Re: filmscanners: Device Profile in VueScan

2001-06-06 Thread shAf
Maris writes ... From: Ramesh Kumar_C [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Maris V. Lidaka, wrote: | Based on your statement, following is my understanding. | | Minolta will have provided a Profile file, which will be laying some where | in my PC. Vuescan will use this profile when Device RGB is selected

Re: filmscanners: Used Nikon LS-20 for sale

2001-06-06 Thread Arthur Entlich
Karsten Petersen wrote: Hi Art, Can I ask you two silly questions? 1) Why did Nikon charge you DM351 to fix a scanner which was operating within the normal technical limitations of the scanner? They claimed that they have cleaned it, and that it was working properly AFTER their

Re: filmscanners: The whole frame

2001-06-06 Thread Arthur Entlich
Dave Suurballe wrote: Good idea; certainly worth considering... I'm scanning now with a Kodak RFS 3600, and it doesn't scan outside the standard frame dimensions. Dave Speaking of the RFS-3600, Kodak is again lowering prices on it. They are now offering 3600 frames of film (100

Re: filmscanners: CD RW Deal

2001-06-06 Thread Arthur Entlich
Jim Snyder wrote: on 6/5/01 7:01 AM, Larry Berman at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I just read in PC World Magazine (July issue page 58) that there is going to be a shortage of CDRW's and prices will triple this summer by July. Buy em while you can. or wait until September when the

Re: filmscanners: CD RW Deal

2001-06-06 Thread Arthur Entlich
Larry Berman wrote: I can't be the only one with this magazine. The shortages are blamed on three things: Soaring demands Consolidation among CD manufacturers High patent royalties Larry Well, it is pretty obvious they have been dumping them on the market. The prices here in

Re: filmscanners: VueScan Question

2001-06-06 Thread EdHamrick
In a message dated 6/5/2001 11:11:38 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I noticed a deep scratch in one of my negs, so I turned on Light Clean in the Filter tab and scanned from Disk again. The scratch disappeared. Yes, this is what should happen. So I suppose my question is: if Clean

Re: filmscanners: CD RW Deal

2001-06-06 Thread Lynn Allen
Larry wrote: I can't be the only one with this magazine. The shortages are blamed on three things: Soaring demands Consolidation among CD manufacturers High patent royalties There was another signifficant reason listed: a lot of small companies geared up their factories and went b*lls-out to

Re: filmscanners: CD RW Deal

2001-06-06 Thread Lynn Allen
Hi, Art-- This is a test, and actually has nothing to do with CD RaW Deals. :-) You said my earlier msg was nearly unanswerable, because of the curious wrapping. In my limited experience, Reply's generally follow the original formatting (e.g. if the mode is set at Replace rather than Insert,

Re: filmscanners: CD RW Deal

2001-06-06 Thread Larry Berman
Hi Lynn, Do you live near Columbus? We'll be exhibiting at the Columbus Arts Festival this week that starts tomorrow. The article did say that despite the rock bottom prices, the companies still had to pay an 8.3 cents per CD royalty for every CD made. Larry The shortages are blamed on

Re: filmscanners: VueScan Question

2001-06-06 Thread Yuri J Sos
On Wed, 6 Jun 2001 02:29:20 EDT, you wrote: This is controlled by the Device|Bits per pixel setting. If you can with it set to 64 bit RGBI (the default), there will be an infrared channel in the raw scan file. Great, thanks: that answered my question perfectly.

