After the last major update of www/firefox to version 23 firefox
rejects of moving/swapping the tabs. They are static now. I do not
know whether this has to do with the great pixman update, because
coincidentally I made bot the pixman update and the update of firefox
towards revision 23 slipped
El día Monday, October 14, 2013 a las 08:54:56AM +0200, O. Hartmann escribió:
After the last major update of www/firefox to version 23 firefox
rejects of moving/swapping the tabs. They are static now. I do not
know whether this has to do with the great pixman update, because
coincidentally
On Mon, 14 Oct 2013 09:50:48 +0200
Matthias Apitz g...@unixarea.de wrote:
El día Monday, October 14, 2013 a las 08:54:56AM +0200, O. Hartmann
escribió:
After the last major update of www/firefox to version 23 firefox
rejects of moving/swapping the tabs. They are static now. I do
Sorry,
FF is in my case 24, too:
pkg info firefox
firefox-24.0,1
root@aurora:~ # pkg_info | fgrep firefox
firefox-24.0,1 Web browser based on the browser portion of Mozilla
Have you done updating the ports regarding
20130929
No, I did 'svn co ...' for /usr/ports
On Mon, 14 Oct 2013, O. Hartmann wrote:
FF is in my case 24, too:
pkg info firefox
firefox-24.0,1
Have you done updating the ports regarding
20130929
in /usr/ports/UPDATING? I did on all boxes and on all boxes I did the
tab-stickyness is present.
Firefox 24 allows tab moves for me on both
On Mon, 07 Oct 2013 05:08:09 +0200
Bernt Hansson articulated:
On 2013-10-06 21:31, Jerry wrote:
$ /usr/local/bin/firefox
(process:71385): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_slice_set_config: assertion
`sys_page_size == 0' failed
This is all I could gather.
I get the same for firefox
Firefox has suddenly went silent. I can view videos on Youtube for
instance, but there is no sound. If I save the video to dist and play
it with MPlayer, there is sound. I did update several PHP modules the
other day, but I don't know it that would have any effect on it. Also,
on several sites
On 06/10/13 at 10:27am, Jerry wrote:
Firefox has suddenly went silent. I can view videos on Youtube for
instance, but there is no sound. If I save the video to dist and play
it with MPlayer, there is sound. I did update several PHP modules the
other day, but I don't know it that would have any
On Sun, 6 Oct 2013 15:33:38 +0100
Dave Morgan articulated:
On 06/10/13 at 10:27am, Jerry wrote:
Firefox has suddenly went silent. I can view videos on Youtube for
instance, but there is no sound. If I save the video to dist and
play it with MPlayer, there is sound. I did update several PHP
El día Sunday, October 06, 2013 a las 10:27:48AM -0400, Jerry escribió:
Firefox has suddenly went silent. I can view videos on Youtube for
instance, but there is no sound. If I save the video to dist and play
it with MPlayer, there is sound. I did update several PHP modules the
other day
On Sun, 6 Oct 2013 16:40:16 +0200
Matthias Apitz articulated:
El día Sunday, October 06, 2013 a las 10:27:48AM -0400, Jerry
escribió:
Firefox has suddenly went silent. I can view videos on Youtube for
instance, but there is no sound. If I save the video to dist and
play it with MPlayer
wheel 198456 Sep 14 2010 /compat/linux/lib/libssl3.so*
$ /usr/local/bin/firefox
(process:71385): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_slice_set_config: assertion `sys_page_size
== 0' failed
This is all I could gather.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do
On 2013-10-06 21:31, Jerry wrote:
$ /usr/local/bin/firefox
(process:71385): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_slice_set_config: assertion `sys_page_size
== 0' failed
This is all I could gather.
I get the same for firefox and thunderbird
% firefox
[1] 37788
%
(process:37788): GLib-CRITICAL
On 10/02/13 14:49, Gary Kline wrote:
well, it just happened again. when I closed an unwanted URL, the
other two instances of firefox vanished. I know the Hard way of
getting them all back, but does is there an easy way of refilling
both browsers? oh
Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986.
