Re: Fedora 34 Change: Golang 1.16 (System-Wide Change proposal)

- Original Message - > From: "Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek" > To: "Jakub Cajka" > Cc: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > > Sent: Wednesday, January 6, 2021 11:10:58 AM > Subject: Re: Fedora 34 Change: Golang 1.16 (System

Re: Fedora 34 Change: Golang 1.16 (System-Wide Change proposal)

- Original Message - > From: "Josh Boyer" > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > > Cc: "Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek" > Sent: Tuesday, January 5, 2021 9:45:28 PM > Subject: Re: Fedora 34 Change: Golang 1.16 (System-Wide Change proposal) > > On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 2:40

Re: AArch64 support for container and flatpak builds

- Original Message - > From: "Clement Verna" > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > > Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2020 2:16:26 PM > Subject: Re: AArch64 support for container and flatpak builds > > > > On Thu, 10 Dec

Re: AArch64 support for container and flatpak builds

- Original Message - > From: "Mark O'Brien" > To: devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org, devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2020 11:44:14 AM > Subject: AArch64 support for container and flatpak builds > > All, > We are very happy to announce that we now

Re: [ELN] Cannot build a package in mock on F32

- Original Message - > From: "Pavel Raiskup" > To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Cc: "Ondrej Budai" > Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2020 11:00:31 AM > Subject: Re: [ELN] Cannot build a package in mock on F32 > > On Tuesday, October 13, 2020 9:07:18 AM CEST Ondrej Budai wrote: > >

Re: Include non-RPM content in buildroot

- Original Message - > From: "Fabio Valentini" > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > > Sent: Friday, February 21, 2020 4:46:52 PM > Subject: Re: Include non-RPM content in buildroot > > On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 3:58 PM Martin Sehnoutka wrote: > > > > Hi, > > Hi! > > I

Re: Fedora 32 System-Wide Change proposal: Golang 1.14

- Original Message - > From: "Igor Gnatenko" > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > > Sent: Thursday, January 2, 2020 4:24:44 PM > Subject: Re: Fedora 32 System-Wide Change proposal: Golang 1.14 > > Do we really need to rebuild all thousand of packages given that most

Re: Fedora 32 System-Wide Change proposal: Modules in Non-Modular Buildroot

- Original Message - > From: "Stephen Gallagher" > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > > Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2019 2:41:28 AM > Subject: Re: Fedora 32 System-Wide Change proposal: Modules in Non-Modular > Buildroot > > > > (And how would restricting default

Re: New Go Packaging Guidelines landed in rawhide (koji) today

- Original Message - > From: "Nicolas Mailhot via devel" > To: "Christophe de Dinechin" , "Development discussions > related to Fedora" > > Cc: "Robin Lee" , "nicolas mailhot" > > Sent: Saturday, July 6, 2019 8:39:12 AM > Subject: Re: New Go Packaging Guidelines landed in rawhide

Re: New Go Packaging Guidelines landed in rawhide (koji) today

rawhide (koji) today > > On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 04:39:07AM -0400, Jakub Cajka wrote: > > > F31 change page: > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Adopt_new_Go_Packaging_Guidelines > > > and approval: https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2120 > > > >

Re: New Go Packaging Guidelines landed in rawhide (koji) today

- Original Message - > From: "Nicolas Mailhot" > To: "Jakub Cajka" > Cc: gol...@lists.fedoraproject.org, "Development discussions related to > Fedora" > Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2019 11:23:34 AM > Subject: Re: New Go Packaging Guidel

Re: New Go Packaging Guidelines landed in rawhide (koji) today

- Original Message - > From: "Nicolas Mailhot via devel" > To: gol...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Cc: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org, "Nicolas > Mailhot" > Sent: Saturday, June 8, 2019 3:45:20 PM > Subject: New Go Packaging Guidelines landed in rawhide

Re: Fedora 31 Self-Contained Change proposal: Adopt new Go Packaging Guidelines

t the > [[ More_Go_packaging|current practices ]] from the Go SIG. As a result of new > RPM macros developed by [[User:nim| Nicolas Mailhot]], the Go SIG wishes to > formally adopt new Go Packaging Guidelines, which aim at automation, > reliability > and simplicity. > > == Owner ==

