Re: Problem: mail moved by thunderbird script is invisible to mail clients, but in cur directory

On 4/14/2015 10:59 AM, David Gessel wrote: Curiously, this directory was created by t-bird, but a simple # chmod 740 cur and the folder opens correctly. Thank you, Steffen, for the help! I believe you should make those permissions 750, so the execute bit is present on both user and

Re: Sensible location for Sieve scripts

On 6/26/2015 5:48 AM, Andrew Beverley wrote: I'm configuring some Sieve scripts for virtual users. I'd like to keep the Sieve scripts somewhere sensible. Currently, all the mail goes into /var/mail/vhosts/domain/mailbox So I thought a good place for the sieve script might be in there as

Re: Sensible location for Sieve scripts

On 6/26/2015 12:25 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote: On June 26, 2015 7:10:29 PM Andrew Beverley a...@andybev.com wrote: in the plugin section: sieve=/home/vmail/sieve/%d/%u/.dovecot.sieve sieve_dir=/home/vmail/sieve/%d/%u/sieve change last sieve to .sieve so it does not colledge with

Re: My dovecot works fine against Active Directory 2003, but not against AD2008

On 9/12/2015 12:31 AM, Mark Foley wrote: > Hmmm, I've not heard of "Active Directory 2003" or 2008. The year numbers > indicated to me you might be talking about Windows Small Business Server 2003 > or > 2008. Is your AD Server Windows? Linux? Something else? I'm using Samba4 > AD/DC > on

Re: Problem with Let's Encrypt Certificate

On 2/17/2017 2:38 PM, chaouche yacine wrote: > Seems wrong to me too, Robert. If you put your private key inside your > certificate, won't it be sent to the client along with it ? The private key should not be sent to the connecting client, even if it is contained in the same place as the

Slow performance with large folders over the Internet

Dovecot package version is 1:1.2.15-7+deb6u1. It is in Debian 6.0.10, using the Debian package. The server is in my basement at home, and is exposed to the Internet so I can fully access my mail from anywhere. I use IMAP for reading mail. I have a number of folders in my mailbox that have

Re: mmap failed messages in syslog

On 4/14/2018 8:36 AM, Shawn Heisey wrote: I'm getting mmap failed messages in syslog on version 1.2.15 for dovecot.index.cache files.  This old dovecot version is installed with debian packages.  The OS and all software is 64-bit. I've found info on this log message, with a suggested fix

Re: mmap failed messages in syslog

On 5/9/2018 10:15 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote: It's been about three weeks since I asked this question.  All the information I have available says that all users have no limits on virtual memory, so it must be dovecot itself that sets the limit.  Can that be changed in the 1.2 version?  I can't

Re: [SOLR] Where is solr-schema.xml?

On 7/27/2018 7:50 AM, Peter Nabbefeld wrote: > > running dovecot 2.3.2.1 on Arch Linux, and installed solr 7.4.0. > > According to the wiki, there should be doc/solr-schema.xml, but I > cannot find it. On ubuntu, this is in the "dovecot-solr" package, not the main dovecot package.  With that

best practices for migrating to new dovecot version

I have a machine with my mail service on it running Debian Squeeze. The version of dovecot on that server is 1.2.15. I'm building a new server with Ubuntu 18.04 (started with 16.04, upgraded in place), where the dovecot version is 2.2.33. I plan to migrate all my services to this new machine.

Re: best practices for migrating to new dovecot version

On 7/17/2018 1:16 PM, Aki Tuomi wrote: > You can just rsync everything over to new system. I did a few initial rsyncs some time ago. So a new rsync will be relatively quick. There's 25GB of data and over a million files in the copy on the new server, which is probably a few months out of date

mmap failed messages in syslog

I'm getting mmap failed messages in syslog on version 1.2.15 for dovecot.index.cache files.  This old dovecot version is installed with debian packages.  The OS and all software is 64-bit. I've found info on this log message, with a suggested fix of raising vsz_limit ... but this seems to be

