: Jan 29 2020 23:56:23 + Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_32_Mass_Rebuild Signed-off-by: Fedora Release

nb pushed to perl-Encode-IMAPUTF7 (epel8). "- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_34_Mass_Rebuild (..more)"

Notification time stamped 2021-02-05 21:40:39 UTC From 784cf9448263c233381d233503a5a49976a9ba4a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Fedora Release Engineering Date: Jan 27 2021 01:07:27 + Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_34_Mass_Rebuild Signed-off-by: Fedora Release

nb pushed to perl-Encode-IMAPUTF7 (epel8). "- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_31_Mass_Rebuild (..more)"

Notification time stamped 2021-02-05 21:40:39 UTC From 47771aa8c0c75f1e6d7ddcfac31718cf02b1323a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Fedora Release Engineering Date: Jul 26 2019 02:42:18 + Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_31_Mass_Rebuild Signed-off-by: Fedora Release

nb pushed to perl-Encode-IMAPUTF7 (epel8). "- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_30_Mass_Rebuild (..more)"

Notification time stamped 2021-02-05 21:40:39 UTC From 94b84b57cd57a7c4ffb2f2660db614c3f36404c1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Fedora Release Engineering Date: Feb 01 2019 20:27:17 + Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_30_Mass_Rebuild Signed-off-by: Fedora Release

nb pushed to perl-Encode-IMAPUTF7 (epel8). "- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_27_Mass_Rebuild"

Notification time stamped 2021-02-05 21:40:39 UTC From 28a22af4b27bd9e8d72856b2f38a7618fe9d22a2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Fedora Release Engineering Date: Jul 27 2017 03:46:27 + Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_27_Mass_Rebuild --- diff --git

nb pushed to perl-Encode-IMAPUTF7 (epel8). "cpan.org addresses moved to MetaCPAN "

Notification time stamped 2021-02-05 21:40:39 UTC From f3edab4c7d0a0f9dde15dccf4b9b16136669d1f8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Petr Písař Date: Jun 04 2018 12:43:47 + Subject: cpan.org addresses moved to MetaCPAN --- diff

nb pushed to perl-Encode-IMAPUTF7 (epel8). "Perl 5.28 rebuild"

Notification time stamped 2021-02-05 21:40:39 UTC From e8b13c9ec0f81b403793e064c5e21294bf9ffd15 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Jun 28 2018 10:29:25 + Subject: Perl 5.28 rebuild --- diff --git a/perl-Encode-IMAPUTF7.spec b/perl-Encode-IMAPUTF7.spec index

nb pushed to perl-Encode-IMAPUTF7 (epel8). "Perl 5.30 rebuild"

Notification time stamped 2021-02-05 21:40:39 UTC From 6cddf4b024ef1efa0cc6339aea717d52ba7abf97 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: May 31 2019 05:01:58 + Subject: Perl 5.30 rebuild --- diff --git a/perl-Encode-IMAPUTF7.spec b/perl-Encode-IMAPUTF7.spec index

nb pushed to perl-Encode-IMAPUTF7 (epel8). "- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_29_Mass_Rebuild (..more)"

Notification time stamped 2021-02-05 21:40:39 UTC From 7765365c6cd4272385f1b7a94885f77a3076899d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Fedora Release Engineering Date: Jul 13 2018 17:12:28 + Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_29_Mass_Rebuild Signed-off-by: Fedora Release

nb pushed to perl-Encode-IMAPUTF7 (epel8). "Tweak .gitignore."

Notification time stamped 2021-02-05 21:40:39 UTC From 0b386f3a26b2d06fe1f1a6b0146b58f91e5b3cff Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jason Tibbitts Date: Nov 14 2016 15:37:42 + Subject: Tweak .gitignore. --- diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index 6cf6477..d981021 100644 --- a/.gitignore +++

nb pushed to perl-Encode-IMAPUTF7 (epel8). "Initial spec and sources import."