Re: New Golang Packaging Guidelines: Feedback needed and appreciated

- Original Message - > From: "Robert-André Mauchin" > To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Cc: "nicolas mailhot" , > gol...@lists.fedoraproject.org, jca...@redhat.com, "Discussion > of RPM packaging standards and practices for Fedora" > > Sent: Friday, March 22, 2019 7:46:23 PM >

Re: Deciding on Fedora Go (Golang) packaging future

- Original Message - > From: "Nicolas Mailhot" > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > , gol...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Sent: Monday, March 18, 2019 8:58:39 PM > Subject: Re: Deciding on Fedora Go (Golang) packaging future > > L

Re: Deciding on Fedora Go (Golang) packaging future

- Original Message - > From: "Robert-André Mauchin" > To: gol...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Sent: Sunday, March 17, 2019 3:36:47 PM > Subject: Re: Deciding on Fedora Go (Golang) packaging future > > On dimanche 17 mars 2019 09:29:28 CET Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > > Le dimanche 17 mars

Re: Ursa Major (modules in buildroot) enablement

> Please do not drag Go into this if you want to handwave Go away > problems. Yes modules will be useful in Go but only to blow away in EPEL > the rotten Go codebase RHEL ships. > > But anyway, since you referred to GO. > > Go is the perfect example of why bundling as a general approach does not

Re: PSA: builds using forge macros with tags broken on rawhide

- Original Message - > From: "Nicolas Mailhot" > To: "Robert-André Mauchin" , jca...@redhat.com > Sent: Monday, October 22, 2018 5:32:55 PM > Subject: Re: PSA: builds using forge macros with tags broken on rawhide > > Le 2018-10-22 16:52, Nicolas Mailhot a écrit : > > >>

Re: PSA: builds using forge macros with tags broken on rawhide

- Original Message - > From: "Nicolas Mailhot" > To: "Jakub Cajka" > Cc: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > > Sent: Monday, October 22, 2018 1:55:02 PM > Subject: Re: PSA: builds using forge macros with tags broken on rawhi

Re: PSA: builds using forge macros with tags broken on rawhide

- Original Message - > From: "Nicolas Mailhot" > To: "Robert-André Mauchin" , "Development > discussions related to Fedora" > > Cc: "Nicolas Mailhot" > Sent: Monday, October 22, 2018 10:00:40 AM > Subject: Re: PSA: builds using forge macros with tags broken on rawhide > > Le lundi

Re: PSA: builds using forge macros with tags broken on rawhide

- Original Message - > From: "Nicolas Mailhot" > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > > Cc: "Fabio Valentini" > Sent: Monday, October 15, 2018 11:56:45 AM > Subject: Re: PSA: builds using forge macros with tags broken on rawhide > > Le 2018-10-15 09:09, Fabio Valentini a

Re: Golang SIG primary goals?

- Original Message - > From: "Nicolas Mailhot" > To: gol...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Cc: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2018 10:37:06 AM > Subject: Re: Golang SIG primary goals? > > Hi, > > Just to get people thinking before the meet… > > IMHO, the core

Re: Golang SIG primary goals?

- Original Message - > From: "Robert-André Mauchin" > To: gol...@lists.fedoraproject.org, devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Sent: Friday, August 24, 2018 4:42:03 PM > Subject: Golang SIG primary goals? > > Hey guys and gals, > > Can we start to discuss this SIG goals? What each of you

Re: Golang SIG for Fedora

- Original Message - > From: "Michael Cronenworth" > To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Sent: Friday, August 10, 2018 8:11:07 PM > Subject: Re: Golang SIG for Fedora > > On 08/09/2018 05:12 AM, Jakub Cajka wrote: > > I have create

Re: Golang SIG for Fedora

- Original Message - > From: "Ricardo Martinelli Oliveira" > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > > Sent: Monday, August 6, 2018 3:47:44 PM > Subject: Re: Golang SIG for Fedora > > I think we already have tools for that. What I expect with the SIG is > something that

Re: Golang SIG for Fedora

- Original Message - > From: "Jakub Cajka" > To: "nicolas mailhot" , "zebob m" > , "ricardo martinelli oliveira" > , "Jan Chaloupka" > , "Derek Parker" > , "Paul Gier" > Cc: gol...@lists.

