SheridanJ West via dmarc-discuss wrote:
> I only have the mismatch problem with opendmarc-reports and thats using
> most of the command line options.
>
> Normal email (port 587) is matched with spf,dkim and dmarc.Please do
> not consider our email servers as mentally retarded in regard to
I only have the mismatch problem with opendmarc-reports and thats using
most of the command line options.
Normal email (port 587) is matched with spf,dkim and dmarc.Please do
not consider our email servers as mentally retarded in regard to that.
Hence my posting on a dmarc list.
report
SheridanJ West via dmarc-discuss wrote:
> i appear to need atps records for google this is with atps dns text records
> and probably others
>
> opendmarc-reports: sent report for gmail.com to mailauth-repo...@google.com
> (2.0.0 Ok: queued as x1)
>
> without atps [results i got from last week]
>
>
obscured example).
- Roland
From: dmarc-discuss <dmarc-discuss-boun...@dmarc.org> on behalf of SheridanJ
West via dmarc-discuss <dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org>
Sent: Wednesday, 1 February 2017 00:53
Cc: dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org
Subject: Re: [dmarc-discu
A. Schulze via dmarc-discuss skrev den 2017-01-30 22:30:
Am 30.01.2017 um 21:40 schrieb SheridanJ West via dmarc-discuss:
I encountered a opendmarc bug that required adsp records
don't waste your time with ADSP, forget it.
it's deprecated and in fact dead
and spamassaasin does not care of
SheridanJ West via dmarc-discuss wrote:
> I encountered a opendmarc bug that required adsp records as well to send
> dmarc reports and i had a fun time trying to reproduce the output for i do
> not know how long the url i mention will last.
> Is nearly the same but I am confused - is the web
I would rather not rebuild our mail server(s) and the bits hanging off it
just to keep opendmarc-report functionality since they do everything else
ok.
Thanks.
On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 9:30 PM, A. Schulze via dmarc-discuss <
dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org> wrote:
>
>
> Am 30.01.2017 um 21:40 schrieb
Am 30.01.2017 um 21:40 schrieb SheridanJ West via dmarc-discuss:
> I encountered a opendmarc bug that required adsp records
don't waste your time with ADSP, forget it.
it's deprecated and in fact dead
Andreas
___
dmarc-discuss mailing list
I encountered a opendmarc bug that required adsp records as well to send
dmarc reports and i had a fun time trying to reproduce the output for i do
not know how long the url i mention will last.
a webparser at www.winserver.com/public/wcadsp/default.wct
which produces example.com main domain and
