Re: [Gendergap] Wikipedia and Feminism.

2015-04-09 Thread Keilana
Well said, Kaldari. On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 1:29 PM, Ryan Kaldari rkald...@wikimedia.org wrote: I find the entire premise of this essay to be a bit misguided. Do we really need to worry about tamping down the trickle of feminists editing art articles on Wikipedia? There are easily ten times

Re: [Gendergap] Wikipedia and Feminism.

2015-04-09 Thread J Hayes
nice wiki-splaining - the problem with your thesis: *What we don't need, however, is more feminists.* is labeling and the double standard of civility enforcement as Djembayz said at Signpost: the rules on Wikipedia are not clear, the enforcement on disruptive behavior is arbitrary or

[Gendergap] National Women's Studies Association (NWSA) partners with Wiki Education Foundation

2015-04-09 Thread Amanda Menking
http://www.nwsa.org/content.asp?pl=17sl=111contentid=111 ___ Gendergap mailing list Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap

Re: [Gendergap] Wikipedia and Feminism.

2015-04-09 Thread Ryan Kaldari
I find the entire premise of this essay to be a bit misguided. Do we really need to worry about tamping down the trickle of feminists editing art articles on Wikipedia? There are easily ten times more men's rights activists editing Wikipedia than feminists, and they actively organize off-wiki to

Re: [Gendergap] Wikipedia and Feminism.

2015-04-09 Thread Sydney Poore
Yes, and its patronizing to write a blog post about NPOV policy directed at the community members who organize community outreach events for feminists. Especially condescending towards art+feminism community organizers who brilliantly executed a well thought out plan that included pre-event

Re: [Gendergap] Wikipedia and Feminism.

2015-04-09 Thread Rob
Well, if you want to write articles about French women painters, go ahead. But you shouldn't do it just because you want more articles about women on Wikipedia. Why not? Nobody says this to the people who write articles about trains or video games. On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 2:29 PM, Ryan Kaldari

Re: [Gendergap] Wikipedia and Feminism.

2015-04-09 Thread Lika Tika
Thanks for your very eloquent response, Sydney, I strongly second that thought. Amy On Apr 9, 2015 3:29 PM, Sydney Poore sydney.po...@gmail.com wrote: Yes, and its patronizing to write a blog post about NPOV policy directed at the community members who organize community outreach events for

Re: [Gendergap] Wikipedia and Feminism.

2015-04-09 Thread Sydney Poore
This part of the we of Wikipedians...me..wants feminist to edit Wikipedia, as well as people who want to solely add articles about women. What I ask of you is to stand back so that those of us who are interested in creating an inclusive editing community can do so without being hindered. Because

[Gendergap] Wikipedia and Feminism.

2015-04-09 Thread Lukas Mezger (Wikipedia)
Dear readers of the gender gap mailing list, My name is Lukas and I am a German Wikipedian (User:Gnom). I recently wrote a blog post on Wikipedia and feminism https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benutzer:Gnom/Blog#2_April_2015:_A_blog_post_on_Wikipedia_and_feminism. and was encouraged to share it with

Re: [Gendergap] Wikipedia and Feminism.

2015-04-09 Thread
I think it would be better to drop, or tone down the bit about: But stay away if your actions are in any way motivated by a certain interest, or worse, a social agenda. We want expert editors and that's not possible if they are being pushed away. Maybe consider re-writing it to promote the idea