Re: Golang SIG for Fedora

Thank you very much for your interest. I will now create SIG wiki page(and let you know to add yourself there), IRC channel(#fedora-golang, making it official). I believe we can use gol...@lists.fedoraproject.org as the mailing list. And as it has been suggested to the container SIG I will

Re: Golang SIG for Fedora

enworth wrote: > > On 07/27/2018 08:28 AM, Jakub Cajka wrote: > > >There are few big outstanding issues that needs to be solved that need > > >more than individual work, most notably the Go packaging guidelines > > >and tooling. I think that should be one

Golang SIG for Fedora

Hello, it seems that lately there has been more people maintaining Go package in the Fedora. I would like to propose to join up and form Go SIG so we could better co-ordinate and collaborate on the packaging issues and general developer experience. There are few big outstanding issues

Re: [CoreOS] Starting a Container SIG

- Original Message - > From: "Clement Verna" > To: "atomic-devel" , "Development discussions > related to Fedora" > , cor...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2018 7:09:39 PM > Subject: [CoreOS] Starting a Container SIG > > Greeting all, > > The container effort in

Re: Mass rebuild, mass Golang packages failures

- Original Message - > From: "Robert-André Mauchin" > To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2018 2:52:05 PM > Subject: Re: Mass rebuild, mass Golang packages failures > > On mardi 17 juillet 2018 14:34:49 CEST you wrote: > > Hello, > > > > > > Since the mass

Re: Mass rebuild, mass Golang packages failures

- Original Message - > From: "Robert-André Mauchin" > To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, jca...@redhat.com > Cc: jchal...@redhat.com > Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2018 2:34:49 PM > Subject: Mass rebuild, mass Golang packages failures > > Hello, > > > Since the mass rebuild and maybe

Re: In the OpenShift Origin/CRI-O/Kubernetes effort we have a dilemma.

- Original Message - > From: "Nicolas Mailhot" > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > > Cc: dwa...@redhat.com, mpa...@redhat.com, run...@redhat.com > Sent: Saturday, June 30, 2018 12:46:28 PM > Subject: Re: In the OpenShift Origin/CRI-O/Kubernetes effort we have a >

Re: F29 Self Contained Change: Origin 3.10

- Original Message - > From: "Stephen Gallagher" > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > > Cc: devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2018 2:05:38 PM > Subject: Re: F29 Self Contained Change: Origin 3.10 > > > > On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 8:02

Re: Proposed Fedora packaging guideline: More Go packaging

ing > standards and practices for Fedora" <packag...@lists.fedoraproject.org> > Sent: Tuesday, February 6, 2018 7:34:03 PM > Subject: Re: Proposed Fedora packaging guideline: More Go packaging > > > > - Mail original - > De: "Jakub Cajka" >

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: Re: Proposed Fedora packaging guideline: More Go packaging

standards > and practices for Fedora" > <packag...@lists.fedoraproject.org> > Sent: Monday, February 5, 2018 3:27:01 PM > Subject: Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: Re: Proposed Fedora packaging > guideline: More Go packaging > > > > - Mail original - > De:

Re: Proposed Fedora packaging guideline: More Go packaging

ing > standards and practices for Fedora" <packag...@lists.fedoraproject.org> > Sent: Monday, February 5, 2018 4:48:31 PM > Subject: Re: Proposed Fedora packaging guideline: More Go packaging > > > > - Mail original - > De: "Jakub Cajka" > > Hi

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: Re: Proposed Fedora packaging guideline: More Go packaging

ing > standards and practices for Fedora" <packag...@lists.fedoraproject.org> > Sent: Monday, February 5, 2018 12:16:14 PM > Subject: [Fedora-packaging] Re: Re: Proposed Fedora packaging > guideline: More Go packaging > > > > - Mail original - > De: &quo

Re: Proposed Fedora packaging guideline: More Go packaging

- Original Message - > From: "Robert-André Mauchin" > To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Cc: gol...@lists.fedoraproject.org, "Discussion of RPM packaging standards > and practices for Fedora" > > Sent: Friday, February 2, 2018

