Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ResilientDB, Incubating, v1.10.0-RC1

On Sun, May 5, 2024 at 12:12 AM John D. Ament wrote: > > > On Sat, May 4, 2024 at 8:50 PM Junchao Chen > wrote: > >> hi Justin, >> >> I have removed all the related code from the source files, and there are >> no >> GPL dependencies there. >>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ResilientDB, Incubating, v1.10.0-RC1

On Sat, May 4, 2024 at 8:50 PM Junchao Chen wrote: > hi Justin, > > I have removed all the related code from the source files, and there are no > GPL dependencies there. > Those dependencies are an optional setting in our project, it is not > necessary. > Just to put it out there - I think the

Re: Questions about a new project entering Apache Incubator

On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 11:06 PM Calvin Kirs wrote: > Podlings are not yet fully accepted as part of the Apache Software > Foundation. > > I haven't specifically witnessed any formal decision or process for > removing the "incubator" prefix from repository names. > > Unless there are compelling

Re: Should we mention license of other projects in NOTICE file

On Sat, Apr 13, 2024 at 1:54 AM Shawn Yang wrote: > Dear Community, > > I'm fixing the license issue of Apache Fury to comply with ASF requirements > for the first release for Fury under ASF. > > Currently we borrowed some code from other projects such as > v8-fast-api-calls.h[1] in v8 and

Re: Request for Updates to the ResilientDB Project Page on Apache Incubator

On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 12:23 AM Apratim Shukla wrote: > Dear Community, > > I'm reaching out on behalf of the ResilientDB team with a request for your > help in updating our project's page on the Apache Incubator website. Our > recent milestones include setting up our DNS, creating a mailing

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Apache Pekko Connectors AWS SPI

John > > The original code written by Matthias Lüneberg was granted to ASF and PJ > has forked the project. There are no restrictions in the grant as to what > commit is being granted. The entire repository is covered by the grant. > > I do not see a problem. > Craig > > > On Ma

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Apache Pekko Connectors AWS SPI

ors.html (Original repo and PR) > > On Fri, 29 Mar 2024 at 14:19, John D. Ament wrote: > > > > On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 8:34 AM PJ Fanning wrote: > > > > > Hi John, > > > My GitHub repo [1] is a fork of Matthias Lüneberg's repo [2]. His > > &

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Apache Pekko Connectors AWS SPI

ted is from your repo at whatever commit hash which was forked from the original author's work as of whatever commit hash. Was the forked repo's commit hash recorded on the SGA? > > > On Fri, 29 Mar 2024 at 13:14, John D. Ament wrote: > > > > I’m a little confused.

Re: [VOTE] Accept HertzBeat Into the ASF Incubator

On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 8:41 AM Sheng Wu wrote: > Hi > > Yes, a project doesn't have to separate the repository into two for > both website and source codes, once the license has been reviewed. > Calcite is another TLP, which is guaranteed, so it is on their PMC > oversight. > > My suggestion is

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Apache Pekko Connectors AWS SPI

I’m a little confused. You’re referring to a third party Matthias Luneberg but the code reference is pointing to the officer’s personal GitHub account. Which is being imported? John On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 14:04 PJ Fanning wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Apache Pekko is receiving a donation of an

Re: ASF at Jetbrains

I think we would also want a SGA from Jetbrains and go through [1] for the donation. 1: https://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/ On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 15:33 PJ Fanning wrote: > Hi Lukasz, > > Could you raise an INFRA JIRA to transfer the GitHub repo? > > An alternative is to create a new

Re: [LICENSE QUESTION] Use jmh as a benchmark tool

ling from source. > > > > Yeah. I'm going to collaborate with Fury to follow this approach and > > document clearly how a developer can intentionally run benchmark with > > JMH as a dep. > > > > Best, > > tison. > > > > John D. Ament 于2023年12月2

Re: [LICENSE QUESTION] Use jmh as a benchmark tool

; > depend on it as a Maven artifact. > > > P.S. > > > don't approach things as "TLP [x] does it this way so > > > it must be the preferred way" > > Yeah .. Even I don't think Flink did it correctly, this expression > > increases confusion. Most r

Re: [LICENSE QUESTION] Use jmh as a benchmark tool

On Tue, Dec 26, 2023 at 8:09 PM tison wrote: > Hi, > > The new podling Fury depends on jmh[1] which is licensed under GPLv2 > with "CLASSPATH" EXCEPTION. > Just to confirm, are you referring to the code under [benchmark]? > > IIRC Flink ever factored out its benchmark code into a separate