Notification time stamped 2021-02-05 21:40:39 UTC From 27bceff70f472202375e19e7d79996a992532666 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jason Tibbitts Date: Nov 11 2016 01:02:24 + Subject: Initial spec and sources import. --- diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index e69de29..6cf6477 100644 ---

nb pushed to perl-Encode-IMAPUTF7 (epel8). "- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_26_Mass_Rebuild"

Notification time stamped 2021-02-05 21:40:39 UTC From d8f8560f4b2b16d69317ba4b4407275925a36693 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Fedora Release Engineering Date: Feb 11 2017 02:53:36 + Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_26_Mass_Rebuild --- diff --git

nb pushed to perl-Encode-IMAPUTF7 (epel8). "perl dependency renamed to perl-interpreter "

Notification time stamped 2021-02-05 21:40:39 UTC From 8d4722e7598a3338c72154d75bec86b3dabc3e5a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Petr Písař Date: Jul 12 2017 12:52:20 + Subject: perl dependency renamed to perl-interpreter

nb pushed to perl-Encode-IMAPUTF7 (epel8). "Perl 5.26 rebuild"

Notification time stamped 2021-02-05 21:40:39 UTC From 842869d5b0a259892784f3dcf0fb0fb6272c00b9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Jun 04 2017 19:32:30 + Subject: Perl 5.26 rebuild --- diff --git a/perl-Encode-IMAPUTF7.spec b/perl-Encode-IMAPUTF7.spec index

Re: Reproducible builds

On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 11:18:40AM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 10:07:33AM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 03:55:33PM +0100, Frédéric Pierret wrote: > > > >be doing it all the time. It's a perfectly good situation to _not_ > > > >optimize. > > > >

Jami, Briar, P2P, etc through telepathy?

In reSIProcate, we did some experiments with telepathy-qt to use GNOME Empathy as front-end. It rests unfinished[1] for anybody who wants to learn the API. Could a similar approach be used for some of the P2P messengers like Jami and Briar? As our reSIProcate attempt is still in such a trivial

Re: Please clarify master vs main vs rawhide branches

On 2/5/21 1:05 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: On 05/02/21 10:08 -0500, Steven A. Falco wrote: I see that the master to main conversion has happened.  I'd like to know the recommended way to deal with that. Currently, I'm doing: git fetch --all git remote prune origin git remote set-head origin

Re: lazarus broken dep?

I'm still thinking on the proper solution. Meanwhile, I submitted a band-aid build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=61412479 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: Pytest 4 in Fedora, let's get rid of it please

On 05. 02. 21 21:11, Kader Miyanyedi wrote: Hello, first of all, I'm sorry about my English. My name is Kader. I am currently a student in computer engineering department from Turkey. I use python but my knowledge of python is not perfect. Mostly I was interested in python/django. I would

Re: Pytest 4 in Fedora, let's get rid of it please

Hello, first of all, I'm sorry about my English. My name is Kader. I am currently a student in computer engineering department from Turkey. I use python but my knowledge of python is not perfect. Mostly I was interested in python/django. I would like to improve my knowledge of Python and help

Re: Reproducible builds

On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 10:07:33AM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 03:55:33PM +0100, Frédéric Pierret wrote: > > >be doing it all the time. It's a perfectly good situation to _not_ > > >optimize. > > > > That was my original remark that pulling a "big" RPM for just one

Re: Status update for the new AAA system

On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 09:49:57AM -, Aurelien Bompard wrote: > > Do you need the compat tree or NIS? slapi-nis and compat tree require > > additional > > resources. You can disable the features with ipa-compat-manage and > > ipa-nis-manage > > commands. You need to disable them on each

Re: Beware: Querying a group's projects on src.fp.o and pagure.io currently broken

On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 6:01 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: > Hi everybody, > > Since the last pagure version was deployed, the API for querying a > group's packages (api/0/group/foo?projects=true) was broken - it is > now paginated, where before it was not: > > https://pagure.io/pagure/issue/5110 > >

Re: Please clarify master vs main vs rawhide branches

On 05/02/21 10:08 -0500, Steven A. Falco wrote: I see that the master to main conversion has happened. I'd like to know the recommended way to deal with that. Currently, I'm doing: git fetch --all git remote prune origin git remote set-head origin -a git checkout main The above sets

CPE Report: 2021-02-05

Hi Everyone, If you would like to see this report and toggle to the section you are most interested in, I would suggest visiting this link https://hackmd.io/8iV7PilARSG68Tqv8CzKOQ?view and use the header bar on your left to skip to where you want to go! ## Initiative FYI Links Initiatives repo

Re: Xen support dead?

