Hello Incubator Community,
Thanks to everyone that participated. The vote to release Apache Wayang
(Incubating) version 0.6.0 in general@incubator is now closed as PASSED.
Vote thread:
https://www.mail-archive.com/general@incubator.apache.org/msg76218.html
This vote passed with 6 +1 votes (4
: [VOTE] Release Apache Wayang (Incubating) 0.6.0-RC9
Hi,
+1 (non binding)
I checked:
- incubating in name
- signatures and hashes are fine
- Disclaimer exists
- LICENSE and NOTICE are fine
- All source have ASF headers
- No unexpected binary files
Hope this helps.
Maybe you would like to use
lve all of the issues pointed out, now let's help them get
>> their first release out the door :-)
>>
>> Chris
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Zhang Yonglun
>> Sent: Dienstag, 7. Dezember 2021 12:51
>> To: general@incubator.apache.org
>>
Dezember 2021 12:51
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wayang (Incubating) 0.6.0-RC9
>
> Hi,
>
> +1 (non binding)
>
> I checked:
> - incubating in name
> - signatures and hashes are fine
> - Disclaimer exists
> - LICENSE and NOTICE are fine
&g
:51
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wayang (Incubating) 0.6.0-RC9
Hi,
+1 (non binding)
I checked:
- incubating in name
- signatures and hashes are fine
- Disclaimer exists
- LICENSE and NOTICE are fine
- All source have ASF headers
- No unexpected binary files
Hi,
+1 (non binding)
I checked:
- incubating in name
- signatures and hashes are fine
- Disclaimer exists
- LICENSE and NOTICE are fine
- All source have ASF headers
- No unexpected binary files
Hope this helps.
Maybe you would like to use this command to generate the hashes:
shasum -a 512
Hello Xun Liu,
I did the modification in the DISCLAIMER [1] and it will be included in the
next release :D.
Thank you for your recommendation.
Best regards,
Bertty
[1] https://github.com/apache/incubator-wayang/blob/main/DISCLAIMER
On Tue, Dec 7, 2021 at 6:04 AM Xun Liu wrote:
> +1
+1 (binding) from me,
I have checked the following items:
- Incubating in name
- LICENSE and NOTICE are fine
- DISCLAIMER exists
- All links are valid
- No unexpected binary files
- All ASF files have ASF headers
- Can compile from source with jdk 8 in macOS
`mvn clean install`
- Checksums and
Hello Incubator Community,
Chris carei a his vote, +1 (binding)[1]
Best regards,
Bertty Contreras Rojas
[1] https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@wayang.apache.org/msg00602.html
[DISCUSS] https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@wayang.apache.org/msg00593.html
On Mon, Dec 6, 2021 at 12:00 PM Bertty
Hello Incubator Community,
The Apache Wayang community has voted on and approved a proposal to release
Apache Wayang(Incubating) version v0.6.0-RC9.
We now kindly request the Incubator PMC members review and vote on this
incubator release.
Wayang community vote thread:
Hi Justin,
I just add the disclaimer-wip in [1] and [2], do I need to rebuild the
".zip"?
Best regards,
Bertty
[1]
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/wayang/0.6.0/rc8/DISCLAIMER-WIP
[2] https://github.com/apache/incubator-wayang/blob/main/DISCLAIMER-WIP
El mié, 1 dic 2021 a las
HI,
> There’s no issue with the file headers, other than it just hard to review as
> there is a lot of files without headers. On solution is to perhaps put all
> the 3rd party code into a folder called “3rdparty” so it’s clearer what is
> ASF code and what is not?
Sorry Ignore the above I was
Hi,
There’s no issue with the file headers, other than it just hard to review as
there is a lot of files without headers. On solution is to perhaps put all the
3rd party code into a folder called “3rdparty” so it’s clearer what is ASF code
and what is not?
Re license information you need to
You know, I want to know clearly what we need to put because we already
iterate four times, and if you tell us what we need to do and add, it will
be faster and more efficient.
