Thanks John,
That makes things very clear.
Regards,
Adrien
> On Aug 20, 2018, at 10:39 PM, John Ralls wrote:
>
> Adrien,
>
> I’ve redone the descriptions of the help manual and T to be more correct
> and I hope clearer. See what you think.
>
> Regards,
> John Ralls
>
>> On Aug 20, 2018,
Adrien,
I’ve redone the descriptions of the help manual and T to be more correct and
I hope clearer. See what you think.
Regards,
John Ralls
> On Aug 20, 2018, at 7:50 PM, John Ralls wrote:
>
> Adrien,
>
> Neither “clarification” is correct.
>
> The “Tutorial and Concepts Guide” contains a
Adrien,
Neither “clarification” is correct.
The “Tutorial and Concepts Guide” contains a *very* basic introduction to
double-entry accounting, enough to get a new user going if all they have is a
simple bank account and credit card. The rest of it is “how-to” on using
GnuCash to perform some
I will try inline editing, even though it is very difficult in Gmail
David C
On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 7:44 PM, Adrien Monteleone <
adrien.montele...@lusfiber.net> wrote:
> David C,
>
> So for clarification this is the first link you posted about:
>
> >
Nice.
How about this for a tad more clarity on the two official documentation items:
* [http://www.gnucash.org/viewdoc.phtml?doc=help The Help Manual] - a quick
reference manual for ~~specific~~ _basic accounting_ tasks, and
* [http://www.gnucash.org/viewdoc.phtml?doc=guide The Tutorial and
David C,
So for clarification this is the first link you posted about:
> https://www.gnucash.org/docs/v3/C/gnucash-guide/txns-register-oview.html#txns-regstyle1
Notice this is in the folder /docs/v3/C/gnucash-guide/
But the link on the Documentation page and the link you included (both in that
> On Aug 20, 2018, at 6:57 AM, David T. via gnucash-devel
> wrote:
>
> OK. I have looked over this issue with an eye to clarifying the text, and I
> believe that the User Documentation section should be simplified. As
> currently written, as you all have noted, the User Documentation
I too am confused now. First, I think David > stated in the other documentation thread that the
document names need to be clarified, and that may be part of why I am
confused. I think that the short names seem to be Guide and Tutorial,
which, if they were used consistently, would work for me. I
Hmm.. Not sure how I missed that recently. (I’ve read it before)
But then if it’s there, I wonder why so many questions still? Perhaps the
organization or presentation isn’t very discoverable? User laziness?
Also, I still don’t think after several years that I’m clear on the difference
between
Frank,
Thank you for implementing the changes.
WRT removing the references to the glossaries, it *was* my intention to remove
them, for a few reasons. First, the glossaries are sections of either the Guide
or of the wiki. Thus, like the FAQ and the Using Gnucash links, it doesn't
merit top
Strange, I followed that path and I still only get /viewdoc links. I can’t seem
to hit the /docs/v3 section of the site. (notice your link is also to the
/viewdoc URL, not /docs/v3)
Anyway, as for Gmail, it’s there, you have to click in the reply box to start
your reply for it to appear. (I
OK.
For my complete itinerary, I started at the GnuCash home page
https://www.gnucash.org/.
Clicked on Downloads > Documentation in the left column
https://www.gnucash.org/docs.phtml
from there I scrolled down the right to GnuCash v3 (current stable release)
then I selected Download Stable Help
I just filed: https://bugs.gnucash.org/show_bug.cgi?id=796823
On the title issue as that’s a basic website usability bug.
I’ll wait for someone else to chime in on the case of the gnucash-guide folder.
Regards,
Adrien
> On Aug 20, 2018, at 1:06 PM, Adrien Monteleone
> wrote:
>
> David,
>
>
David,
The confusion as to which document you were in I think is that the link text
says ‘gnucash-guide’. There are also several references scattered on the
website/wiki that refer to the ‘Help Guide’ though it appears the Documentation
page calls it the ‘Help Manual’. That folder name I
Hi David,
I have applied it, but have 2 questions:
Was it intended to remove the reference to the glossary completely?
Should we somehow note, that in doubt the wiki might be more recent than
the official docs?
Regards
Frank
Am 20.08.2018 um 15:57 schrieb David T. via gnucash-devel:
> OK. I
Much better.
Regards,
Adrien
> On Aug 20, 2018, at 8:57 AM, David T. wrote:
>
> OK. I have looked over this issue with an eye to clarifying the text, and I
> believe that the User Documentation section should be simplified. As
> currently written, as you all have noted, the User
OK. I have looked over this issue with an eye to clarifying the text, and I
believe that the User Documentation section should be simplified. As currently
written, as you all have noted, the User Documentation section includes
different layers of content, presented at the same tier of coverage.
"Frank H. Ellenberger" writes:
> Am 15.08.2018 um 17:16 schrieb Derek Atkins:
>> I think it's safe to remove it; the old text will remain in the page
>> history.
>
> Because some pages have several pages of history, do you know similar
> command like git blame for mediawiki?
I do not. That
18 matches
Mail list logo