RE: filmscanners: RE: Nikon LS-40 Coolscan 4

2001-06-06 Thread James Grove
Umm when the motors move i cant say its really noisey just loader than my Minolta was! You can here the motors whirring (is that a word?) when you put the film adaptors in. I just want to know whether they are supposed to whirr?! -- James Grove [EMAIL PROTECTED]

filmscanners: VueScan information

2001-06-06 Thread Marvin Demuth
I am picking up bits and pieces of information on getting started with VueScan from reading the messages and the help file information. Surely there is more efficient way to be introduced to VueScan. Can anyone refer me to other VueScan information? Marvin Demuth

filmscanners: Hazy bleed in hi contrast blacks on LS2000

2001-06-06 Thread IQ3D
Hi All We have been using the LS2000 for some time now and have been very pleased with the results. Just recently however we have put through a batch of slides with subjects against black backgrounds. The scans have all got a hazy halo round all the bright areas such that on an A4 print there

filmscanners: OT: Monitor compatability

2001-06-06 Thread Maris V. Lidaka, Sr.
A stupid question no doubt but I have to be sure before I spend the money: I am in the PC world. My son the film student needs a Mac for film editing so I'll get him a Power Mac G4 dual processor. Any concerns in monitor compatibility - i.e. can we just pick the monitor and it will work or

Re: filmscanners: open and control

2001-06-06 Thread B.Rumary
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Laurie Solomon wrote: currently copyrights in the US are valid for the life of the originator even if assigned to someone else, I believe, and are renewable for a limited length of time only once. I think you may be confusing copyrights for an artistic works, such as a

Re: filmscanners: open and control

2001-06-06 Thread B.Rumary
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], wrote: Studios were widespread throughout France and made a quick fortune. 400 pounds a day was achieved which was a small fortune in the mid 1800s. Some photographers are not able to charge that now! 400 pounds a _year_ was a small fortune in those days! Are you

Re: filmscanners: Used Nikon LS-20 for sale

2001-06-06 Thread Lynn Allen
Art wrote: You have my sympathies. They must have international training for their service people. Your story was repeated here by Nikon Canada in my dealings with them with their camera service division. I'm not big on International Conspiracy Theories, so I have to defer to Ed's comment

filmscanners: OT: Kodak RSF 3600 (was:The whole frame

2001-06-06 Thread Lynn Allen
Although I'm getting totally off-topic here (again!!), I think it's appropriate to mention that Kodak is a *film specialist* and has been since the 1880's. Their ventures into hardware have largely been to sell film, right from the git-go. If I've seemed hard on Kodak, it's because I love 'em

filmscanners: High Capacity Storage (was CD RW Deal)

2001-06-06 Thread Robert Kehl
- Original Message - From: Arthur Entlich [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 12:30 AM Subject: Re: filmscanners: CD RW Deal Jim Snyder wrote: on 6/5/01 7:01 AM, Larry Berman at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I just read in PC World Magazine

Re: filmscanners: RE: Nikon LS-40 Coolscan 4

2001-06-06 Thread Jan Copier
James, I don't know how a minolta sounds, but my first filmscanner was an LS-20 and that machine moves the complete filmstripholder in en out during the scan stage and was very noisy especially the focus machanism, the LS-40 doesn't make so much noise as far as I can hear. I'm only complaining

RE: filmscanners: VueScan information

2001-06-06 Thread Paul Chefurka
Unfortunately, I don't think there's a better way. The best thing is to play with all the settings, doing repeated previews from memory, until you get an understanding of how the system works and what all the choices do. Frankly, I've been using it for a couple of years now, and I just got

Re: filmscanners: VueScan information

2001-06-06 Thread Ira Beckoff
Surely you can get a full working demo at: www.hamrick.com Well it does leave criss crosses on the scan till you buy it for a measly $40.00 Ira Ira Beckoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: Marvin Demuth [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001

Re: filmscanners: OT: Monitor compatability

2001-06-06 Thread Pat Perez
The connector for Macs and PCs is the same physically, but the pinout or timing is slightly different (think different!), but the good news is that almost all but the lowliest budget monitors come with the Macintosh connector adapter in the box. I am 99% certain the Mitsubishi would (and I really

RE: filmscanners: RE: Nikon LS-40 Coolscan 4

2001-06-06 Thread James Grove
Nikon Scan V3.1 is out soon, dont worry the bugs are fixed, well most of them anyway! -- James Grove [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.jamesgrove.co.uk http://www.mountain-photos.co.uk ICQ 99737573 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jan Copier