Of_Interest: With 27 years of service to the Unix community.
guys,
well, it just happened again. when I closed an unwanted URL, the
other two instances of firefox vanished. I know the Hard way
I think I should know this but I don't, and a search didn't turn up anything
recent.
It's my understanding firefox 22 with html5 should allow playing youtube videos
without the flash plugin. But when I try to watch a youtube video, firefox
crashes. I had this working on firefox 17 under 9.0
Hey Gary,
Try launching FireFox in a terminal emulator, do you get an error
message related to cubeb_refill_stream? To fix the error
try either setting media.use_cubeb - false in about:config
or rebuild audio/alsa-plugins with ARIFF_OSS disabled.
On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 12:25:41AM -0600, Gary
just did a ports update, haven't done one for a few months.
portmaster -w www/firefox
craps out with:
In file included from
/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/mozilla-release/gfx/2d/Blur.cp
p:7:
In file included from ../../dist/include/mozilla/gfx/Blur.h:12:
../../dist/include/mozilla/CheckedInt.h:179
#rpc_lockd_enable=YES
#rpc_statd_enable=YES
nfs_client_enable=YES
nfs_client_flags=-n 4
Firefox starts but no bookmarks, history,
With rpc_lockd_enable=YES
Firefox dosn't come up after 5 minutes
With nolockd mountoption:
Firefox dosn't come up after 5 minutes
Can someone please enlighten me
On Sat, 29 Jun 2013 07:53:13 +0200
Leslie Jensen articulated:
2013-06-28 19:07, Jerry skrev:
Using Firefox 21, if I enter this URL:
http://www.nclawreview.org/documents/91/1/wegner.pdf
nothing happens. The PDF is not displayed nor is there any evidence
that Firefox did anything
Using Firefox 21, if I enter this URL:
http://www.nclawreview.org/documents/91/1/wegner.pdf
nothing happens. The PDF is not displayed nor is there any evidence
that Firefox did anything at all.
Now, entering the same URL using the same version of Firefox on a
Windows machine, it works perfectly
28.06.2013 21:07, Jerry пишет:
Using Firefox 21, if I enter this URL:
http://www.nclawreview.org/documents/91/1/wegner.pdf
nothing happens. The PDF is not displayed nor is there any evidence
that Firefox did anything at all.
Now, entering the same URL using the same version of Firefox
On Fri, 28 Jun 2013 21:46:43 +0400
Boris Samorodov articulated:
This works for me: Edit - Prefernces - Applications - PDF:
preview in Firefox. As well as other viewer (mupdf tested).
My current Firefox version is 22.0 though. But I recall it
working at previous firefox versions.
I have tried
On 2013-06-28 19:07, Jerry wrote:
Using Firefox 21, if I enter this URL:
http://www.nclawreview.org/documents/91/1/wegner.pdf
nothing happens. The PDF is not displayed nor is there any evidence
that Firefox did anything at all.
Now, entering the same URL using the same version of Firefox
2013-06-28 19:07, Jerry skrev:
Using Firefox 21, if I enter this URL:
http://www.nclawreview.org/documents/91/1/wegner.pdf
nothing happens. The PDF is not displayed nor is there any evidence
that Firefox did anything at all.
Now, entering the same URL using the same version of Firefox
Hi all :-)
I need use -X ssh and use firefox on remote machine:
ssh -X -l user xxx host
Is there a way to install firefox without X? or less ports possible
thanks!
Pol
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman
On Jun 18, 2013, at 6:41 AM, Pol Hallen wrote:
Hi all :-)
I need use -X ssh and use firefox on remote machine:
ssh -X -l user xxx host
Is there a way to install firefox without X? or less ports possible
I indeed run Firefox using the above method from my servers (which aren't
On 18 June 2013 14:01, Teske, Devin devin.te...@fisglobal.com wrote:
On Jun 18, 2013, at 6:41 AM, Pol Hallen wrote:
Hi all :-)
I need use -X ssh and use firefox on remote machine:
ssh -X -l user xxx host
Is there a way to install firefox without X? or less ports possible
I
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 8:41 AM, Pol Hallen m...@fuckaround.org wrote:
Hi all :-)
I need use -X ssh and use firefox on remote machine:
ssh -X -l user xxx host
Is there a way to install firefox without X? or less ports possible
On a clean machine, setting WITHOUT_X11=yes in /etc/make.conf
Thanks for your comment. I agree that firefox is intermittently slow or
stop. Which do you use? I tend to use chromium although I still will
probably go back to firefox unless chrome becomes a bit more firefox like.