On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 2:40 PM PGNet Dev wrote: > > > Actually, the buggy file (/etc/grub.d/20_linux_xen) belongs to the grub2 > > package, so the bug is assigned to a wrong package. > > Not that it matters, but I'd originally assigned it to grub. It was ignored > there as well. > I switched

Beware: Querying a group's projects on src.fp.o and pagure.io currently broken

Hi everybody, Since the last pagure version was deployed, the API for querying a group's packages (api/0/group/foo?projects=true) was broken - it is now paginated, where before it was not: https://pagure.io/pagure/issue/5110 Note that it does not return any error code, but instead just gives

Re: src.fedoraproject.org branch conversion to rawhide/main tomorrow

On Friday, February 5, 2021 3:03:58 PM WET Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > for i in `ls -1` As far as I know there is no need to pass the -1. It should be enough for i in `ls` If the directories have spaces you need other technicalities, that is not the case for our directories. Regards, -- José

Re: src.fedoraproject.org branch conversion to rawhide/main tomorrow

On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 04:03:58PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 03:35:27PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > > > Dne 05. 02. 21 v 12:39 Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a): > > > On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 12:11:45PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > > > > * Kevin Fenzi: > > > > > >

Re: Grub2 patches in Fedora

Am 05.02.21 um 15:03 schrieb Marek Marczykowski-Górecki: I know it's problematic when you run Fedora VM on non-fedora Xen host if you use pvgrub/pygrub - in that case it uses host's grub to parse guest grub.cfg and load the actual kernel. But I'm pretty sure there are other problematic cases

[Bug 1924313] F34FailsToInstall: perl-Astro-FITS-CFITSIO

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1924313 Miro Hrončok changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|---

Re: Grub2 patches in Fedora

> What is the vision for grub2 package in Fedora versus upstream grub? The > huge amount of patches in Fedora's grub (279 at this time) makes it > basically a fork. And indeed many parts are incompatible with upstream > grub, like "increment" module, or BLS, just to name a few. I know it's >

Please clarify master vs main vs rawhide branches

I see that the master to main conversion has happened. I'd like to know the recommended way to deal with that. Currently, I'm doing: git fetch --all git remote prune origin git remote set-head origin -a git checkout main The above sets origin/HEAD to rawhide Question 1: Is that the right

Re: Reproducible builds

On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 03:55:33PM +0100, Frédéric Pierret wrote: > >be doing it all the time. It's a perfectly good situation to _not_ optimize. > > That was my original remark that pulling a "big" RPM for just one file is > not optimal. But as you said, it will probably concern very few amount

Re: src.fedoraproject.org branch conversion to rawhide/main tomorrow

On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 03:35:27PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > Dne 05. 02. 21 v 12:39 Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a): > > On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 12:11:45PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > > > * Kevin Fenzi: > > > > > > > Once the change is completed you will want to checkout rawhide/main > > > >

Re: Reproducible builds

Le 2/5/21 à 3:30 PM, Matthew Miller a écrit : On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 02:21:32PM +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: If you're trying to consume the buildinfo data though, it feels pretty suboptimal to have to pull in the enourmous debuginfo RPM just to get access to a tiny piece of build info

Re: src.fedoraproject.org branch conversion to rawhide/main tomorrow

Dne 05. 02. 21 v 12:39 Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a): On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 12:11:45PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: * Kevin Fenzi: Once the change is completed you will want to checkout rawhide/main instead of master and update/recreate any existing forks you have. See

Re: Reproducible builds

On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 02:21:32PM +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > If you're trying to consume the buildinfo data though, it feels pretty > suboptimal to have to pull in the enourmous debuginfo RPM just to get > access to a tiny piece of build info data. "Suboptimal" is a great word here.

Re: Reproducible builds

On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 01:47:00PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 08:10:28AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 7:03 AM Marek Marczykowski-Górecki > > wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 10:56:43PM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > > > > On

Re: Reproducible builds

On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 01:47:00PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > Is it really worth creating a package for this? The payload could just > as well be implemented as a json file. Wrapping this in a separate > subpackage seems like unnecessary overhead. If we want to expose it in > a

Grub2 patches in Fedora

Hi, What is the vision for grub2 package in Fedora versus upstream grub? The huge amount of patches in Fedora's grub (279 at this time) makes it basically a fork. And indeed many parts are incompatible with upstream grub, like "increment" module, or BLS, just to name a few. I know it's

Fedora-Rawhide-20210205.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Xfce raw-xz armhfp Minimal raw-xz armhfp Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 7 of 43 required tests failed, 5 results missing openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Failed openQA tests: 11/183 (x86_64), 13/124

Re: Reproducible builds

On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 08:10:28AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 7:03 AM Marek Marczykowski-Górecki > wrote: > > > > On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 10:56:43PM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 9:23 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at

Re: Fedora 34 Change: DNF/RPM Copy on Write enablement for all variants (System-Wide Change)

On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 07:01:56PM +, Matthew Almond via devel wrote: > Signature *verification* partially works. Everything to do with > signatures on just the header works (and the header describes the > payload digest). There is one specific area which needs fixed: regular > RPMs are read,

Re: lazarus broken dep?

