On Thursday 14 September 2006 01:21, Kevin Brunelle wrote:
As for the GNU tools, yes most sysadmins use some of them (although not
always). I know that BSD tar handles gzip and bzip2 just fine ( -z and -j
respectively). So I know I wouldn't download gtar just for that feature.
In fact, as I
On 9/14/06, Olivier Nicole [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't know why. I'm running DNS server on old Celeron 400Mhz with
96MB RAM just fine. Why do you think you need Xeon dual core for that?
Of course I don't, and won't.
I was just replying to the guy that told me that I am using archaic
On Sep 14, 2006, at 12:29 AM, Jonathan McKeown wrote:
On Thursday 14 September 2006 01:21, Kevin Brunelle wrote:
As for the GNU tools, yes most sysadmins use some of them
(although not
always). I know that BSD tar handles gzip and bzip2 just fine ( -
z and -j
respectively). So I know I
On Thursday 14 September 2006 08:40, Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC wrote:
On Sep 14, 2006, at 12:29 AM, Jonathan McKeown wrote:
In fact, as I discovered a few days ago (after all, how often does
one read tar(1)'s manpage?), you only need to use -z and -j when
creating a tar archive.
Hi,
I'm trying to flash Nanobsd on a Compact Flash which is not listed in
/usr/src/tools/tools/nanobsd/FlashDevice.sub.
Does anyone know how to calculate NANO_MEDIASIZE, NANO_HEADS and NANO_SECTS for
a specific CF, in my case a Transcend 512 MB CF?
I found a datasheet, but I'm not sure what
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are there any options I can use when installing apache 2.x
from the ports tree so it won't overwrite apache 1.x?
Hi,
Yes, you have one option: use jails in your server.
http://docs.freebsd.org/44doc/papers/jail/jail.html
Cheers,
---
Philippe Lang
Attik
What am I doing wrong?
# ll /dev/ad0s7
crw-r- 1 root operator0, 93 Sep 4 02:30 /dev/ad0s7
# file -s /dev/ad0s7
/dev/ad0s7: Linux rev 1.0 ext2 filesystem data
# grep -w ad0s7 /etc/fstab
/dev/ad0s7 /linux ext2fs ro 0 0
# ll -d /linux
drwxr-xr-x 2 root
Hello I wanted to buildworld and kernel on FReeBSD 6.1 since I have Xeon
cpu, I Wanted to rebuild it with CPUTYPE=nocona
when I put the oprion in /etc/make.conf upon compilation instead of
-march=nocona is used -march=prescott
I also fixed bsd.cpu.mk but it does not work, alwaus
On Thu, 14 Sep 2006, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
On 2006-09-14 00:48, Tamouh H. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think TOP and load averages are no longer accurate on FBSD 5.x and
6.x with SMP kernel. As far as I've seen. Load averages hit sometimes
8.0 without a noticable degradation in
Check out http://www.bsdstats.org ... Republic of Korea is about to push
the US out of first place, but there are *zero* FreeBSD boxes reporting
from there ... DragonFly is first, then NetBSD and then OpenBSD ...
6 days later: Thailand jumped from 12 machines to 110... ahead of
France and
Hello,
I am running FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE-p6 build with buildworld.
THe system has exactly 4GB of memory but the memory is not complitely
seen by the system.
At boot thime I Get this warning
524288Kb of memory above 4GB ignored
and then if I check
real memory = 3757965312 (3583 MB)
avail
On 9/13/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--On September 13, 2006 5:05:17 PM -0700 snacktime [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Are there any options I can use when installing apache 2.x from the
ports tree so it won't overwrite apache 1.x?
Sure. Just like any other port. Just choose
Olivier Nicole wrote:
Check out http://www.bsdstats.org ... Republic of Korea is about to push
the US out of first place, but there are *zero* FreeBSD boxes reporting
from there ... DragonFly is first, then NetBSD and then OpenBSD ...
6 days later: Thailand jumped from 12 machines to
RJ45 wrote:
THe system has exactly 4GB of memory but the memory is not complitely
seen by the system.
