I use a CHEAP usb sound card adaptor ( 8 EUROS) on one of my old
Dell laptops which has no soundcard sucessfully for pskmail/puppy linux.
Rein PA0R
I would be interested to know if Linux even supports these cheap USB sound
devices? I did run Linux in the shack for a while and unfortunately
g4ilo wrote:
I would be interested to know if Linux even supports these cheap USB sound
devices? I did run Linux in the shack for a while and unfortunately sold one
of the original RigExpert devices because it wasn't usable under Linux and at
the time I though I wouldn't revert back to
On 08/14/2010 02:15 PM, g4ilo wrote:
Well, that isn't my experience. Regardless of the chip set used, it's the
entire product including the drivers that will determine the performance.
My suspicion is that these devices run at a fixed sampling rate, and that
resampling to the rate requested
Yes the 11K sample rate may be a problem with the 'new' time critical
modes, wspr used to have a sample rate problem where the card rate reduced
the 'tx' time and caused problems with sync frames , the othere week while
running Ros MF-1/7 on 500 Khz , local decodesd where scrabled
I had one that looks exactly like that though it was sold under another name,
and I could not decode 300baud packet at all with it. When used to play back
recordings of very weak EME CW all I could hear was band noise.
I did try it on my Echolink node for a bit with no apparent problems. So my
lør, 14 08 2010 kl. 13:57 +, skrev g4ilo:
I had one that looks exactly like that though it was sold under another name,
and I could not decode 300baud packet at all with it. When used to play back
recordings of very weak EME CW all I could hear was band noise.
I did try it on my
Well, that isn't my experience. Regardless of the chip set used, it's the
entire product including the drivers that will determine the performance.
My suspicion is that these devices run at a fixed sampling rate, and that
resampling to the rate requested by the software is carried out by the
I hadn't heard of this software.
I have had two of these one pound USB eBay sound devices. One was so poor you
could see the noise it generated on the waterfall. I tossed it.
The second one I bought to use for computer audio so I could free up the
on-board sound card for digimodes. After a
lør, 14 08 2010 kl. 18:15 +, skrev g4ilo:
Well, that isn't my experience. Regardless of the chip set used, it's the
entire product including the drivers that will determine the performance.
My suspicion is that these devices run at a fixed sampling rate, and that
resampling to the
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Peter Frenning pe...@... wrote:
The Signalink USB (which I recommend myself with the caveats on my
homepage), uses one of the same Cheap chips used by the low cost general
purpose adapters, in this case the USB Audio Codec. As a class of
devices you
Thanks for the link ,
G..
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, GregCT n1...@... wrote:
This is the one I use, the CreativeMedia X-Fi. Its a little bit larger that
today's standard 'thumb' drives, but does double as one. Works well with the
rigblaster as well as other 'standard'
11 matches
Mail list logo
