On 22.01.2003 23:55:14 Arnd Beißner wrote:
Hello there,
after some research I found and fixed a bug in the PS renderer
that can be a real nuisance.
Yeah, one that I never got round to fix.
The problem is as follows: The ascii (and Unicode) minus
character is mapped to the hyphen
jeremias2003/01/23 00:37:37
Modified:src/org/apache/fop/render/ps Tag: fop-0_20_2-maintain
PSRenderer.java
Log:
Temporary fix for an encoding mismatch (WinAnsiEncoding vs. ISOLatin1). The hyphen
character is the only character corrected.
Submitted by: Arnd
jeremias2003/01/23 00:39:38
Modified:.Tag: fop-0_20_2-maintain CHANGES
Log:
Update changes
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No revision
1.10.2.44 +3 -0 xml-fop/CHANGES
Index: CHANGES
BUG in initial-page-number handling?
This xsl:fo document renders 3 pages
?xml version=1.0 encoding=iso-8859-1?
fo:root xmlns:fo=http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Format;
fo:layout-master-set
!-- layout for the first page --
fo:simple-page-master
Keiron Liddle wrote:
Personally I would like to see some sort of rotation (assuming that there will
always be 1 or 2). For example every 6 months.
Why? So the PMC becomes something that is better known and diverse than the
mystery that it currently seems to be.
This is an excellent idea.
This isnt a bug. Try setting the attribute force-page-count=no-force on
the first page-sequence.
3 pages are rendered because default value for force-page-count is auto,
which basically means that because you set the initial page count of the 2nd
page sequence to an odd number (1 in your
Hi all (and especially Peter)
I'd like to ask if and when we can integrate Peter's work into the main
redesign. If nobody is against this move in general, I'd volunteer to
help Peter integrate it. I've got some time for this and I think this
could help focus our limited resources.
Peter, would
Jeremias,
I shall do that, although, never having had anything to do with Wikis
before, I will be fumbling.
As you may have noticed, I have been somewhat distracted since the New
Year. Among the things that require attention are my attempts at a
pseudo-code-walkthrough style of documentation
On 23.01.2003 12:34:33 Peter B. West wrote:
Jeremias,
I shall do that, although, never having had anything to do with Wikis
before, I will be fumbling.
It's easy. You'll see. :-)
As you may have noticed, I have been somewhat distracted since the New
Year. Among the things that require
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
On 23.01.2003 12:34:33 Peter B. West wrote:
...
There are a couple of issues in the design of the properties code that
will require decisions from the editors. I will detail these on the
Wiki, and formulate questions for the editors in hopes of a quick reply.
I
Peter B. West wrote:
. . .
What will be interesting here is the possibility
of defining a set of structure events for integration with the structure
renderers like RTF, and I hope we can have some fruitful discussions
with Bertrand on this.
Looks promising, let me know where to look when the
Title: Integration of Peter's work
If
clear documentation of what needs to be done can be produced, I'm willing to
offer my time to it, too, though I don't know if my not having R/W access to the
CVS would make me an unsuitable candidate.
-Original Message-From: Jeremias Maerki
Processing properly generated unified diffs is not much of a problem. It
would be cool if you could help, too. We can use all the help we can get.
Just curious: Is the missing R/W access to CVS a reason for you not to
contribute?
(another little thing: Are you forced to use that particular mail
Rhett Aultman wrote:
As for my mail client...pretty much, yes, I am. It's a standard
at my company. The only other option is for me to switch to my
private email account and start using a web-based client. If
it's annoying people, I can.
If you're using Outlook, there is a checkbox on the
For my part, I've never understood why people seem to prefer mailing lists
to NTTP newsgroups. Has there ever been a discussion about moving to a
newsgroup?
-Original Message-
From: Jeremias Maerki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 9:59 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I can't remember any. Do you know about gmane (http://www.gmane.org)?
You could try to have the FOP lists registrated there. Other Apache
projects have done the same.
On 23.01.2003 16:42:09 Patrick Dean Rusk wrote:
For my part, I've never understood why people seem to prefer mailing lists
to
On 23.01.2003 16:07:24 Rhett Aultman wrote:
Doing anything is why I have volunteered to help integrate Peter's
work. It seems like the sort of thing I could do without excessive
domain knowledge and like something I can do while I keep an eye on the
layout system and while thinking about my
...and I don't use the built-in Ant support. Doesn't work on my machine.
Lots of error with out build.xml.