At boot thime I Get this warning
524288Kb of memory above 4GB ignored
A normal 32bit OS can only address 4GB RAM -- but your system has various
L2 and other caches built into the CPUs,
On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 09:55:09AM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
RJ45 wrote:
THe system has exactly 4GB of memory but the memory is not complitely
seen by the system.
At boot thime I Get this warning
524288Kb of memory above 4GB ignored
A normal 32bit OS can only address 4GB RAM
On Wednesday 13 September 2006 14:59, Jonathan McKeown wrote:
I'm using my laptop and tip(1) as a serial terminal. This is working well
when a machine is booted with the laptop connected to its serial port.
However, I need to be able to connect the laptop to a machine which was
booted without
I have FreeBSD 6.1 installed on one machine and Fedora Core 2 on
another. I dual boot the FreeBSD 6.1 machine with a RedHat EL 4.3
installation. I have assigned the same static IP address and hostname
to this machine for both the FreeBSD and RHEL installations.
While my RHEL installation is
On 14/09/2006 04:05, Olivier Nicole wrote:
I don't know why. I'm running DNS server on old Celeron 400Mhz with
96MB RAM just fine. Why do you think you need Xeon dual core for that?
Of course I don't, and won't.
I was just replying to the guy that told me that I am using archaic
hardware
On Sep 14, 2006, at 7:49 PM, Arindam wrote:
I have FreeBSD 6.1 installed on one machine and Fedora Core 2 on
another. I dual boot the FreeBSD 6.1 machine with a RedHat EL 4.3
installation. I have assigned the same static IP address and hostname
to this machine for both the FreeBSD and RHEL
Hi.
At Wed, 13 Sep 2006 10:05:07 +0800,
musashi miyamoto wrote:
FreeBSD mori.ranmaru 6.1-STABLE FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE #0: Tue Sep 5 02:09:57
PHT 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/i386/compile/SHOGUN i386
is there a dialup pci modem that is compatible with FreeBSD?
Lucent(Agere) Mars
At Fri, 1 Sep 2006 09:54:02 -0400,
David Robillard wrote:
Sounds like a good idea indeed. I've always followed Ralf S.
Engelschall's instructions at http://people.freebsd.org/~rse/mirror/
which involves using dump(8) to transfer the data onto the second disk
once it's setup as a gmirror
At Sun, 10 Sep 2006 19:24:32 +0400,
gb wrote:
Got hold of an old IBM X21 Thinkpad. Anyone out there have any
recommendations for a good kernel config or whatever to squeeze the
most of this little fellow?
a good starting point:
I have FreeBSD 6.1 installed on one machine and Fedora Core 2 on
another. I dual boot the FreeBSD 6.1 machine with a RedHat EL 4.3
installation. I have assigned the same static IP address and hostname
to this machine for both the FreeBSD and RHEL installations.
While my RHEL installation
On Sep 14, 2006, at 8:15 PM, Arindam wrote:
I have FreeBSD 6.1 installed on one machine and Fedora Core 2 on
another. I dual boot the FreeBSD 6.1 machine with a RedHat EL 4.3
installation. I have assigned the same static IP address and
hostname
to this machine for both the FreeBSD and
I can boot fine with loader(8). However if I try to load kernel directly from
boot(8) I always get BTX halted no matter which kernel and options I choose.
The only command that works is the loader itself, /boot/loader. Why?
man 8 loader says that BTX client is the name of the loader on i386. So
Hello.
This might be OT in FreeBSD list, but hopefully some of yours is
involved in sophisticated AWK programming.
To keep a small shell script portable I use awk for separating an ASCII
file from a home brewn scientific model software. The datasets of the
output is enclosed by
Hi,
I'm missing somehow the classic 'fortune' command and files in the
ports, the are Italian and Russian ones, but don't see the fortune
itself. If there is a Spanish one a pointer would be nice too. Thx
matthias
Linux es para gente que odia Micro$soft, FreeBSD es para los amantes de
Hi,
At Thu, 14 Sep 2006 12:40:13 +0200,
Jonathan McKeown wrote:
On Wednesday 13 September 2006 14:59, Jonathan McKeown wrote:
I'm using my laptop and tip(1) as a serial terminal. This is working well
when a machine is booted with the laptop connected to its serial port.
