On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 11:04 AM Alessandro Vesely wrote:
> On Thu 14/Mar/2024 15:38:23 +0100 Todd Herr wrote:
> > To summarize this thread, I see three nits, all of which have been added
> to
> > issue 133:
> >
> [snip]
> >
> > 3. Section 5.3., General Record Format, update the description of
On Thu 14/Mar/2024 15:38:23 +0100 Todd Herr wrote:
To summarize this thread, I see three nits, all of which have been added to
issue 133:
1. Section 5.4, Formal Definition, reword the comments for dmarc-uri to be:
; "URI" is imported from [RFC3986];
; commas (ASCII
mutations or a
> more generic one such as :
>
> dmarc-fo = dmarc-fo-value *(":" dmarc-fo-value)
> dmarc-fo-value = "0" / "1" / "d" / "s"
>
>
>
> Olivier
>
> --
> *De: *"Tim Wicinski&
ort.
>
> However, with the current ABNF, we could only ask for "DMARC failure report"
> or ("DKIM failure report" and/or "SPF failure report")
>
> Shouldn't we have an ANBF rule with all the possible permutations or a more
> generic one such
On Sat, Mar 9, 2024 at 4:00 PM Tim Wicinski wrote:
> Just picking over the ABNF with my checks, some Qs
>
> dmarc-version = "v" equals %s"DMARC1
>
>
> I believe the "%s" should be dropped
>
I think this was intentional; we want "v=DMARC1" to be valid and "v=dmarc1"
to be not valid. Unless I'm
On 10/03/2024 05:34, Tim Wicinski wrote:
On Sat, Mar 9, 2024 at 10:33 PM OLIVIER HUREAU
wrote:
[...]
I would also add comment about the dmarc-fo ABNF :
dmarc-fo = "0" / "1" / "d" / "s" / "d:s" / "s:d"
The FO paragraph (
":" dmarc-fo-value)
> dmarc-fo-value = "0" / "1" / "d" / "s"
>
>
The wording for FO has changed to say "0", "1" OR a colon-separated list.
Looking at the 7489 ABNF I
am wondering if someone could say "fo=0:1:d:s"
thanks
tim
&
ot;DMARC failure report" or
("DKIM failure report" and/or "SPF failure report")
Shouldn't we have an ANBF rule with all the possible permutations or a more
generic one such as :
dmarc-fo = dmarc-fo-value *(":" dmarc-fo-value)
dmarc-fo-value = "0"
Just picking over the ABNF with my checks, some Qs
dmarc-version = "v" equals %s"DMARC1
I believe the "%s" should be dropped
dmarc-value = %x20-3A | %x3C-7E
I think it should be %x20-3A / %x3C-7E
and now just something suggested. The comments for URI read like this