thanks
ed
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 4:09 PM, Mikhail Krutov n...@takino.org
On Tue, 30 Apr 2013 14:08:55 -0500
Edwin L. Culp W. edwinlc...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for your comment. I agree that firefox is intermittently slow
or stop. Which do you use? I tend to use chromium although I still
will probably go back to firefox unless chrome becomes a bit more
firefox
On Tue, 30 Apr 2013 21:01:39 -0300
Mario Lobo l...@bsd.com.br wrote:
On Tue, 30 Apr 2013 14:08:55 -0500
Edwin L. Culp W. edwinlc...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for your comment. I agree that firefox is intermittently
slow or stop. Which do you use? I tend to use chromium although I
still
On Tue, 30 Apr 2013 14:08:55 -0500, Edwin L. Culp W. wrote:
Thanks for your comment. I agree that firefox is intermittently slow or
stop. Which do you use?
Opera. No, really. :-)
I tend to use chromium although I still will
probably go back to firefox unless chrome becomes a bit more
Hi,
I used to love firefox in the early days, when I started using Linux
around 2003-2004. It was so fast. Now it's just amazing how long does
it take to start.
On my machine : intel i3 540, 2G of RAM and FreeBSD 9.1 it takes
around 12 secondes to start. Is it so long for you too?
What kind
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 11:18:57AM +0200, David Demelier wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
I used to love firefox in the early days, when I started using Linux
around 2003-2004. It was so fast. Now it's just amazing how long does
it take to start.
The ugly fact is that every browser is slow. Except
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 11:18:57AM +0200, David Demelier wrote:
Hi,
I used to love firefox in the early days, when I started using Linux
around 2003-2004. It was so fast. Now it's just amazing how long does
it take to start.
On my machine : intel i3 540, 2G of RAM and FreeBSD 9.1 it takes
2013/4/29 Roland Smith rsm...@xs4all.nl:
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 11:18:57AM +0200, David Demelier wrote:
Hi,
I used to love firefox in the early days, when I started using Linux
around 2003-2004. It was so fast. Now it's just amazing how long does
it take to start.
On my machine : intel i3
:
AMD Phenom, 4 cores @ 3 Ghz, 8mbytes RAM
With the load (as reported by top) at around 6, Firefox 20 also
takes ~12 seconds.
On the other hand ... once I open a browser I work within it,
until it's no longer needed (or it crashes :-( ). Opening a new
window/tab in SeaMonkey is so fast
2013 amd64
Hardware:
AMD Phenom, 4 cores @ 3 Ghz, 8mbytes RAM
With the load (as reported by top) at around 6, Firefox 20 also
takes ~12 seconds.
On the other hand ... once I open a browser I work within it,
until it's no longer needed (or it crashes
On 4/29/2013 5:06 AM, Mikhail Krutov wrote:
~ 5 seconds on kinda sligthly better machine;
~ 0.1 seconds if I move ~/.mozilla to tmpfs (which is a kludge and which
sucks)
What if you make it a gmirror with a ramdisk, with the mirror syncing on
boot and preferring the ramdisk? It's still a
use Firefox only when I'm forced to do so (on win32),
and on sanier platforms I have better choices.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 11:35 AM, Bernt Hansson b...@bananmonarki.se wrote:
A blind Linux user's homepage: http://juliencoder.de/
The homepage of my provider: http://www.o2online.de/
What site is more pleasant ;)?
The first one.
Agree, it contains more information than the second one which is
On Wed, 2013-02-13 at 11:39 +0100, CeDeROM wrote:
Agree, it contains more information than the second one which is
picture-flash based and I cannot see ~80% of its content :-)
And the biggest evil is, that those web pages hide important things and
they don't add a site map.
I can't find the
On 12/02/2013 21:38, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
In general, I don't upgrade my ports very often, so up until recently
I was running a fairly old version of firefox (firefox-15.0.1,1).
