Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Baremaps 0.7.3-rc1 (incubating)

I am a mentor of Baremaps. Sorry that I didn't have time to vote on this RC on dev@. +1 (binding) Downloaded, checked keys, compiled and ran tests (following instructions in README), ran RAT. I am not familiar with "Creative Commons Public License". Is it compatible with ALv2? Julian On Mon,

Re: Registering a release

think this is required for a podling release. Reporter tool > only seems to worry about TLP releases. > > The releases have to be announced on mailing lists including this one > and the main ASF announce list. > > On Thu, 21 Mar 2024 at 00:30, Julian Hyde wrote: > > > > Can

Re: Registering a release

; to go here: >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/ >> Kind Regards, >> Justin >>> On 21 Mar 2024, at 10:29 am, Julian Hyde wrote: >>> >>> Can someone remind me where I go (whimsy or reporter, I presume) to >>> register a release from a p

Registering a release

Can someone remind me where I go (whimsy or reporter, I presume) to register a release from a podling (in this case SDAP)? In Calcite, a top-level project that deploys Java artifacts to Maven Central, the process has been straightforward. I believe I even received an email from Reporter sending

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache SDAP (Incubating) as a Top Level Project

ED, that the persons listed immediately below be and hereby are > appointed to serve as the initial members of the Apache SDAP Project: > > - Edward M Armstrong > - Nga Thien Chung > - Thomas Cram > - Frank Greguska > - Thomas Huang > - Julian Hyde > - Jose

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache SDAP (incubating) 1.2.0-rc4

Forwarding my vote from the dev@ list: +1 (binding) The points made by Sebb and PJ seem valid but they do not affect this vote. Julian On Fri, Mar 8, 2024 at 2:25 PM sebb wrote: > > On Fri, 8 Mar 2024 at 22:17, PJ Fanning wrote: > > > > Hi Stepheny, > > > > Can you remove the old RCs from >

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache SDAP (Incubating) as a Top Level Project

gt; > > > > of open-source software, for distribution at no charge to the public, > > > > > related to an integrated data analytic center for Big Science > > > > > problems. > > > > > > > > > > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a

Re: [LICENSE QUESTION] Use jmh as a benchmark tool

PS Use of jmh was addressed explicitly: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-399 On Fri, Dec 29, 2023 at 4:50 PM Julian Hyde wrote: > > According to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-450, it's OK > to use a GPL linter. And a project can use GPL "build tools provide

Re: [LICENSE QUESTION] Use jmh as a benchmark tool

According to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-450, it's OK to use a GPL linter. And a project can use GPL "build tools provided they leave no code traces (licensed under a cat X license) in your final release artifacts". In Calcite we use jmh on the understanding that it does not

Re: [VOTE] Accept XTable into the ASF Incubator

+1 (binding) Good luck! On Sat, Dec 16, 2023 at 12:50 PM Austin Bennett wrote: > > +1 [ non-binding ] > > On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 8:18 PM Jesus Camacho Rodriguez > wrote: > > > Hi All, > > > > Following the discussion in the incubator mailing list [1], I am starting > > this official vote for

Re: [DISCUSS] Procedure for graduating an existing sub project to new top level project

* P. Taylor Goetz * Reynold Xin * Julian Hyde * Julien Le Dem * Jacques Nadeau * James Taylor * Jake Luciani * Parth Chandra * Alex Levenson * Marcel Kornacker * Steven Phillips * Hanifi Gunes * Jason Altekruse

Re: [DISCUSS] Procedure for graduating an existing sub project to new top level project

I believe the process is for the Board to create a new PMC whose IP and PMC members are an exact copy of the parent PMC. (Like the Unix “fork” function.) And then both PMCs delete the stuff, and PMC members, they no longer need. Arrow itself was created via this process (from Drill). You