On 23.01.2003 18:32:01 Jeremias Maerki wrote:
BTW, does anyone here use Eclipse as their IDE? I use it, and getting
it to play nice with FOP's source hasn't been easy for me, so I
Just realize that I am, with the exception of my layout experience, a grunt. I'm
volunteering for this because I'm assuming that Peter has gotten the majority of the
actual engineering out of the way and that helping incorporate his work isn't going to
require massive amounts of domain
Confronted to volumetric problems I am very interested in the re-design
branch of the FOP project, in particular the FO SAX input and ASAP
rendering tasks. I wonder if I could try helping in order to make possible
getting a release available this year.
But I have not been able to catch the real
Patrick Dean Rusk wrote:
For my part, I've never understood why people seem to prefer mailing lists
to NTTP newsgroups. Has there ever been a discussion about moving to a
newsgroup?
Probably security stuff, old practice and archiving. But anyway, what's wrong
with mail list? Please, no more
Howdy folks,
I have a file where I've commented a fairly large section of my source
XML file (commented areas affect FLOW content--so it won't print out so
many darn pages! :-). I've found significant discrepancies involving the
timing of outputting the commented version vs. the uncommented
Sorry for the re-post. I'd neglected to include some information on the
XML file info summary for the un-commented version. I've included it, as
well as a summary of the FOP .4 .5rc rendering times. You can delete
the previous post.
:-)
Howdy folks,
I have a file where I've commented a
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
It's not only about the HTML. It's also about the In-Reply-To
and/or References
header entry. Some mail clients have a thread view (as a tree) and not
having these header entries involves attaching mails manually to the
thread.
Hmmm. I use Outlook it does this for
Has anyone made or is making an effort to implement strokeSVGText==false
feature in PS renderning?
I don't want to reinvent wheel here, if no effort is there, I would like to
dive into this.
Whenever I talk to my collegures or boss about how wonderful FOP is for PDF
publishing, the feedback
I use Mozilla 1.2.1 and your msgs come through fine for me.
:-)
Victor Mote wrote:
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
It's not only about the HTML. It's also about the In-Reply-To
and/or References
header entry. Some mail clients have a thread view (as a tree) and not
having these header entries
Yours are ok. You can check yourself for the In-Reply-To header.
On 23.01.2003 19:17:48 Victor Mote wrote:
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
It's not only about the HTML. It's also about the In-Reply-To
and/or References
header entry. Some mail clients have a thread view (as a tree) and not
keiron 2003/01/23 10:59:08
Modified:src/org/apache/fop/area AreaTreeModel.java BodyRegion.java
CTM.java CachedRenderPagesModel.java MinOptMax.java
RegionViewport.java RenderPagesModel.java Span.java
On 23.01.2003 19:32:47 George Yi wrote:
Has anyone made or is making an effort to implement strokeSVGText==false
feature in PS renderning?
No.
I don't want to reinvent wheel here, if no effort is there, I would like to
dive into this.
Whenever I talk to my collegures or boss about how
Where did you find these tasks? I'm not sure what you mean with these.
That's great that you want to help! Welcome!
On 23.01.2003 18:37:55 LENEVANEN Cedrick wrote:
Confronted to volumetric problems I am very interested in the re-design
branch of the FOP project, in particular the FO SAX input
Sounds attractive to me. I don't know how much dedication I can put into
this. My paid job has absolute No.1 priority. But if some committer take a
lead, I am certainly willing to help to implement some features.
Anyway, help me setup first. I can always learn something:-)
-Original
Deal. I'll start setting up the basic infrastructure for it tomorrow. I
hope we can get you started on this real fast. :-)
On 23.01.2003 20:29:22 George Yi wrote:
Sounds attractive to me. I don't know how much dedication I can put into
this. My paid job has absolute No.1 priority. But if some
Hey Maestro!
Have you tried to run only the XSLT part of it? Do that and compare
execution times there. That should be interesting.
Jeremias Maerki
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email:
Jeremias,
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
Hey Maestro!
Have you tried to run only the XSLT part of it? Do that and compare
execution times there. That should be interesting.
