Hi Craig,
Thanks for your detailed explanations.
I will be woring towards the improvement you suggested in the next releases.
Sincerely,
He
On 2023/06/01 04:57:57 Craig Russell wrote:
> Hi He,
>
> I'd just like to emphasize that the mission of Apache is to create software,
> which implies
Hi He,
I'd just like to emphasize that the mission of Apache is to create software,
which implies that creating releases is a primary goal. That's why we spend so
much effort on getting it right. A release is an act of the Foundation, which
is only possible if the PMC members vote on releases.
Hi Yu,
Very nice to have your explanations.
I will tell the committers to add what they check during voting.
Regards,
He
On 2023/06/01 03:22:38 Yu Xiao wrote:
> Dear He Sun,
>
> It is very useful for PPMC and dev to check of the vote thread[1],
> rather than simply +1 (for incaubating
Dear He Sun,
It is very useful for PPMC and dev to check of the vote thread[1],
rather than simply +1 (for incaubating project).
There may be the following reasons:
1. there may be many processes not match the apache release (e.g.
license and notice file).
2. more than 1 release manager if
Hi Craig,
It is an honor to receive your comments about Teaclave. I did not quit get you
though. I would appreciate it if you could explain more about your concerns
while other projects also have the same conditions you descirbed above.
According to my understanding about the Apache way,
Hi,
I'm a bit concerned that there are 19 PPMC members and six additional
committers and none of them voted on the release.
Voting on releases should be a regular exercise for all developers. Is there
some reason that only mentors voted?
Regards,
Craig
> On May 30, 2023, at 20:20, He Sun
Hello everyone,
The vote has passed with 3 binding +1 votes. The vote PASSED with 3 binding +1,
0 non-binding +1 and 0 -1 votes.
Binding +1 votes:
- Gordon
- Felix Cheung
- Wenli Zhang
Vote thread: https://lists.apache.org/thread/5h8zd2chnj6bo262wx1sg6df0z1rsrgc
Thank you everyone for your
