On Friday 05 November 2010 22:51:01 Robert Bonomi wrote:
From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Fri Nov 5 02:26:31 2010
From: Jonathan McKeown j.mcke...@ru.ac.za
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2010 10:27:38 +0200
Subject: Glue records (was Re: ATTN GARY KLINE
In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 335, Issue 8, Message: 29
On Fri, 05 Nov 2010 01:32:11 -0400 Jon Radel j...@radel.com wrote:
On 11/5/10 12:22 AM, kline wrote:
[..]
It is time to get this stuff arrow-straight, so hoping that someone
on-list can clue me in.
[..]
On Friday 05 November 2010 09:28:27 Ian Smith wrote:
But you don't always have any control of what parent nameservers do;
eg we do DNS for a .com but both NS are in .au so DNS reports always
whinge about lack of glue
They should be whingeing about lack of clue (their own) unless I'm horribly
In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 335, Issue 9, Message: 7
On Fri, 5 Nov 2010 10:27:38 +0200 Jonathan McKeown j.mcke...@ru.ac.za wrote:
On Friday 05 November 2010 09:28:27 Ian Smith wrote:
But you don't always have any control of what parent nameservers do;
eg we do DNS for a .com but both
On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 01:32:11AM -0400, Jon Radel wrote:
On 11/5/10 12:22 AM, kline wrote:
i''m using evo to be able to click on. i have fewer ``Fail'' type
responses, but do not understand the failure messages. Also, since it
has been 9.5 years since I read DNS AND BIND, the jargon is
From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Fri Nov 5 02:26:31 2010
From: Jonathan McKeown j.mcke...@ru.ac.za
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2010 10:27:38 +0200
Subject: Glue records (was Re: ATTN GARY KLINE)
On Friday 05 November 2010 09:28:27 Ian Smith wrote:
But you
Seee below for typing from deadbbs.com.
On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 08:10:07PM -0600, Robert Bonomi wrote:
Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2010 22:50:00 -0700
From: Gary Kline kl...@thought.org
Subject: Re: is there a utillity...?
*please* fix the DNS for 'thought.org'. you are utterly unmailable.
On Thu, Nov 04, 2010 at 06:29:38AM +0100, Polytropon wrote:
On Wed, 3 Nov 2010 21:51:04 -0500, Ryan Coleman ryan.cole...@cwis.biz wrote:
He likely won't. This was pointed out to him two months ago
and nothing's been fixed.
Seems to be fine from here:
% nslookup -type=any thought.org
2010-11-04 06:59, Gary Kline:
On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 08:10:07PM -0600, Robert Bonomi wrote:
Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2010 22:50:00 -0700
From: Gary Klinekl...@thought.org
Subject: Re: is there a utillity...?
*please* fix the DNS for 'thought.org'. you are utterly unmailable.
There is no IP
On Thu, Nov 04, 2010 at 01:52:17AM -0400, Jon Radel wrote:
On 11/4/10 1:29 AM, Polytropon wrote:
On Wed, 3 Nov 2010 21:51:04 -0500, Ryan Colemanryan.cole...@cwis.biz
wrote:
He likely won't. This was pointed out to him two months ago
and nothing's been fixed.
Seems to be fine from here:
On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 09:08 +0100, Bernt Hansson wrote:
2010-11-04 06:59, Gary Kline:
On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 08:10:07PM -0600, Robert Bonomi wrote:
Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2010 22:50:00 -0700
From: Gary Klinekl...@thought.org
Subject: Re: is there a utility...?
*please* fix the DNS for
On 11/5/10 12:22 AM, kline wrote:
i''m using evo to be able to click on. i have fewer ``Fail'' type
responses, but do not understand the failure messages. Also, since it
has been 9.5 years since I read DNS AND BIND, the jargon is lost. What
does glue means? and how should I resolve?
It is
Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2010 22:50:00 -0700
From: Gary Kline kl...@thought.org
Subject: Re: is there a utillity...?
*please* fix the DNS for 'thought.org'. you are utterly unmailable.
There is no IP address for the primary nameserver, 'ns1.thought.org'
The secondary nameserver 'ns2.everydns.net'
He likely won't. This was pointed out to him two months ago and nothing's been
fixed.
On Nov 3, 2010, at 9:10 PM, Robert Bonomi wrote:
Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2010 22:50:00 -0700
From: Gary Kline kl...@thought.org
Subject: Re: is there a utillity...?
*please* fix the DNS for 'thought.org'.
On Wed, 3 Nov 2010 21:51:04 -0500, Ryan Coleman ryan.cole...@cwis.biz wrote:
He likely won't. This was pointed out to him two months ago
and nothing's been fixed.
Seems to be fine from here:
% nslookup -type=any thought.org
Server: 192.168.100.1
Address:192.168.100.1#53
On 11/4/10 1:29 AM, Polytropon wrote:
On Wed, 3 Nov 2010 21:51:04 -0500, Ryan Colemanryan.cole...@cwis.biz wrote:
He likely won't. This was pointed out to him two months ago
and nothing's been fixed.
Seems to be fine from here:
% nslookup -type=any thought.org
Server: 192.168.100.1
On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 08:10:07PM -0600, Robert Bonomi wrote:
Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2010 22:50:00 -0700
From: Gary Kline kl...@thought.org
Subject: Re: is there a utillity...?
*please* fix the DNS for 'thought.org'. you are utterly unmailable.
There is no IP address for the primary
On 9/27/05, Bill Schoolcraft [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At Mon, 26 Sep 2005 it looks like Kris Kennaway composed:
You are blocking mail from me again:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: host ns1.thought.org[216.231.43.140] said: 550 5.0.0
No SPAM (in reply to MAIL FROM command)
This has been an
You are blocking mail from me again:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: host ns1.thought.org[216.231.43.140] said: 550 5.0.0
No SPAM (in reply to MAIL FROM command)
This has been an issue in the past..unless you can get it under
control I'll just stop bothering to read your emails, in case I'm
tempted to
At Mon, 26 Sep 2005 it looks like Kris Kennaway composed:
You are blocking mail from me again:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: host ns1.thought.org[216.231.43.140] said: 550 5.0.0
No SPAM (in reply to MAIL FROM command)
This has been an issue in the past..unless you can get it under
control I'll just
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 03:50:30PM -0700, Bill Schoolcraft wrote:
At Mon, 26 Sep 2005 it looks like Kris Kennaway composed:
You are blocking mail from me again:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: host ns1.thought.org[216.231.43.140] said: 550
5.0.0
No SPAM (in reply to MAIL FROM command)
This has
21 matches
Mail list logo