Re: [DISCUSS] OneTable proposal

ossible. >>>> >>>> -Jesús >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 10:09 PM Jesus Camacho Rodriguez < >>>> jcama...@apache.org> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Thanks Julian. I was mainly considerin

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache SDAP (incubating) 1.2.0-rc3

Forwarding my vote from the dev thread: +1 (binding) Julian > On Dec 13, 2023, at 9:05 AM, Stepheny Perez wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > This is a friendly reminder that the Apache SDAP community is looking for > approval on our 1.2.0-rc3 release. I'll extend the vote another 72 hours. > >

Re: [DISCUSS] OneTable proposal

Much easier to change the name before incubation. It’s not so much code as all the infrastructure (mailing lists, git repos, web servers, svn files, …) that goes along with a podling. It’s a lot of work for INFRA and for the PPMC/champion. Also, branding. Calcite entered incubation as ‘Optiq’

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache SDAP (incubating) 1.2.0-rc2

I had voted +1 on dev@ but I'm changing my vote until we clarify the use of chardet: 0 (binding) Is there an automated way to check the licenses of Python dependencies (analogous to how Java-based projects use RAT)? It would be useful for me (not a Python expert but voting on releases) and the

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Baremaps 0.7.2-rc3 (incubating)

members (including non-PMC committers). Julian > On Oct 12, 2023, at 03:05, Bertil Chapuis wrote: > > Thanks a lot for the clarification, we will eventually get familiar with the > process  > >> On 11 Oct 2023, at 21:02, Julian Hyde wrote: >> >> Note th

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Baremaps 0.7.2-rc3 (incubating)

t; > +1 votes [5]: > - Leonard Cseres > - Julian Hyde > - Jean-Baptiste Onofré > - Calvin Kirs > - Bertil Chapuis > > 0 votes [0]: > None > > -1 votes [0]: > None > > Best regards, > > Bertil > > > > > On 7 Oct 2023, at 07:08, Calvin K

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Baremaps 0.7.2-rc3 (incubating)

+1 (binding) Downloaded, checked signatures, README, LICENSE, NOTICE, DISCLAIMER-WIP; compared src-tar contents with git; built using OpenJDK 17/Maven 3.8.1 on Ubuntu/amd64; ran RAT. Checked that file headers are now correct. Julian > On Oct 3, 2023, at 11:48 AM, Leo wrote: > > +1

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Baremaps 0.7.2-rc2 (incubating)

-1 (binding) I had voted +1 on the dev list but I am changing my vote in light of the header issues that Calvin discovered. A typical java file in Baremaps has this header: /* *

Re: Feedback requested - How to deal with retired podling resources

In regard to assets, I see no particular reason to treat retired podlings differently from graduated podlings. Keep the foo.apache.org hostname; retain the repository (read-only); keep the website (tagged with a notice ’This podling has retired. It may be contacted at

Re: Little "upsie" at the Wayang podling

As others have said, there’s no way to retract a release when it’s gone to Maven Central. (Many of us have noticed show-stopping bugs just after the release.) The only remedy is to make a superseding release. I don’t support adding a step where an IPMC member presses the release button.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache SDAP (incubating) 1.1.0-rc0

(I am a mentor of SDAP but was too late to vote in the thread on dev@sdap.) +1 (binding) Checked signatures/hashes, compared with git, checked NOTICE, LICENSE.txt, DISCLAIMER-WIP; built Collection Manager and Granule Infester using Docker, following the instructions in README. Notes: * You

Re: [QUESTION] are binary distributions/releases required?

