Re: Proposal

Develop an open community and develop in the open. If the community starts to grow then come back and ask for guidance in how to make your open source community an ASF community. Did I mention open and community enough? All the best, Dave Sent from my iPhone > On May 16, 2022, at 10:47 PM, m

Re: Proposal

Not sure if this made it: Just a term of endearment, mot taken to be meant literally. Sure. Initially the community would be a private group put together by me. Then we can discuss building it once others have decided if it’s even a useful application first? On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 10:20 PM

Re: [DISCUSSION] Incubating Proposal of Firestorm

Thanks Weiwei, let me add you to the mentor list. Best regards, Jerry Weiwei Yang 于2022年5月17日周二 12:18写道： > +1 > This is an interesting project, I'd be happy to help the project's > incubation process. > Let me know if you need my help, Thanks > > On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 8:09 PM Saisai Shao >

Re: Proposal

I'm not an ASF warlord or general. In fact, I don't think such things exist. It's about community. Decisions are made by communities. Warlords, generals, and benevolent dictators don't fit well. Related, I don't see anything "community" in your post. You state "I" have got code, not "we".

Proposal

I have some gpt3 based python code to simulate leonardo da vinci as a chatbot proof of concept. I think it could be useful, but i am not sure, so i leave it to the council of ASF warlords and generals to decide if the code should be incubated? I have not shared sources as of yet. On Mon, May

Test

Test 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0

Re: [DISCUSSION] Incubating Proposal of Firestorm

+1 This is an interesting project, I'd be happy to help the project's incubation process. Let me know if you need my help, Thanks On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 8:09 PM Saisai Shao wrote: > Got it, thanks a lot Justin. > > Best regards, > Jerry > > Justin Mclean 于2022年5月17日周二 10:59写道： > > > Hi, > > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Linkis (Incubating) 1.1.1-RC1

Hi Justin, Thanks for your reminder, About "how contributions to the project are licensed",I found some useful information: According to py4j CONTRIBUTING.rst[1]: "Py4J does not have an official Contributor License Agreement (CLA), but it is assumed that as soon as you make a contribution

Re: [DISCUSSION] Incubating Proposal of Firestorm

Got it, thanks a lot Justin. Best regards, Jerry Justin Mclean 于2022年5月17日周二 10:59写道： > Hi, > > The new project name doesn’t need to be a registered trademark, but you > would still need to pick a name that is now likely to have any trademark > issues. > > The project may want to get the ASF

Re: [DISCUSSION] Incubating Proposal of Firestorm

Hi, The new project name doesn’t need to be a registered trademark, but you would still need to pick a name that is now likely to have any trademark issues. The project may want to get the ASF to register the mark at a later date, but it wold be best to talk abut that on the trademarks@ list.

Re: [DISCUSSION] Incubating Proposal of Firestorm

Hi Daniel and Justin， Sorry about one more questions. Seems like the name "firestorm" has some conflicts in USPTO searching and we only submitted China trademark registration. So about a new name, do we need to register this new "name" before donation (and transfer to ASF before graduation), or

Re: [DISCUSSION] Incubating Proposal of Firestorm

Thanks Daniel and Justin, let me resolve the naming issue first. Best regards, Jerry Justin Mclean 于2022年5月17日周二 09:52写道： > Hi, > > > Thanks for your reply. The trademark "firestorm" as a software has > already > > been submitted the registration by Tencent in China, I'm not sure is that > >

Re: [DISCUSSION] Incubating Proposal of Firestorm

Hi, +1 (binding for me) As stated in the proposal, Shuffle is a critical part of the distributed computing engine for exchanging data between distributed tasks, and it is important to maintain high performance and continuous stable operation, issues that often plague users and developers of big

Re: [DISCUSSION] Incubating Proposal of Firestorm

Hi, > Thanks for your reply. The trademark "firestorm" as a software has already > been submitted the registration by Tencent in China, I'm not sure is that > enough or not. If that trademark is approved it would need to be transferred to the ASF before graduation. Even f it was approved there

Re: [DISCUSSION] Incubating Proposal of Firestorm

I trust your lawyer will know better than I will about the trademark. I simply entered "firestorm software" into a search engine and got a product that's not yours, available since at least July 2017. This site [1] has the general naming guidance and the existence of the other software may