However, I need to
Matthias Apitz wrote:
Hi,
I'm missing somehow the classic 'fortune' command and files in the
ports, the are Italian and Russian ones, but don't see the fortune
itself. If there is a Spanish one a pointer would be nice too. Thx
Fortune is part of the base system.
El día Thursday, September 14, 2006 a las 02:50:56PM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze
escribió:
Matthias Apitz wrote:
Hi,
I'm missing somehow the classic 'fortune' command and files in the
ports, the are Italian and Russian ones, but don't see the fortune
itself. If there is a Spanish one a
On Thu, 2006-09-14 at 15:21 +0200, Matthias Apitz wrote:
El día Thursday, September 14, 2006 a las 02:50:56PM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze
escribió:
Matthias Apitz wrote:
Hi,
I'm missing somehow the classic 'fortune' command and files in the
ports, the are Italian and Russian ones, but
I just glanced at the latest statistics on www.bsdstats.org. In the
last week or so OpenBSD has overtaken FreeBSD in the USA.
Should one conclude that OpenBSD admins have enthusiastically embraced
this project and FreeBSD admins have not; or, is OpenBSD really more
widely deployed than FreeBSD?
From: Matthias Apitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [LoN]Kamikaze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
I'm missing somehow the classic 'fortune' command and files in
the
Fortune is part of the base system.
Maybe I'm stupid, but I don't see it:
man fortune
FILES
Matthias Apitz wrote:
El día Thursday, September 14, 2006 a las 02:50:56PM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze
escribió:
Matthias Apitz wrote:
Hi,
I'm missing somehow the classic 'fortune' command and files in the
ports, the are Italian and Russian ones, but don't see the fortune
itself.
Matthias Apitz wrote:
El día Thursday, September 14, 2006 a las 02:50:56PM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze
escribió:
Matthias Apitz wrote:
Hi,
I'm missing somehow the classic 'fortune' command and files in the
ports, the are Italian and Russian ones, but don't see the fortune
itself. If there
El día Thursday, September 14, 2006 a las 03:06:48PM +0100, Alex Zbyslaw
escribió:
Matthias Apitz wrote:
El día Thursday, September 14, 2006 a las 02:50:56PM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze
escribió:
Matthias Apitz wrote:
Hi,
I'm missing somehow the classic 'fortune' command and
Reko Turja wrote:
From: Matthias Apitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [LoN]Kamikaze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
I'm missing somehow the classic 'fortune' command and files in
the
Fortune is part of the base system.
Maybe I'm stupid, but I don't see it:
man
In the last episode (Sep 14), Ian Smith said:
I still can't fathom what top tells me on a UP 5.5-STABLE system (300MHz
Celeron if speed's relevant). I initiated this thread (weeks ago :) re
seeing 0.0% idle (as expected) during buildworld but not seeing anything
add up to anything like 100%,
I have a FreeBSD 6.1 box running behind a router/gateway. When it tries
to go into passive mode, it returns it's internal 192.168. ip address to
the client which the client stupidly uses to try to connect to. I've
confirmed this by tyring to FTP from several external systems (windows
linux).
Hello
Our mailhub is actually a HP DL360 with one processor (Xeon 2.8 ghz)
with 2 Gb RAM and 120 Gb disks, it is 3 years old.
It runs Postfix + imap + imaps + pop3 + pop3s + squirrelmail + vexira antivirus
+ postgrey
and some small auxiliary services.
We have approx 2500 users / mailboxes and
That is more a matter for your router. Your router should be wrapping the
internal address with a public one. Be sure you are forwarding all the
ports needed for ftp.
-Derek
At 09:40 AM 9/14/2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a FreeBSD 6.1 box running behind a router/gateway.
Since the BIOS reports the memory as ignored, I'd say it is your
motherboard causing the issue. You should check the manufacturer's specs
on the board and see if this is a limit to the board for the memory you are
using. Many system boards have different memory limits based on the actual
Frank Bonnet wrote:
[...]
