http://suegardner.org/2011/09/28/on-editorial-judgment-and-empathy/
A lot of things I think about, and I'm sure a lot of other people here think
about.
I'm sure this blog won't be well received on other WMF-related mailing
lists, but, I have to admit - for me - I feel like she's speaking for
Thanks for the link Sarah. It's an outstanding post by Sue, and a courageous
one, too.
Andreas
--- On Thu, 29/9/11, Sarah Stierch sarah.stie...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Sarah Stierch sarah.stie...@gmail.com
Subject: [Gendergap] Sue's new blog
To: Increasing female participation in Wikimedia
I normally hate +1s, but I would like to echo this. Really exceptionally
well crafted, and even for people following it's a very good writeup. Thank
you, Sue.
~A
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 09:36, Andreas Kolbe jayen...@yahoo.com wrote:
Thanks for the link Sarah. It's an outstanding post by
Can I nominate Sue for the Executive Director's Barnstar? :)
Kaldari
On 9/29/11 4:06 PM, Amory wrote:
I normally hate +1s, but I would like to echo this. Really
exceptionally well crafted, and even for people following it's a very
good writeup. Thank you, Sue.
~A
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at
ehhh, sorry for be the different, but you people are reading the thread
about that same blog post in Foundation-l ? The opinions there seems to be
quite different than yours.
_
*Béria Lima*
Wikimedia Portugal http://wikimedia.pt
(351) 963 953 042
*Imagine um mundo onde é dada a qualquer
I think it works both ways: There you might get stomped on by people who
disagree with the lies Sue told in the post, and here I will be stomp up for
even mentioned that she did lied in that blog post.
Safe environment do not exist in this case. Is safeR for supports to come
here, and safeR for
Would you like to elaborate?
Ryan Kaldari
On 9/29/11 4:35 PM, Béria Lima wrote:
I think it works both ways: There you might get stomped on by people
who disagree with the lies Sue told in the post, and here I will be
stomp up for even mentioned that she did lied in that blog post.
Safe