On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 3:47 AM Artur Frenszek-Iwicki wrote: > Yes, I was gonna post a "Help wanted" message about this to the list, but > as it happens, procrastination got in the way. > > The gist is: In lazarus.spec, we have a "%qt5pas_release" macro, and then > there's "Requires: qt5pas-devel

Re: Xen support dead?

Actually, the buggy file (/etc/grub.d/20_linux_xen) belongs to the grub2 package, so the bug is assigned to a wrong package. Not that it matters, but I'd originally assigned it to grub. It was ignored there as well. I switched it to Xen after I was told in #irc to do so. Too much pushing

Re: Xen support dead?

On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 08:23:06AM -0500, PGNet Dev wrote: > On 2/5/21 8:13 AM, Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 6:31 AM PGNet Dev wrote: > > > > > > Hm. Can't manage to get a fix, a reply, or interest. > > > > > > Is Xen packaging/support abandoned for Fedora? > > > > > > > No.

Re: Xen support dead?

On 2/5/21 8:13 AM, Neal Gompa wrote: On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 6:31 AM PGNet Dev wrote: Hm. Can't manage to get a fix, a reply, or interest. Is Xen packaging/support abandoned for Fedora? No. But the maintainer of Xen in Fedora doesn't pay attention to the devel@ mailing list. You can see

[Bug 1925453] Upgrade perl-IO-Interactive to 1.023

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1925453 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-EPEL-2021-e642bf1199 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-e642bf1199 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are

Re: Xen support dead?

On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 6:31 AM PGNet Dev wrote: > > Hm. Can't manage to get a fix, a reply, or interest. > > Is Xen packaging/support abandoned for Fedora? > No. But the maintainer of Xen in Fedora doesn't pay attention to the devel@ mailing list. You can see it's actively maintained here:

Re: Reproducible builds

On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 7:03 AM Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 10:56:43PM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 9:23 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 12:17:28AM +0100, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >

[Bug 1925453] Upgrade perl-IO-Interactive to 1.023

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1925453 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-EPEL-2021-414bf334ea has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-414bf334ea -- You are receiving this mail because: You are

[Bug 1925453] Upgrade perl-IO-Interactive to 1.023

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1925453 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-9a8c12d672 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-9a8c12d672 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[Bug 1925453] Upgrade perl-IO-Interactive to 1.023

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1925453 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-d2889f585c has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-d2889f585c -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[Bug 1925453] Upgrade perl-IO-Interactive to 1.023

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1925453 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1925450] Upgrade perl-DBIx-Admin-TableInfo to 3.04

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1925450 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-a2fb54e41e has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-a2fb54e41e -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[Bug 1925450] Upgrade perl-DBIx-Admin-TableInfo to 3.04

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1925450 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-fe331fb2ca has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-fe331fb2ca -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[Bug 1925450] Upgrade perl-DBIx-Admin-TableInfo to 3.04

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1925450 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED

Re: Reproducible builds

On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 10:56:43PM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 9:23 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > > On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 12:17:28AM +0100, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote: > > > > > > Does it make sense? > > > > That does make sense to me... and perhaps this fits in with

Re: src.fedoraproject.org branch conversion to rawhide/main tomorrow

On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 12:11:45PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Kevin Fenzi: > > > Once the change is completed you will want to checkout rawhide/main > > instead of master and update/recreate any existing forks you have. > > > > See > >

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20210205.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210204.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210205.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:3 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 2 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 193 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 2.93 MiB Size of dropped packages:0 B

Xen support dead?

Hm. Can't manage to get a fix, a reply, or interest. Is Xen packaging/support abandoned for Fedora? On 2/3/21 12:09 PM, PGNet Dev wrote: F33 on EFI + Xen delays 30+ seconds, sometimes hangs, on boot @ grub2 error, ... Loading Xen 4.14.1 ... error:

Re: src.fedoraproject.org branch conversion to rawhide/main tomorrow

* Kevin Fenzi: > Once the change is completed you will want to checkout rawhide/main > instead of master and update/recreate any existing forks you have. > > See > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GitRepos-master-to-main > for more information. Would it be possible to add the sequence of

[EPEL-devel] Re: how to request access for EPEL-only package which existed in Fedora previously?