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: Proposed Fedora packaging guideline: More Go packaging

ing > standards and practices for Fedora" <packag...@lists.fedoraproject.org> > Sent: Saturday, February 3, 2018 4:27:36 PM > Subject: Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: Proposed Fedora packaging > guideline: More Go packaging > > > De: "Jakub Cajka" > > Hi Jakub >

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: Proposed Fedora packaging guideline: More Go packaging

ing > standards and practices for Fedora" <packag...@lists.fedoraproject.org> > Sent: Thursday, February 1, 2018 4:24:52 PM > Subject: Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: Proposed Fedora packaging > guideline: More Go packaging > > > De: "Jakub Cajka" > > >

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: Proposed Fedora packaging guideline: More Go packaging

ing > standards and practices for Fedora" <packag...@lists.fedoraproject.org> > Sent: Thursday, February 1, 2018 2:51:13 PM > Subject: Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: Proposed Fedora packaging > guideline: More Go packaging > > > De: "Jakub Cajka" > > Hi J

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: Proposed Fedora packaging guideline: More Go packaging

- Original Message - > From: "nicolas mailhot" > To: gol...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Cc: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > , "Discussion of RPM packaging > standards and practices for Fedora"

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: Proposed Fedora packaging guideline: More Go packaging

- Original Message - > From: "Owen Taylor" > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > > Cc: gol...@lists.fedoraproject.org, "Discussion of RPM packaging standards > and practices for Fedora" >

Re: Re: Proposed Fedora packaging guideline: More Go packaging

- Original Message - > From: "nicolas mailhot" > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > > Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2018 7:45:06 PM > Subject: Re: Re: Proposed Fedora packaging guideline: More Go packaging > >

Re: Proposed Fedora packaging guideline: More Go packaging

- Original Message - > From: "Jason L Tibbitts III" > To: "nicolas mailhot" > Cc: gol...@lists.fedoraproject.org, "Development discussions related to > Fedora" , > "Discussion of RPM packaging standards

Re: Proposed Fedora packaging guideline: More Go packaging

- Original Message - > From: "nicolas mailhot" > To: "Jason L Tibbitts III" > Cc: gol...@lists.fedoraproject.org, "Development discussions related to > Fedora" , > "Discussion of RPM packaging standards

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: Proposed Fedora packaging guideline: More Go packaging

- Original Message - > From: "Marcin Dulak" > To: "Discussion of RPM packaging standards and practices for Fedora" > > Cc: gol...@lists.fedoraproject.org, "Development discussions related to > Fedora"

Re: F28 System Wide Change: Golang 1.10a

- Original Message - > From: "nicolas mailhot" <nicolas.mail...@laposte.net> > To: "Jakub Cajka" <jca...@redhat.com> > Cc: gol...@lists.fedoraproject.org, "Development discussions related to > Fedora" <devel@lists.fedor

Re: F28 System Wide Change: Golang 1.10a

- Original Message - > From: "nicolas mailhot" <nicolas.mail...@laposte.net> > To: gol...@lists.fedoraproject.org, "Jakub Cajka" <jca...@redhat.com>, > "Development discussions related to Fedora" > <devel@lists.fedoraproject.o

[EPEL-devel] Golang update

Hello, I have just submitted bodhi update for CVE-2017-15041 and CVE-2017-15042, https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-f7e4cbd529. If you maintain any package or application using "net/smtp" stdlib package, rebuild of your package/application is strongly recommended using

Re: Any plans for completing the go 1.9 rebase (to stable 1.9)?

- Original Message - > From: "nicolas mailhot" > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > > Sent: Tuesday, October 3, 2017 11:41:09 AM > Subject: Re: Any plans for completing the go 1.9 rebase (to stable 1.9)? > >

Re: Any plans for completing the go 1.9 rebase (to stable 1.9)?