Jeremias Maerki
I don't know how to run only the XSLT part of it... Can you give any
more information as to what you're
Run the XSL transformation alone. Using fop.bat you've done:
XML XSL-FO --- PDF
(XSLT) (FOP)
The XSLT part of it is this:
XML XSL-FO
(XSLT)
(I hope the ASCII art comes out ok)
Since the comments should in theory not reach FOP it is my guess that
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
Run the XSL transformation alone. Using fop.bat you've done:
XML XSL-FO --- PDF
(XSLT) (FOP)
The XSLT part of it is this:
XML XSL-FO
(XSLT)
(I hope the ASCII art comes out ok)
Since the comments should in theory not reach
On 23.01.2003 22:15:17 Clay Leeds wrote:
It helps. However, I only have fop-0.20.4 (.5rc) installed. I also
notice that in the lib/ folder I've got xalan-2.3.1.jar. Will this
suffice, or do I need to install the full version of xalan. Also, the
current version of xalan is 2.4.1... should I
Victor Mote wrote:
It's not only about the HTML. It's also about the In-Reply-To
and/or References
header entry. Some mail clients have a thread view (as a tree) and not
having these header entries involves attaching mails manually to the
thread.
Hmmm. I use Outlook it does this for me. Are
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
On 23.01.2003 22:15:17 Clay Leeds wrote:
It helps. However, I only have fop-0.20.4 (.5rc) installed. I also
notice that in the lib/ folder I've got xalan-2.3.1.jar. Will this
suffice, or do I need to install the full version of xalan. Also, the
current version of xalan
On 23.01.2003 22:47:20 Clay Leeds wrote:
snip/
That worked great (except I had to change the version numbers for xerces
(xercesImpl-2.0.1.jar) xalan(xalan-2.3.1.jar) (which was probably
expcected :-):
C:\Program Files\Java\fop-0.20.4java -cp
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
On 23.01.2003 22:47:20 Clay Leeds wrote:
snip/
That worked great (except I had to change the version numbers for xerces
(xercesImpl-2.0.1.jar) xalan(xalan-2.3.1.jar) (which was probably
expcected :-):
C:\Program Files\Java\fop-0.20.4java -cp
On Thursday, January 23, 2003, at 06:37 PM, LENEVANEN Cedrick wrote:
Confronted to volumetric problems I am very interested in the re-design
branch of the FOP project, in particular the FO SAX input and ASAP
rendering tasks. I wonder if I could try helping in order to make
possible
getting a
On Thursday, January 23, 2003, at 07:32 PM, George Yi wrote:
Has anyone made or is making an effort to implement strokeSVGText==false
feature in PS renderning?
Not that I am aware of.
I don't want to reinvent wheel here, if no effort is there, I would
like to
dive into this.
Whenever I
I ran the XSLT transform twice (just out of curiosity), and there was
about 300ms difference between the two identicalk runs. However, it is
more in line with the results we were expecting. However, it was still
about 15-18 seconds shorter than my previous results (diligently
watching the
Would you think we should put a Xalan.bat/Xalan.sh file
into the FOP distribution? (or xslt.bar/xslt.sh)
J.Pietschmann
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Clay Leeds wrote:
It took 2 seconds of rendering time compared to 65 seconds of time taken
from command line [Enter] to FOP output completion.
This latter time includes JVM startup, loading all the code and
whatnot. Occasionally the OS is busy and it takes longer to load
an executable and the
J.Pietschmann wrote:
Would you think we should put a Xalan.bat/Xalan.sh file
into the FOP distribution? (or xslt.bar/xslt.sh)
Very good idea. Probably most people create these
batchfiles/shellscripts anyway.
Might also lead to more people trying the transformation
step separately to see where
J.Pietschmann wrote:
Would you think we should put a Xalan.bat/Xalan.sh file
into the FOP distribution? (or xslt.bar/xslt.sh)
J.Pietschmann
That's an intriguing idea. Assuming that it would help trouble-shoot
problems like this, that might be good for this type of testing. Also, I
noticed a
I think it would be preferable to have a FOP option to output the
intermediate FO file that it uses in its processing, similar to the way many
compilers can output some of their intermediate files.
Just today I've finally diagnosed a strangeness in my program to the fact
that using FOP to
Patrick Dean Rusk wrote:
I think it would be preferable to have a FOP option to output the
intermediate FO file that it uses in its processing, similar to the way many
compilers can output some of their intermediate files.
It's well-known feature request, see
Patrick Dean Rusk wrote:
Just today I've finally diagnosed a strangeness in my program to the fact
that using FOP to transform gives a different result sometimes than doing
the transform manually and following it with a FOP run on the .fo file. In
my case, the difference was from having the
51 matches
Mail list logo