It’s useful to clarify the terminology. There’s no such thing as a “binary release”. Release policy [1] says: > Every ASF release MUST contain one or more source packages > All releases are in the form of the source materials needed to make changes > to the software being released. > > As a

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache SDAP (incubating) 1.0.0-rc3

Forwarding my vote from the dev@sdap thread: +1 (binding) To repeat what I said for RC2, I am the sole active mentor for SDAP, and we appreciate the time and attention of IPMC members doing due diligence on this release. In RC3, SDAP have taken pains to address the issues noted in RC2. The

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache SDAP (incubating) 1.0.0-rc2

Thank you to Calvin, John, Justin, Larry for reviewing/voting. You raised some good points. SDAP is discussing on its dev@ list and I will argue there that they should address most or all in a new RC. A couple of responses to specific remarks. > On 2023/01/03 04:48:23 Justin Mclean wrote: > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache SDAP (incubating) 1.0.0-rc2

Good catch. But could you (and others) continue the process of reviewing and voting on the release. It is established that an official ASF release must not contain gradle-wrapper.jar [1], but in my opinion this is a problem that could be solved in the next incubating release. If a few IPMC

SDAP release vote

Could some IPMC members please vote on the SDAP 1.0.0-rc2 release thread? [1] The vote has been open for a week and there's only one vote so far (from me). (The podling has been in incubation for some time, and all of its original mentors have drifted away. I joined as a mentor in November

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache SDAP (incubating) 1.0.0-rc2

I am a mentor of SDAP. Forwarding my vote from the PPMC thread [1]: +1 (binding) Julian [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/vh9472q76kzndcs55pmpjmld8snzn1ny On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 7:19 PM Riley Kuttruff wrote: > Hello everyone, > > This is a call for a vote to release Apache SDAP

SDAP 1.0.0-rc2

Incubator PMC members, Can I get some help inspecting a release candidate? SDAP has been in incubation for several years, has only one remaining active mentor (myself!) and has just produced a release candidate good enough for me to vote +1. In due course this RC will appear in a vote on this

Removed 'incubator.' from project status template

FYI, I removed 'incubator' from the project status template [1]. In Baremaps we concluded that we wanted the shorter URL and email addresses that would survive into graduation. And I figured that the next podling would want to do the same. If there are objections I can back it out. Julian [1]

Re: [MENTORS] Projects > 1000 days in Incubation

> SDAP - discussing steps to graduation (making a release) Last week I joined SDAP as a mentor. I am encouraging them to reassess what's left before graduation. As Justin says, the main thing is to make a release. There's a lot of stuff that they *think* they need to do (e.g. setting up CI) that

Re: [DISCUSS] What to do with long incubating projects?

One idea is to schedule a review after the project has been in the incubator longer than the median time (say after 2 years). Deep-dive into what is going right and wrong, identify things that can be fixed, and set targets. And schedule another review a year later. Or schedule a vote to retire.

Re: [DISCUSS] Remove 72 hour waiting time to add PPMC members.

> If we now exercise our means to object [to] a nomination after it’s executed, > we have this odd unpleasant situation of the person knowing what happened. While this is a legitimate concern, as far as I know the Board and the IPMC have not once exercised the right of veto, for hundreds if not

Re: [VOTE] Accept Baremaps into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) Julian On Thu, Oct 6, 2022 at 8:10 AM Josh Fischer wrote: > > +1 (non-binding) > > On Thu, Oct 6, 2022 at 7:54 AM Bertrand Delacretaz > wrote: > > > Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > > > ...I'm calling a vote to accept Baremap into the > > > Apache incubator. > > >... > > > > +1,

Re: [Discuss] Baremaps Proposal

I’m happy to have this meeting if and when Baremaps starts incubation. But first let’s make the case to the IPMC that Baremaps should be in the Incubator, and get the vote passed. Julian > On Sep 28, 2022, at 12:45 AM, Bertil Chapuis wrote: > > >>> When I mentor a project (as I have

Re: [Discuss] Baremaps Proposal

remaps/baremaps> > >> > >> The base map can be found at: > >> https://github.com/baremaps/baremaps/tree/main/map > >> <https://github.com/baremaps/baremaps/tree/main/map> > >> > >> == External Dependencies == > >> To our knowledge