Re: [DISCUSSION] Incubating Proposal of Firestorm

Hi Daniel and Justin, Thanks for your reply. The trademark "firestorm" as a software has already been submitted the registration by Tencent in China, I'm not sure is that enough or not. Is there any guidance in ASF about naming or trademark things? I will consult this to our company lawyer.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Linkis (Incubating) 1.1.1-RC1

Hi, > But the py file is still missing license headers and have different > authors[2]. We don't know how to solve this problem. You may need to look at the history f the files to see if that provide some clues or how contributions to the project are licensed. You could also contact the

Re: [DISCUSSION] Incubating Proposal of Firestorm

Hi, Sounds like an interesting project. I also think the name may be problematic from a trademark point of view. It might be best to do a trademark search as see if there are any issues. Changing the name is difficult, but is much much harder if it needs to be done later. Kind Regards,

Re: [DISCUSSION] Incubating Proposal of Firestorm

+0.9 (non-binding). I think the project is a great idea. I think the name is going to run into a lot of issues with trademarks and pre-existing software products and would recommend the project consider a new name before incubating. On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 6:44 AM Jerry Shao wrote: > Hi all,

Re: [DISCUSSION] Incubating Proposal of Firestorm

+1， good luck！ -- Original -- From: Jerry Shao https://spark.apache.org/;, Apache Hadoop MapReduce

Re: [DISCUSSION] Incubating Proposal of Firestorm

+1。 On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 10:13 PM Goson zhang wrote: > +1 > Good luck! > > > Jerry Shao 于2022年5月16日周一 21:44写道： > > > Hi all, > > > > We would like to propose Firestorm[1] as a new Apache incubator project, > > you can find the proposal here [2] for more details. > > > > Firestorm is a high

Re: [DISCUSSION] Incubating Proposal of Firestorm

+1 Good luck! Jerry Shao 于2022年5月16日周一 21:44写道： > Hi all, > > We would like to propose Firestorm[1] as a new Apache incubator project, > you can find the proposal here [2] for more details. > > Firestorm is a high performance, general purpose Remote Shuffle Service for > distributed compute

[DISCUSSION] Incubating Proposal of Firestorm

Hi all, We would like to propose Firestorm[1] as a new Apache incubator project, you can find the proposal here [2] for more details. Firestorm is a high performance, general purpose Remote Shuffle Service for distributed compute engines like Apache Spark , Apache

Re:Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache Doris (Incubating) as TLP

[1] and [2] has been renamed. And [3] has been removed. The website[4] still has some issues waiting to be modified. I will keep touch with starrocks. [1] https://github.com/StarRocks/flink-connector-starrocks [2] https://github.com/StarRocks/spark-starrocks-connector [3]

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache Doris (Incubating) as TLP

HI, There is also an issue with the naming and use of ASF trademark of this product: https://github.com/StarRocks/flink-connector-starrocks And this: https://github.com/StarRocks/apache-orc And this: https://github.com/StarRocks/spark-starrocks-connector Kind Regards, Justin

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache Doris (Incubating) as TLP

HI, > I searched their website and found this is a link "trademarks"[1] at the > bottom of every page. Does this meet the requirements? No as explained before it does not. Most of the answers can be found in the trademark FAQ including [1][2][3] There are further issues with pages like [4].

Re:Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache Doris (Incubating) as TLP

Hi, > The current StarRock website is still not following ASF trademark / branding > policy. I searched their website and found this is a link "trademarks"[1] at the bottom of every page. Does this meet the requirements? [1] https://www.starrocks.com/en-US/product/trademarks -- 此致！Best

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache Doris (Incubating) as TLP

Hi, Some are recent (in 2022) but I don’t know how or if the author(s) are related to either project. Taking one at random [1] it was published on 15-5-2022 and looks to me not following ASF trademark policy and potentially misleading users, although It’s hard to say for certain as I can only

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Linkis (Incubating) 1.1.1-RC1

Hi Justin We found that the new version of py4j has removed the backport.py file, so after our evaluation, we upgraded the py4j version to py4j-0.10.7-src.zip[1]. But the py file is still missing license headers and have different authors[2]. We don't know how to solve this problem. [1]