On Sunday 13 January 2008 08:15:45 pm John Becker, WØJAB wrote:
The anti-automatic and anti-everything-that-is-not-PSK31
hams have a very hard time understanding what the rest are doing.
Some of us are just ant-Bully In The Neighborhood.
You simply refuse to recognize that some modes are a
Hello Bonnie,
Thanks for the reply.
It just seemed pretty convoluted; and, at best, nebulous.
To be honest I have never heard anyone complain about soundings, but I
may miss a lot. Compared to some best-not-be-mentioned systems, ALE
operations have not shown up on my qrm map.
73,
Bill N9DSJ
Look at it this way - NO transmissions without listening first, either ALE
soundings, beacons, or mailboxes of any kind, are permissible on the
*shared* HF amateur bands, except in designated beacon areas or the
automatic subbands ( where it is presumed by the FCC to occur, since
unattended
This is getting ridiculous! It takes me nearly 10 seconds to say
This is AA5J Is the frequency in use?
expeditionradio wrote:
This is simply childish backlash directed at me personally because I
opposed the Digital Stone Age Petition. It really has nothing at all
to do with HFLINK or ALE. It will go away.
Bonnie KQ6XA
Actually, what is childish is the never-ending assertion by Winlink
Exactly... they *just* don't get it frown
Bill KA8VIT
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 08:22:37 -0500
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: Trouble at mill RTTY contesters war with HFlink
Look at it this way - NO transmissions without
Bill N9DSJ wrote:
Hello Bonnie,
Thanks for the reply.
It just seemed pretty convoluted; and, at best, nebulous.
To be honest I have never heard anyone complain about
soundings, but I may miss a lot. Compared to some
best-not-be-mentioned systems, ALE operations have not
shown up on my
At 08:14 AM 1/13/2008, you wrote:
Twice in the last seven days
I have had QSOs disrupted by a Pactor Winlink station firing up on top
of my QSO. Fortunately, both times I turned the power way up (from
about 40 watts to 200 watts) and we were able to work through it.
Roger - how do you know
At 08:05 AM 1/13/2008, you wrote:
This is getting ridiculous! It takes me nearly 10 seconds to say
This is AA5J Is the frequency in use?
In what mode?
John Becker, WØJAB wrote:
At 08:14 AM 1/13/2008, you wrote:
Twice in the last seven days I have had QSOs disrupted by a Pactor
Winlink station firing up on top of my QSO. Fortunately, both times
I turned the power way up (from about 40 watts to 200 watts) and we
were able to work
Comments in line
Your problem, John, is that you are unable to stick to an argument of
the issues. Instead, everything becomes personal with you as evidenced
by the above ad hominem remarks. Disappointing.
Wrong again Roger.
I do pactor as well as RTTY and Amtor.
I can copy each of them
Hard to discern what is actually happening; seems like a tempest in a
teapot.
73,
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Andrew O'Brien
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After Tony Blair has solved the Israel-Palestine issue, he may be
needed to address those old fashioned RTTY folks who
(Elaine) Gibbons
WA6UBE / AAR9JA
http://www.qrz.com/wa6ube
_
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Bill McLaughlin
Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2008 4:42 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: Trouble at mill RTTY contesters
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Bill McLaughlin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hard to discern what is actually happening; seems like a tempest in a
teapot.
73,
Bill N9DSJ
Hi Bill,
This is simply childish backlash directed at me personally because I
opposed the Digital Stone Age
Or This Was :)
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Patricia \(Elaine\) Gibbons
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's the way I look at it, Bill ...
soapbox
A sounding message is simply the station's callsign as the ALE ID,
and soundings are only done if the station has an operator
15 matches
Mail list logo
