Re: spamassassin Y2010 bug

2010-01-04 Thread Matthew Seaman
Matthew Seaman wrote: I'll add your patches and post an updated shar later on. Done. Matthew -- Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate

Re: spamassassin Y2010 bug

2010-01-03 Thread Matthew Seaman
Jeffrey Goldberg wrote: Alternatively, if someone were sufficiently motived they could put together an SA utilities port that installs a number of maintenance scripts which a user can enable. This sounds like a very good idea to me. As far as I can see, there's only one script required,

Re: spamassassin Y2010 bug

2010-01-03 Thread Matthew Seaman
Matthew Seaman wrote: Jeffrey Goldberg wrote: Alternatively, if someone were sufficiently motived they could put together an SA utilities port that installs a number of maintenance scripts which a user can enable. This sounds like a very good idea to me. As far as I can see, there's only

Re: spamassassin Y2010 bug

2010-01-03 Thread Jeffrey Goldberg
On Jan 3, 2010, at 2:10 PM, Matthew Seaman wrote: There's a .shar of the new port at: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/sa-utils.shar Comments, critique are welcome. Unless there are any killer bugs, I'll send-pr(1) in a week or so. Thanks for doing that. It looks great to me. I just

Re: spamassassin Y2010 bug

2010-01-03 Thread RW
On Sun, 03 Jan 2010 20:10:19 + Matthew Seaman m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk wrote: Comments, critique are welcome. Unless there are any killer bugs, I'll send-pr(1) in a week or so. You have: : ${daily_sa_compile=YES} sa-compile is installed by the SA port, but it requires

Re: spamassassin Y2010 bug

2010-01-03 Thread Matt Emmerton
On Sun, 03 Jan 2010 20:10:19 + Matthew Seaman m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk wrote: Comments, critique are welcome. Unless there are any killer bugs, I'll send-pr(1) in a week or so. You have: : ${daily_sa_compile=YES} sa-compile is installed by the SA port, but it requires

Re: spamassassin Y2010 bug

2010-01-03 Thread Matthew Seaman
Jeffrey Goldberg wrote: On Jan 3, 2010, at 2:10 PM, Matthew Seaman wrote: There's a .shar of the new port at: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/sa-utils.shar Comments, critique are welcome. Unless there are any killer bugs, I'll send-pr(1) in a week or so. Thanks for doing that. It looks

Re: spamassassin Y2010 bug

2010-01-03 Thread Matthew Seaman
Matt Emmerton wrote: On Sun, 03 Jan 2010 20:10:19 + Matthew Seaman m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk wrote: Comments, critique are welcome. Unless there are any killer bugs, I'll send-pr(1) in a week or so. You have: : ${daily_sa_compile=YES} sa-compile is installed by the SA port, but

Re: spamassassin Y2010 bug

2010-01-02 Thread Matthew Seaman
Jeffrey Goldberg wrote: How do I know if I am running sa-update? When installing SpamAssassin from ports I was prompted as to whether I wanted to do this (I said yes), but I don't see anything about it in any crontab I can find nor in /etc/periodic or /usr/local/etc/periodic. You need some

Re: spamassassin Y2010 bug

2010-01-02 Thread RW
On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 13:15:25 + Matthew Seaman m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk wrote: However, neither of these have been accepted by the p5-Mail-SpamAssassin port maintainer. It's not really a one-size fits all problem - it depends on which channels you use and whether you want sa-compile

Re: spamassassin Y2010 bug

2010-01-02 Thread Jeffrey Goldberg
On Jan 2, 2010, at 8:45 AM, RW wrote: On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 13:15:25 + Matthew Seaman m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk wrote: However, neither of these have been accepted by the p5-Mail-SpamAssassin port maintainer. It's not really a one-size fits all problem - it depends on which

spamassassin Y2010 bug

2010-01-01 Thread Jeffrey Goldberg
I've submitted a PR for this, but email administrators who use SpamAssassin may wish to take immediate action. There is a SpamAssassin rule which treats messages with dates after 2009 as far in the future. This adds about 3 points to the SA score, so is very substantial. I've posted details

Re: spamassassin Y2010 bug

2010-01-01 Thread RW
On Fri, 1 Jan 2010 15:05:54 -0600 Jeffrey Goldberg jeff...@goldmark.org wrote: There is discussion on the SA mailing list, and it is likely that some fix will be in with the next batch of rule updates for those who use sa-update. It's already available in sa-update.

Re: spamassassin Y2010 bug

2010-01-01 Thread Jeffrey Goldberg
On Jan 1, 2010, at 5:19 PM, RW wrote: On Fri, 1 Jan 2010 15:05:54 -0600 Jeffrey Goldberg jeff...@goldmark.org wrote: it is likely that some fix will be in with the next batch of rule updates for those who use sa-update. It's already available in sa-update. Great. How do I know if I

Re: spamassassin Y2010 bug

2010-01-01 Thread RW
On Fri, 1 Jan 2010 18:05:59 -0600 Jeffrey Goldberg jeff...@goldmark.org wrote: How do I know if I am running sa-update? When installing SpamAssassin from ports I was prompted as to whether I wanted to do this (I said yes), but I don't see anything about it in any crontab I can find nor in