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache SDAP (incubating) 1.0.0-rc2

The Gradle wrapper is the only issue I saw. If you think it'll be a big issue to reroll the release my vote is +1. On Fri, Dec 30, 2022, 16:30 Julian Hyde wrote: > Good catch. But could you (and others) continue the process of > reviewing and voting on the release. > > It is established that an

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache SeaTunnel(Incubating) 2.3.0

and that the email should be on file. On Thu, Dec 29, 2022 at 8:16 PM Lucifer Tyrant wrote: > Hi John, > > I'm sorry I wrote down their other nickname, > > David ==> lidongdai lidong...@apache.org > > William-Guowei ==> guowei guo...@apache.org > > Chao Tian > >

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache SeaTunnel(Incubating) 2.3.0

Hi I can't find "David" nor "William-Guowei" as IPMC members. John On Thu, Dec 29, 2022, 06:39 Lucifer Tyrant wrote: > Dear all, > > The vote closes now as 72 hours have passed. > > The vote PASSES with > > 3 (+1 binding): > David, > William-Guowei, > Calvin Kirs > > No -1 votes > > The

Re: [VOTE] Accept Pekko into the Apache Incubator

+1 good luck! On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 4:05 AM Claude Warren, Jr wrote: > After reviewing the [DISCUSS] threads concerning bringing Pekko into the > incubator [1][2], and finding that there is no further comment, I am > calling for a VOTE to accept Pekko into the Apache Incubator. The text of >

Re: package names (pekko related)

We should keep in mind that the trademarks requirements and the release requirements are two different sets of requirements. They're often conflated. The main thing to remember with trademarks and naming is that the first time a project is referenced in documentation, websites, etc, it must be

Re: [VOTE] Accept ICLA and Software Grant from UMD Into the Apache Flagon Podling

JSON files). You may want to consult with legal on how to add license file references for them. [1]: https://github.com/UMD-ARLIS/incubator-flagon-distill/blob/distill_toolkit_refactor/NOTICE On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 11:12 AM John D. Ament wrote: > Hey Josh, > > Thanks for the clarifi

Re: [VOTE] Accept ICLA and Software Grant from UMD Into the Apache Flagon Podling

" on > general is perfunctory. > > Respectfully, > > Josh (Flagon PPMC) > > On 2022/08/30 11:05:03 "John D. Ament" wrote: > > Note that you're using public and private lists which is a big no-no. > > > > I'll be honest I don't understand what

Re: [VOTE] Accept ICLA and Software Grant from UMD Into the Apache Flagon Podling

Note that you're using public and private lists which is a big no-no. I'll be honest I don't understand what you're trying to get the IPMC to vote on. You may need some help from mentors. I saw IP clearance and will point out that [1] isn't for podlings. Likewise if this CCLA is new after your

Re: [Branding Issue] Shenyu is still decleared as a project of dromara community

Hi My questions have mostly to do with translations, as the source sites are predominantly in Chinese, not a language I understand. On Wed, Jun 29, 2022 at 8:38 PM Sheng Wu wrote: > Hi Shenyu and incubator > > Shenyu is going to graduate in next month, I accidentally have a > chance to review

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache ShenYu(Incubating) as a TLP [ROUND 2]

+1 to graduate. Just a note for internal, maybe we need to update some process documents, but the resolution can change between when the IPMC votes and the final version that board reviews during the board meeting. We should not require the podling to create a new vote in this situation. On

Re: Rebooting Ambari PMC via board resolution

On Fri, Jun 10, 2022 at 05:51 Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > Hi! > > after a few discussion with interested community members it > now seems that a board resolution for rebooting Apache Ambari > PMC may be the quickest and most convenient option. Since > the initial PMC are all (more or less)

Re: [MENTORS] Late podling reports and missing signoffs

On Sun, Jun 5, 2022 at 9:42 PM Calvin Kirs wrote: > Hi, > Don't worry, DevLake and Kyuubi have just signed. > Updated: > We are missing reports from: > - Hivemall* > - Livy* > - Nemo > - SDAP* > - Spot > > We are missing mentor sign off on: > - Marvin-AI > - PonyMail* > This is a little

Re: Any incubation proposal template for projects which leaving the attic.