Re: Disable logging for localhost

On 10/21/2018 8:23 AM, André Rodier wrote: I am using Zabbix to monitor my Dovecot server, and my logs are filled with lines like this: Oct 21 15:04:46 osaka dovecot[1256]: pop3-login: Aborted login (no auth attempts in 0 secs): user=<>, rip=127.0.0.1, lip=127.0.0.1, secured, session= Oct 21

Re: Disable logging for localhost

On 10/24/2018 4:46 AM, André Rodier wrote: These lines are in the mail.log. I am not talking about Zabbix. Zabbix generate a connection every second, on both Postfix and Dovecot. I want these two services to not log connections when they are coming from 127.0.0.1, if possible. Both

Re: Dovecot - Upgrade Solr 7.7.2 to 8.4.1

On 1/22/2020 4:03 PM, Domenico Pastore wrote: So, with Dovecot is it possible to use Apache Solr 8.4? High RAM usage is the only problem? I don't know whether it's possible, but I imagine there is some way to make it work. I don't see anything in the solrconfig or schema provided for

Re: solr fts and removing accounts

On 1/19/2020 3:31 AM, Wojciech Puchar wrote: i use solr fts indexing. It worls very well but it have one database per system, not per user. Lets suppose i delete one or more e-mail users in system. How to remove them in solr database to reclaim space? I cannot say whether there is anything

Re: v2.3.11.3 solr plugin search via MUA fails to match accented ascii characters; cmd line exec of `doveadm fts lookup` PANICs (assertion failed)

On 10/11/2020 4:27 PM, PGNet Dev wrote: I'm running, dovecot --version 2.3.11.3 (502c39af9) solr -version 8.6.3 Attempting to test/debug from from cmd line, doveadm fts lookup -u myu...@example.com body "tambien" causes a PANIC I

Re: v2.3.11.3 solr plugin search via MUA fails to match accented ascii characters; cmd line exec of `doveadm fts lookup` PANICs (assertion failed)

On 10/18/2020 6:33 PM, PGNet Dev wrote: is it that you're not using the dovecot plugin, but _DO_ have solr search setup?  by what method/mean? or that you're avoiding solr usage altogether? I am using dovecot for my mail service. My host in AWS only has 2GB of memory ... I would expect an

Re: solr and dovecot-2.2.36.4

On 7/17/2020 3:23 AM, Maciej Milaszewski wrote: I try schema.xml and solrconfig.xml from working solr-6.6.5 (dovecot) "dovecot: org.apache.solr.common.SolrException:org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Error initializing QueryElevationComponent" That looks like a Solr error. This list is not

Re: Trying to use solr

On 7/22/2020 11:13 AM, Francis Augusto Medeiros-Logeay wrote: On Solr I get this error: org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Exception writing document id 210/9fd7941e8297d25d9160c3fdd3da/fran...@francisaugusto.com

Re: Trying to use solr

On 7/26/2020 3:48 AM, r...@med-lo.eu wrote: Thanks a lot Shawn. I will send the full error when I get home a week from now. But this was my first attempt to use solr - is it still subject to those conflicts? You'll have to be more specific ... but I believe the answer to your question is

Major upgrade of mail server

I have a mail server in AWS that is currently running Ubuntu 18. Every time I log in, I am reminded that I can upgrade to Ubuntu 20. On Ubuntu 18, the dovecot version is 3.3.0-1ubuntu0.3. On Ubuntu 20, it is 2.3.7.2-1ubuntu3. Many other packages, probably including the mysql server, would

OT: Re: Bypass Trash Folder Sometimes.

On 7/3/2021 1:18 PM, dove...@ptld.com wrote: this is imho not controlled in dovecot at all Oops, wrong mailing list. I meant to send this to the roundcube mailing list. Roudcube user here, talking to dovecot. I've just verified something I thought was true. If you select one or more

Re: Major upgrade of mail server

On 7/8/2021 7:46 AM, Oscar del Rio wrote: It would also be a good opportunity to switch to using the official Dovecot repositories. https://repo.dovecot.org/ I tried this, and at first couldn't figure out why the packages were in a broken state that wouldn't install. Then I realized I had