I need SCSI Disks of course , budget is around 10K$
Why the insistence on SCSI? Is there any reason that SATA or RAID with
SATA is not acceptable? Just curious.
--
Gerard
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
Hello All.
Thursday, September 14, 2006, 4:24:43 AM, RJ45 wrote in regards to his
message titled Memory problem:
snip
R I am running FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE-p6 build with buildworld.
snip
What does the -p6 nomenclature represent in the above statement?
I've noticed some messages have contained
* On 14/09/06 16:51 +0200, Frank Bonnet wrote:
| Hello
|
| Our mailhub is actually a HP DL360 with one processor (Xeon 2.8 ghz)
| with 2 Gb RAM and 120 Gb disks, it is 3 years old.
|
| It runs Postfix + imap + imaps + pop3 + pop3s + squirrelmail + vexira
| antivirus + postgrey
| and some small
In response to ograbme [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello All.
Thursday, September 14, 2006, 4:24:43 AM, RJ45 wrote in regards to his
message titled Memory problem:
snip
R I am running FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE-p6 build with buildworld.
snip
What does the -p6 nomenclature represent in the
Gerard Seibert wrote:
Frank Bonnet wrote:
[...]
I need SCSI Disks of course , budget is around 10K$
Why the insistence on SCSI? Is there any reason that SATA or RAID with
SATA is not acceptable? Just curious.
Because I want it
--
Cordialement
Frank Bonnet
On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 16:40:18 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a FreeBSD 6.1 box running behind a router/gateway. When it tries
to go into passive mode, it returns it's internal 192.168. ip address to
the client which the client stupidly uses to try to connect to. I've
confirmed this by
In response to Frank Bonnet [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Gerard Seibert wrote:
Frank Bonnet wrote:
[...]
I need SCSI Disks of course , budget is around 10K$
Why the insistence on SCSI? Is there any reason that SATA or RAID with
SATA is not acceptable? Just curious.
Because I want it
--On Thursday, September 14, 2006 08:40:21 -0500 Doug Poland
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just glanced at the latest statistics on www.bsdstats.org. In the
last week or so OpenBSD has overtaken FreeBSD in the USA.
Should one conclude that OpenBSD admins have enthusiastically embraced
this
On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 12:27:11AM -0700, Perry Hutchison wrote:
What am I doing wrong?
# ll /dev/ad0s7
crw-r- 1 root operator0, 93 Sep 4 02:30 /dev/ad0s7
# file -s /dev/ad0s7
/dev/ad0s7: Linux rev 1.0 ext2 filesystem data
# grep -w ad0s7 /etc/fstab
/dev/ad0s7 /linux
On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 08:40:21AM -0500, Doug Poland wrote:
I just glanced at the latest statistics on www.bsdstats.org. In the
last week or so OpenBSD has overtaken FreeBSD in the USA.
Should one conclude that OpenBSD admins have enthusiastically embraced
this project and FreeBSD admins
Some process on my system is really slamming my gstripe volume (so says
systat -iostat and gstat). Is there a relatively easy way to see which
processes are responsible?
--
Kirk Strauser
pgpJ2aFH5pyri.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--- Bill Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In response to Frank Bonnet [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Gerard Seibert wrote:
Frank Bonnet wrote:
[...]
I need SCSI Disks of course , budget is around
10K$
Why the insistence on SCSI? Is there any reason
that SATA or RAID with
SATA is
Frank Bonnet wrote:
Gerard Seibert wrote:
Frank Bonnet wrote:
[...]
I need SCSI Disks of course , budget is around 10K$
Why the insistence on SCSI? Is there any reason that SATA or RAID with
SATA is not acceptable? Just curious.
Because I want it
I have yet to have a SATA drive last
SATA is still quite limited. To go beyond those limits use SAS, but SAS
costs even more than SCSI and is brand new technology.
-Derek
At 10:46 AM 9/14/2006, Bill Moran wrote:
In response to Frank Bonnet [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Gerard Seibert wrote:
Frank Bonnet wrote:
[...]
I
On Sep 14, 2006, at 10:28 AM, Derek Ragona wrote:
SATA is still quite limited. To go beyond those limits use SAS,
but SAS costs even more than SCSI and is brand new technology.
