Skip, I agree with you.
My considerations to prefer in HF Contestia 250/4 format is related to
the idea to find some compromise for bpsk31 folk, Olivia light users,
and rtty folk when the propagation is not enough good for bpsk31 and rtty.
So Cnt 250/4 with 39wpm is the first alternative for
Jaak,
I agree with your reasoning in testing Contestia 250/4. I also think
that a good approach would be for EVERYONE to use RSID so a station can
shift the QSO mode according to typing preference or propagation
conditions, as determined at either end of the QSO. Multipsk, DM780, and
Fldigi
: Re: [digitalradio] Contestia 250 - new concept for usage
Jaak,
I agree with your reasoning in testing Contestia 250/4. I also think that a
good approach would be for EVERYONE to use RSID so a station can shift the QSO
mode according to typing preference or propagation conditions
Hi Patrick,
Yahoo reports there is no RSID group. Where should I request additional
RSID codes?
73 - Skip KH6TY
Patrick Lindecker wrote:
Hello Skip,
About Contestia:
I think this mode is a better compromise between robustness and speed
than Olivia (too much robustness) and RTTYM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, May 10, 2010 10:04 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Contestia 250 - new concept for usage
Hi Patrick,
Yahoo reports there is no RSID group. Where should I request additional RSID
codes?
73 - Skip KH6TY
Patrick Lindecker wrote
-
*From:* KH6TY mailto:kh...@comcast.net
*To:* digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
mailto:digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
*Sent:* Monday, May 10, 2010 10:04 PM
*Subject:* Re: [digitalradio] Contestia 250 - new concept for usage
Hi Patrick,
Yahoo reports there is no RSID group. Where
mailto:digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
*Sent:* Monday, May 10, 2010 10:04 PM
*Subject:* Re: [digitalradio] Contestia 250 - new concept for usage
Hi Patrick,
Yahoo reports there is no RSID group. Where should I request
additional RSID codes?
73 - Skip KH6TY
Patrick Lindecker
Hi Jaak,
Great idea to start a long test of Contestia 250/4!
Perhaps Contestia 250/8 can also be compared in actual practice to
Contestia 250/4. Contestia 250/8 is slower (at 29 wpm), but decodes 2 dB
deeper into the noise, which may be important when there is QSB (fading)
and the signal is