Re: Incorrect value sent to solr

On 4/7/2021 4:13 AM, Łukasz Szczepański wrote: I've prepared pull request with fixed rows parameter: https://github.com/dovecot/core/pull/160 I've tested this fix on mailbox which caused a problem earlier, and its works fine. I admit to not being very familiar with dovecot source, but I did a

Re: Incorrect value sent to solr

On 4/2/2021 7:11 AM, Łukasz Szczepański wrote: On a Solr side I got an error: java.lang.NumberFormatException: For input string: "2206267083" NumberFormat expect an int which max value is 2147483647. Quick test reviles that rows parameter isn't required for correct response from solr. I think

Re: Incorrect value sent to solr

On 4/3/2021 12:12 PM, Łukasz Szczepański wrote: Rows isn't part of manage-schema for solr collection its build in common query parameters in solr, and type of this field cannot be changed. It controls the number of returned results (by default 10). I still think that an issue on dovecot side,

Re: Sieve by the addressee

On 2/20/2021 8:50 AM, Markus Schönhaber wrote: I consider it a better idea to filter mailing list messages by their List-ID header. I agree with Markus. It's what I do. This works well: if header :regex "list-id" "solr-user.lucene.apache.org" { fileinto "asf.solr-user";

[OT] Re: What kind of search response time are you setting with solr full text search?

On 8/24/2021 7:19 PM, Steve Dondley wrote: THE PROBLEM: When I do a full text search through all my inbox and all subfolders on a single word, search results are returned in about 10 to 15 seconds. This is better than the 40 seconds or so I'm getting when I turn off the fts and fts_solr plugins

Re: [OT] Re: What kind of search response time are you setting with solr full text search?

On 8/25/2021 11:33 AM, Steve Dondley wrote: OK, I take this back. I did an imap search via telnet and solr reports the search takes about 3 to 4 seconds. Here's the output: a search text "maynez" Try this in on the commandline of the Solr server: time curl

Re: [OT] Re: What kind of search response time are you setting with solr full text search?

On 8/25/2021 12:05 PM, Steve Dondley wrote: OK I had to modify the query path slightly to get it to work with my core to: time curl http://localhost:8983/solr/dondley/select?q=maynez=edismax=body+to+subjec:t+ccfrom But it didn't return any results: I only have emails for this person

Re: [OT] Re: What kind of search response time are you setting with solr full text search?

On 8/25/2021 2:10 PM, Steve Dondley wrote: And it looks like I'm running into a major bug in the slightly dated version of dovecot debian uses: https://www.mail-archive.com/dovecot@dovecot.org/msg78825.html Recently I did a fairly major upgrade.  I had an older Ubuntu release with

Solr FTS - when does indexing happen?

I have Solr FTS on my dovecot install.  I followed the instructions on the dovecot wiki. How long a delay should I expect to see between new mail being delivered with the dovecot LDA and an indexing request sent to Solr?  Because I get a LOT of email from various mailing lists, and I do not

Re: Dovecot - FTS Solr: disk usage & position information?

On 9/6/2021 12:58 AM, Vincent Brillault wrote: Hi Alessio, this optimization also produce a less RAM requirements on Solr server? Unfortunately we didn't measure this before/after the change. Since we are removing features (position information), I wouldn't expect the memory requirement to

Re: Solr FTS - when does indexing happen?

On 9/4/2021 4:06 PM, Steve Dondley wrote: As I recall, indexing an email is triggered immediately when an email is received if you have you dovecot settings set properly to trigger the indexing. The dovecot documentation for FTS, it spells it out. See

Re: Solr FTS - when does indexing happen?

On 9/4/2021 4:52 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote: I see something talking about autoindex, but it does not have an example so that I can see where it needs to go.  I cannot work it out from what is there. With a little googling, I was able to figure out where it needs to go. And now it acts like I

Re: Dovecot - FTS Solr: disk usage & position information?

On 8/5/2021 1:00 AM, Vincent Brillault wrote: Indeed, I should have. I'm using Solr 8.6, which is clearly not the same as Solr 6.2.0, but when looking at more recent versions of the documentation, no information about the use of each file appeared. That's why I was mentioning it was slightly

Re: Dovecot - FTS Solr: disk usage & position information?