Re: [DISCUSS] Incubating Proposal for Datark

HW-Chao, Your message is unreadable. Can you please resend without the HTML markup? Julian > On Sep 23, 2022, at 7:12 AM, HW-Chao Wang <576749...@qq.com.INVALID> wrote: > > This is an interesting project, +1 on the proposal. > On 2022/09/23 13:06:00 Yu Li wrote: Thanks all for the >

Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator

A few people on this thread are voting -1 with the rationale that StreamPark is similar to existing projects. This is not a valid reason. Apache does not try to ensure that projects don't overlap. The 'community over code' mantra holds true: Apache does not pick technologies, it builds

Re: Short process intro for exec's?

Rich, Thanks for revising this presentation and sharing back. I hope others will find it useful. Julian > On Jul 23, 2022, at 8:58 AM, Salz, Rich wrote: > > Thanks Julian. > > Here is the current draft intended to be a stand-alone introduction to Apache > and Incubation. Hope others find

Crail retirement is complete

As you know, the Crail podling retired as of 2022-06-20 [1]. I am pleased to report completion of the steps to clean up [2][3]. I note that Crail's retirement is mentioned in the draft Board report for July [4]. Julian [1] https://incubator.apache.org/projects/index.html#crail [2]

Re: Short process intro for exec's?

es look great BTW, exactly what I can use as my starting point > internally. > > On 6/17/22, 3:15 PM, "Julian Hyde" wrote: > >When I was mentoring the Hop podling a couple of years ago, I gave the > following talk to educate the initial committers about the proc

Re: Short process intro for exec's?

When I was mentoring the Hop podling a couple of years ago, I gave the following talk to educate the initial committers about the process. But it is probably suitable for executives: https://www.slideshare.net/julianhyde/what-to-expect-when-youre-incubating

[RESULT] [VOTE] Retire Crail

With five binding +1 votes and no 0 or -1 votes, the vote passes. Thanks to all who voted. I'll work with other mentors to carry out the post-retirement steps. Julian On 2022/06/06 19:48:20 Julian Hyde wrote: > After years of declining activity[1][2], and following discussions on > dev@

[VOTE] Retire Crail

-1 [ ] Do not retire Crail from the Incubator Here is my vote: +1 [x] Retire Crail from the Incubator Julian Hyde (Member IPMC, Crail mentor) [1] https://incubator.apache.org/projects/crail.html [2] https://lists.apache.org/list?d...@crail.apache.org [3] https://lists.apache.org/thread

Re: Thank you

like to take a few moments to thank everyone that was involved in helping us throughout the graduation process. First and foremost I want to thank our mentors who did an excellent job in guiding us. In particular Julian Hyde was very present with practical advice and, I think, much needed

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Hop (Incubating) as a TLP

sibility of the Apache Hop Project; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and hereby are > appointed to serve as the initial members of the Apache Hop Project: > > * Bart Maertens > * Brandon Jackson > * Dave Campen > * Francois Papon >

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Hop (Incubating) as a TLP

irectors as the chair of the Apache Hop Project, and to > have primary responsibility for management of the projects within the > scope of responsibility of the Apache Hop Project; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and hereby are > ap

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache Hop (Incubating) as a TLP

29, 2021, at 9:12 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz > wrote: > > Hi, > > On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 5:56 PM Julian Hyde wrote: >> ...Let’s just assume that it’s OK to include people with non-Apache email >> addresses in the graduation resolution... > > I don't think that's

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache Hop (Incubating) as a TLP

> On Nov 29, 2021, at 7:50 AM, sebb wrote: > > On Mon, 29 Nov 2021 at 04:58, Julian Hyde wrote: >> >> >> Is it possible to give someone an Apache id even if though are not a >> committer or PMC member of any project? Maybe that would solve some of

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache Hop (Incubating) as a TLP