But over the weekend, I moved everything over to a new drive
containing the latest 9.1-RELEASE FreeBSD
On Wed, 2013-02-13 at 13:13 +, Chris Whitehouse wrote:
Is there a file .mozilla/firefox/profiles.ini? If so it should list
which profile to use. Just change it to the one you want and it
should
just work.
I'm using an older version so don't know how the latest works
Good point Chris
in a directory having a name which
has the following general form:
~/.mozilla/firefox/.default
Hey Ronald, are you sure there is no corruption on the disk?
I have no reason whatsoever to suspect that there is.
___
freebsd-questions
In general, I don't upgrade my ports very often, so up until recently
I was running a fairly old version of firefox (firefox-15.0.1,1).
But over the weekend, I moved everything over to a new drive
containing the latest 9.1-RELEASE FreeBSD, and with a complete set
of freshly rebuilt ports
The profile should be available by 'firefox -ProfileManager' [1], OTOH
I'm booted to Ubuntu Precise and the ProfileManager doesn't start, for
Arch Linux I used two profiles, one shared with another Linux and after
a while I couldn't use the shared profiles anymore, but the
ProfileManger still
On Tue, 2013-02-12 at 22:49 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
The profile should be available by 'firefox -ProfileManager' [1], OTOH
I'm booted to Ubuntu Precise and the ProfileManager doesn't start, for
Arch Linux I used two profiles, one shared with another Linux and after
a while I couldn't use
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 10:38 PM, Ronald F. Guilmette
r...@tristatelogic.com wrote:
Looking into this issue a bit deeper, I've now learned that all of
one's personal settings are stored in a directory having a name which
has the following general form:
~/.mozilla/firefox
On Tue, 2013-02-12 at 22:52 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Tue, 2013-02-12 at 22:49 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
The profile should be available by 'firefox -ProfileManager' [1], OTOH
I'm booted to Ubuntu Precise and the ProfileManager doesn't start, for
Arch Linux I used two profiles, one
corruption on the filesystem and some
settings are lost/changed...
Firefox is my preferred browser, but it has some disadvantages compared
to other browsers. 1. It's slow and bloated, even without add-ons,
fortunately it doesn't matter on my relatively modern machine. 2. It's
known for all kind
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 11:11 PM, Ralf Mardorf
ralf.mard...@rocketmail.com wrote:
Firefox is my preferred browser, but it has some disadvantages compared
to other browsers.
Give a try to Chromium :-) I have been using Opera for long time
because it was fast and small. Not that long ago I have
On Tue, 2013-02-12 at 23:26 +0100, CeDeROM wrote:
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 11:11 PM, Ralf Mardorf
ralf.mard...@rocketmail.com wrote:
Firefox is my preferred browser, but it has some disadvantages compared
to other browsers.
Give a try to Chromium :-) I have been using Opera for long time
with Chromium and Firefox too. I like
the possibility to remove visual controls (red X button
on tabs for example) without losing functionality (middle
click on tab closes tab). From my very individual experience,
Opera offers the best integration of mouse and keyboard. It's
sufficiently fast and renders stuff
On Wed, 2013-02-13 at 00:16 +0100, Polytropon wrote:
Even though I don't like Flash especially because it
has become what animated GIFs have been used for in the
past - replacement for HTML, nagging, stealing focus,
aggressive advertising with sound and so on - it perfectly
works with Opera.
Forwarded Message
From: Ralf Mardorf ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Upgrade causes loss of all firefox settings (?)
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 00:52:34 +0100
On Wed, 2013-02-13 at 00:47 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
The best websites are made
On 01/31/2013 10:50 PM, Peter Vereshagin wrote:
Hello.
2013/01/31 21:42:50 + Walter Hurry walterhu...@gmail.com = To
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org :
WH WH What, for example, is the problem with compiling Firefox 18 from the
WH port?
WH WH
WH WH It takes about an hour to compile on my
and a chromium at the least, needn't to mention
the OOo is a must, too.
Looking at
http://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-current/www/
I can't find them. FF is v16 there (v18+ is in the ports' head) and no
any chromium.