On 8/4/2021 1:24 AM, Vincent Brillault wrote: On a local dovecot cluster currently hosting roughly 2.1TB of data, using Solr as its FTS backend, we now have 256GB of data in Solr, split in 12 shard (to which replication adds 256GB of data through 12 additional cores). I'm now trying to see if

Re: No source packages in APT repo?

On 12/3/21 1:28 PM, Aki Tuomi wrote: Is there a particular reason you need to build source packages? There are sometimes moments when I want to test out a code change in a program I'm running on a server.  If a source package is available, I can make the change and build a new package that

No source packages in APT repo?

I added a deb-src entry to my APT config matching the deb entry: deb https://repo.dovecot.org/ce-2.3-latest/ubuntu/focal focal main deb-src https://repo.dovecot.org/ce-2.3-latest/ubuntu/focal focal main When this is there, I see a warning when running "apt update". W: Skipping acquire of

Re: Error: fts_solr: received invalid uid

On 1/2/22 3:08 PM, John Fawcett wrote: unless I'm missing something that doesn't look like the type of query dovecot launches - dovecot sends various parameters including the request for xml results. The thing that looks odd to me is that the results fields should be single values not arrays

Re: modernizing dovecot.conf

On 12/29/2021 9:53 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote: On 2021-12-30 05:40, Laura Steynes wrote: Because gmail is dumb. good mail client interfaces see reply-all with a mailing list as reply to list only so you are just a gmail victim ? :=) I have no experience on this with gmail. I haven't

Re: Solr FTS - message deletes not working as expected

On 11/3/21 11:45 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote: Manual expunges of existing messages also are not sending a delete request to Solr.  I waited several minutes for that too. Update on this, since you're all on the edge of your seat waiting. :) I did a Send test with TypeApp, a mail client for Android

Re: FTS config - cannot search substrings

On 11/18/2021 4:43 PM, infoomatic wrote: sometimes ignoring the problem for a few moments and then starting over again helps ... the solution was already solved here in a mail over 10 years ago - https://dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2011-May/059338.html Thanks Daniel Miller! There's something to

Re: Solr FTS - message deletes not working as expected

On 10/28/21 8:00 AM, Shawn Heisey wrote: Also, when I send a message with Thunderbird, which deletes the message in Drafts and adds one to Sent, I am not seeing a delete request in the Solr log.  I do see the add. So this isn't limited to just the shift-delete workflow. I have confirmed

Re: Solr FTS - message deletes not working as expected

On 10/26/21 12:18 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote: But if I use shift-delete in Thunderbird, which deletes the message immediately without going through Trash, things are different. Also, when I send a message with Thunderbird, which deletes the message in Drafts and adds one to Sent, I am

Solr FTS - message deletes not working as expected

I have Solr FTS enabled in dovecot.  It is behaving differently than I would expect. When I delete messages in Thunderbird normally, using IMAP to talk to dovecot, the deletion hits Solr right away.  If I then ask Thunderbird to empty the trash, that delete also hits Solr immediately. But

Re: Solr FTS - message deletes not working as expected

On 11/3/21 12:38 PM, Michael Slusarz wrote: Have you tried another client? I tried evolution on Linux. I can't work out how to do an expunge in evolution.  I'm not sure that it CAN do it.  Whenever I delete a message, even with shift-delete, it is moved to the Trash folder (with delete and

Re: Solr FTS - message deletes not working as expected

On 11/3/21 12:38 PM, Michael Slusarz wrote: Have you tried another client? I only have two clients configured:  Thunderbird 78.13.0 on Linux and Thunderbird 91.2.1 on Windows.  Behavior is the same on both. I will see if I can get another client configured.  Windows Mail is included on

Re: Solr FTS - message deletes not working as expected

On 11/3/2021 10:12 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote: Maybe I can do a custom compile of the source code and replace the /usr/lib/dovecot/modules/lib21_fts_solr_plugin.so file with what the compile produces.  I'm going to try that, and see if it explodes. :) Bit of a problem trying to do this. I pulled

Re: Solr FTS - message deletes not working as expected

On 11/3/2021 11:10 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote: Then I downloaded the source archive from the main site, extracted it, and the configure script was included in that.  After compiling, I found the .so file and moved it into place, and I will be testing it. The new library is significantly larger

Re: Solr FTS - message deletes not working as expected

On 11/3/21 1:09 PM, Michael Slusarz wrote: For Solr, there's a code path in the FTS expunge code that will silently toss expunge requests: if (ctx->last_indexed_uid == 0 || uid > ctx->last_indexed_uid + 100) { /* don't waste time asking Solr to expunge a

Re: No source packages in APT repo?

