[Gendergap] Other (non -male or -female) Gender Knowledge for Study

2014-09-23 Thread Tim Davenport
Assuming that you are not studying the matter of gender self-identification itself (i.e. the dynamics of the count of the very small number of people who do not consider themselves either male or female), it seems to me that a survey over time should tally (self-identified) MALE / FEMALE / DECLINE

Re: [Gendergap] Other (non -male or -female) Gender Knowledge for Study

2014-09-23 Thread Megan Wacha
Hi Max, I haven't studied these decisions, but I try to be sensitive to these issues and am happy to provide some thoughts. Would you ask editors to provide this information? If so, I would ask them to self identify - as a man, as a woman, [fill in the blank], or decline to answer. I realize

Re: [Gendergap] Other (non -male or -female) Gender Knowledge for Study

2014-09-23 Thread Maximilian Klein
Hi Megan, If I were asking editors to Identify I would definitely believe in giving a blank text field to enter. However that is not the purpose of this study, I am merely looking at Wikipedia *Biography Articles*. That is statistics of what is recorded in Wikidata, and then trying to compare it

Re: [Gendergap] Other (non -male or -female) Gender Knowledge for Study

2014-09-23 Thread Amanda Menking
Max, You may want to use Category tags such as https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Transgender_and_transsexual_people, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Women, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Men. Imperfect, but a start? Best, Amanda From: Maximilian Klein

[Gendergap] Gender Gap Strategy: Next Steps!

2014-09-23 Thread Alex Wang
Hi All, At this year's Wikimania, over 40 Wikimedians helped prioritize ideas and identified 7 key gender gap initiatives to work on. We’ve created a page that summarizes gender gap strategy activities to-date, lists the initiatives, and organizes teams: