On Tuesday, April 25, 2023 2:27:18 PM EDT Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Tuesday, March 28, 2023 4:15:04 AM EDT Barry Leiba wrote:
> > I raised this issue in the DMARC session in Vienna, and have let it
> > sit for a while so as not to derail other discussion. As we're pretty
> > close to finished
I was not proposing what other people should do, nor was I proposing a
standards change. I was just observing that we always have choices (with
supporting software.)
In this case, if a remote correspondent cannot do acceptable TLS
encryption, then the local correspondent always has the option
Douglas,
In general, you can’t impose or mandate TLS under PORT 25 unsolicited,
unauthenticated sessions. You can do this with ESMTP AUTH a.k.a SUBMISSION
Protocol (RFC6409) which is Port 587. Under this port, you can mandate more
Authentication/Authorization and mail format correctness than
I would like to propose updates to the DMARCbis documentation, specifically for
Section 4.4.3 and a new Appendix A.8. Please find the suggested revisions
below. Your input would be greatly appreciated. It is just a starting point.
Proposed update for Section 4.4.3:
4.4.3. Alignment and
On 4/28/2023 5:19 AM, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
> On Sun 02/Apr/2023 20:13:48 +0200 Scott Kitterman wrote:
>> Mailing list changes to ameliorate damage due to DMARC are in no
way an improvement. Absent DMARC, they would not be needed at all.
>
> +1
In my view, when an incomplete protocol is
On Friday, April 28, 2023 3:57:55 AM EDT Alessandro Vesely wrote:
> On Fri 28/Apr/2023 05:14:16 +0200 Jesse Thompson wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 27, 2023, at 9:54 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> >> On April 28, 2023 2:49:48 AM UTC, Jesse Thompson
wrote:
> >>>On Thu, Apr 27, 2023, at 9:40 PM, Jesse
On Sun 02/Apr/2023 20:13:48 +0200 Scott Kitterman wrote:
Mailing list changes to ameliorate damage due to DMARC are in no way an
improvement. Absent DMARC, they would not be needed at all.
+1
Best
Ale
--
___
dmarc mailing list
On Thu 27/Apr/2023 22:49:31 +0200 Scott Kitterman wrote:
On April 27, 2023 4:02:32 PM UTC, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
On Wed 26/Apr/2023 13:21:33 +0200 Scott Kitterman wrote:
On April 26, 2023 8:08:39 AM UTC, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
On Tue 25/Apr/2023 20:27:18 +0200 Scott Kitterman wrote:
On Fri 28/Apr/2023 05:14:16 +0200 Jesse Thompson wrote:
On Thu, Apr 27, 2023, at 9:54 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
On April 28, 2023 2:49:48 AM UTC, Jesse Thompson wrote:
On Thu, Apr 27, 2023, at 9:40 PM, Jesse Thompson wrote:
On Thu, Apr 27, 2023, at 10:44 AM, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
Also,