On 12/8/21 3:46 AM, Aki Tuomi wrote: You only need dovecot-dev for that, not the sources. The dovecot-dev package looks like it's for writing programs that integrate with dovecot, not for building dovevot. If I'm wrong about that, can somebody explain how I can use it to build custom

Re: email location - files or sql

On 2/22/2022 9:12 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: What I am seeing is that many of the packages seem to roll the messages into some SQL database.  My Dovecot setup uses the /home/vmail/doman/../{cur,new,etc} tree structure. I use dovecot and postfix in conjunction with a postfixadmin database in

Re: resend whole inbox to user

On 2022-04-06 13:29, Marc wrote: I was wondering if there is some way to force an imap client to 're-download' all the messages from the inbox. I can remember in the 'old days' that when the connection was dropped during a pop download, the whole inbox was re-downloaded, resulting in quite a lot

Re: Set up per user sieve rules

On 4/9/2022 9:29 PM, Austin Witmer wrote: I am curious Shawn, what the contents of your /etc/dovecot/conf.d/90-sieve.conf file is? It's almost all comments.  A LOT of detailed comments.  Stripping those out: --- root@bilbo:~# cat /etc/dovecot/conf.d/90-sieve.conf | egrep -v "^#|^\s+#|^$"

Re: Set up per user sieve rules

On 4/9/2022 6:00 PM, Austin Witmer wrote: I am struggling to wrap my mind around how to set up sieve rules for my individual users on my mail server. I set up a global sieve script file at "/var/lib/dovecot/sieve/default.sieve” and that works great. My users maildirs are located at

Logging for doveadm index?

I have dovecot using Solr for FTS. Dovecot version is 2:2.3.20-3+ubuntu20.04 pulled from the official APT repo. This is my reindex script: https://paste.elyograg.org/view/74accd23 The reindex script kicks off the indexing process in the background. Dovecot logs to syslog, and those logs

Re: DOvecot requires both IPv4 and IPV6 to start

On 9/4/23 12:36, Michael Peddemors wrote: However, I 'get' this persons' opinion, from a developers perspective. The system should either run, or provide a clear reason why it didn't startup (that reason could be .. You have selected * but IPv6 is not available). Doesn't really matter what

Re: DOvecot requires both IPv4 and IPV6 to start

On 9/4/23 13:42, TWHG Technical via dovecot wrote: I believe it really would be good practice to fallback to IPV4 only listeners if IPV6 listener fails. Rather than crash out. On my previous reply, I had not yet read the other messages. They were part of another thread in Thunderbird that I

[offtopic] Re: DOvecot requires both IPv4 and IPV6 to start

On 9/4/23 15:40, Arjen de Korte wrote: Citeren Shawn Heisey : An interesting read: https://cr.yp.to/djbdns/ipv6mess.html FUD. This document was written something like two decades ago and pretty much all arguments against IPv6 are no longer relevant anymore. In most cases nowadays

Re: how to setup IMAPs with letsencrypt

On 4/22/22 02:20, Jean-Daniel Dupas wrote: While it's true for SMTP, my experience is that IMAP clients prefer imaps in 993 instead of STARTTLS. I have a server with only port 993 opened, and almost never had any issue with client configuration. I have noticed the opposite.  Every time I

Re: Bad Signature - Both Roundcube and Squirrelmail webmail cannot search for anything + cannot open many emails because there are more than 200, 000 emails in my Inbox

On 4/20/22 07:51, Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming wrote: I believe Gmail is using IMAP. The instructions for configuring Gmail email accounts in Outlook specifically mention IMAP server hostname: imap.gmail.com TCP Port 993, SSL Indeed you CAN use IMAP with gmail.  For work, I mostly use my