On Sat, Jun 4, 2022 at 06:23 Brahma Reddy Battula wrote: > Thanks Justin,it’s good hearing from you that incubation might not require. > > I will give the list of people involved on this on next mail.. > > Are you looking any specific format?? The champion should be helping you with this part.

Re: [DISCUSSION] Incubating Proposal of Firestorm

On Sun, May 22, 2022 at 23:32 Daniel Widdis wrote: > Adding onto this, even if there may be no legal trademark issue, there is > other software by this name which makes it less than desirable. Quoted > from [1] > > > Avoiding search-results confusion is important for another reason. > Apache

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache Doris (Incubating) as TLP

On Fri, May 20, 2022 at 08:09 Zhao Chun wrote: > Justin, thanks for your note. > > I'm one of Apache Doris PPMC members, and now working for StarRocks. > > We have our web developers update our web site to fix the > trademark/branding issues. > > We have also modified our codebase to ensure that

Re: Setting up project website

if they add it in the > first paragraph. On a 1080p monitor, the text Apache Kvrocks (incubating) gets very close to the navigation area. It may be confusing to a visitor with the layout, so putting it in another place that's a little lower but more direct line of site may be just as good.

Re: Setting up project website

onymail.apache.org/ > > > On May 18, 2022, at 23:15, John D. Ament wrote: > > > > On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 10:14 AM kezhenxu94 > wrote: > > > >> Congrats but please remember to add “incubating” in the headline and > >> GitHub index page (

Re: Setting up project website

On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 10:14 AM kezhenxu94 wrote: > Congrats but please remember to add “incubating” in the headline and > GitHub index page (README), I know the podling is in progress but just in > case. > Neither is required per [1]. Please don't recommend undue burden. [1]:

Re: [DRAFT] Incubator PMC Board Report - May 2022

Justin, I wish you communicated with the RM that you were going to take over. It gets a little confusing, too many cooks in the pot. I see the following issues with the report: - Confluence version doesn't appear reformatted - Marvin-AI, Spot have no mentor sign offs. In the past, those

Re: [DRAFT] Incubator PMC Board Report - May 2022

On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 3:13 AM Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > You are currently down to report this month as the report attribute in > podlings.xml is set too true. This is probably an error. The reason all podlings were marked as monthly was explained a couple of times [1][2]. The podlings

[MENTORS] Make sure your reporting groups are accurate for new podlings

Hi all mentors, Don't forget that when you're adding a podling to podlings.xml, their reporting group should be based on the month that they enter the incubator. For a podling that is voted in in April, they should be in reporting group 2, and have a monthly attribute set to May, June, July.

Re: [HELP REQUEST] Report Runbook issues

On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 2:49 AM Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > 2. A lot of the processes error'd out, assuming they're one time runs. > > Because the entire year's worth of reports were pre-made, it doesn't work > > right. Some of what I noticed: > > > > - I can't rerun shepherd assignments

[DRAFT] Incubator PMC Board Report - May 2022

Hi all Wednesday board reports are due. I plan to submit to the board Wednesday late afternoon Eastern time. Below please find the report draft, you can edit it at . We are still missing a few podling reports. They will remain monthly if unresolved. -- # Incubator PMC report for May 2022

Re: Is Livy podling still active?

Hi all Based on the discussions, it seems like we should start a formal retirement vote. I will plan to start it within the next couple of days unless someone else does. John On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 9:38 AM sebb wrote: > On Tue, 5 Apr 2022 at 13:27, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > > > Hi, >

Re: Podling DataLab Report in May

On Wed, May 4, 2022 at 11:05 AM Vira Vitanska wrote: > Hi all, > > > As I know, DataLab reporting group is #1 (January, April, July, October): > https://incubator.apache.org/clutch > > > In April we reported on time: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/April2022#datalab > >

Question - are the confluence diffs readable for the Incubator report?