Does it mean that if I need the binary-updated firefox
Hello.
2013/01/31 18:44:30 + Walter Hurry walterhu...@gmail.com = To
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org :
WH What, for example, is the problem with compiling Firefox 18 from the port?
WH
WH It takes about an hour to compile on my main box (9.1 Release on-
WH x86_64), which has nothing special
Peter Vereshagin pe...@vereshagin.org writes:
Hello.
2013/01/31 18:44:30 + Walter Hurry walterhu...@gmail.com = To
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org :
WH What, for example, is the problem with compiling Firefox 18 from the port?
WH
WH It takes about an hour to compile on my main box (9.1
So, on FreeBSD, how does one get firefox and/or opera to use, for example,
evince or some other PDF displayer instead of using this goddamn lousey
buggy *^%$#@ acroread ?
In Firefox, Edit-Preferences, click the Applications tab, look for
application/pdf and make the obvious adjustments.
I find
Hi,
Reference:
From: Warren Block wbl...@wonkity.com
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 20:10:16 -0700 (MST)
Message-id: alpine.bsf.2.00.1212112008090.8...@wonkity.com
Warren Block wrote:
On Tue, 11 Dec 2012, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
So, on FreeBSD, how does one get firefox
site. These are not free. They cost ten cents
per page. I tried to download a 29 page document and it downloaded
into firefox just fine and then was displayed in a new firefox tab
which was apparently using acroread8 to display the document.
I know from past experience that acroreadN runs like
a 29 page document and it downloaded
into firefox just fine and then was displayed in a new firefox tab
which was apparently using acroread8 to display the document.
I know from past experience that acroreadN runs like crap on FreeBSD...
often using up enormous amounts of CPU % for no apparently
12.12.2012 12:16, Ronald F. Guilmette пишет:
So, on FreeBSD, how does one get firefox and/or opera to use, for example,
evince or some other PDF displayer instead of using this goddamn lousey
buggy *^%$#@ acroread ?
Or do I have to fire up my Windows machine, just to print out a lousey
PDF
On Tue, 11 Dec 2012, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
So, on FreeBSD, how does one get firefox and/or opera to use, for example,
evince or some other PDF displayer instead of using this goddamn lousey
buggy *^%$#@ acroread ?
Remove acroread entirely. Install graphics/xpdf. Click on a PDF link
On Tue, 11 Dec 2012 20:10:16 -0700 (MST), Warren Block wrote:
On Tue, 11 Dec 2012, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
So, on FreeBSD, how does one get firefox and/or opera to use, for example,
evince or some other PDF displayer instead of using this goddamn lousey
buggy *^%$#@ acroread
Le Wed, 07 Nov 2012 00:14:09 +0400,
Boris Samorodov b...@passap.ru a écrit :
Hi,
For and unknown reason here, Firefox (16.0 and ESR) doesn't want to
be in french anymore. Does i18n work for you?
I use directly the fr.xpi (cd /usr/ports/www/firefox-i18n, make
extract), then I add
07.11.2012 14:27, Patrick Lamaiziere пишет:
Le Wed, 07 Nov 2012 00:14:09 +0400,
Boris Samorodov b...@passap.ru a écrit :
Hi,
For and unknown reason here, Firefox (16.0 and ESR) doesn't want to
be in french anymore. Does i18n work for you?
I use directly the fr.xpi (cd /usr/ports/www
HTH
/Leslie
Patrick Lamaiziere patf...@davenulle.org skrev:Le Wed, 07 Nov 2012 00:14:09
+0400,
Boris Samorodov b...@passap.ru a écrit :
Hi,
For and unknown reason here, Firefox (16.0 and ESR) doesn't want to
be in french anymore. Does i18n work for you?
I use directly the fr.xpi (cd
Le Wed, 07 Nov 2012 11:52:51 +0100,
Leslie Jensen les...@eskk.nu a écrit :
Quite some time ago there was a solution posted where you had to go
to addons and install from a file. The language file is downloaded
to distfiles/xpi. So you just point to the file and choose to
install it.