Re: Both Roundcube and Squirrelmail webmail cannot search for anything + cannot open many emails because there are more than 200, 000 emails in my Inbox

On 4/20/22 08:03, Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming wrote: Dear Shawn Heisey, Your instructions for integrating Apache SOLR with Dovecot is too much for me to understand. Do you have links/URLs to excellent guides for doing this? Here's the dovecot manual page on it: https://doc.dovecot.org

Re: Bad Signature - Both Roundcube and Squirrelmail webmail cannot search for anything + cannot open many emails because there are more than 200, 000 emails in my Inbox

On 4/19/2022 5:12 PM, Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming wrote: It is not true that no email system was ever designed for 200,000 or more emails. If I did not remember wrongly, more than 10 years ago, I used to have a Gmail email account, with 4-5 MILLION email messages in the Inbox. There was no

Re: how to setup IMAPs with letsencrypt

On 4/23/2022 6:45 PM, Richard Hector wrote: _A_ web server has to be there. It doesn't have to serve anything else useful. My mail server has a web server that only serves the LE challenge. Well, actually it's a proxy server that serves several other domains too, but there's nothing else

Re: Set up per user sieve rules

On 4/9/2022 9:36 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote: sieve_default = file:/var/vmail/global.sieve And in case it matters, here are the contents of the global.sieve file: --- require ["envelope", "fileinto", "reject", "vacation", "regex", "

Re: auth between postfix and dovecot?

On 4/22/2022 10:35 PM, ミユナ (alice) wrote: my question is: when postfix talks to dovecot, does it require user's username/password for authentication? or this communication just goes without authentication? I asked this, b/c my webmail send mail from localhost has been going without

Re: auth between postfix and dovecot?

On 4/23/2022 9:07 AM, Alexander Dalloz wrote: With this Postfix configuration you do not make use of LMTP delivery. Interesting.  I thought it was using LMTP but it looks like master.cf has it running /usr/lib/dovecot/dovecot-lda to deliver. Would LMTP be a better option? It has always

Re: dovecot-fts-solr Solr9 support

On 5/17/22 09:02, PGNet Dev wrote: Modifying the config to use CaffeineCache cp solr-config-7.7.0.xml solr-config-9.0.0.xml perl -pi -e '\ s|solr.FastLRUCache|solr.CaffeineCache|g; \ s|solr.LRUCache|solr.CaffeineCache|g; \

Re: FTS Solr -- no commit on message delete

On 5/18/2022 8:24 AM, Shawn Heisey wrote: Today I discovered a related problem that I think IS in Dovecot.  I did a shift-delete on some messages, and then exited Thunderbird.  Dovecot did delete the messages from Solr, but it did not send a commit to make those changes affect subsequent

FTS Solr -- no commit on message delete

I've been chasing down oddities in behavior related to FTS Solr for a while now. First the part that isn't a problem with dovecot:  In cases where message deletes bypass the Trash folder (such as shift-delete and normal workflow with the Drafts and Sent folders), Thunderbird does not inform

Re: solr-jetty package in Debian 11 bullseye

On 5/25/22 13:30, John Gateley wrote: I am in the process of upgrading the OS on my mailserver, currently Debian 9, to Debian 11. The solr-jetty package does not appear to exist in Debian 11. The Solr package that was included in Debian and derivatives was REALLY ancient -- Solr 3.6. 

Re: dovecot-fts-solr Solr9 support

On 5/17/2022 11:32 AM, PGNet Dev wrote: CaffeineCache  _should_ be a solution for both series. I'm just starting to do a bit of testing, but so far, indexing/search with Caffeine seems quicker, at least. I do not yet know in which case(s) CaffeineCache is _not_ an appropriate solution.

