mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/gendergap/attachments/20130509/bc52fac7/attachment.html
Hi folks,
I've just been watching this list quietly (and the other one I'm
interested in, Education). I'm a newbie to Wikipedia and this
conversation in general.
But I have an idea - what about a list of problem pages (in terms of
gender content) for women to go to and edit. Especially
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 8:19 AM, Erik Moeller e...@wikimedia.org wrote:
The Terms of Use prohibit harassment, which is the same word that's
used to characterize the behaviors the friendly space policy
prohibits. So at least in that respect the two are already somewhat
analogous.
Two good posts.
Bear in mind though that there is also a half-way house solution, whereby
contributors would identify to the Foundation, but remain at liberty to use
a pseudonymous user name.
Identification might then be a prerequisite for certain community roles (as
indeed it is today).
Karina, you might want to start here, there might be other more recent
pages, the Teahouse is also a good place to get advice and get started.
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 9:35 PM, Andreas Kolbe jayen...@gmail.com wrote:
Two good posts.
Bear in mind though that there is also a half-way house solution, whereby
contributors would identify to the Foundation, but remain at liberty to use
a pseudonymous user name.
This would involve
Hi Karina! Yes, WikiProject Women Scientists keeps a list of women
scientists without articles. We also have a box on our main page that shows
the quality of articles - they're quite poor so almost anywhere is a good
place to start. I'm so glad to see you're interested! Feel free to send me
an
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 10:03 PM, Pete Forsyth petefors...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 1:49 PM, Andreas Kolbe jayen...@gmail.com wrote:
Pete,
I don't know which Commons you participate in. The one I know has tons of
nude pictures of women uploaded by anonymous throwaway accounts,
Hi, I have some comments inline.
---o0o---
This image, originally posted to Flickr, was reviewed on 3 March 2013 by
the administrator or reviewer Mattbuck, who confirmed that it was available
on Flickr under the stated license on that date.
---o0o---
Zero concern for model consent to
Pete,
Please suggest a revised wording that you feel would be clearer. Then we
can request that the board adopt it and amend the resolution accordingly.
Andreas
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 10:38 PM, Pete Forsyth petefors...@gmail.com wrote:
The resolution wording is:
---o0o---
We feel that it
Would you like the board to adopt and amend a resolution based purely
upon the opinions of editors who are members of this mailing list, or
do you intend to open it up to discussion for the wider, including the
Commons, community?
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 7:36 AM, Andreas Kolbe jayen...@gmail.com
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 10:37 PM, Sarah Stierch sarah.stie...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi, I have some comments inline.
---o0o---
This image, originally posted to Flickr, was reviewed on 3 March 2013 by
the administrator or reviewer Mattbuck, who confirmed that it was available
on Flickr under the
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 12:41 AM, Russavia russavia.wikipe...@gmail.comwrote:
Would you like the board to adopt and amend a resolution based purely
upon the opinions of editors who are members of this mailing list, or
do you intend to open it up to discussion for the wider, including the
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 5:02 PM, Andreas Kolbe jayen...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 12:41 AM, Russavia
russavia.wikipe...@gmail.comwrote:
Would you like the board to adopt and amend a resolution based purely
upon the opinions of editors who are members of this mailing list, or
/gendergap/attachments/20130509/fe5b89cd/attachment.html
--
___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
End of Gendergap Digest, Vol 28, Issue 21
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 1:22 AM, Pete Forsyth petefors...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 5:02 PM, Andreas Kolbe jayen...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 12:41 AM, Russavia
russavia.wikipe...@gmail.comwrote:
Would you like the board to adopt and amend a resolution based
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 8:43 AM, Andreas Kolbe jayen...@gmail.com wrote:
Would you feel that is sufficient? This would make it clearer that editors
are expected to obtain subject consent before uploading images taken in
private situations to Wikimedia websites.
Define private situations.
(changing the topic back)
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 5:29 PM, Sylvia Ventura slvent...@gmail.com wrote:
Anne, you're absolutely right on the 'high profile'. The broader the
reach, impact, exposure, the more likely you are to become the target of
good and bad 'attention'. The question is, much
One of the things I talked to one of the female admins about is figuring
out how to better support them in the stuff they have to deal with, and
it's on my radar. That's just an FYI.
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 5:57 PM, phoebe ayers phoebe.w...@gmail.com wrote:
(changing the topic back)
On Thu,
Actually, it's total gobbledygook.
But can you confirm that what you take it to mean is that quite simply
consent is required if the photo is taken in a private place with an
expectation of privacy?
Cheers
Russavia
___
Gendergap mailing list
I'm glad to hear that Gayle.
But please remember - female admins get it bad, but, the attention I got,
wasn't upped when I became an admin. Yes, i'm a bit more of a known
person than perhaps other women in the community (right now) but...I know
women (Cristamuse, Slim Virgin, just to name two)
I know women (Cristamuse, Slim Virgin, just to name two) who deal with plenty
of crap and *ARE NOT* admins.
Actually, Sara, Slim Virgin is an admin:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:UserRights/SlimVirgin
And are you sure you’ve got the other username right?
Presumably Sarah means Cindamusehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Cindamuse
.
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 9:12 PM, Daniel and Elizabeth Case
danc...@frontiernet.net wrote:
I know women (Cristamuse, Slim Virgin, just to name two) who deal with
plenty of crap and *ARE NOT* admins.
Actually,
It took me one minute to find the uploads of this user:
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Austin_photoguy50
Please nominate all of them for deletion. I will be interested in watching how
what goes.
Done. With the WMF resolution linked and quoted at length.
Oh dear, I'm not sure there's enough vodka in the universe for us all to
play that drinking game, Daniel! Especially given that closed by Mattbuck
as delete probably ought to be a finish your drink qualifier...
-Fluffernutter
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 10:55 PM, Daniel and Elizabeth Case
File:Ronda F7998.JPGhttp://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ronda_F7998.JPGis
clearly in scope. Could be used to illustrate Urn, Vase,
Pottery,
Crosslegged etc.
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 10:08 PM, Russavia russavia.wikipe...@gmail.comwrote:
I will be of course posting a link to this list on the
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 4:08 AM, Russavia russavia.wikipe...@gmail.comwrote:
I will be of course posting a link to this list on the DR given the
idiocy and trolling of a Commons admin going on here.
Cheers,
Russavia
The message you posted at the DR,
---o0o---
*Comment* This nomination
Fluffernutter,
That is a totally ridiculous comment to make.
Do I have to show you just how ridiculous it is by generating a list
of sexuality discussions that Mattbuck has 1) nominated for deletion
or 2) closed as delete.
Of course, if one was more active on Commons
Erik,
I will answer your questions, only too happy to, and you are free to
pass my answers on to others within the foundation. Because it is
something that I have trying addressing with others in the foundation
in the past, but which has been ignored by way of no reply.
But I would prefer that
29 matches
Mail list logo
