Hello All,
As there are many people involved and truly interested in further
Firebird development in this thread, I would like to remind, that
Firebird is funded by Firebird Foundation sponsors and members, and
there is always ability to boost development with money sponsorship and
donations.
For me highest priority are grouping sets and pivot.If we are talking about
triggers/procedures. For me there is one big disadvantage about string
processing.Why we can not use indexed access to string? This should be
simplified.E.g. declare variable A char(50)A[4] = 'x'A[7] = A[8]I
Hi Alexey,
Just my 2cents from someone who has not had time to review the code and
could not find a breakdown of the firebird code structure in a very cursory
search.
> (1) Schema support as per oracle not microsoft (although you can simulate
MS style schema with a proper implementation)
>
On 2018-11-06 14:44, Fabiano Bonin fabiano.bo...@personalsoft.com.br
[firebird-support] wrote:
> There is a 31 characters table name limit, the can bring some
> restrictions if you are planning to create a multi-database
> application and you use big table names.
This limit will be doubled (to
Hello Dalton,
>Where do you see the list of features that are destined to be in 5?
There is no list of features yet. However, as a member of Technical Task
Group, I will work to include into 5.0 the 3 main features: multi-master
replication, partitioning/table spaces, schema support.
>I
Kjell,
In our shop we are using Firebird 2.5x for Data warehouse and Postgresql 10..x
for other projects.
Below is my list of Pros and Cons between the two. The list below is my
experience with the two products.
PostgreSQL over Firebird 2.5
Pros
* Table Partitions are
Hi Alexey,
Where do you see the list of features that are destined to be in 5?
I have been a supporter of firebird for years but there are several things
that hold it back
(1) Schema support as per oracle not microsoft (although you can simulate
MS style schema with a proper implementation)
(2)
On 2018-11-07 16:28, Michal Kurczabinski michk...@gmail.com
[firebird-support] wrote:
> Firebird also doesn't support data partitioning, extended window
> functions
What are you really missing in existing window functions support?
Mark
Alexey
I can confirm that it is possible to 'compile' SP with error that will
appear during SP execution. Probably the most annoying thing in the
world for Firebird users ;-)
I hate it.
Marcin
-- Wiadomość oryginalna --
Od: "Alexey Kovyazin a...@ib-aid.com [firebird-support]"
Do:
Thank you!
In my opinion, Firebird will close the gap with PG in main features in 2
years, with FB5.0 version.
Regards,
Alexey Kovyazin
IBSurgeon www.ib-aid.com
On 07.11.2018 19:58, 'Martijn Tonies (Upscene Productions)'
m.ton...@upscene.com [firebird-support] wrote:
> Hello Alexey,
>
>> What
Hello Alexey,
>What about compilation of stored procedures - is it true that it is
>possible to create SP with errors, and they appear only when it will be
>invoked?
Unsure, will try tomorrow. Do note, that for example, Oracle allows you to
'save' or 'compile' invalid stored routines > they are
Martijn,
What about compilation of stored procedures - is it true that it is
possible to create SP with errors, and they appear only when it will be
invoked?
Also, about checking the parameters - is it true that you can create
stored procedure which invokes other stored procedure with wrong
Yes, it's true and it's rather annoying when, for example, developing an
interactive database development tool ;)
With regards,
Martijn Tonies
Upscene Productions
http://www.upscene.com
Database Workbench - developer tool for Oracle, MS SQL Server, PostgreSQL,
SQL Anywhere, MySQL, InterBase,
07.11.2018 17:11, liviuslivius liviusliv...@poczta.onet.pl [firebird-support]
wrote:
> Wow is this true?
https://www.tutorialspoint.com/postgresql/postgresql_transactions.htm
"Transactions can be started using BEGIN TRANSACTION or simply BEGIN command.
Such
transactions usually persist until
Wow is this true? If yes in my opinion going to PG is a mistake.Regards,Karol
Bieniaszewski
null
07.11.2018 16:28, Michal Kurczabinski michk...@gmail.com [firebird-support]
wrote:
> Firebird also doesn't support data partitioning, extended window functions
On the other hand transactions in PostgreSQL are strange: they automatically
rolled
back on any statement error.
--
WBR, SD.
Firebird also doesn't support data partitioning, extended window functions
--
Regards,
Michal Kurczabinski
2018-11-06 14:44 GMT+01:00, Fabiano Bonin
fabiano.bo...@personalsoft.com.br [firebird-support]
:
> Firebird doesn't support schemas.
> This is the main reason I am replacing it by
07.11.2018 14:16, hv...@users.sourceforge.net [firebird-support] wrote:
> The last lines i see inyour message is:
After that several bugchecks wer reported. You should have whole message in
your mail box.
> (Message over 64 KB, truncated)
AFAIU it is limitation of web-interface.
--
2018. 11. 07. 8:51 keltezéssel, hvlad@... mailto:hvlad@...
[firebird-support] írta:
>> There should be no crash. Errors - yes, crash - no.
>> Attached log is truncated and i see no message about crash there.
> The firebird.log not exists when started the OLTP. My second message
>
2018. 11. 07. 8:51 keltezéssel, hv...@users.sourceforge.net
[firebird-support] írta:
> There should be no crash. Errors - yes, crash - no.
> Attached log is truncated and i see no message about crash there.
The firebird.log not exists when started the OLTP. My second message
contains the
On 07/11/2018 07:51, hv...@users.sourceforge.net [firebird-support] wrote:
> > While I executed some OLTP with 2.5(.9.27119 SS Win64) and no more space
> > for the database the server crashed. See the attachment. Is it a known
> > limitation (not fixed in 2.5 because it's too old) or a bug?
>
> While I executed some OLTP with 2.5(.9.27119 SS Win64) and no more space
> for the database the server crashed. See the attachment. Is it a known
> limitation (not fixed in 2.5 because it's too old) or a bug?
There should be no crash. Errors - yes, crash - no.
Attached log is
22 matches
Mail list logo