- Original Message - > From: "Fabio Valentini" > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > > Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2017 8:29:24 PM > Subject: Any plans for completing the go 1.9 rebase (to stable 1.9)? > >

Re: Golang in PPC64

- Original Message - > From: "Gianluca Sforna" > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > > Sent: Monday, July 31, 2017 10:02:55 AM > Subject: Golang in PPC64 > > So I am getting the following becasue arduino-builder is a

Re: Fedora 27 mass rebuild at risk

- Original Message - > From: "Carlos O'Donell" <car...@redhat.com> > To: "Florian Weimer" <fwei...@redhat.com>, "Development discussions related > to Fedora" > <devel@lists.fedoraproject.org>, "Jakub Jelinek" <ja

Re: F27 System Wide Change: Golang 1.9

- Original Message - > From: "Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski" <domi...@greysector.net> > To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2017 1:40:35 PM > Subject: Re: F27 System Wide Change: Golang 1.9 > > On Thursday, 22 Jun

Re: F27 System Wide Change: Golang 1.9

- Original Message - > From: "Tony Breeds" > To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2017 2:03:44 AM > Subject: Re: F27 System Wide Change: Golang 1.9 > > On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 10:06:17AM +0200, Jan Kurik wrote: > > > > > Along with

Re: Fedora Developer Portal release

- Original Message - > From: "Jakub Cajka" <jca...@redhat.com> > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > <devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> > Sent: Wednesday, March 1, 2017 11:56:02 AM > Subject: Re: Fedora Developer Portal

Re: Fedora Developer Portal release

- Original Message - > From: "Petr Hracek" > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > > Sent: Wednesday, March 1, 2017 10:37:09 AM > Subject: Fwd: Fedora Developer Portal release > > Hi Fedora developers, > > we released

Re: F26 System Wide Change: Golang 1.8

h the end of the year, JC > > > -- Původní zpráva -- > Od: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbys...@in.waw.pl> > Komu: Development discussions related to Fedora > <devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> > Datum: 13. 12. 2016 19:35:01 > Předmět: Re: F26 System Wide Cha

Re: F26 System Wide Change: Golang 1.8

- Original Message - > From: jfi...@fedoraproject.org > To: jca...@redhat.com > Cc: devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org, "Development discussions related > to Fedora" > > Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2016 6:17:23 AM > Subject: Re: F26 System Wide

Re: F26 System Wide Change: Golang 1.8

- Original Message - > From: "Stephen Gallagher" <sgall...@redhat.com> > To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Sent: Monday, December 12, 2016 4:09:41 PM > Subject: Re: F26 System Wide Change: Golang 1.8 > > On 12/12/2016 10:03 AM, Jakub Cajka

Re: F26 System Wide Change: Golang 1.8

- Original Message - > From: "Stephen Gallagher" > To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Sent: Monday, December 12, 2016 3:29:09 PM > Subject: Re: F26 System Wide Change: Golang 1.8 > > On 12/12/2016 06:27 AM, Jan Kurik wrote: > > = Proposed System Wide Change:

[EPEL-devel] Golang 1.7 in el6

Hello, I have updated golang to version go1.7.1 in el6. As there were several outstanding issues with the old version(and it is no longer supported by upstream) and go1.7 brings several improvements(see https://tip.golang.org/doc/go1.7). It is now submitted as update in bodhi(no build-root

Re: F24 System Wide Change: Golang 1.6

- Original Message - > From: "Florian Weimer" > To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2016 9:46:15 AM > Subject: Re: F24 System Wide Change: Golang 1.6 > > On 01/13/2016 12:56 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 5:30 PM,

Re: packaging golang guidelines (like etcd, consul)

- Original Message - > From: "Adam Goode" > To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Cc: "Matthew Miller" > Sent: Friday, November 6, 2015 3:47:42 PM > Subject: Re: packaging golang guidelines (like etcd, consul) > > On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at

Re: Docker and gcc-go

- Original Message - From: Jakub Cajka jca...@redhat.com To: Development discussions related to Fedora devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, p...@lists.fedoraproject.org, s3...@lists.fedoraproject.org Sent: Thursday, April 2, 2015 4:50:15 PM Subject: Docker and gcc-go Hello, as gcc5

Docker and gcc-go

Hello, as gcc5 is in Fedora22+ it is possible to build docker and its BRs using gcc-go with small changes to the spec files. Not only on x86_64, but also on ppc64le, even on s390x(sharkcz tried) and ppc64. It crashes/hangs sometimes(I'm looking in to it) but works on x86_64 and ppc64(le)

Re: I wrote small script to list FTBFS koji entries

As my work usually is around fixing packages which failed to build on AArch64 I spend lot of time with Koji. Today I started writing script which has to list all current FTBFS entries from selected Koji instance - kind like [1] does but with few extras: - no packages which got built