> On Nov 26, 2021, at 6:05 AM, sebb wrote: > > On Fri, 26 Nov 2021 at 12:06, Matt Casters > mailto:matt.cast...@neo4j.com.invalid>> > wrote: > >> As for Ricardo: he is indeed not a committer (yet) but an advisor to the >> project. His insights as an educator have been very valuable and is

Re: Report template generation changes

Justin, Did you recently change the template to add text such as the "Are things..." and "Are 3rd..." in the following? # Have your mentors been helpful and responsive? Are things falling through the cracks? If so, please list any open issues that need to be addressed. # Is the PPMC

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache Hop (Incubating) as a TLP

so that it can be >> easily reused by other software; and be it further >> >> RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache Hop" be and hereby >> is created, the person holding such office to serve at the direction of >> the Board of Directors as the chair of the Ap

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache Hop (Incubating) as a TLP

to be known as the "Apache Hop Project", be and hereby is >>>>> established pursuant to Bylaws of the Foundation; and be it further >>>>> >>>>> RESOLVED, that the Apache Hop Project be and hereby is responsible for >>>>> the crea

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hop (incubating) 1.0.0-rc1

Forwarding my +1 (binding) from the podling vote. > On Sep 26, 2021, at 11:58 PM, Hans Van Akelyen > wrote: > > Hi All, > > After a thorough testing period for Hop 0.99, we are ready to release > version 1.0.0 to the public. All issues raised during the previous release > have been resolved.

Re: Require websites to have standard download URL?

Also: if anyone visits http://podling.apache.org/download it MUST redirect to https://podling.apache.org/download . (Note ‘http’ in first ‘https’ in second.) > On Sep 17, 2021, at 6:26 AM, Alexander Alten wrote: > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hop (incubating) 0.99-rc4

+1 (binding) Downloaded, checked signatures, built using “./mvnw clean install -DskipTests" and Java 8 on Ubuntu 20.04.2 LTS. Followed build instructions in README.md. Checked LICENSE, NOTICE, DISCLAIMER; ran RAT. Note: It’s nothing to do with this release, but before you go 1.0 I think you

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hop (incubating) 0.99-rc1

Forwarding my vote from the PPMC poll: +1 (binding) On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 5:54 AM Xun Liu wrote: > > +1 (non-binding) from me, I have checked the following items: > > - Incubating in name > - NOTICE is fine > - DISCLAIMER exists > - All links are valid > - No unexpected binary files > - All

Re: Turn on GitHub Issues on apache/incubator

How much will this increase the email traffic? > On Jun 3, 2021, at 9:39 AM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > Unless there is an objection I will turn on GitHub Issues on > https://github.com/apache/incubator next Monday. > > I’ll also set notifications so that PRs and issues are sent to general@i.a.o

[jira] [Commented] (INCUBATOR-245) Slider - Auditing Capability

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-245?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17311754#comment-17311754 ] Julian Hyde commented on INCUBATOR-245: --- Good point. Can an admin please close it. > Sli

[jira] [Commented] (INCUBATOR-245) Slider - Auditing Capability

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-245?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17311739#comment-17311739 ] Julian Hyde commented on INCUBATOR-245: --- [~jmclean], As an admin, can you please remove the spam

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hop (incubating) 0.60-rc1

encoding: UTF-8 OS name: "linux", version: "5.4.0-64-generic", arch: "amd64", family: "unix" $ java -version java version "1.8.0_271" Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_271-b09) Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 25.271-b09, mixed

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hop (incubating) 0.60-rc1

FWIW, I get the same error. Ubuntu 20.04, Java 8, "mvn clean compile". ... [INFO] Hop Assemblies Plugins Dist SUCCESS [ 17.172 s] [INFO] Hop Assemblies Static Assets ... SUCCESS [ 0.272 s] [INFO] Hop Assemblies Demo

[jira] [Commented] (INCUBATOR-245) Slider - Auditing Capability

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-245?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17264435#comment-17264435 ] Julian Hyde commented on INCUBATOR-245: --- Great minds, [~elserj]! > Slider - Auditing Capabil

