Has anyone else tried to characterize the SignaLinkUSB frequency
response and S/N properties?
I Have, and, to put it mildly, I'm underwhelmed. Compared to my old
homebrew interface combined with an aged SoundBlaster16 PCI it sucks as
far as pure data is concerned (I have spectralab dumps to
QUOTE
The real interesting question here is: how important is this in real
life? Both interfaces work fine doing everyday PSK31, RTTY, SSTV etc,
but how critical does it become when working signals near the detection
limit as in WSJT JT65, FSK441 and very weak HF PSK31?
/QUOTE
This is something
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 6:11 AM, Peter G. Viscarola [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now, in terms of S/N ratio... I find it hard to believe that quieter
isn't better no matter how you look at it.
But at what point does it become insignificant? I've heard of people
using low-noise preamps on
--- On Wed, 9/3/08, Russell Hltn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Russell Hltn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] SignaLinkUSB freq response and S/N
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Date: Wednesday, September 3, 2008, 1:29 PM
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 6:11 AM, Peter G. Viscarola