On 05. 02. 21 10:11, Felix Schwarz wrote: Hi, I created a review request for python3-configobj which is needed to update certbot in EPEL 7. (certbot now only supports Python 3). The python3-configobj repo was used in Fedora (in ancient history) but I think it can be "reused" to provide an

perl-PDF-API2 license correction

I corrected perl-PDF-API2 license from "LGPLv2+" to "LGPLv2+ and (GPL+ or Artistic) and (MIT or Artistic)". -- Petr signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: Status update for the new AAA system

> Alexander Bokovoy created the feature > https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/issues/5482. Once > implemented you will be able to Kerberos check authentication indicators like > OTP from a > PAM service. Yeah, this seems like the way to go, thanks. > You have a couple of options to speed up migration

Re: Ars claims: Fedora 32 is sluggish

On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 10:03 AM Roberto Ragusa wrote: > > On 2/4/21 9:52 PM, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: > > > considerable lag. In the last 4 or so years I remember issues with > > tracker, gnome-shell, mutter/clutter and friends on specific GPUs, > > default or popular shell extensions and dbus

[Bug 1925463] New: Upgrade perl-Tree-Simple to 1.34

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1925463 Bug ID: 1925463 Summary: Upgrade perl-Tree-Simple to 1.34 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Tree-Simple Assignee: rc040...@freenet.de

Re: Status update for the new AAA system

Hi Aurelien, > - The infra team wants to do a couple things that FreeIPA does not support > out of the box, > like enforcing 2FA for specific services such as sudo, so we need to think > about how we > want to do it. Alexander Bokovoy created the feature

[EPEL-devel] how to request access for EPEL-only package which existed in Fedora previously?

Hi, I created a review request for python3-configobj which is needed to update certbot in EPEL 7. (certbot now only supports Python 3). The python3-configobj repo was used in Fedora (in ancient history) but I think it can be "reused" to provide an EPEL7-only package. Now my review request

Re: Ars claims: Fedora 32 is sluggish

On 2/4/21 9:52 PM, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: considerable lag. In the last 4 or so years I remember issues with tracker, gnome-shell, mutter/clutter and friends on specific GPUs, default or popular shell extensions and dbus services. A recent bug If tracker is enabled the performance drop

[Bug 1925453] New: Upgrade perl-IO-Interactive to 1.023

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1925453 Bug ID: 1925453 Summary: Upgrade perl-IO-Interactive to 1.023 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-IO-Interactive Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com

Re: src.fedoraproject.org branch conversion status

Dne 03. 02. 21 v 23:22 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a): Here's the current status of the branch conversion change: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GitRepos-master-to-main For the record: If you have fedpkg-1.40-1 or older you may hit: Unknown build target: rawhide-candidate. The solution is to

[Bug 1925450] New: Upgrade perl-DBIx-Admin-TableInfo to 3.04

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1925450 Bug ID: 1925450 Summary: Upgrade perl-DBIx-Admin-TableInfo to 3.04 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-DBIx-Admin-TableInfo Assignee:

Re: Help wanted: Multiple packages with different ver-rel from one spec

Dne 04. 02. 21 v 20:19 Fabio Valentini napsal(a): On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 7:24 PM Artur Frenszek-Iwicki wrote: The Lazarus package currently builds three RPMs: "lazarus", which contains the IDE, and the "qt5pas" library, along with "qt5pas-devel". qt5pas is, technically, a separate project

Re: ELN build order

Thinking about this, would it be possible to disable automatic ELN rebuild after side-tag merge? Such packages could be flagged until they are build manually. Of course it would be nice if automation did it properly, but the manual work would be much better then broken ELN. Vít Dne 11. 01.

[Bug 1925321] perl-File-Path-Tiny-1.0 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1925321 --- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-6a0e0ff598 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-6a0e0ff598 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[Bug 1925321] perl-File-Path-Tiny-1.0 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1925321 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1925321] perl-File-Path-Tiny-1.0 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1925321 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

Re: mesa 21.0.0-rc3 making rawhide really unstable?

On Fri, 2021-02-05 at 16:17 +1000, David Airlie wrote: > Has anyone got a backtrace they could put in a bug? I'm not seeing a > crash with X.org here in my test VMs. Hi, I do not see any crash as such, Xorg simply fails to start with: Fatal server error: [32.661] (EE) no screens