[jira] [Commented] (INCUBATOR-245) Slider - Auditing Capability

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-245?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17264434#comment-17264434 ] Julian Hyde commented on INCUBATOR-245: --- The attachment '2021_01_10_07_45_25.mp4', just added

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hop (incubating) 0.50-rc2

Forwarding my vote from the dev@hop thread: +1 (binding). IPMC members, please note that 0.50 will be Hop’s first release in incubation. As such, there are issues with the release that would not be allowed in an official Apache release, namely: * EPL-licensed source files (category B); * some

Re: [VOTE] Hop proposal

* Maximilian Michels (m...@apache.org) Nominated Mentors * Tom Barber (magicaltr...@apache.org) * Julian Hyde (jh...@apache.org) * Maximilian Michels (m...@apache.org) * Francois Papon (fpa...@apache.org) * Kevin Ratnasekera (djkevi..

Re: [VOTE] Hop proposal

+1 I have known several of the members of the Hop community (Matt, Bart, Rodrigo, Doug, Gretchen, Dave) for well over ten years; they were contributing to Pentaho, Kettle and other projects while I was working on Mondrian. They are good people, and they know how to build a great product by first

Re: Giving our PMs and contributors triage rights on GitHub

By PM, I presume that you mean either Product Manager or Program Manager. I’ve worked at a few companies that practiced “commercial open source”, and there is inherent tension in the relationship with the “business” people. The key questions are whether a PM can participate in the community

Re: "Fork Me" on GitHub (was Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache ShardingSphere (incubating) as a TLP)

Ah, thanks Justin. Sorry I didn't notice the board action and the recommendation from trademarks. I don't think there's much left to discuss. The board and trademarks have made their policy clear. We (the incubator) should make podlings aware of the policy. I think "fork me on GitHub" is less

Re: "Fork Me" on GitHub (was Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache ShardingSphere (incubating) as a TLP)

I read the board@ thread and, unless I missed it, there was no edict from the board to not say “fork me on GitHub”. Therefore it’s down to projects’ discretion how they promote themselves. (Consistent with branding policy etc.) Unless and until the board speaks I don’t think we need to tell

Re: Tiered Storage Proposal

Neha, Did you perhaps intend to send this to d...@pinot.apache.org? This list covers all projects incubating at Apache, not just Pinot. Julian On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 10:32 AM Neha Pawar wrote: > > Hi, > > Please review the proposal below for Tiered Storage in Pinot: >

Re: [VOTE] Release 0.5.2-incubating, release candidate #1

Good luck with the vote on your dev@ list. When you're ready for a vote on general@ it will be helpful if you add 'hudi' to the subject, something like this: [VOTE] Release apache-hudi-0.5.2-incubating, release candidate #1 We on general@ see many release vote threads... Julian On Thu, Mar

Re: [MENTORS] March report signoff due Tuesday March 10

Ah, I had the right link but I think cwiki was temporarily down. Justin, Many thanks for creating the redirect page. It will be very helpful. I also created https://s.apache.org/incubator-report (as a shortcut to your redirect page) if folks would prefer to add that to their bookmarks. Julian

Re: [MENTORS] March report signoff due Tuesday March 10

Is this the link i should be using? (It changes every month, so I never get around to bookmarking the link.) https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/incubator/March2020 > On Mar 5, 2020, at 6:35 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Crail 1.2-incubating (rc2)

Changing my vote to +1. Be sure to fix the copyright date next time. I noticed another "2018" in the source code - https://github.com/apache/incubator-crail/blob/master/doc/source/conf.py#L38 - so change that too. Julian On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 4:31 AM Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > > > -1

Re: [VOTE] Apache Crail 1.2-incubating (rc2)