Hi all I've been struggling to read the diffs that confluence generates. I also looked on the web, and with how we load the report it's just a big lob of data. Can't really tell what changed. What do others think? John

[HELP REQUEST] Report Runbook issues

Hi all Wondering if those more familiar with python may be able to help me. I ran into a couple of issues using the report runbook and related scripts. 1. report_reminders.py requires python2.7. It seems that Apple is removing this as they upgrade to latest OS's and wondering how hard this

Re: Multiple entities of software grant agreement

On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 5:08 AM Sheng Wu wrote: > SGA is not required if the project is on a personal repository, this > SGAs can apply for individuals and corporations [1]. Doesn't matter where it's sourced from. We have received a number of SGAs in the past that just represent a single

Re: May 2022 Podling Reporting Timeline

r not pinging them in time, but I really would > love to see reports, that we missed. > > > > But what do the others think? > > > > Chris > > > > Holen Sie sich Outlook für Android<https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg> > > &g

Re: May 2022 Podling Reporting Timeline

; - Hivemail > - InLong > - Liminal > - Marvin-AI > - Milagro > - Nemo > - Pony Mail > - Spot > - Teaclave > - Wayang > > So, we're also expecting these projects to report this month. > > Chris > > -Original Message- > From: John D. Ament >

May 2022 Podling Reporting Timeline

Note - I'm sending this a week early per procedure as we have some catch up to do. May 2022 Incubator report timeline: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/May2022 Wed May 04 -- Podling reports due by end of day Sun May 08 -- Shepherd reviews due by end of day Sun

Re: Need some help to bring ambari into incubator again

The incubation proposal guide can be found at [1]. You'll need a champion and 3 mentors. The champion you can think of as your go to person for getting the proposal written and submitted. Note that because your employer wants something doesn't mean the incubator would be the right place to make

Bug in report generation script - doesn't work for podlings with spaces in the name?

Hi I went to sign off on Pony Mail's report and I noticed clicking on their report from the TOC doesn't bring me to their section. It does for the few other podlings I checked. Is it because it's spelled "Pony Mail" but the link goes to "#ponymail" ? John

Re: Looking for a champion: resurrect log4j 1.x

> | Blog > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < > https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > < > https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high

Re: Looking for a champion: resurrect log4j 1.x

Hi Vladimir, I think based on what you're describing and the Logging PMC's response, re-incubating the project makes sense. I would be curious if the Logging PMC would be interested in restarting the sub-project after a successful incubation period. This seems to match what Ralph is suggesting

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache AGE Incubating as a Top Level Project

Hi Putting aside this subproject for a moment I am concerned with your contributor vs committer counts. If you’ve had 68 contributors why are the numbers for new committers and PPMC so low? John On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 21:08 Eya Badal wrote: > Hello Willem, > > Thank you very much for your

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Apache AsterixDB - JDBC Driver

e donor changed the license headers before donating. There’s actually no usable history in the GitHub repo as best as I can tell. > > While some history is nice to have, I’m not sure it’s worth this > conversation. > > David Jencks > > > On Sep 7, 2021, at 5:42 PM, John D. Ame

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Apache AsterixDB - JDBC Driver

Hi Till fwiw I think the donation is fine though the AsterixDB PMC will need to do some due diligence in verifying ownership of code before forming a release. This is likely what Justin is trying to refer to as well. Some background on possible issues…. Before GitHub became the popular place to

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Apache AsterixDB - JDBC Driver

Hi Any reason that the vote occurred on your private list instead of the dev@ list? Typically a change like this would be voted on a public list. Note that not all IPMC members would be able to see the vote thread in the current state. John On Sun, Aug 22, 2021 at 22:00 Till Westmann wrote:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Pegasus (Incubating) 2.2.0-RC0

here’s my -1 > > > Thanks for pointing out these issues. I think the PPMC should fix them > soon. But anyway, I do not think these issues are a blocker for this > release. > > John D. Ament 于2021年6月21日周一 上午12:17写道： > > > On Sun, Jun 20, 2021 at 11:11 张铎(Duo Zhang) >

Re: [RESULT] WAS: +3 Release Apache Flagon 2.2.0

E > > I'll progress with the remainder of the release procedure. > > Best, > Gedd Johnson > > > On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 2:36 PM John D. Ament > wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 9:52 PM Xun Liu wrote: > > > > > Hi, Johnson > > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Pegasus (Incubating) 2.2.0-RC0

ub. > > This is the download page > > https://pegasus.apache.org/en/docs/downloads/ > > I haven't seen any old releases here... > > Thanks. > > John D. Ament 于2021年6月20日周日 下午10:52写道： > > > Hi > > > > I was checking your vote on your dev list. It list

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Pegasus (Incubating) 2.2.0-RC0

Hi I was checking your vote on your dev list. It lists 4 binding votes, but I can't find the listed voters on the Incubator PMC. For reference, only IPMC votes are binding for releases, regardless of list they are voted on (see [1] for reference). Did any of your mentors review this release?