Re: dovecot-fts-solr Solr9 support

On 5/17/22 11:32, PGNet Dev wrote: Something that is missing from the current instructions is how to initiate a FULL reindex of all data in the dovecot install. Beyond looping over each $acct  doveadm fts rescan -u ${acct}  doveadm index  -u ${acct} -q '*' I hadn't seen the fts rescan

Re: Recovering deleted mailbox

On 4/27/22 16:18, Sean McBride wrote: I have a user (coworker) that accidentally deleted a mailbox and all its sub-mailboxes. I use Maildir format storage. I have backups. Is it enough to put the mailbox folder back where it was? I'm talking about the folder that contains 'cur', 'new',

Re: Both Roundcube and Squirrelmail webmail cannot search for anything + cannot open many emails because there are more than 200, 000 emails in my Inbox

On 4/16/2022 11:32 PM, Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming wrote: Both Roundcube and Squirrelmail webmail cannot search for anything because there are more than 200,000 emails in my Inbox. Both Roundcube and Squirrelmail webmail cannot open many emails because there are more than 200,000 emails

Re: Both Roundcube and Squirrelmail webmail cannot search for anything + cannot open many emails because there are more than 200, 000 emails in my Inbox

On 4/17/2022 7:44 AM, Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming wrote: My Dovecot, Postfix, Roundcube and Squirrelmail were automatically installed, configured and deployed by Virtualmin web hosting control panel install scripts. How do I integrate Apache SOLR searching capability with Dovecot? Are there

Re: Recovering deleted mailbox

On 4/27/2022 11:48 PM, Aki Tuomi wrote: # drop fts data doveadm fts rescan -u user # rebuild index doveadm index -u user "*" I do full reindexes a lot more often than a typical user would. When I do a reindex, I want it to happen for all users, not one at a time.  Do you have a sequence of

Re: Recovering deleted mailbox

On 4/27/2022 11:27 PM, Aki Tuomi wrote: There is no reason to delete the dovecot files after recovery. You can run `doveadm force-resync` to ensure everything is synced. Removing the files just cause more problems than benefit usually. Thanks for that information!  Very helpful for future

Re: Maybe a bit offtopic, Sieve beaviour

On 8/23/22 03:44, João Silva wrote: If a sieve filter contains a rule if header :regex ["From"] ["@xxx.com","@yyy.pt"] {     fileinto :create "ac"; } The mail should be copied to the folder ac and then proceed to other rules that a user might have or I understood the fileinto wrong? I

Re: Replication

On 9/5/22 08:18, Silvio Siefke wrote: On Mon, 5 Sep 2022 14:59:01 +0200 Narcis Garcia wrote: I SEE THIS IN LOG COPY: Sep 5 18:02:18 asia dovecot: replicator: Panic: data stack: Out of memory when allocating 268435496 bytes Yes but Memory is enough free. I had follow the link It is very

Re: how to configure imapsieve to be used per user

On 10/17/22 04:46, Marc wrote: I only see configurations that are active for all users, how to configure this in the user sieve rules. I only need this for specific users. I have a working setup where every user can have their own sieve rules and manage them with managesieve, which I think

Re: Dovecot does not start on MacOS Monterey

On 10/30/22 07:24, Doro Rose wrote: Thanks for the explanation. In the other thread it was mentioned that the only setting that works with this problem is setting default_vsz_limit to 0 which sounds like the lowest limit possible. A setting of 0 tells dovecot to not set a limit, at which

Re: Dovecot does not start on MacOS Monterey

On 10/26/22 04:27, Doro Rose wrote: Thanks for the quick response! No. If I set default_vsz_limit to 0 it works. My understanding was that this shouldn't be necessary in the first place, shouldn't it? Most systems and software do not limit the virtual memory size. This is because virtual

Re: Matching Addresses in Sieve

On 9/30/22 15:14, Doug Hardie wrote: I have an email with the following header line: From: 'Thank you!Kohls' I am trying to match that with: if address :contains "from" "Thank you!Kohls" { addflag "\\Seen"; fileinto "Junk"; stop; } However, the matching portion of

Re: dovecot-fts-solr Solr9 support

On 9/27/22 19:32, Nathanael Anderson wrote: I was trying a new install of dovecot w/ solr9.   I've manually fixed the file linking to the proper directories, however one plugin is no longer shipped.   Since the solr files aren't updated yet to 9, can anyone tell me if I need the discontinued