Re: filmscanners: OT: Monitor compatability

2001-06-06 Thread Collin Ong
On Wed, 6 Jun 2001, Maris V. Lidaka, Sr. wrote: I am in the PC world. My son the film student needs a Mac for film editing so I'll get him a Power Mac G4 dual processor. Any concerns in Great choice. The dual-processor really cranks through the video rendering. Look around for deals on

RE: filmscanners: Device Profile in VueScan

2001-06-06 Thread Ramesh Kumar_C
Robert E wrote: There are two Minolta profiles on your system (c:\windows\color if using a PC).One for negative and one for positive images. Yes, there should be 2 profiles, I can see 2 profiles in PS6. The Vuescan help file states that Device RGB is only useful if you select image as the

filmscanners: VueScan and Occam's Razor

2001-06-06 Thread EdHamrick
In a message dated 6/6/2001 12:28:18 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I have to defer to Ed's comment that Incompetence is more likely than Malice-- I can't quote Ed's exact text because an International Conspiracy ate my email-files! ;-) I happen to live near Ockham, and have always

RE: filmscanners: VueScan information

2001-06-06 Thread Ramesh Kumar_C
Hi I am also new to scanning and Vuescan. I used the help given with Vuescan software as documentation. These help files are very informative compared to what Minolta help gives. But there will be some issues un-addressed and this list has helped in clearing such issues. Please, let me know

Re: filmscanners: VueScan information

2001-06-06 Thread Maris V. Lidaka, Sr.
I think the bits and pieces you are picking up are primarily fine-tuning suggestions. Perhaps the easiest way to start is to just leave it at the default settings except the Color tab where you can select your film type, the Files Tab where you may wish to select the default folder for saving

Re: filmscanners: Fast, decent, low res scans

2001-06-06 Thread Phil
Hello All, Two weeks ago I e-mailed the list to ask you all about making fast, decent low res scans. I went ahead and purchased the Acer Scanwit 2740S. I spent the first half of this day struggling with SCSI drivers and Acer scanning software. I could not get the scanner to work. Finally, I

Re: filmscanners: OT: Monitor compatability

2001-06-06 Thread Richard N. Moyer
No limitations whatsoever. Monitor cables same as on PC, on new Macs, and most monitor companies send along a DB15 adapter (DB15 to HDDB15) for earlier Macs. There are also some very interesting all digital monitor possibilities, which you can read up on the Apple website. But analog

Re: filmscanners: Device Profile in VueScan

2001-06-06 Thread Maris V. Lidaka, Sr.
I am not sure this has changed but I think so - perhaps Ed will answer this. It may have changed when he (not too long ago) added the Device Profile option to the color space menu for this very reason. I believe it picks up the scanner's color profile selection because I had set my Nikon LS-30

filmscanners: Low-end Scanner Roundup

2001-06-06 Thread Collin Ong
In response to a question posted on another forum from somebody wanting to scan a lot of old slides, I wrote the following advice and roundup of low-cost scanners. I thought there are probably lurkers on this list that are looking for the same type of information, so I'm reposting it here, at

Re: filmscanners: Fast, decent, low res scans

2001-06-06 Thread Collin Ong
On Wed, 6 Jun 2001, Phil wrote: It turns out that the SCSI PCI card they include with the scanner only works on PCs I can't use this scanner on my Mac G4 without paying almost $300 additional for a new Mac compatible SCSI card. Sorry for your struggles. However, you can get SCSI cards

Re: filmscanners: open and control

2001-06-06 Thread TREVITHO
In a message dated 6/6/01 6:26:37 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: In most of the world artistic copyright now extends to 70 years after the death of the author. The copyright can be sold or transferred to another person or a company, or passed to the authors descendants but it still only

Re: filmscanners: VueScan and Occam's Razor

2001-06-06 Thread Colin Maddock
Ed Hamrick wrote: I happen to live near Ockham Is that the same Ockham as the place William of Occam was born in? Colin Maddock

Re: filmscanners: VueScan and Occam's Razor

2001-06-06 Thread EdHamrick
In a message dated 6/6/2001 4:07:36 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Ed Hamrick wrote: I happen to live near Ockham Is that the same Ockham as the place William of Occam was born in? Yes, it's just down the road from where I live. I need to get a picture of me standing next to the

