On 5/6/12 1:07 PM, Carol Moore DC wrote:
On 5/2/2012 9:39 PM, Andreas Kolbe wrote:
Don't miss http://thehairpin.com/2011/01/women-laughing-alone-with-salad
Where are women laughing as they chop up bloody sausage...
To me I guess I see hostility and dominance in the kind of shots
people
Good idea Sarah. Prove everyone in the world we don't even have enough
woman in the 9% of editors who can take a picture of some trivial thing.
Prove the world the only way to have picture of girls in commons is hiring
models and photographers to take them.
I have NO idea why no one thought of
Excuse me, Beria, but I agree that your tone is, in fact,
highly inappropriate.
From,
Emily
On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 12:32 PM, Béria Lima beria.l...@wikimedia.pt wrote:
Sarah, until i tell you to fuck off I'm being respectful to you.
Actually the simple meaning of taking time in my volunteer,
This is highly inappropriate:
http://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Beriadiff=3706794oldid=3691439(at
that is just the last one, I can give you both a pile bigger than the
Everest)
And none of you are seing me complain about it. A single mail with irony
and you run around claiming
Of course, that's inappropriate and rude. So were you, but we all know that
you know better.
From,
Emily
On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 12:43 PM, Béria Lima beria.l...@wikimedia.pt wrote:
This is highly inappropriate:
Irony?? As the meme says, You keep using that word and I don't think you
know what it means. -
http://cdn.memegenerator.net/instances/400x/17230566.jpg
I think the word hostile is more suitable. There's a difference between
constructive criticism of an idea, and calling it 'idiotic' and
Hi all -
As was announced several months ago, I am now one of the moderators of
this list.
Some time ago, there was a discussion on this list about behavioral
standards for this list. There was widespread agreement in the
initial thread that it's important for this list to remain a safe
space
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 7:03 AM, Kevin Gorman kgor...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all -
Given this, I'm going to change how the moderation of this list is
handled a little bit moving forward. Previously, there has been no
hands-on moderation of this list. From now on, there will potentially
be
On 6 May 2012 17:16, Laura Hale la...@fanhistory.com wrote:
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 7:03 AM, Kevin Gorman kgor...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all -
Given this, I'm going to change how the moderation of this list is
handled a little bit moving forward. Previously, there has been no
hands-on
I don't care who is moderating, but it would be nice to have more
civility on this list. When I resigned as moderator, I invited several
people to take my place (all women). They all declined citing the
contentious nature of the list, except for SlimVirgin. SlimVirgin,
unfortunately, was not
Thanks. It really makes me as a women expressing concerns about feeling
unsafe and unable to talk about issues in terms men on the list feel
unimportant and resolved because a man has said they do not care who
moderates. Clearly the fact that a man has stepped up to enforce civility
on women and
Given this, I'm going to change how the moderation of this list is
handled a little bit moving forward. Previously, there has been no
hands-on moderation of this list.
Then how come I had two posts returned to me last week with the message:
5.x.0 - Message bounced by administrator
They
Laura, I'm the one who's called you out here. I don't think it is any more
tolerable for sexism to be directed toward men as when it is directed
toward women, and I am reasonably certain that is the case with many
(present and former) subscribers to this list. There are two active
moderators for
On 6 May 2012 18:50, Kevin Gorman kgor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 3:44 PM, Daniel and Elizabeth Case
danc...@frontiernet.net wrote:
Given this, I'm going to change how the moderation of this list is
handled a little bit moving forward. Previously, there has been no
I have to agree with Risker here. Laura, it sounds as if perhaps you
want a woman-only space, but this is list for discussion by all, of
any gender, who are interested in the issues. That doesn't mean we
need to dump on men, any more than they should dump on women.
LadyofShalott/Aleta
On 5/6/12,
@Risker: Sorry for not making it more clear in my initial post.
Although Sue is a moderator, she chooses not to be active in most
moderation decisions. Sarah and I talked about this, and she looked
over, edited, (and agreed with) my initial email in this thread. I
signed it personally instead of
I guess the better way to solve this is to place someone from the other
side of the fight also on moderation. Why not Laura herself?
_
*Béria Lima*
*Imagine um mundo onde é dada a qualquer pessoa a possibilidade de ter
livre acesso ao somatório de todo o conhecimento humano. Ajude-nos a
I like Sarah's idea. Could help a lot.
Gillian
On 7 May 2012 04:03, Sarah Stierch sarah.stie...@gmail.com wrote:
On 5/6/12 1:54 PM, Caroline Becker wrote:
Can we please focus on the idea and facts instead of (in)appropriate tones
?
I think that trying a professional Wiki Loves Women
Wikimedia Australia has a program to assist photographers purchasing
equipment if they use Creative Commons licences and properly describe
their images.
http://www.wikimedia.org.au/wiki/Proposal:Camera_equipment_program
Adding 'other photography related expenses' would be good.
On Mon, May 7,
On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 4:17 PM, Ryan Kaldari rkald...@wikimedia.org wrote:
I don't care who is moderating, but it would be nice to have more civility
on this list. When I resigned as moderator, I invited several people to take
my place (all women). They all declined citing the contentious
20 matches
Mail list logo
