Praedor,
I haven't used it myself, but a friend of mine (one of the original
members of 386 BSD development team at Berkley) has been trying it out.
He said that for now anything built with it isn't compatible with programs
compiled with earlier versions of gcc. In short he told me it's
On Thu, 24 Jan 2002 03:03:35 -0800
James [EMAIL PROTECTED] studiouisly spake these words to ponder:
Praedor,
I haven't used it myself, but a friend of mine (one of the original
members of 386 BSD development team at Berkley) has been trying it out.
He said that for now anything built
How is gcc 3.0 these days? Has its problems been corrected enough to make it
a worthy compiler?
praedor
_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
On Tuesday 27 November 2001 23:36, you wrote:
On Sat, 2001-11-24 at 19:28, Darwin Gottfried wrote:
yep it's in the download version of 8.1 for sure. gcc 3.0.1.
[Copy posted to the list instead of an individual]
G. May I suggest to the listop that reply-to be changed to
[EMAIL
On Sat, 2001-11-24 at 19:28, Darwin Gottfried wrote:
yep it's in the download version of 8.1 for sure. gcc 3.0.1.
[Copy posted to the list instead of an individual]
G. May I suggest to the listop that reply-to be changed to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] for any messages posted via the list?
Avoid
On Saturday 24 November 2001 18:20, you wrote:
So sprach »Jose Luis Vazquez Gonzalez« am 2001-11-24 um 18:49:22 +0100 :
Hi,
Has someone upgraded to gcc 3.0.x?
Yep.
how?
urpmi gcc3
Dunno if it's in 8.1, but it's for sure in cooker.
yep it's in the download version of 8.1 for sure.
On 06-Aug-2001 Jesse Hepburn wrote:
I'm trying to upgrade to GCC 3.0 (because 2.96 is buggy). Whenever I
try to make it (using make --bootstrap) I get preprocessor errors and
the make fails. Is this a known problem, or is it just me? Any help
would be appreciated.
Cheers,
Jesse
I
Im trying to upgrade to GCC 3.0 (because 2.96 is
buggy). Whenever I try to make it (using
make --bootstrap) I get preprocessor errors and the make fails. Is this a known problem, or is it just
me? Any help would be appreciated.
Cheers,
Jesse
Regards,
Joe
RLU# 186063
Reading is the essence of knowledge
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 22, 2001 01:53 AM
To: Shahrimi Johann
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [expert] GCC 3.0 - Question
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2001 07:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [expert] GCC 3.0 - Question on GPL
Shahrimi Johann wrote:
Hi all,
just a question.
GCC is a GPL, open source software and it comes
Nathan Callahan wrote:
BTW M$, AFIK, does not use GPLed code in any of its operations. It uses
BSD licensed code, which, by not having the contagious elements of the
GPL, lets this sort of thing go on.
They DO use lots of GPL code... albeit to try to move *nix users to NT...
Hi all,
just a question.
GCC is a GPL, open source software and it comes with libraries that will be
used in the programs that are created using them.
These resulting programs that we developed, do they fall under GPL/Open
Source as well since GPL is otherwise known as Contagious License? This
Shahrimi Johann wrote:
Hi all,
just a question.
GCC is a GPL, open source software and it comes with libraries that will be
used in the programs that are created using them.
I'm no expert on the GPL, but, as I understand it, it only becomes viral
when you use source from another GPL'd
]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2001 07:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [expert] GCC 3.0 - Question on GPL
Shahrimi Johann wrote:
Hi all,
just a question.
GCC is a GPL, open source software and it comes with libraries
that will be
used in the programs that are created using
14 matches
Mail list logo
