Separate branch for site (was: Move attic to git,)

On 28 April 2018 at 12:48, sebb wrote: > On 28 April 2018 at 12:37, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: ... >> In Git, this would naturally be in a separate branch named "asf-site" How would that work for Attic? Where would the source files used to generate the site

Proposed httpd tlp config changes for Attic redirects

I've created an updated copy of the TLP httpd configs for the proposed flags/banners layout: https://github.com/apache/infrastructure-puppet/compare/deployment...sebbASF:attic-flags The rules are in addition to the existing rules. This makes it easier to do a changeover. Once the new layout is

Re: svn commit: r1830424 - /attic/site/xdocs/process.xml

Le samedi 28 avril 2018, 19:44:45 CEST Jan Iversen a écrit : > Sent from my iPad > > > On 28 Apr 2018, at 18:10, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: > > > > Le samedi 28 avril 2018, 15:07:34 CEST Jan Iversen a écrit : > >> Sent from my iPad > >> > On 28 Apr 2018, at 14:56, sebb

svn commit: r1830478 - /attic/site-jekyll/docs/flags/

Author: sebb Date: Sat Apr 28 20:24:58 2018 New Revision: 1830478 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1830478=rev Log: Don't make assumptions about docs subdirectories Removed: attic/site-jekyll/docs/flags/

svn commit: r1830476 - /attic/site-jekyll/src/_layouts/project.html

Author: sebb Date: Sat Apr 28 20:11:26 2018 New Revision: 1830476 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1830476=rev Log: Use relative URLs Modified: attic/site-jekyll/src/_layouts/project.html Modified: attic/site-jekyll/src/_layouts/project.html URL:

Re: site-lua buildbot job added

On 28 April 2018 at 14:57, Henk P. Penning wrote: > On Sat, 28 Apr 2018, sebb wrote: > >> Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2018 15:43:51 +0200 >> From: sebb >> To: general@attic.apache.org >> Subject: Re: site-lua buildbot job added >> >> On 28 April 2018 at 14:34, Henk P.

Re: svn commit: r1830452 - /attic/site/xdocs/process.xml

+1 completely agree on the 2 use cases: being able to build locally is useful for complex cases, but avoiding to require it is useful for normal use this will be one of my expectations when we'll change the build engine: being able to build locally without too much hassle when I want to test

Re: svn commit: r1830424 - /attic/site/xdocs/process.xml

Le samedi 28 avril 2018, 15:07:34 CEST Jan Iversen a écrit : > Sent from my iPad > > > On 28 Apr 2018, at 14:56, sebb wrote: > >> On 28 April 2018 at 13:45, Jan Iversen wrote: > >> > >> > >> Sent from my iPad > >> > On 28 Apr 2018, at 14:28, sebb

Re: site-lua buildbot job added

On Sat, 28 Apr 2018, sebb wrote: Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2018 15:43:51 +0200 From: sebb To: general@attic.apache.org Subject: Re: site-lua buildbot job added On 28 April 2018 at 14:34, Henk P. Penning wrote: On Sat, 28 Apr 2018, sebb wrote: -- The

Re: site-lua buildbot job added

On 28 April 2018 at 14:34, Henk P. Penning wrote: > On Sat, 28 Apr 2018, sebb wrote: > >> Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2018 14:46:09 +0200 >> From: sebb >> To: general@attic.apache.org >> Subject: site-lua buildbot job added >> >> >> I added a site-lua buildbot job. >> >>

svn commit: r1830453 - /attic/site/docs/process.html

Author: buildbot Date: Sat Apr 28 13:41:12 2018 New Revision: 1830453 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1830453=rev Log: Automatic Site Publish by Buildbot Modified: attic/site/docs/process.html Modified: attic/site/docs/process.html URL:

svn commit: r1830452 - /attic/site/xdocs/process.xml

Author: sebb Date: Sat Apr 28 13:41:06 2018 New Revision: 1830452 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1830452=rev Log: Clarify alternate strategy Modified: attic/site/xdocs/process.xml Modified: attic/site/xdocs/process.xml URL:

Re: site-lua buildbot job added

On Sat, 28 Apr 2018, sebb wrote: Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2018 14:46:09 +0200 From: sebb To: general@attic.apache.org Subject: site-lua buildbot job added I added a site-lua buildbot job. It's on demand only (like the jekyll one). It assumes there is a build.sh script to do the