The license issue came again over the same files, and this is the second
time the release got rejected by the same
Hi,
Sorry but it’s -1 (binding) from me. You might want to consider using the work
in progress disclaimer.
I checked:
- incubator in name
- signatures and hashes are fine
- LICENSE is missing info on [1] and about a dozen other files. License
information needs to go in the LICENSE file. [3]
-
Hello Incubator Community,
Chris carei a his vote, +1 (binding)[1]
Best regards,
Bertty Contreras Rojas
[1] https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@wayang.apache.org/msg00579.html
[DISCUSS] https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@wayang.apache.org/msg00572.html
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 11:52 PM Bertty
Hello Incubator Community,
The Apache Wayang community has voted on and approved a proposal to release
Apache Wayang(Incubating) version v0.6.0-RC8.
We now kindly request the Incubator PMC members review and vote on this
incubator release.
Wayang community vote thread:
Hi Calvin,
Thank you for spotting the issue, with the community we reviewed the code
and we found the issue of naming in other places too. We fix it and also we
preparing the next candidate :D
Best regards,
Bertty
On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 3:04 AM Calvin Kirs wrote:
> changed my vote to +0
>
changed my vote to +0
Sorry, I checked it again and it was right. (I Local default algorithm 256)
But I am not sure if the two items I mentioned are obstructive. So I
changed my vote to +0
Bertty Contreras 于2021年11月25日周四 上午1:29写道：
> Hello Calvin,
>
> Just to know which command you use to check
Hello Calvin,
Just to know which command you use to check the sha512 ?
because I use the following commands:
wget
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/wayang/0.6.0/rc7/apache-wayang-0.6.0-incubating-source-release.zip.sha512
wget
Thanks, fixed with PR #42 and #43. We look into the sha512 issue, was correct
some days ago ..
cheers,
—Alex
> On 24. Nov 2021, at 15:29, Calvin Kirs wrote:
>
> The DISCLAIMER and NOTICE text is Incorrect：
>should be added "(Incubating)" after Apache wayang.
btw, PPMC should list their checklist, I checked the dev's vote, Zoi's vote
is only +1.
Calvin Kirs 于2021年11月24日周三 下午10:29写道：
> -1
>
> This is the problem I checked：
>
> Sha512 files are Incorrect
> The DISCLAIMER and NOTICE text is Incorrect：
> should be added "(Incubating)" after
-1
This is the problem I checked：
Sha512 files are Incorrect
The DISCLAIMER and NOTICE text is Incorrect：
should be added "(Incubating)" after Apache wayang.
Bertty Contreras 于2021年11月24日周三 下午8:03写道：
> Hello Incubator Community,
>
> The Apache Wayang community has voted on and approved
Hello Incubator Community,
The Apache Wayang community has voted on and approved a proposal to release
Apache Wayang(Incubating) version v0.6.0-RC7.
We now kindly request the Incubator PMC members review and vote on this
incubator release.
Wayang community vote thread:
Hi Justin,
Also we found other files that have the same issue and we fixed it :D.
We will prepare the new RC :D
Best Regards,
Bertty
On Sun, Nov 21, 2021 at 9:29 AM Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sorry but it -1 (binding) from me due to LICENSE and NOTICE issues and 3rd
> party code having
Hi,
Thanks for finding this, Justin. We fix and prepare the new RC.
Stay safe, cheers,
—Alex
> On 21. Nov 2021, at 09:29, Justin Mclean wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Sorry but it -1 (binding) from me due to LICENSE and NOTICE issues and 3rd
> party code having an ASF header.
>
> I checked:
> -
Hi,
Sorry but it -1 (binding) from me due to LICENSE and NOTICE issues and 3rd
party code having an ASF header.
I checked:
- incubating in name
- signatures and hashes are fine.
- DISCLAIMER exists
- NOTICE and LICENSE are not correct. Licenses need to be mentioned in LICENSE.
