Just keep the FCC out of this. They do will not deal with such issues. If
pushed, the out come will not be pretty. This was discussed at Dayton a few
years out. Basically we either self police or risk extinction.
On 7/12/10 5:00 PM, Rein A rein...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
Dear
The FCC never said anything that was a commitment. A staff member wrote a
very non committal letter basically hoping you would go away. This FCC stuff
is silly.
On 7/12/10 5:33 PM, KH6TY kh...@comcast.net wrote:
Unless there is spread spectrum in ROS you cannot use it. Of
sorry, my typo. It's in 97.3. (b)(9)
- Original Message -
From: Lester Veenstra les...@veenstras.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2010 12:38:40 AM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central
Subject: RE: [digitalradio] Re: Moving ROS forward in the USA?
SS
-Original Message-
From: W2XJ w...@w2xj.net
Sent: Jul 12, 2010 6:24 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: AW: [digitalradio] Re: Moving ROS forward in the USA?
The FCC never said anything that was a commitment. A staff member wrote a
very non committal letter basically hoping you
No, the problem is that the spread spectrum variants are mixed in with
the others, all inside the ROS program, so any overall approval of ROS,
which undiniably includes the non spread-spectrum modes, would
accidentally approve the spread-spectrum modes also. I'm sure that the
FCC is not that
Sigi,
Have to agree with you here.
Since Spread Spectrum is not authorized in the US below 220MHz, and since
CHIP 64/128 is Spread Spectrum, no one in the US can use MultiPSK since it
includes CHIP??? Well, of course, that isn't the case. Logic would have
to prevail, but with the negativity
...@gmail.com
Sent: Jul 12, 2010 7:25 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Moving ROS forward in the USA?
Sigi,
Have to agree with you here.
Since Spread Spectrum is not authorized in the US below 220MHz, and since
CHIP 64/128 is Spread Spectrum, no one in the US can
: Moving ROS forward in the USA?
Sigi,
Have to agree with you here.
Since Spread Spectrum is not authorized in the US below 220MHz, and since
CHIP 64/128 is Spread Spectrum, no one in the US can use MultiPSK since it
includes CHIP??? Well, of course, that isn't the case. Logic would
: [digitalradio] Re: Moving ROS forward in the USA?
No, the problem is that the spread spectrum variants are mixed in with
the others, all inside the ROS program, so any overall approval of ROS,
which undiniably includes the non spread-spectrum modes, would
accidentally approve the spread-spectrum
7:19 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: AW: [digitalradio] Re: Moving ROS forward in the USA?
That would mean if you would implement ros or similar in a multimode soft
like multipsk or dm780 you would not be allowed to use it (the whole soft)
in us ??? I think if only a part of the soft
Unless there is spread spectrum in ROS you cannot use it. Of course, you
can use the part that is not spread spectrum, but the FCC is not going
to issue a blanket approval for ROS if any part of it is spread
spectrum. They are not interested in issuing approvals for programs
anyway. They just
I was begging onb my knees that jose will Stopp the autospotting cause that
made a lot of trouble
I said that we all should stop the adif in a firewall . maybe THAT will
bring jose to think
But if he has made a decision there is almost no way to change his thoughts
I do not know if boycott will
, ROS is illegal to
use, so
why should we getting involved?
73 Rein W6SZ
-Original Message-
From: Siegfried Jackstien siegfried.jackstien@
Sent: Jul 12, 2010 7:19 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: AW: [digitalradio] Re: Moving ROS forward
I was contacted by the person. I did not initiate the contact. I have
had dealings with the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau as a result of
a petition I amde and I guess I have earned a little measure of respect
and trust by some of them. I have been asked not to identify anyone, so
please
not using it is the right thing for me to do.
Jim - K6JM
- Original Message -
From: AA0OI
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, July 12, 2010 1:51 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Moving ROS forward in the USA?
HI:
I Just have one question... HOW THE HELL
Hear, hear
rgrds
Craig
kq6i
-Original Message-
From: AA0OI [mailto:aa...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Monday, July 12, 2010 2:52 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Moving ROS forward in the USA?
HI:
I Just have one question... HOW THE HELL OLD ARE YOU PEOPLE
rgrds
Craig
kq6i
-Original Message-
From: AA0OI [mailto:aa...@...]
Sent: Monday, July 12, 2010 2:52 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Moving ROS forward in the USA?
HI:
I Just have one question... HOW THE HELL OLD ARE YOU PEOPLE
rgrds
Craig
kq6i
-Original Message-
From: AA0OI [mailto:aa...@...]
Sent: Monday, July 12, 2010 2:52 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Moving ROS forward in the USA?
HI:
I Just have one question... HOW THE HELL OLD ARE YOU PEOPLE
I have been followed this character Ros from the start. Sorry to say ,
but I'm not surprised at all . This fits in with his odd but fascinating
personality.
LA5VNA Steinar
On 12.07.2010 23:38, Siegfried Jackstien wrote:
I was begging onb my knees that jose will Stopp the autospotting cause
: [digitalradio] Re: Moving ROS forward in the USA?
Greg is using ROS. I have logged him.
Of course he is living in the North West far away from the government.
And Graig, I did not suggest an nice older person to go and ask.
That were others who wanted it to die.
73 Rein W6sz
--- In digitalradio
...@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of bg...@comcast.net
Sent: Monday, July 12, 2010 11:49 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Moving ROS forward in the USA?
SS is defined in 97.1. ..Brent, KE4MZ
___
21 matches
Mail list logo