Re: svn commit: r1830424 - /attic/site/xdocs/process.xml

Sent from my iPad > On 28 Apr 2018, at 14:56, sebb wrote: > >> On 28 April 2018 at 13:45, Jan Iversen wrote: >> >> >> Sent from my iPad >> On 28 Apr 2018, at 14:28, sebb wrote: On 28 April 2018 at 13:06, Jan Iversen

Re: svn commit: r1830424 - /attic/site/xdocs/process.xml

On 28 April 2018 at 13:45, Jan Iversen wrote: > > > Sent from my iPad > >> On 28 Apr 2018, at 14:28, sebb wrote: >> >>> On 28 April 2018 at 13:06, Jan Iversen wrote: >>> >>> >>> Sent from my iPad >>> On 28 Apr 2018, at 13:07, Hervé

Re: svn commit: r1830424 - /attic/site/xdocs/process.xml

Sent from my iPad > On 28 Apr 2018, at 14:28, sebb wrote: > >> On 28 April 2018 at 13:06, Jan Iversen wrote: >> >> >> Sent from my iPad >> >>> On 28 Apr 2018, at 13:07, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: >>> >>> oh, I was just trying to

Re: svn commit: r1830424 - /attic/site/xdocs/process.xml

On 28 April 2018 at 13:06, Jan Iversen wrote: > > > Sent from my iPad > >> On 28 Apr 2018, at 13:07, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: >> >> oh, I was just trying to document, not change anything: >> - the svnwcsub part is what works for years but was not well known

Re: svn commit: r1830437 - /attic/site/xdocs/flagged/

On 28 April 2018 at 13:22, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: > ah sorry, I missed that one > do you prefer me to just fix (add the "x") to the procedure? or revert? > (I don't know how to proceed now to propose little changes: GitHub PRs in the > future will probably help on proposing

Re: svn commit: r1830437 - /attic/site/xdocs/flagged/

ah sorry, I missed that one do you prefer me to just fix (add the "x") to the procedure? or revert? (I don't know how to proceed now to propose little changes: GitHub PRs in the future will probably help on proposing concrete little changes to discuss before merging or not...) notice that the

svn commit: r1830447 - /attic/site/docs/process.html

Author: buildbot Date: Sat Apr 28 12:22:21 2018 New Revision: 1830447 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1830447=rev Log: Automatic Site Publish by Buildbot Modified: attic/site/docs/process.html Modified: attic/site/docs/process.html URL:

svn commit: r1830446 - /attic/site/xdocs/process.xml

Author: sebb Date: Sat Apr 28 12:22:15 2018 New Revision: 1830446 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1830446=rev Log: We now have buildbot Modified: attic/site/xdocs/process.xml Modified: attic/site/xdocs/process.xml URL:

svn commit: r1830444 - /attic/site/xdocs/process.xml

Author: sebb Date: Sat Apr 28 12:17:10 2018 New Revision: 1830444 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1830444=rev Log: flagged should be edited in xdocs Modified: attic/site/xdocs/process.xml Modified: attic/site/xdocs/process.xml URL:

svn commit: r1830445 - /attic/site/docs/process.html

Author: buildbot Date: Sat Apr 28 12:17:17 2018 New Revision: 1830445 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1830445=rev Log: Automatic Site Publish by Buildbot Modified: attic/site/docs/process.html Modified: attic/site/docs/process.html URL:

Re: svn commit: r1830437 - /attic/site/xdocs/flagged/

On 28 April 2018 at 13:08, Jan Iversen wrote: > Please do not change the current procedure, until we have agreed on a new > one. This change is not followed if you read process.html Actually it was not discussed or agreed that flagged directory was only added to docs. However

Re: svn commit: r1830437 - /attic/site/xdocs/flagged/

Please do not change the current procedure, until we have agreed on a new one. This change is not followed if you read process.html rgds jan i Sent from my iPad > On 28 Apr 2018, at 13:42, hbout...@apache.org wrote: > > Author: hboutemy > Date: Sat Apr 28 11:42:38 2018 > New Revision: 1830437

Re: Use svn.apache.org URLs for Subversion source

viewvc is for human to look at: IMHO useful for people to have more human readable info I can uderstand that my personal habit of doing: url of effective svn can be confusing If you prefer having strict equality between link text and link href, I'd like to add "(viewvc)" additional text for