If the code has
+1 (binding) from me,
I have checked the following items:
- Incubating in name
- LICENSE and NOTICE are fine
- DISCLAIMER exists
- All links are valid
- No unexpected binary files
- All ASF files have ASF headers
- Can compile from source on Mac Big Sur 11.6
`mvn clean install`
- Checksums and
Hi,
I carry my +1 from the project, here as non-binding.
Stay safe,
—Alex
> On 19. Nov 2021, at 18:01, Lars George wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> +1
>
> - Compiled on Windows (WSL Ubuntu)
> - Licenses checked (Ran rat plugin via Maven)
> - Checksum checked (SHA512)
> - Checked incubation in name
>
>
Hi,
+1
- Compiled on Windows (WSL Ubuntu)
- Licenses checked (Ran rat plugin via Maven)
- Checksum checked (SHA512)
- Checked incubation in name
Lars
On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 4:16 AM Bertty Contreras
wrote:
> Hello Incubator Community,
>
> Chris carei a his vote, +1 (binding)[1]
>
> Best
Hi All,
I do not see an issue with the code snippet. The NOTICE.txt part was
already mentioned and will be fixed soon.
+1
- Compiled on Windows (WSL Ubuntu)
- Licenses checked (Ran rat plugin via Maven)
- Checksum checked (SHA512)
- Checked incubation in name
Lars
On Sun, Nov 7, 2021 at 3:43
Hello Incubator Community,
Chris carei a his vote, +1 (binding)[1]
Best regards,
Bertty Contreras Rojas
[1] https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@wayang.apache.org/msg00534.html
On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 1:14 PM Bertty Contreras
wrote:
> Hello Incubator Community,
>
> The Apache Wayang community
Hello Incubator Community,
The Apache Wayang community has voted on and approved a proposal to release
Apache Wayang(Incubating) version v0.6.0-RC6.
We now kindly request the Incubator PMC members review and vote on this
incubator release.
Wayang community vote thread:
in.
Chris
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Alexander Alten
Gesendet: Sonntag, 7. November 2021 12:43
An: general@incubator.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wayang (Incubating) 0.6.0-RC5
Hi,
Ya, you’re right :)
+1 (non-binding)
Compiled on Arm M1
Compiled on Windows
Licenses ch
Hi,
Ya, you’re right :)
+1 (non-binding)
Compiled on Arm M1
Compiled on Windows
Licenses checked (rat)
Checksum checked
Incubation in name
ASF headers
> On 7. Nov 2021, at 12:34, Justin Mclean wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I’ll also note that Alexander’s vote is non binding, best practice to
>
Hi,
The issue has been described in detail multiple times. If you don’t understand
please talk to you mentors and they can help.
Kind Regards,
Justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For
Hi,
I’ll also note that Alexander’s vote is non binding, best practice to indicate
it as such like so “+1 (non-binding)”. It also a good idea to list what was
checked in the release rather than just voting “+1". Only IPMC members votes
are binding on ASF incubator releases.
Kind Regards,
Hi,
I don’t understand what is the current problem because what was “copied”
was the image that was transcripts to OUR representation. Then the element
that can be claimed as “copied” is the information inside of the OUR
representation. When we change the content of the graph the Wikipedia
Hi,
Honestly I don’t get it. Same techniques are used in Apache Spark and Apache
Flink, as example. How’s that working?
We referenced the Wikipedia article as a documentation how page rank works. Why
should this violate the ASF policy? The algorithm looks exactly as is it is
[1], means the
Hi,
> Agree with Daniel, the node creation is a common technique in the data
> science community and does not represent code, it is representing a procedure
> to create nodes. Therefore the use of this procedure seems compliant.
IMO it is not compliant with ASF policy, no matter how common
+1
PR for the NOTICE [1] includes the changes Justin suggested, will be fixed in
the next release. Agree with Daniel, the node creation is a common technique in
the data science community and does not represent code, it is representing a
procedure to create nodes. Therefore the use of this
Generally in agreement, but:
> given there may be a license issue and it's very easy to fix, why not fix it?
Any "fix" will look like the old code and thus be "modified".