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flagon UserALE.js (Incubating) 2.2.0 (RC3)

On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 9:52 PM Xun Liu wrote: > Hi, Johnson > > I have checked the following items: > > - Incubating in name > - NOTICE is fine > - DISCLAIMER exists > - All links are valid > - No unexpected JS files > > BUT, This file does not have ASF headers, Please fixed it. > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flagon UserALE.js (Incubating) 2.2.0 (RC3)

+1 from me On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 2:42 AM Gedd Johnson wrote: > Hi Folks, > > Please VOTE on the Apache Flagon UserALE.js 2.2.0 Release Candidate #3. > > A VOTE was carried out on dev@flagon with the following results: > > [ 4 ] +1, let's get it released!!! (+2 (IPMC/Binding) +2 PPMC) > [ 0 ]

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache Tuweni 2.0.0

Yeah apologies, you're good so never mind me https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 9:41 AM Antoine Toulme wrote: > I thought you needed 3 +1s. Thanks for the clarification. > > > On Jun 16, 2021, at 15:38, John D. Ament wrote: > > > > On W

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache Tuweni 2.0.0

On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 2:40 AM Antoine Toulme wrote: > Thanks all, > > The vote has concluded. > > The results are as follows: > 4 +1: Furkan Kamaci (binding), Antoine Toulme (binding), John D. Ament > (binding), Xun Liu (non-binding). > 0 +0 > 1 -1: Justin Mclean &

Re: [VOTE] Apache Tuweni 2.0.0

On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 8:48 AM Antoine Toulme wrote: > Mikuli is from the same company that donated Cava… please, what are you > talking about? > And Cava is the project's name before it was Tuweni? > > > On Jun 14, 2021, at 14:45, Justin Mclean > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > >> Again, no.

Re: [VOTE] Apache Tuweni 2.0.0

Hi On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 8:16 AM Antoine Toulme wrote: > > > > On Jun 14, 2021, at 14:10, John D. Ament wrote: > > > > Hi > > > >> On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 6:41 AM Antoine Toulme > wrote: > >> OK clearly I don’t get it. This code has bee

Re: [VOTE] Apache Tuweni 2.0.0

Hi On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 6:41 AM Antoine Toulme wrote: > OK clearly I don’t get it. This code has been there since day 1 of the > project in our repo and in good standing. > Because someone on the Internet copied the defunct project prior to > donation in no way warrants this release to

Re: Turn on GitHub Issues on apache/incubator

On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 18:30 Christopher wrote: > Ideally, the GitHub traffic would go to a separate list... yes? I think it should be the cvs@ list unless that got converted to commits@ > > On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 12:42 PM Julian Hyde > wrote: > > > > How much will this increase the email

NuttX Archive Structure (was Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NuttX (Incubating) 10.1.0 [RC1])

Hi, Apologies for not responding earlier. On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 7:36 PM Nathan Hartman wrote: > On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 9:42 PM John D. Ament > wrote: > > > Hi > > > > +1 binding from me, with a couple of notes: > > > > - it could be how I'm extrac

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Sedona 1.0.1-incubating RC1

That should be fine since it’s Apache licensed and has no notice. On Sat, May 22, 2021 at 23:13 Daniel Widdis wrote: > The scala configuration file [1] appears to be a copy from [2] or its > github source at [3]. > > [1] ./examples/sql/src/test/resources/scalastyle_config.xml > [2]

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NuttX (Incubating) 10.1.0 [RC1]

Hi +1 binding from me, with a couple of notes: - it could be how I'm extracting your source tars, but the packages are ending up in a directory child to it. We typically look for the LICENSE/NOTICE/DISCLAIMER in the root folder. - I'm ok with the LICENSE but would like you all to fix this

Re: How to understand cut a release

On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 11:10 AM Zhang Yonglun wrote: > Hi, > > In the 'Creating an Apache Release' section of the graduation guide [1], I > am a little confused by the statements of 'cut a release', 'publish a > release' and 'create a release'. What's the difference between them? > I really

[jira] [Commented] (INCUBATOR-265) Maybe typo in Graduation Guide

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-265?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17346217#comment-17346217 ] John D. Ament commented on INCUBATOR-265: - I don't think typo is correct but clarification

Re: What happened to TubeMQ?

nt and everyone has a sense of > participation. > > Thanks! > > sebb 于2021年5月14日周五 下午6:00写道： > > > On Thu, 13 May 2021 at 12:30, John D. Ament > wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 07:12 Goson zhang > wrote: > > > > > > > H

Re: What happened to TubeMQ?

sues > 2. > https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/INFRA/issues/INFRA-21881?filter=allopenissues > > John D. Ament 于2021年5月13日周四 下午7:30写道： > >> >> >> On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 07:12 Goson zhang wrote: >> >>> Hi Sebb >>> >>>

Re: What happened to TubeMQ?