Re: sasl service for other app

On 12/7/22 21:53, Henry R wrote: can dovecot run as a general sasl service for other apps? such as webdav. I am using dovecot to provide authentication for postfix submission.  This is the config in postfix: smtpd_sasl_type = dovecot # Referring to /var/spool/postfix/private/auth

Re: Backups

On 12/11/22 01:42, John Tulp wrote: sorry, no clue. i did find this link quickly... https://doc.dovecot.org/configuration_manual/quota/ looks like the following section near the bottom of page may apply ? "Maximum Saved Mail Size" I was looking into this on my server.  My config has the

Re: mail filters

On 12/19/22 11:08, mick.crane wrote: On 2022-12-19 16:07, Shawn Heisey wrote: I actually have a filter for exactly that purpose: https://www.dropbox.com/s/5alqcawio2e1vki/roundcube_managesieve_lkml.png?dl=0 I should experiment further then to see what filters actually do. "stop evalu

Re: mail filters

On 12/18/22 20:59, mick.crane wrote: On 2022-12-13 00:42, John Stoffel wrote: Maybe you're filtering the wrong way? I use something like this and it's pretty good:    require ["fileinto", "envelope"];    require "imap4flags";    require "regex";    if header :contains "Sender"

Re: Backups and disaster recovery

On 12/3/22 16:02, GDS wrote: After reading some of the past threads on backups, I was wondering if I could get a sanity check... I run a Maildir configuration for a small (10 mailboxes) mail server. Using "/doveadm backup"/, for each mailbox I do: - Weekly full backups and then copy the

Re: Backups and disaster recovery

On 12/3/22 20:16, Sam Kuper wrote: You might want to consider using ZFS. Bystander reply: I do like ZFS.  There are two reasons that I chose btrfs for my deployment: 1) License incompatibilities with ZFS and Linux.  These don't affect end users, but the situation is a little murky if you

Re: Dovecot 2.2 to 2.3 migration

On 11/15/22 03:29, Markus Wienhöfer wrote: we are currently using Dovecot 2.2 (from the Ubuntu 18.04 repos) and would like to migrate to 2.3 I have read the migration documentation regarding the configuration changes. Apart from that, is it feasible/possible to change from Ubuntu to official

Re: Dovecot 2.2 to 2.3 migration

On 11/17/22 09:28, Oscar del Rio wrote: I believe there is no Dovecot APT repo for Ubuntu 22 (yet) https://repo.dovecot.org/ Very true.  I believe I read somewhere that there will not be a Dovecot 2.3 repo for jammy, but there will be one for 2.4 when it is released. Thanks, Shawn

2.4 ballpark release date?

I'm wondering whether there is a ballpark release date for Dovecot 2.4. I know an exact release date is probably not available, but can it at least be narrowed to a specific quarter? Is it likely in 2023? I have seen on previous messages that an Ubuntu repository for 22.04 (jammy) will

Re: Error: /proc/self/status is larger than expected

On 3/20/23 21:29, Elisamuel Resto Donate wrote: Hello, I don't know what the error means or how to get rid of it. But in the replies, I do see something that might indicate a misunderstanding of how /proc works. Every pid will be getting a different file than another pid when it accesses

Re: 2.4 ballpark release date?

On 1/17/23 14:04, Shawn Heisey wrote: I'm wondering whether there is a ballpark release date for Dovecot 2.4. I know an exact release date is probably not available, but can it at least be narrowed to a specific quarter?  Is it likely in 2023? I have seen on previous messages that an Ubuntu

Re: iPhone Mail clients generate high Solr I/O

On 3/20/23 09:52, Alessio Cecchi wrote: I'm running a mail server with Dovecot 2.3.20 and Apache Solr as FTS backend. It seems that iPhone/iPad Mail clients are generating some IMAP searches, especially on header Message-ID, that are increasing our Solr I/O load, especially during the night.

Re: ot: how to t/s TBird problems ?

On 3/21/23 07:27, Christopher Wensink wrote: Jim, can you explain the format of the Date header, what each digit should represent? Chris A date value that's a big number like that is "seconds since epoch". The epoch is 1970-01-01 00:00:00 UTC. This is a common way of telling time on

  1   2   >