DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33555] - Markers: Current implementation has bugs

2005-02-15 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33555. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: Markers added to the wrong page

2005-02-15 Thread Jeremias Maerki
Simon, thanks for looking into this. I'm not quite sure I got your instructions for a markers5c right. I'd appreciate if you'd check in the test case you created. I've added a Bugzilla item [1] for this. I intend to revisit this later. It would really be good to have test cases for all those

Error in computation of inline progression dimension ?

2005-02-15 Thread Luca Furini
I noticed a strange behaviour concerning margins that could be related to the inheritance of start-indend and end-indent, which was discussed a few weeks ago. It seems that in some situations the margins are subtracted twice from the available inline progression dimension. In the little fo file

Re: Error in computation of inline progression dimension ?

2005-02-15 Thread Jeremias Maerki
Hi Luca, the reason for the effect you're seeing is the inheritance of start-indent and end-indent. In your exapmle, if you specify a margin-left and margin-right on the simple-page-master, this results (corresponding properties) in a start-indent and end-indent of 50pt each. Now, because

Re: Error in computation of inline progression dimension ?

2005-02-15 Thread Glen Mazza
--- Jeremias Maerki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Luca, the reason for the effect you're seeing is the inheritance of start-indent and end-indent. In your exapmle, if you specify a margin-left and margin-right on the simple-page-master, this results (corresponding properties) in a

Re: [XML Graphics - FOP Wiki] Updated: CollapsingBorderModel

2005-02-15 Thread Jeremias Maerki
I've documented a few thoughts about the collapsing border model in the Wiki in preparation for the implementation. There are a few important decisions that have to be made prior to implementing it, so I'd be glad for any feedback. I'm currently inclined to pursue strategy 1 as it is probably

Re: Error in computation of inline progression dimension ?

2005-02-15 Thread Jeremias Maerki
On 15.02.2005 17:46:54 Glen Mazza wrote: --- Jeremias Maerki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Luca, the reason for the effect you're seeing is the inheritance of start-indent and end-indent. In your exapmle, if you specify a margin-left and margin-right on the simple-page-master,

Re: Error in computation of inline progression dimension ?

2005-02-15 Thread Jeremias Maerki
Yes, I was probably not 100% correct in my explanation though my interpretation still stands. On 15.02.2005 18:02:14 Glen Mazza wrote: Oh--5.3.2 says: There are two more properties, end-indent and start-indent (block-level formatting objects) which correspond to the various absolute margin

Re: Error in computation of inline progression dimension ?

2005-02-15 Thread Glen Mazza
But if start-indent and margin-left are not Corresponding Properties, then the inheritance of 50pt. you gave in your example would not occur. IMO, if start-indent and margin-left were actually intended to be Corresponding Properties, the former would have been named margin-start. Also,

Re: Error in computation of inline progression dimension ?

2005-02-15 Thread Jeremias Maerki
In mid January Peter helped me understand what's going on. Please have a look at his explanation [1]. Maybe that makes it clearer. The margin properties are never used directly in the layout engine (I think and hope). I'm always working from *-indent and space-*. I think it's obvious enough from

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33593] New: - colspec colwidth=0*/ causes FOP to run forever

2005-02-15 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33593. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33593] - colspec colwidth=0*/ causes FOP to run forever

2005-02-15 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33593. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6094] - 0.20.3rc hangs in endless loop

2005-02-15 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6094. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33597] New: - [Patch] for xdocs Design and Implementation

2005-02-15 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33597. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33597] - [Patch] for xdocs Design and Implementation

2005-02-15 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33597. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: Error in computation of inline progression dimension ?

2005-02-15 Thread Glen Mazza
Jeremias, I am wrong here. This phrase in 5.3.2: If the corresponding absolute margin property is specified on the formatting object... Clearly means that margin *is* a CP, and hence is a CP with start-indent/end-indent as appropriate. Forget that argument--never mind, and I'm sorry that you

Re: Error in computation of inline progression dimension ?

2005-02-15 Thread Glen Mazza
--- Jeremias Maerki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Luca, the reason for the effect you're seeing is the inheritance of start-indent and end-indent. In your exapmle, if you specify a margin-left and margin-right on the simple-page-master, (margin-left and margin-right of 50pt each on

Re: Error in computation of inline progression dimension ?

2005-02-15 Thread Glen Mazza
On second thought, Jeremias, instead of arguing this, why don't we just compromise at 75pt. margins? ;) Glen --- Glen Mazza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- Jeremias Maerki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Luca, the reason for the effect you're seeing is the inheritance of start-indent

Re: Error in computation of inline progression dimension ?

2005-02-15 Thread Jeremias Maerki
90pt, no less. On 16.02.2005 05:15:36 Glen Mazza wrote: On second thought, Jeremias, instead of arguing this, why don't we just compromise at 75pt. margins? ;) Jeremias Maerki

Re: Error in computation of inline progression dimension ?

2005-02-15 Thread Jeremias Maerki
I'm afraid that you're wrong here. It's true that s-p-m and region-body don't directly generate reference areas but they also can't, because they are only used as a template for each new page. For for each page they serve as FOs that generate reference areas. But let me give you another example