Re: Move attic to git,

On 28 April 2018 at 12:37, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: > Le samedi 28 avril 2018, 13:17:03 CEST sebb a écrit : >> On 28 April 2018 at 11:52, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: >> > ok for me >> > >> > IIUC, the Buildbot configuration that Sebb started can work from Git

svn commit: r1830437 - /attic/site/xdocs/flagged/

Author: hboutemy Date: Sat Apr 28 11:42:38 2018 New Revision: 1830437 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1830437=rev Log: put flagged directory in xdocs sources: will be copied by build.sh to generated content in docs Added: attic/site/xdocs/flagged/ - copied from r1830427,

svn commit: r1830436 - /attic/site/docs/process.html

Author: buildbot Date: Sat Apr 28 11:40:33 2018 New Revision: 1830436 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1830436=rev Log: Automatic Site Publish by Buildbot Modified: attic/site/docs/process.html Modified: attic/site/docs/process.html URL:

svn commit: r1830435 - /attic/site/build.sh

Author: sebb Date: Sat Apr 28 11:40:27 2018 New Revision: 1830435 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1830435=rev Log: Rebuild all Modified: attic/site/build.sh Modified: attic/site/build.sh URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/attic/site/build.sh?rev=1830435=1830434=1830435=diff

Re: Request GitBox access for Attic?

Le samedi 28 avril 2018, 12:30:46 CEST sebb a écrit : > On 28 April 2018 at 11:15, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: > > creating a GitBox/GitHub test repository is easy: it's self service [1] > > I looked at that, and one can only create empty repos for projects > that are registered

Re: Move attic to git,

Le samedi 28 avril 2018, 13:17:03 CEST sebb a écrit : > On 28 April 2018 at 11:52, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: > > ok for me > > > > IIUC, the Buildbot configuration that Sebb started can work from Git > > source as well as from svn: that's great > > > > one thing that we should

svn commit: r1830431 - /attic/site-lua/data/page.tmpl

Author: henkp Date: Sat Apr 28 11:29:04 2018 New Revision: 1830431 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1830431=rev Log: fix some static urls Modified: attic/site-lua/data/page.tmpl Modified: attic/site-lua/data/page.tmpl URL:

svn commit: r1830430 - /attic/site/xdocs/process.xml

Author: sebb Date: Sat Apr 28 11:26:08 2018 New Revision: 1830430 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1830430=rev Log: Wrap long line and re-trigger build Modified: attic/site/xdocs/process.xml Modified: attic/site/xdocs/process.xml URL:

Re: Move attic to git,

On 28 April 2018 at 11:52, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: > ok for me > > IIUC, the Buildbot configuration that Sebb started can work from Git source as > well as from svn: that's great > > one thing that we should do IMHO would be to better separate source from > generated output:

Re: svn commit: r1830424 - /attic/site/xdocs/process.xml

oh, I was just trying to document, not change anything: - the svnwcsub part is what works for years but was not well known outside infra team - the buildbot job *for the current build.sh* (in/repos/asf/attic/site/) which is just a way to not require to do the build locally this does not include

Re: svn commit: r1830424 - /attic/site/xdocs/process.xml

On Sat, 28 Apr 2018, Jan Iversen wrote: Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2018 12:54:40 +0200 From: Jan Iversen To: general@attic.apache.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r1830424 - /attic/site/xdocs/process.xml Isn’t it a bit premature to change the process ? Seen from pow we are experimenting

svn commit: r1830427 - /attic/site-jekyll/src/_plugins/generate_projects.rb

Author: sebb Date: Sat Apr 28 10:57:08 2018 New Revision: 1830427 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1830427=rev Log: viewvc => repos/asf as that is better as a source of source Modified: attic/site-jekyll/src/_plugins/generate_projects.rb Modified:

Re: Move attic to git,

Sent from my iPad > On 28 Apr 2018, at 12:52, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: > > ok for me > > IIUC, the Buildbot configuration that Sebb started can work from Git source > as > well as from svn: that's great > > one thing that we should do IMHO would be to better separate

svn commit: r1830426 - /attic/site/docs/projects/

Author: buildbot Date: Sat Apr 28 10:56:26 2018 New Revision: 1830426 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1830426=rev Log: Automatic Site Publish by Buildbot Modified: attic/site/docs/projects/abdera.html attic/site/docs/projects/avalon.html

svn commit: r1830425 - in /attic/site/xdocs: projects/axis-savan-java.xml projects/shale.xml stylesheets/site.vsl