Re: filmscanners: VueScan information

2001-06-06 Thread Lynn Allen
On Wed, 06 Jun 2001 08:00:21 Marvin Demuth wrote: I am picking up bits and pieces of information on getting started with VueScan from reading the messages and the help file information. Surely there is more efficient way to be introduced to VueScan. Can anyone refer me to other VueScan

Re: filmscanners: CD RW Deal

2001-06-06 Thread Lynn Allen
On Wed, 06 Jun 2001 09:17:36 Larry Berman wrote: Hi Lynn, Do you live near Columbus? We'll be exhibiting at the Columbus Arts Festival this week that starts tomorrow. DARNIT! We'll be down that way in 2 weeks, (we're closer to Cleveland), and we have immutable plans for this weekend.

Re: filmscanners: CD RW Deal

2001-06-06 Thread Lynn Allen
I think that everyone here can see that this is another Ooops! I'm trying to sort out a new email address, since the last one crashed badly. Mia Culpas all around, and I'm sorry I helped clog your mail boxes. (and boy, my face is red--again!!) Best regards--LRA -- On Wed, 06 Jun 2001 10:27:32

Re: filmscanners: RE: Nikon LS-40 Coolscan 4

2001-06-06 Thread Maris V. Lidaka, Sr.
Define soon :-) Maris - Original Message - From: James Grove [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 2:29 PM Subject: RE: filmscanners: RE: Nikon LS-40 Coolscan 4 | Nikon Scan V3.1 is out soon, dont worry the bugs are fixed, well most of | them anyway!

filmscanners: Sprintscan 120 and new negative proile scheme

2001-06-06 Thread Hemingway, David J
Polaroid is developing a new scheme for negative profile's. I am looking for any Sprintscan 120 user who would like to help evaluate this new scheme. Please contact me directly OFF LIST Thank you David Hemingway [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: filmscanners: Device Profile in VueScan

2001-06-06 Thread shAf
Maris writes ... I am not sure this has changed but I think so - perhaps Ed will answer this. It may have changed when he (not too long ago) added Device Profile option to the color space the menu for this very reason. I believe it picks up the scanner's color profile selection because

Re: filmscanners: [OT] Olympus P-400 printer ???

2001-06-06 Thread Johnny Deadman
on 6/6/01 5:55 PM, Nick Taylor at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm considering a replacement for my Epson Stylus Color 800 inkjet printer. Two printers have been highly recommended to me, the Epson Photo Stylus 1280 and the Olympus P-400. Does anyone here have experience with either or both of

filmscanners: [OT] Olympus P-400 printer ???

2001-06-06 Thread Nick Taylor
Sorry about the off topic post, but I think that most everyone that uses a film scanner also has some printer experience. I'm considering a replacement for my Epson Stylus Color 800 inkjet printer. Two printers have been highly recommended to me, the Epson Photo Stylus 1280 and the Olympus

RE: filmscanners: Device Profile in VueScan

2001-06-06 Thread Lynn Allen
Ramesh wrote: I am not planning to use Device RGB as workingspace. I am new to this scanning and still in the process of finding out the workflow. Initially I was thinking of archiving in Device RGB and now this seems to impossible because I have negatives. I'm pretty sure to get in trouble

RE: filmscanners: RE: Nikon LS-40 Coolscan 4

2001-06-06 Thread Vladislav Jurco
- Original Message - From: James Grove [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 10:44 AM Subject: RE: filmscanners: RE: Nikon LS-40 Coolscan 4 Umm when the motors move i cant say its really noisey just loader than my Minolta was! You can here the motors

Re: filmscanners: [OT] Olympus P-400 printer ???