Get a 12 or 16 or 24 port Areca card and have a few hot spares and
you will see SATA fly for less money than
On 9/14/2006 10:32 AM, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
* On 14/09/06 16:51 +0200, Frank Bonnet wrote:
| Hello
|
| Our mailhub is actually a HP DL360 with one processor (Xeon 2.8 ghz)
| with 2 Gb RAM and 120 Gb disks, it is 3 years old.
|
| It runs Postfix + imap + imaps + pop3 + pop3s +
On Thursday 14 September 2006 12:09, Kris Kennaway wrote:
One should not conclude anything until the numbers are much larger
than they are now, because small fluctuations from e.g. regional
promotion of bsdstats in one country but not another, or one large
company deploying it on all machine,
--On Thursday, September 14, 2006 11:45:49 -0500 Greg Groth
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are any of the major server brands more FreeBSD friendly than others? I'm
looking to purchase a server for some web apps. Our current config is
running on a 6 year old Dell PowerEdge machine with SCSI RAID 5,
In the last episode (Sep 14), Kirk Strauser said:
Some process on my system is really slamming my gstripe volume (so says
systat -iostat and gstat). Is there a relatively easy way to see which
processes are responsible?
You can try top in I/O mode. Run top, hit m, then enter ototal.
--
I'm being driven slowly mad by cvs...
I have 3 boxes, one is acting as a cvs server. The cvs clients (for
lack of a better term) are running 6.1 and should be configured the
same. Yet, one machine lets me do a cvs login, the other requires I
use cvs -d :psserver:.. with each cvs command.
I do
In response to Michael Grant [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I'm being driven slowly mad by cvs...
I have 3 boxes, one is acting as a cvs server. The cvs clients (for
lack of a better term) are running 6.1 and should be configured the
same. Yet, one machine lets me do a cvs login, the other requires I
On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 12:53:04PM -0400, Gerard Seibert wrote:
On Thursday 14 September 2006 12:09, Kris Kennaway wrote:
One should not conclude anything until the numbers are much larger
than they are now, because small fluctuations from e.g. regional
promotion of bsdstats in one
Yes, I'm su'ed on both machines:
uid=0(root) gid=0(wheel) groups=0(wheel), 5(operator)
-Mike
On 9/14/06, Bill Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In response to Michael Grant [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I'm being driven slowly mad by cvs...
I have 3 boxes, one is acting as a cvs server. The cvs
On Sep 13, 2006, at 7:17 PM, Chuck Swiger wrote:
On Sep 13, 2006, at 3:48 PM, Fred C! wrote:
Hello I have a problem with Python + sqlite3. My main machine is a
FreeBSD 6.1 I have also try on an old machine running FreeBSD 5.5
and it doesn't work either. I join to this email some
What about making it a sysinstall option? Not in the base install, but
the option is presented when setting up a new box.
On 9/14/06, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 12:53:04PM -0400, Gerard Seibert wrote:
On Thursday 14 September 2006 12:09, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 11:56:24AM -0500, Paul Schmehl wrote:
--On Thursday, September 14, 2006 11:45:49 -0500 Greg Groth
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are any of the major server brands more FreeBSD friendly than others? I'm
looking to purchase a server for some web apps. Our current config
Is it possible to tell syslog to log everything *except* some facility?
I have a very noisy service (openldap) that I don't want to log into
my all.log; but I still want all.log to catch everything else.
Something like this maybe?
*.*,!local4.* all.log
--
--
Perfection is just a word I use
On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 01:29:38PM -0400, Andy Greenwood wrote:
What about making it a sysinstall option? Not in the base install, but
the option is presented when setting up a new box.
That's not ruled out, if someone does the work.
Kris
pgpIrJBp4JQSq.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sep 14, 2006, at 10:24 AM, Fred C! wrote:
As I told you in my previews emails all the python tests went with
no errors.