Checked signatures, LICENSE, NOTICE, DISCLAIMER; downloaded and compiled on Ubuntu/Linux 5.3.0/JDK 8, ran RAT. -1 (binding) due to copyright year. Problems: * In NOTICE, copyright is 2017-2018, should be 2019 Remarks: * In the vote email, it is better to use

Re: [VOTE] Recommend 'Apache Druid graduation to Top Level Project' resolution to the board

.org) > > * Dylan Wylie (dylanwy...@apache.org) > > * Eric Tschetter (ched...@apache.org) > > * Fangjin Yang (f...@apache.org) > > * Fokko Driesprong (fo...@apache.org) > > * Furkan Kamaci(kam...@apache.org) > > * Gian

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Druid (incubating) 0.16.1 [RC2]

+1 (binding) Download, check signatures, NOTICE, LICENSE, DISCLAIMER; compile on macOS. > On Dec 9, 2019, at 10:56 AM, Gian Merlino wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > - Proper NOTICE, LICENSE, DISCLAIMER files are present in both src and bin > packages. > - Verified .asc signatures and .sha512

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Druid (incubating) 0.16.0 [RC3]

che Druid (incubating) is a high performance analytics data store for >> event-driven data. >> >> The community voting thread can be found here: >> >> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ea2f70b0533f403215288ae35294adc59f9ab33accabd9048eeb082f@%3Cdev.druid.apache.org

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache Rya (incubating) as a TLP

I’ve been monitoring Rya for a few years now. The project seems to have a steady level of activity from diverse contributors, operating according to the Apache Way. +1 to graduate, good luck! Julian > On Sep 3, 2019, at 6:27 PM, Adina Crainiceanu wrote: > > Hi, > > 5 of the proposed PMC

Re: [MENTORS] Mentor guidance document

+1 This guidance document is worth pursuing. There is plenty of criticism of mentors on this list, it helps to have some guidelines. Thanks Justin. > On Aug 20, 2019, at 9:41 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > > Sone thoughts inline. > >> Documentation does not solve the problem. > > I

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Apache Beam ZetaSQL Translator

Do you mean https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/9210 ? 6561 is the Dataflow Runner. > On Aug 13, 2019, at 2:07 PM, Kenneth Knowles wrote: > > Apache Beam has received a code donation of a ZetaSQL Translator > > The IP clearance document is at >

Re: [DISCUSS] Drop requirement that ASF members can join IPMC by just asking

I agree with a lot of Dave Fisher's points. Some mentors will fail. Let's not waste effort trying to 'vet' them beforehand; it's time-consuming and counter-productive. Let's instead make it easier to detect when mentors fail (I think the "Have your mentors been helpful?" question on podling

Re: [VOTE] Recommend 'Apache Druid graduation to Top Level Project' resolution to the board

> > > * Benedict Jin (asdf2...@apache.org) > > * Charles Allen (cral...@apache.org) > > * Clint Wylie (cwy...@apache.org) > > * David Lim(david...@apache.org) > > * Dylan Wylie (dylanwy...@apache.org) > > *

Re: [DISCUSS] Drop requirement that ASF members can join IPMC by just asking

t; mentoring other podlings after Druid graduates. Julian has been very > helpful to us while we've been incubating and I'd like to pay it forward. > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 11:12 AM Julian Hyde wrote: > >> I don’t have a strong opinion on the subject of this thread - whethe

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Druid (incubating) 0.15.1 [RC2]

+1 (binding) Checked hashes; in -src.tar.gz, checked license, notice, disclaimer, readme; compiled from source (skipping tests) on Ubuntu/JDK 8; ran RAT; checked that src tarball contents match git commit c698daa. Did not examine -bin.tar.gz. Julian > On Aug 9, 2019, at 5:28 PM, Justin

Re: [DISCUSS] Drop requirement that ASF members can join IPMC by just asking

I don’t have a strong opinion on the subject of this thread - whether it should be easy for ASF members to join the IPMC - but I have a strong opinion about a related matter - namely, how easy it should be for non-ASF members to join the IPMC. The IPMC should be actively recruiting members of