2001-06-06 Thread Pat Perez
This is specious experience to say the least, but I looked at the output (in the form of the sample book, and what Olympus likely feels is flattering to the product) from the Olympus at the store the other day and I was seriously underwhelmed by the quality of it's output. Images were uniformly

Re: filmscanners: Fast, decent, low res scans

2001-06-06 Thread Lynn Allen
Phil wrote: I can't use this scanner on my Mac G4 without paying almost $300 additional for a new Mac compatible SCSI card. Ouch! I don't think that I, for one, realized that Phil's G4 wouldn't use a standard SCISI card. Aparently, Acer didn't, either. Phil, if I can apologize, I certainly

Re: filmscanners: CD RW Deal

2001-06-06 Thread Richard N. Moyer
You can get Kodak CD-R Ultima 80 (Gold/Silver 700MB, 80 Min) with InfoGuard (with printable surface) in 100 pack spindles for $59. $65 delivered. Sure others can quote equal to or better. From: Lynn Allen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mine are costing me about $1.50 (for CD-R's) to $3.50 (for RW's), and

Re: filmscanners: Low-end Scanner Roundup

2001-06-06 Thread Lynn Allen
On Wed, 6 Jun 2001 12:36:44 Collin Ong wrote: In response to a question posted on another forum from somebody wanting to scan a lot of old slides, I wrote the following advice and roundup of low-cost scanners. clip Scanning 500-1000 negatives or slides will turn into a very time consuming

Re: filmscanners: open and control

2001-06-06 Thread Hersch Nitikman
I think you might be talking about the Super Kodak 620, which was apparently the first automatic exposure camera. It had a big sensor array above the lens area. It was a folder, also. Very 'advanced', but died out before long. At 02:27 PM 06/04/2001, you wrote: Richard wrote: What was that

filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: RE: Nikon LS-40 Coolscan 4

2001-06-06 Thread Rob Geraghty
James wrote: Umm when the motors move i cant say its really noisey just loader than my Minolta was! You can here the motors whirring (is that a word?) when you put the film adaptors in. I just want to know whether they are supposed to whirr?! Yes. The scanner is readjusting the mechanism for

Re: filmscanners: CD RW Deal

2001-06-06 Thread Hersch Nitikman
Larry, et al, it is my understanding that the 'tripling' of cost is from the 'fire-sale' prices currently in existence. However, that appears to also be primarily in the 'junk' CD-Rs now selling as low as 10ยข each. They might be useful for temporary storage. Tripling those numbers brings one back

RE: filmscanners: Sprintscan 120 and new negative proile scheme

2001-06-06 Thread Austin Franklin
Polaroid is developing a new scheme for negative profile's. I am looking for any Sprintscan 120 user who would like to help evaluate this new scheme. Perhaps you could explain exactly what you mean by negative profiles, and why one would need them.

RE: filmscanners: Sprintscan 120 and new negative proile scheme

2001-06-06 Thread Austin Franklin
David, That is what I believed you would say, and I completely disagree with that philosophy. Films have certain characteristics that photographers use particular films for. I don't want every film to give me the same results! People never did this in the darkroom, so why do it in digital?

filmscanners: Nikon scanner and noice

2001-06-06 Thread Mikael Risedal
I have tested 3 different LS4000 (for sharpness. se earlier messages) and one of them had a terrible sound and noice in the scanner mechanism. If you have that problem - return the scanner to Nikon. Mikael Risedal Photographer Lund Sweden

RE: filmscanners: RE: Nikon LS-40 Coolscan 4

2001-06-06 Thread Mikael Risedal
About Nikon Scan V3.1. I have been using LS 4000 + NikonScan plugin 3.1 (version nr 3.2.0 1001) since april and it is not much better then 3.0 . lots of bugs and hopeless slow compare to Silverfast 5.2 (LS4000 demo). Something much better must come out from Nikon then a uppgrade to 3.1.