Yes
Hello,
For and unknown reason here, Firefox (16.0 and ESR) doesn't want to be
in french anymore. Does i18n work for you?
I use directly the fr.xpi (cd /usr/ports/www/firefox-i18n, make
extract), then I add the .xpi via the firefox addons menu. That worked
like a charm before. The fr language
06.11.2012 23:34, Patrick Lamaiziere пишет:
Hello,
For and unknown reason here, Firefox (16.0 and ESR) doesn't want to be
in french anymore. Does i18n work for you?
I use directly the fr.xpi (cd /usr/ports/www/firefox-i18n, make
extract), then I add the .xpi via the firefox addons menu
I have a problem with various parts of web pages stopping
before getting completely downloaded. Links has a useful retries
setting (setup-network options-retries) which seems to fix
this. I need a similar fix for firefox 3.6.2
Firefox 15
URL: about:config
search: retry
On Thu, 20 Sep 2012 20:52:27 -0400, Dieter BSD wrote:
I would have never guessed to type about:config as a URL.
Very useful to know. Thank you.
Allow me a sidenote: This also works in Opera and provides
access to configuration and functionality that has no usable
GUI equivalent.
--
need a similar fix for firefox 3.6.2
Firefox 15
URL: about:config
search: retry
network.http.connection-retry-timeout;250
jb
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe
[ no response on mozilla@ list, trying questions@ ]
I have a problem with various parts of web pages stopping
before getting completely downloaded. Links has a useful retries
setting (setup-network options-retries) which seems to fix
this. I need a similar fix for firefox 3.6.2
After a upgrading to 15, and subsequently firefox-15.0.1,1 this morning,
all menus (menu bar, right click context menu, etc) have a fully
transparent background rendering it nearly useless. I've tried starting
with a new profile and that doesn't fix it as well as with qt4/gtk2 to
now avail
2012/9/4 Warren Block wbl...@wonkity.com
On Tue, 4 Sep 2012, Waitman Gobble wrote:
On Sep 4, 2012 7:03 PM, Mario Lobo l...@bsd.com.br wrote:
All I've done was csup -L 2 ports-supfile with ports-www in it.
Then cd /usr/ports/www/firefox; make with default options.
As for my /etc
Mario Lobo l...@bsd.com.br writes:
2012/9/4 Warren Block wbl...@wonkity.com
On Tue, 4 Sep 2012, Waitman Gobble wrote:
On Sep 4, 2012 7:03 PM, Mario Lobo l...@bsd.com.br wrote:
All I've done was csup -L 2 ports-supfile with ports-www in it.
Then cd /usr/ports/www/firefox; make
on without a glitch.
I tested it with all firefox port versions under www/ and they all went ok.
Thanks to all that took the time to help.
--
Mario Lobo
http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br
FreeBSD since version 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio YET!!] (99,7% winfoes FREE
Hi;
env:
FBSD 8.3-STABLE AMD64
Firefox 15 port
The problem seems to be with the porting itself.
The first problem showed up during configure. Libvpx could not be found and
configure stops.
After examining Config.Log, I found a compiler switch like this:
-L/usr/local/lib/nss
I made a symlink
On 09/04/2012 08:11 PM, Mario Lobo wrote:
/bin/mv -f /usr/ports/www/firefox/work/fake/lib/pkgconfig
/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/fake/libdata/ || true
mv: rename /usr/ports/www/firefox/work/fake/lib/pkgconfig to
/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/fake/libdata/pkgconfig: No such file or
directory
/bin
2012/9/4 Alexander Kapshuk alexander.kaps...@gmail.com
This might help...
/usr/ports/UPDATING
20120726:
AFFECTS: users of devel/pkg-config
AUTHOR: b...@freebsd.org
devel/pkg-config has been replaced by devel/pkgconf
# portmaster -o devel/pkgconf devel/pkg-config
or
#
On 09/04/2012 10:29 PM, Mario Lobo wrote:
Thank Alexander but been there, done that.
pkg_info | grep pkg
pkgconf-0.8.7 pkg-config compatible utility which does not depend on glib
Hopefully, somebody else on the list will be of more help than I have been.