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache Druid (incubating) as a TLP

(david...@apache.org) > * Dylan Wylie (dylanwy...@apache.org) > * Eric Tschetter (ched...@apache.org) > * Fangjin Yang (f...@apache.org) > * Gian Merlino (g...@apache.org) > * Himanshu Gupta (himans...@apache.org) > * Jihoon Son

Re: Podling expectations and some issues encountered in incubation

Thanks for making this list, Justin. Next time I mentor a project, I shall probably convert the list into a presentation (with a few “and here’s the good news” slides at the beginning and end) and schedule a video meeting with a few of the initial committers, leaving plenty of time for

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Druid (incubating) 0.15.0 [RC2]

Forwarding my vote from the dev list: +1 (binding) I am grateful for Sebb’s thorough review but I don’t see anything that blocks the release (e.g. the commit hash is stated in the email even though not given as a link; the extra text in NOTICE files is a “should” not a “must”). The project

Re: [IMPORTANT] Board proposal on podling releases

We’re trying to nail down the definition of “serious”. May I suggest that we divide the guidelines into MAY, SHOULD and MUST. Anything with MUST is mandatory for all podling releases. The list may or may not be the same as for TLP releases. Julian Sent from my iPad > On Jun 7, 2019, at

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Druid (incubating) 0.14.2 [RC1]

s, > Dave > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On May 21, 2019, at 5:36 PM, Julian Hyde wrote: >> >> No. >> >> In my defense, Druid has produced quite a few RCs recently and I’ve found it >> difficult to keep up. The other mentors have been quiet for a

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Druid (incubating) 0.14.2 [RC1]

No. In my defense, Druid has produced quite a few RCs recently and I’ve found it difficult to keep up. The other mentors have been quiet for a couple of months. Julian > On May 21, 2019, at 4:50 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > > Did any mentor or other rIPMC member vote on this release

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Druid (incubating) 0.14.2 [RC1]

+1 Downloaded, checked LICENSE, NOTICE, DISCLAIMER, compiled on Linux/JDK 8, ran RAT. Checked that contents of src tarball correspond to git 1053684f38. Did not look at bin tarball. LICENSE and NOTICE files have grown significantly since the previous release. I would appreciate if Justin or

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Druid (incubating) 0.14.1 [RC1]

+1 (binding) Downloaded; checked sigs and hashes, LICENSE, NOTICE and DISCLAIMER; compiled under JDK 8 on Linux; checked that release contains the same code as the corresponding git commit; ran RAT. Caveats: * I did not inspect the -bin.tar.gz file. * I got some test failures:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Druid (incubating) 0.14.0 [RC3]

Forwarding my vote from the PPMC vote: +1 (binding) > On Apr 8, 2019, at 8:25 AM, Mohammad Asif Siddiqui > wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > Checks Done : > - incubating in name > - signatures and hashes are good > - LICENSE, NOTICE and DISCLAIMER exists > - Source files have ASF header > >

Re: Podling use of StackOverflow

It can be frustrating when someone posts a question to both the user list and to StackOverflow. It means that the community has to answer the question in two places. But like many problems, that is an opportunity. Answering StackOverflow questions is a great way for people to contribute

Re: [DISCUSS] Mentors SHOULD vote on podling releases prior to asking IPMC to vote

Per my reading http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#release-approval it’s not OK to stop when you reach 3 +1 votes. Because it’s not 3 +1s absolute, it’s 3 more +1s than -1s. So, you have to have a fixed, reasonable

Re: List of Projects that went straight to Top Level Projects

> On Apr 1, 2019, at 11:19 AM, Greg Stein wrote: > > I would disagree with your latter statement; they went to TLP based > on oversight, rather than on userbase/impact. I didn’t mean to suggest that we treated them differently because they had a large user base. By “important” I meant

  1   2   3   4   >