Yes. This probably means the problem is not with the basic Python
installation and may not be specific to FreeBSD. In other words, you
might obtain better results
RJ45 wrote on Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 01:47:28AM -0600:
Hello I wanted to buildworld and kernel on FReeBSD 6.1 since I have Xeon
cpu, I Wanted to rebuild it with CPUTYPE=nocona
when I put the oprion in /etc/make.conf upon compilation instead of
-march=nocona is used -march=prescott
RJ45 wrote on Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 02:24:43AM -0600:
Hello,
I am running FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE-p6 build with buildworld.
THe system has exactly 4GB of memory but the memory is not complitely
seen by the system.
At boot thime I Get this warning
524288Kb of memory above 4GB ignored
On Thursday 14 September 2006 12:01 pm, Dan Nelson wrote:
You can try top in I/O mode. Run top, hit m, then enter ototal.
That was exactly it. Thanks!
--
Kirk Strauser
pgpv29LbwLcuV.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Bill Moran wrote:
Has anyone every verified whether or not SATA has the problems that plagued
ATA? Such as crappy quality and lying caches?
Personally, I still demand SCSI on production servers because it still
seems as if:
a) The performance is still better
b) The reliability is still
Hello all,
I'm using freebsd 6.1 as a bridge (if_bridge)
The interfaces are vr0 (plugged into the DSL modem)
and rl0 (plugged into the switch, to the rest of the network
On the bridge, I'm attempting to use pf to rdr all http requests from
my lan, to squid (actually dansguardian)
I have
On Thursday 14 September 2006 13:29, Andy Greenwood wrote:
What about making it a sysinstall option? Not in the base install, but
the option is presented when setting up a new box.
On 9/14/06, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 12:53:04PM -0400, Gerard Seibert
hello Lowell,
thank you for your reply, i wish you could find some solution for me
i tried to google the net, and found many results for atapci1: failed to
enable memory mapping!
but most with no solutions.
here is the dmesg,
Copyright (c) 1992-2006 The FreeBSD Project.
Copyright
On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 07:29:13PM +, Marwan Sultan wrote:
hello Lowell,
thank you for your reply, i wish you could find some solution for me
i tried to google the net, and found many results for atapci1: failed to
enable memory mapping!
but most with no solutions.
I doubt it's
Chris wrote:
This is probably going to tax the memory. I'm sorry in advance.
We observed 2 hangs and 3 crashes in the last 5 hours and finally
after looking at the nature of the traffic, it appears to be little
infested windows spybots from all over targeting our forums to
attempt to
On Sep 14, 2006, at 12:53 PM, Panagiotis wrote:
Chris wrote:
...system, we could come back up I think and try ride out the
attack. I've never done this before but in an earlier thread I
saw where you configure a pipe such as:
ipfw pipe 1 config bw 256Kbit/s
ipfw add pipe 1 tcp from
Is it possible to tell syslog to log everything *except* some facility?
I have a very noisy service (openldap) that I don't want to log into
my all.log; but I still want all.log to catch everything else.
Something like this maybe?
*.*,!local4.* all.log
*.*,local4.none all.log
On Thu, 14 Sep 2006, Roger 'Rocky' Vetterberg wrote:
Olivier Nicole wrote:
Check out http://www.bsdstats.org ... Republic of Korea is about to push
the US out of first place, but there are *zero* FreeBSD boxes reporting
from there ... DragonFly is first, then NetBSD and then OpenBSD ...
6
I am at my wits end with this... help please!
FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE
Sendmail 8.13.6 (base)
I'm trying to accomplish what should be simple:
1) all outgoing From: email addresses should be stamped @ourdomain.com and
not @server.corpdomain.com
2) All emails should be routed through the corp SMTP
# ll /dev/ad0s7
crw-r- 1 root operator0, 93 Sep 4 02:30 /dev/ad0s7
# file -s /dev/ad0s7
/dev/ad0s7: Linux rev 1.0 ext2 filesystem data
# grep -w ad0s7 /etc/fstab
/dev/ad0s7 /linux ext2fs ro 0 0
# ll -d /linux
drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Perry Hutchison) writes:
# ll /dev/ad0s7
crw-r- 1 root operator0, 93 Sep 4 02:30 /dev/ad0s7
# file -s /dev/ad0s7
/dev/ad0s7: Linux rev 1.0 ext2 filesystem data
# grep -w ad0s7 /etc/fstab
/dev/ad0s7 /linux ext2fs ro 0 0
On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 02:07:56PM -0700, Perry Hutchison wrote:
# ll /dev/ad0s7
crw-r- 1 root operator0, 93 Sep 4 02:30 /dev/ad0s7
# file -s /dev/ad0s7
/dev/ad0s7: Linux rev 1.0 ext2 filesystem data
# grep -w ad0s7 /etc/fstab
/dev/ad0s7 /linux ext2fs
FreeBSD 6.1
I have been trying to get a few of my friends to try
FBSD on their PCs without much success. One of the
major problems is the inability to get flash to work
properly to display videos available on Google. I know
that the linux-flash port is marked broken, so that it
out. How else can
--- White Hat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FreeBSD 6.1
I have been trying to get a few of my friends to try
FBSD on their PCs without much success. One of the
major problems is the inability to get flash to work
properly to display videos available on Google. I know
that the linux-flash port
On Sep 14, 2006, at 3:23 PM, Peter wrote:
Yes, the Flash issue is a real bummer. It is best *not* to show your
friends that when you introduce them to FBSD.
Why? Is there some reason that you or they want to watch ads?
I can't think of a single site that I use that needs Flash; I don't
On 9/14/06, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- White Hat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FreeBSD 6.1
I have been trying to get a few of my friends to try
FBSD on their PCs without much success. One of the
major problems is the inability to get flash to work
properly to display videos available
--- michael johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, assuming I remove Firefox and install
linux-firefox, which what version of flash in the
ports tree am I suppose to install to make it all
work?
--
White Hat
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
Do You Yahoo!?
On 9/14/06, White Hat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- michael johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, assuming I remove Firefox and install
linux-firefox, which what version of flash in the
ports tree am I suppose to install to make it all
work?
Don't deinstall firefox. just install linux-firefox
Chuck Swiger wrote:
On Sep 14, 2006, at 3:23 PM, Peter wrote:
Yes, the Flash issue is a real bummer. It is best *not* to show your
friends that when you introduce them to FBSD.
Why? Is there some reason that you or they want to watch ads?
I can't think of a single site that I use that
On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 06:56:30PM -0400, michael johnson wrote:
On 9/14/06, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- White Hat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FreeBSD 6.1
I have been trying to get a few of my friends to try
FBSD on their PCs without much success. One of the
major problems is
Just out of curiosity I tried ruby port on two machines - fast one
(1.6GHz Athlon with 1GB RAM) and small one (400MHz with 96MB RAM).
Fast one has no problems with ruby, it builds and installs in few
minutes. The slow one is another story, however.
There is definitely something in teh
| Our mailhub is actually a HP DL360 with one processor (Xeon 2.8 ghz)
| with 2 Gb RAM and 120 Gb disks, it is 3 years old.
| It runs Postfix + imap + imaps + pop3 + pop3s + squirrelmail + vexira
| antivirus + postgrey
| and some small auxiliary services.
Your server is good enough to
Hi,
I know the mistake was on my side, I was not carefull enough when
using portupgrade on a production machine but...
Yesterday I froze our system for about one hour when I used
portupgrade to upgrade Samba. It was a very minor upgrade (from 3.0.10
to 3.0.23c,1 I think), but it happens that in
Olivier Nicole wrote:
I know the mistake was on my side, I was not carefull enough when
using portupgrade on a production machine but...
Yesterday I froze our system for about one hour when I used
portupgrade to upgrade Samba. It was a very minor upgrade (from 3.0.10
to 3.0.23c,1 I think),
# ll /dev/ad0s7
crw-r- 1 root operator0, 93 Sep 4 02:30 /dev/ad0s7
# file -s /dev/ad0s7
/dev/ad0s7: Linux rev 1.0 ext2 filesystem data
# grep -w ad0s7 /etc/fstab
/dev/ad0s7 /linux ext2fs ro 0 0
# ll -d /linux
drwxr-xr-x 2 root
1 - 100 of 110 matches
Mail list logo
