Hi,
+1 (non binding)
I checked:
- incubating in name
- signatures and hashes are fine
- Disclaimer exists
- LICENSE and NOTICE exist
- No unexpected binary files
Kindly reminder that maybe you would like to update the year in the NOTICE
file before the next release.
--
Zhang Yonglun
Apache
Hi,
+0 (nonbinding)
I checked:
- incubating in name
- signatures and hashes are fine
- DISCLAIMER exists
- LICENSE and NOTICE are correct
Need to update the NOTICE year in the next version
- No unexpected binary files
- all source files have ASF headers
- stax:stax:jar:1.2.0
I did not find
Thanks for reply.
The connector is released to maven for the convenience of users. It is not
a new version of Doris. It is base on Doris 0.15 release. Do I need to put
those jar packages under https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/
?
Justin Mclean 于2022年1月7日周五 13:01写道：
> Hi,
>
> The
Hi Mclean and Kirs,
Thanks for the checking and guidances. I'd cancel this vote here, will
re-initiate a vote after solved the problems you indicated.
Thanks again for helping Linkis become a better, more Apache Way compliant
project :)
Shuai Di
Best Regards.
Justin Mclean 于2022年1月7日周五
Hi Yonglun,
Thanks for the checking and guidances!
- signatures and hashes are fine
[reply] We used gpg --print-md SHA512 to generate the hashes which caused
the format problem. Will change to shasum instead.
- No unexpected binary files
In the src package, there are binary files:
Hi,
+1 (binding)
I checked:
- incubating in name
- signatures and hashes are fine
- DISCLAIMER exists
- LICENSE and NOTICE are correct
- No unexpected binary files
- all source files have ASF headers
- can compile from source
Kind Regards,
Justin
Hi,
The official release area is
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/doris/ not maven. This email
should also include a link to your KEYS file and to the vote on your dev list.
Kind Regards,
Justin
-
To
Hi,
Sorry but t’s -1 binding from me.
I checked:
- incubating in name
- signatures and hashes are fine
- DISCLAIMER exists
- LICENSE and NOTICE are not correct and include licenses that are not Category
A licenses. One;y code that is Category A can be included in a source release
and there
Hi all
We are ready to deploy Doris connectors to Maven Central Repository, as the
version 1.0.0, and the next version will be 1.0.1
This release contains Spark connectors and Flink connectors for spark 2/3
and flink 1.11/1.12/1.13. And this is not a new release of doris, it based
on Doris 0.15
朱辉 于2022年1月7日周五 12:07写道：
>+1(binding)
>
Hi, only IPMC's vote is binding.
>
>I checked：
> [ √] Download links are valid.
> [ √] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid.
> [ √] Source code distributions have correct names matching the current
> release.
> [√ ] LICENSE and
Hi:
I suggest to re-initiate a vote on the dev mailing list. I observed the
dev's voting thread. There are very few valid votes for PPMC. Most people
only have a simple +1 without listing their own checklist result
.
Zhang Yonglun 于2022年1月7日周五 11:43写道：
> Hi,
>
> Hope this helps.
>
> I checked:
+1(binding)
I checked：
[ √] Download links are valid.
[ √] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid.
[ √] Source code distributions have correct names matching the current
release.
[√ ] LICENSE and NOTICE files are correct for each Linkis repo.
[ √] All files have license
Hi,
Hope this helps.
I checked:
- incubating in name
- signatures and hashes are fine
signatures are fine, but hashes I'm not sure, this is what prompted when I
checked:
shasum: apache-linkis-1.0.3-incubating-bin.tar.gz.sha512: no properly
formatted SHA1 checksum lines found
- Disclaimer
On Thu, 6 Jan 2022 at 22:58, Dave Fisher wrote:
>
> Hi -
>
> Have a look at https://whimsy.apache.org/roster/ppmc/age and see that 4 PPMC
> members are not subscribed to private.
>
> Also there are two of your mentors who are not subscribed. Those two probably
> have not done anything for the
Hi -
Have a look at https://whimsy.apache.org/roster/ppmc/age and see that 4 PPMC
members are not subscribed to private.
Also there are two of your mentors who are not subscribed. Those two probably
have not done anything for the AGE podling.
> On Jan 6, 2022, at 2:30 PM, Felix Cheung wrote:
I am definitely in private@ and in a bunch of dev@ discussion. Not sure if
that was mis reported.
On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 11:15 PM Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > * Dehowe Feng
> > * Eya Badal
> > * Felix Cheung
> > * Jasper Blues
> > * John Gemignani
Hi Justin,
> >> (4) Are all of the License Headers taken care of? I’m seeing a PR that
> >> indicates they are not. [1]
>
> This is still an issue as far as I can see.
The PR that fixes the licenses for the Python and Go drivers has been reviewed
and merged into master. The original license
Hi -
Not every repository at GitHub.com/hugegraph is included in the proposal. What
does the HugeGraph community intend to do with those repositories? Are any of
those key to the project?
Thanks,
Dave
> On Jan 4, 2022, at 9:47 AM, Jermy Li wrote:
>
> Hi, I'm Jermy from HugeGraph team.
+1
On 2022/01/06 14:54:03 Shuai Di wrote:
> Hello Incubator Community,
>
> The Apache Linkis community has voted and approved the release of Apache
> Linkis(incubating) 1.0.3-RC1. We now kindly request IPMC members and the
> incubator community to help review and vote for this release.
>
>
Hello Incubator Community,
The Apache Linkis community has voted and approved the release of Apache
Linkis(incubating) 1.0.3-RC1. We now kindly request IPMC members and the
incubator community to help review and vote for this release.
Apache Linkis builds a computation middleware layer to
20 matches
Mail list logo