Mario Lobo l...@bsd.com.br writes:
env:
FBSD 8.3-STABLE AMD64
Firefox 15 port
The problem seems to be with the porting itself.
The first problem showed up during configure. Libvpx could not be found and
configure stops.
After examining Config.Log, I found a compiler switch like
First, thanks for replying !
On Tue, 04 Sep 2012 21:14:06 -0400
Lowell Gilbert freebsd-questions-lo...@be-well.ilk.org wrote:
Mario Lobo l...@bsd.com.br writes:
env:
FBSD 8.3-STABLE AMD64
Firefox 15 port
The problem seems to be with the porting itself.
The first problem showed
On Sep 4, 2012 7:03 PM, Mario Lobo l...@bsd.com.br wrote:
First, thanks for replying !
On Tue, 04 Sep 2012 21:14:06 -0400
Lowell Gilbert freebsd-questions-lo...@be-well.ilk.org wrote:
Mario Lobo l...@bsd.com.br writes:
env:
FBSD 8.3-STABLE AMD64
Firefox 15 port
The problem
On Tue, 4 Sep 2012, Waitman Gobble wrote:
On Sep 4, 2012 7:03 PM, Mario Lobo l...@bsd.com.br wrote:
All I've done was csup -L 2 ports-supfile with ports-www in it.
Then cd /usr/ports/www/firefox; make with default options.
As for my /etc/make.conf
CPUTYPE?=nocona
OVERRIDE_LINUX_BASE_PORT
Is it possible to reduce priority
of port building processes with
something like nice +19 make (tcsh syntax)?
Here's a typical scenario for a large build
(actually building gcc-4.7 and firefox in parallel):
last pid: 54736; load averages: 5.27, 5.38, 5.11up
9+15:37
Hi,
On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 14:56:07 +0100 (BST)
Anton Shterenlikht me...@bristol.ac.uk wrote:
Is it possible to reduce priority
of port building processes with
something like nice +19 make (tcsh syntax)?
Here's a typical scenario for a large build
(actually building gcc-4.7 and firefox
On 29/08/2012 15:56, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
Is it possible to reduce priority
of port building processes with
something like nice +19 make (tcsh syntax)?
Sure, I do it all the time.
You may even want to make a shell alias in your cshrc, i.e.
alias make nice +19 make
(or something like it)
From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Wed Aug 29 16:52:53 2012
Is it possible to reduce priority
of port building processes with
something like nice +19 make (tcsh syntax)?
Sure, I do it all the time.
ok, thanks.
I'll try it next time.
Anton
_OPTIONS_READ=png-1.4.8
WITH_APNG=true
In this example you can see that it has been properly installed.
the install of freebsd fails w/ the error message given below.
Sadly the Firefox build error message is not included.
is there something else required in the png makefile
!
# Options for png-1.4.8
_OPTIONS_READ=png-1.4.8
WITH_APNG=true
In this example you can see that it has been properly installed.
the install of freebsd fails w/ the error message given below.
Sadly the Firefox build error message is not included.
is there something else
'.
# No user-servicable parts inside!
# Options for png-1.4.8
_OPTIONS_READ=png-1.4.8
WITH_APNG=true
In this example you can see that it has been properly installed.
the install of freebsd fails w/ the error message given below.
Sadly the Firefox build error message
the Firefox build error message is not included.
is there something else required in the png makefile or elsewhere that
i'm
missing?
I'm sure this entry of /usr/ports/UPDATING applies:
20120531:
AFFECTS: users of graphics/png
AUTHOR: din...@freebsd.org
The PNG
On Thu, 23 Aug 2012 12:41:41 -0400, david coder wrote:
it's happened already: in another post here, polytropon gives a more central
role to /var/db/ports/png/options. if i understand him correctly, make
showconfig executed in /usr/ports/graphics/png reads from that file.
changes made through
+++ Polytropon [23/08/12 19:17 +0200]:
On Thu, 23 Aug 2012 12:41:41 -0400, david coder wrote:
it's happened already: in another post here, polytropon gives a more central
role to /var/db/ports/png/options. if i understand him correctly, make
showconfig executed in /usr/ports/graphics/png
1 - 100 of 1961 matches
Mail list logo