Re: filmscanners: Fast, decent, low res scans

2001-06-06 Thread Stan McQueen
It turns out that the SCSI PCI card they include with the scanner only works on PCs I can't use this scanner on my Mac G4 without paying almost $300 additional for a new Mac compatible SCSI card. I can't use this scanner on my Mac G4 without paying almost $300 additional for a new

Re: filmscanners: CD RW Deal

2001-06-06 Thread Jim Snyder
on 6/6/01 1:30 AM, Arthur Entlich at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jim Snyder wrote: on 6/5/01 7:01 AM, Larry Berman at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I just read in PC World Magazine (July issue page 58) that there is going to be a shortage of CDRW's and prices will triple this summer by

RE: filmscanners: Sprintscan 120 and new negative proile scheme

2001-06-06 Thread Hemingway, David J
Austin, I think we may be talking by each other a bit. ICC profiles do contain several LUTS including sophisticated 3d luts. These negative profiles will be similar wich ring around sub sets to correct for specific conditions such as over exposure, underexposure, high or low contrast, over and

RE: filmscanners: Sprintscan 120 and new negative proile scheme

2001-06-06 Thread Austin Franklin
Austin, All scanning software characterises film in some way as an attempt to get you near where you want to be. You can still use your individual artistic talents to effect the final product. In no scanner software of which I am aware will give you by default the raw data from the ccd.

RE: filmscanners: Sprintscan 120 and new negative proile scheme

2001-06-06 Thread Hemingway, David J
Austin, All scanning software characterises film in some way as an attempt to get you near where you want to be. You can still use your individual artistic talents to effect the final product. In no scanner software of which I am aware will give you by default the raw data from the ccd. The raw

Re: filmscanners: OT: Kodak RSF 3600 (was:The whole frame

2001-06-06 Thread Arthur Entlich
Lynn Allen wrote: Advantix, it seems to me, is a perfect example of over-reaching. It's a wonderful concept, but they have few real cameras to back it up--and established camera-makers are not *about* to forget 110 and The Disc. Their digital cameras and systems show similar

Re: filmscanners: CD RW Deal

2001-06-06 Thread Arthur Entlich
Lynn Allen wrote: There was another signifficant reason listed: a lot of small companies geared up their factories and went b*lls-out to produce discs without purchase orders. Then they were stuck with inventories which they sold at bankrupcy prices (in fact the case with many

Re: filmscanners: Fast, decent, low res scans

2001-06-06 Thread Arthur Entlich
Phil wrote: Hello All, Two weeks ago I e-mailed the list to ask you all about making fast, decent low res scans. I went ahead and purchased the Acer Scanwit 2740S. I spent the first half of this day struggling with SCSI drivers and Acer scanning software. I could not get the

RE: filmscanners: open and control

2001-06-06 Thread Laurie Solomon
Before we get into an argument that may be based in a) use of terms or b) the nature of laws in different countries, I agree with you on the specs you gave for copyrights. As for trademarks, I am not confusing them with copyrights; in the US they are two quite separate and distinct laws and

Re: filmscanners: CD RW Deal

2001-06-06 Thread Arthur Entlich
Lynn Allen wrote: There was another significant reason listed: a lot of small companies geared up their factories and went b*lls-out to produce discs without purchase orders. Then they were stuck with inventories which they sold at bankruptcy prices (in fact the case with many

Re: filmscanners: Hazy bleed in hi contrast blacks on LS2000

2001-06-06 Thread Arthur Entlich
1st question: How many people smoke near where the scanner is located? Or cook fried foods? Or was the unit moved that day from a cold to warm place? The most common cause of halos in a scanner which seemed fine in the past, is an accumulation of residue on the lenses optics of ccd surface.

Re: filmscanners: RE: Nikon LS-40 Coolscan 4

2001-06-06 Thread Douglas Landrum
Mine whirrs and grinds, but not objectionably. - Original Message - From: James Grove [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 1:44 AM Subject: RE: filmscanners: RE: Nikon LS-40 Coolscan 4 Umm when the motors move i cant say its really noisey just loader

RE: filmscanners: Sprintscan 120 and new negative proile scheme

2001-06-06 Thread Austin Franklin
These negative profiles will be similar wich ring around sub sets What's a ring around sub sets? to correct for specific conditions such as over exposure, underexposure, high or low contrast, But isn't that what a tonal curve adjustment box is supposed to do, or are you saying you will