On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 07:12 Goson zhang wrote: > Hi Sebb > > How should we fix it? > > I did not pay attention to the issue, maybe we missed some items that must > be adjusted > I might be missing official sources [1] but after you vote the name it should be made aware to the IPMC (I would

Re: IP clearance protocol for solo external project developed by a project committer

On Tue, May 4, 2021 at 2:00 PM Nick Kew wrote: > > > > On 4 May 2021, at 16:45, Dave Fisher wrote: > > > > > > > > Sent from my iPhone > > > >> On May 4, 2021, at 8:31 AM, John D. Ament > wrote: > >> > >> IP clearan

Re: IP clearance protocol for solo external project developed by a project committer

IP clearance should be required per this line. *This form is not for new projects.* This is for projects and PMCs that have already been created and are receiving a code donation into an existing codebase. Any code that was developed outside of the ASF SVN repository and our public mailing lists

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Liminal (incubating) 0.0.2rc1-INCUBATING

Seems like a good first step if not already done is to reach out to airflow. On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 09:30 Lior Schachter wrote: > We can't just remove this dependency as it comes from the Airflow package > deoendencies. > > On Tue, Apr 20, 2021, 15:51 JB Onofré wrote: > > > Did it change

[jira] [Closed] (INCUBATOR-245) Slider - Auditing Capability

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-245?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] John D. Ament closed INCUBATOR-245. --- Resolution: Won't Fix > Slider - Auditing Capabil

[jira] [Commented] (INCUBATOR-245) Slider - Auditing Capability

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-245?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17311756#comment-17311756 ] John D. Ament commented on INCUBATOR-245: - sure > Slider - Auditing Capabil

[jira] [Updated] (INCUBATOR-245) Slider - Auditing Capability

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-245?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] John D. Ament updated INCUBATOR-245: Attachment: (was: Twitter-Social-Icons (1).zip) > Slider - Auditing Capabil

[jira] [Updated] (INCUBATOR-245) Slider - Auditing Capability

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-245?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] John D. Ament updated INCUBATOR-245: Attachment: (was: iyyd.log) > Slider - Auditing Capabil

[jira] [Updated] (INCUBATOR-245) Slider - Auditing Capability

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-245?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] John D. Ament updated INCUBATOR-245: Attachment: (was: iyyd.log) > Slider - Auditing Capabil

Re: Looking for guidance on IP clearance process for donation to Apache Arrow

Hi Andy Typically you would look at the top contributors and aim for ICLAs from those. Don't forget you have to have a vote here as well when done! I would aim for these individuals: 231 Andy Grove 27 Ximo Guanter 7 QP Hou 6 Boaz Berman 5 Daniël Heres 4 Jack Chan 4 Patrick

Reordering retirement steps?

Hi I think we should reorder the retirement steps as documented on [1]. Specifically, we say to install an .htaccess file after requesting infra to disable resources. This probably worked in the SVN days, but now that most podlings are git and websites are hosted in git, we should probably

Re: Tamaya retired, but there is no indication on its website

Hi If the website doesn't show retired that's my fault. I asked infra to mark the repos readonly, which they have done. But likely missed updating the landing page to indicate retired status. Let me reach out to infra to see what can be done. All other resources are in fact closed down. John

Re: [incubator-pinot] Migrate LinkedIn internal CI pipeline from Travis CI to Github Actions

Hi, I would suggest that you get in touch with someone from the Apache Pinot team to get this coordinated. One of their PPMC or mentors should help get this moving with Apache Infra to get resolved. John On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 3:22 PM Jialiang Li wrote: > Hi community, > > This is Jack from

Re: Request SVN permission for ip-clearance

Please make sure you are using https. HTTP is read only. Try again. John On Sun, Nov 22, 2020 at 10:37 Ming Wen wrote: > hello, incubator, > I want to submit a new ip clearance to svn[1], but I found that I did not > have the permission to write. > How should I apply? thank you. > my svn

