Re: [Gendergap] Gendergap Digest, Vol 9, Issue 5

2011-10-02 Thread Gillian White
It has been concerning me for a while reading this discussion that the accusations rest heavily on an expectation that everyone can and should master English (and even American English) as well as write the language in an acceptable tone. This is a huge ask. Getting the tone right demands a very

Re: [Gendergap] Women on Wikimedia group

2011-10-02 Thread Béria Lima
Let's not reinvent the wheel, shall we? A group like Maggie described already exist - for years - under the name Wikichix-l (see http://lists.modernthings.org/listinfo.cgi/wikichix-l-modernthings.org ) Is a mailing list who exist since December

Re: [Gendergap] Women on Wikimedia group

2011-10-02 Thread Béria Lima
I'm there for months and I must say is a pretty quiet mailing list. And we have around 60 members. No dia 2 de Out de 2011 09:32, John Vandenberg jay...@gmail.com escreveu: On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 6:47 PM, Béria Lima beria.l...@wikimedia.pt wrote: Let's not reinvent the wheel, shall we? A

Re: [Gendergap] Women on Wikimedia group

2011-10-02 Thread John Vandenberg
Have wikichix-l talked about possible solutions to the gender gap? -- John Vandenberg ___ Gendergap mailing list Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap

Re: [Gendergap] Women on Wikimedia group

2011-10-02 Thread Béria Lima
I'm not sure if I can talk about wikichix-l here (since is a private ml after all). Let me ask them and them I come to you with a answer :) _ *Béria Lima* Wikimedia Portugal http://wikimedia.pt (351) 963 953 042 *Imagine um mundo onde é dada a qualquer pessoa a possibilidade de ter livre

Re: [Gendergap] Gendergap Digest, Vol 9, Issue 16

2011-10-02 Thread Maggie
A bit rude are we? It would have been more useful to simply mention the other list, which I clearly was not aware of. Also, discussion followed on whether this is a positive development, and whether a number of other divisions will (or should) spring up after this. If anyone really would like to

Re: [Gendergap] Women on Wikimedia group

2011-10-02 Thread Risker
The reason you can't find the archives is that it is a non-archiving list, and there are none. I too have been a member of this list for many years. It is used infrequently, and I believe its intention was to draw issues of interest to women editors to their attention, and to provide support to

Re: [Gendergap] Gendergap Digest, Vol 9, Issue 18

2011-10-02 Thread Maggie
@Risker/Anne The Women on Wiki list, while membership is monitored, is archived and public--anyone can read it. Also trans women are absolutely accepted into this community. No question. I don't want to exclude any women from this group. --Maggie ___

Re: [Gendergap] Gendergap Digest, Vol 9, Issue 18

2011-10-02 Thread Sarah Stierch
If people can read it, doesn't it go against the privacy that women seek in the list? What about genderqueer? -Sarah On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 11:21 AM, Maggie rockerre...@gmail.com wrote: @Risker/Anne The Women on Wiki list, while membership is monitored, is archived and public--anyone can

Re: [Gendergap] Gendergap Digest, Vol 9, Issue 16

2011-10-02 Thread Fred Bauder
A bit rude are we? It would have been more useful to simply mention the other list, which I clearly was not aware of. Also, discussion followed on whether this is a positive development, and whether a number of other divisions will (or should) spring up after this. If anyone really would

Re: [Gendergap] Girl Geek Dinner Volunteers

2011-10-02 Thread Sarah Stierch
Hey Fiona, I think this is awesome. I didn't know that Girl Geek was considered international.. I'm busy as a bee, but, I'd love to develop an edit-a-thon, a cocktail edit-hour, a party, etc... I also like the idea that Girl Geek is inclusive - men can attend right (if a guest of a woman?)? As

Re: [Gendergap] Girl Geek Dinner Volunteers

2011-10-02 Thread Sarah Stierch
One more question Fiona - is this something we'd get funding through GG for or would we look towards chapter/WMF support? -Sarah On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 12:35 PM, Sarah Stierch sarah.stie...@gmail.comwrote: Hey Fiona, I think this is awesome. I didn't know that Girl Geek was considered

Re: [Gendergap] Girl Geek Dinner Volunteers

2011-10-02 Thread Fiona Apps
Hey, Depends on the organisation. Bristol was chapter support but Manchester was mostly support from the Girl Geeks themselves. IN summary, it is negotiable. Fiona From: gendergap-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org [mailto:gendergap-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of Sarah Stierch

Re: [Gendergap] Girl Geek Dinner Volunteers

2011-10-02 Thread Sarah Stierch
Right on - so we'll just look at funding as it arises (especially because the States is special in regards to funding/chapters/blah). But good to know there might be opportunities for co-funding. Perhaps Laura might have interest in this in Australia - she posted about grants yesterday

Re: [Gendergap] Women on Wikimedia Group

2011-10-02 Thread Maggie
@Sarah If the woman on the list would prefer it to be private, I have no problem with that. I just didn't want it to seem like we were trying to hide anything. I am really familiar with all the issues in the gender community, and I know how feminism has tended to exclude non-white, disabled, or

[Gendergap] Mind the Gap Barnstar/Award - I need your help!

2011-10-02 Thread Sarah Stierch
Hi everyone, I recently mentioned the idea of the Mind the Gap barnstar/award. The term mind the gap is in reference to the warning set forth by the London underground to warn people to make sure they pay attention the space between the train door and the station platform (learn more here:

Re: [Gendergap] Mind the Gap Barnstar/Award - I need your help!

2011-10-02 Thread Gillian White
Hi Sarah, I love this idea and have always loved the phrase in its original use too. I've passed on the request. Gillian On 3 October 2011 12:17, Sarah Stierch sarah.stie...@gmail.com wrote: Hi everyone, I recently mentioned the idea of the Mind the Gap barnstar/award. The term mind the gap