Author: sebb Date: Sat Apr 28 10:56:14 2018 New Revision: 1830425 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1830425=rev Log: viewvc => repos/asf as that is better as a source of source Modified: attic/site/xdocs/projects/axis-savan-java.xml attic/site/xdocs/projects/shale.xml

Re: svn commit: r1830424 - /attic/site/xdocs/process.xml

Isn’t it a bit premature to change the process ? Seen from pow we are experimenting with at least 3 proposals of which 1 does not need a buildbot. This is of course just my opinion. rgds jan I Sent from my iPad > On 28 Apr 2018, at 12:33, hbout...@apache.org wrote: > > Author: hboutemy >

Re: Move attic to git,

ok for me IIUC, the Buildbot configuration that Sebb started can work from Git source as well as from svn: that's great one thing that we should do IMHO would be to better separate source from generated output: only source should go to Git, and generated html should be elsewhere this means

Re: Buildbot now working, but checkin not enabled

great news: thank you Sebb I just tried to add a link to this Buildbot job in our documentation, but it seems the job did not manage to commit the change in generated html: - my commit: http://svn.apache.org/r1830424 - the Buildbot run: https://ci.apache.org/builders/attic-site/builds/45 - but

svn commit: r1830424 - /attic/site/xdocs/process.xml

Author: hboutemy Date: Sat Apr 28 10:33:07 2018 New Revision: 1830424 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1830424=rev Log: added links to Buildbot job and svnwcsub configuration Modified: attic/site/xdocs/process.xml Modified: attic/site/xdocs/process.xml URL:

Re: Request GitBox access for Attic?

On 28 April 2018 at 11:15, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: > creating a GitBox/GitHub test repository is easy: it's self service [1] I looked at that, and one can only create empty repos for projects that are registered to use GitBox - see INFRA-16456. > You'll get an empty Git

Re: Request GitBox access for Attic?

On 28 April 2018 at 11:17, Jan Iversen wrote: > > > Sent from my iPad > >> On 28 Apr 2018, at 00:09, sebb wrote: >> >>> On 27 April 2018 at 17:57, Jan Iversen wrote: >>> >>> >>> Sent from my iPad >>> On 27 Apr 2018, at 17:17, sebb

Re: Request GitBox access for Attic?

Sent from my iPad > On 28 Apr 2018, at 00:09, sebb wrote: > >> On 27 April 2018 at 17:57, Jan Iversen wrote: >> >> >> Sent from my iPad >> >>> On 27 Apr 2018, at 17:17, sebb wrote: >>> >>> I think it would be useful to have an Attic

Re: Request GitBox access for Attic?

creating a GitBox/GitHub test repository is easy: it's self service [1] You'll get an empty Git repository that is read/write both from GitBox and GitHub: you'll be able to do the tests you want. The only little issue is that future delete of this test repo won't be self service...

svn commit: r1830421 - in /attic/site-lua/tmp: ./ Makefile mk-yaml

Author: henkp Date: Sat Apr 28 10:05:44 2018 New Revision: 1830421 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1830421=rev Log: += tmp ; generate attic.yaml from site-jekyll/src/_data/projects.json Added: attic/site-lua/tmp/ attic/site-lua/tmp/Makefile attic/site-lua/tmp/mk-yaml (with

svn commit: r1830411 - in /attic/site-lua: Makefile data/ docs/Makefile docs/data/ docs/flagged/ docs/flags/ docs/gen-flags docs/mk-stuff docs/scripts/ docs/style/ gen-flags jakarta-sites/ mk-stuff st

Author: henkp Date: Sat Apr 28 08:03:58 2018 New Revision: 1830411 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1830411=rev Log: re-organise Added: attic/site-lua/Makefile - copied unchanged from r1830354, attic/site-lua/docs/Makefile attic/site-lua/data/ - copied from r1830354,

Re: new sites and swarm of commits.

Sent from my iPad > On 28 Apr 2018, at 00:15, sebb wrote: > >> On 27 April 2018 at 18:01, Jan Iversen wrote: >> >> >> Sent from my iPad >> On 27 Apr 2018, at 16:30, Henk P. Penning wrote: On Fri, 27 Apr 2018, Jan Iversen