The new graph in this case happens to have the same number of nodes and arcs as
the original copyrighted artwork, but
Hi,
> And sure, the image labeled with B and C is based on the non-labeled image
> with smiley faces, so I'll concede that image, and even the exact network it
> represents, may fall under CC-BY-SA, and thus it was correct to remove the
> old code.
This main issue I think as the old code
> It unclear what has been used from that page, there is text, code and images
> on it all under different licenses.
It's very clear to me. The code you linked to is simply a representation of
what nodes link to what other nodes by a directed arc. For example, the top
two sites labeled B and
Hi,
It unclear what has been used from that page, there is text, code and images on
it all under different licenses.
In general content on wikipedia is not in the public domain and care needs to
be taken with is use, also what “public domain” means varies. For how to treat
public domain works
> taking creative common license code and making modifications to it
I visited the indicated page [1] and there is no code there. The code appears
to have represented connecting letters to match the image on that page.
The license on the image itself [2] indicates that it is public domain.
I
Hi,
+0 on this. while some issues have been fixed, I'm concerned that taking
creative common license code and making modifications to it [1] and removing
the comment to where it was originally from doesn’t actually change the
original license of that code.
I checked:
- incubating in name
-
Hello Incubator Community,
The Apache Wayang community has voted on and approved a proposal to release
Apache Wayang(Incubating) version v0.6.0-RC5.
We now kindly request the Incubator PMC members review and vote on this
incubator release.
Wayang community vote thread:
Hi,
> Graphchi: Graphchi has an Apache License. The authors didn't mention the
> license in the repository of graphchi-java(it is a wrapper of
> Graphchi-cpp).
Just because Graphchi-cpp is Apache licensed doesn’t mean graphchi-java is or
that people understand that they are contributing code
Hi Justin,
Thanks you for you feedback, I write some answer to your question :D
Graphchi: Graphchi has an Apache License. The authors didn't mention the
license in the repository of graphchi-java(it is a wrapper of
Graphchi-cpp). Still, in the graphchi-cpp you can find the license[1];
also, it
Hi,
-1 (binding) as this release seems to contain 3rd party code incorrectly
labeled as ASF code and contains code of unknown and category X licenses. But
it’s not 100% clear in all cases. You might want to consider using the work in
progress disclaimer while you fix these things.
I checked:
On Sat, 23 Oct 2021 at 16:20, bertty contreras
wrote:
>
> Hi Sebb,
>
> The directory was created :D
>
> The KEYS file got updated at [1] and synced on [2]. From now we will use
> just the canonical link [2] for the KEYS file
Excellent!
That was quick.
Remember that the same file is used for
Hi Sebb,
The directory was created :D
The KEYS file got updated at [1] and synced on [2]. From now we will use
just the canonical link [2] for the KEYS file
Best regards,
Bertty
[1]https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/wayang
[2]http://downloads.apache.org/incubator/wayang/KEYS
On Sat, 23 Oct 2021 at 12:52, Bertty Contreras wrote:
>
> Hello Incubator Community,
>
> The Apache Wayang community has voted on and approved a proposal to release
> Apache Wayang(Incubating) version v0.6.0-RC4.
>
> We now kindly request the Incubator PMC members review and vote on this
>
+1 binding
Carrying over my +1 from the vote on the project list
Chris
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Alexander Alten
Gesendet: Samstag, 23. Oktober 2021 14:44
An: general@incubator.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wayang (Incubating) 0.6.0
+1 (binding)
--alex
On Sat
+1 (binding)
--alex
On Sat, Oct 23, 2021, 13:52 Bertty Contreras wrote:
> Hello Incubator Community,
>
> The Apache Wayang community has voted on and approved a proposal to release
> Apache Wayang(Incubating) version v0.6.0-RC4.
>
> We now kindly request the Incubator PMC members review and
Hello Incubator Community,
The Apache Wayang community has voted on and approved a proposal to release
Apache Wayang(Incubating) version v0.6.0-RC4.
We now kindly request the Incubator PMC members review and vote on this
incubator release.
Wayang community vote thread:
57 matches
Mail list logo