Re: Infra info for new podlings

I can't speak to the cookbook page, but I've added a link to this guide on the mentor page. On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 9:49 AM Andrew Wetmore wrote: > Hi, all: > > Infra has added an explainer about how it helps a podling get set up [1]. > > I thought you might want to add that to your packet of

[jira] [Closed] (INCUBATOR-255) Rename "DLab" to "DataLab" on https://incubator.apache.org/clutch/datalab.html

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-255?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] John D. Ament closed INCUBATOR-255. --- Resolution: Not A Problem > Rename "DLab" to "DataLab" on https

Re: BlueMarlin Slow Bootstrap into Incubator

On Fri, Oct 9, 2020 at 1:37 AM Justin Mclean wrote: > HI, > > > It is out of date and COMPLETELY misses DNS requests! > > I believe it’s up to date, but as always PRs welcome. > > It's mentioned under Resources: > "The first resources to be created are LDAP and DNS. These should be > requested

[jira] [Commented] (INCUBATOR-255) Rename "DLab" to "DataLab" on https://incubator.apache.org/clutch/datalab.html

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-255?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17210856#comment-17210856 ] John D. Ament commented on INCUBATOR-255: - [~vvitanska] you should reach out to your mentors

Re: [VOTE] Apache Toree 0.5.0-incubating RC1

Actually seems I spoke too soon, the new policies are available: https://incubator.apache.org/guides/distribution.html#pypi On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 7:51 AM John D. Ament wrote: > Luciano, > > I can change my vote to a -1 if you: > > - Rename the contents of the pypi f

Re: [VOTE] Apache Toree 0.5.0-incubating RC1

Luciano, I can change my vote to a -1 if you: - Rename the contents of the pypi folder to comply with the expected naming conventions - Or completely remove the files from the release. There's an open ticket that the board is reviewing about how to handle 3rd party distros (like PyPi), so for

Re: [VOTE] Apache Toree 0.5.0-incubating RC1

Hi The contents of the pip folder don’t include the expected incubating name in them so it’s a -1 from me http://incubator.apache.org/policy/incubation.html#releases On Sat, Sep 12, 2020 at 18:25 Luciano Resende wrote: > Please vote to approve the release of Apache Toree 0.5.0-incubating >

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Apache Cassandra Harry

Hi, Typically the flow is to vote on your dev list then vote here. Once that's done, the vote should be in the bottom votes section of the IP Clearance. Looking at the related threads on Cassandra lists, I'm not sure why Nate McCall was selected. Since you're a member I'd rather see your name

Re: Problems with Committer Invite Documentation

On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 4:19 PM leerho wrote: > Folks, > > It is our first time going through the recommended New Committer process > and we have uncovered some significant problems with the documentation > . > > First

Re: [VOTE] Accept Sedona into the Apache Incubator

While not a vote against Sedona, I think it would be best to fix the mentor list to only include IPMC members and allow those not on the IPMC to submit proper requests to join the IPMC. On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 11:49 PM Felix Cheung wrote: > Hi, > > As we discussed the Sedona proposal [1], I

Re: [DISCUSS] When to add Apache Headers to Third Party Code [WAS] Re: [MENTORS] PPMC case-by-case decision for major modifications of third-party work guidance

On Sat, Jun 13, 2020 at 2:19 PM Bob Paulin wrote: > Hi, > > I agree there does not appear to be consensus on when it's appropriate to > add Apache License Headers to Third Party code across projects. Here is > Justin's email that request the Apache Headers removed [1] > > > > - file copyright

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Hudi (Incubating) as a TLP

+1 binding good work incubating and good luck! On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 9:50 PM Vinoth Chandar wrote: > Hello all, > > I would like to call for a VOTE for graduating Apache Hudi (Incubating), as > a top level project. > > Please vote on the resolution pasted below to graduate Apache Hudi from

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache DataSketches-java 1.3.0-incubating-RC1

date has already > > voted at dev list. So, I've dropped the dev mail list from Cc when I > reply > > to it. Mail should not have been sent to both mailing list. > > > > Kind Regards, > > Furkan KAMACI > > > > On Sat, May 2, 2020 at 7:56 PM John D. Ament

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache DataSketches-java 1.3.0-incubating-RC1

The part that Justin's probably referring to is this line: Copyright 2018- Verizon Media Copyright should have stopped claiming by Verizon Media when the code was donated, so listing an end date there would be preferred (though unless the project was called DataSketches at Yahoo/Verizon

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >