Re: Help needed: 2.6.17 not building on 32-bit systems

2017-09-05 Thread Derek Atkins
Hi, Rich Shepard writes: > On Fri, 1 Sep 2017, Derek Atkins wrote: > >> What URL is showing the error? > > Derek, > > http://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Bugzilla > >> What is the exact error message? > > Unable to connect. Try https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Bugzilla and

Re: Help needed: 2.6.17 not building on 32-bit systems [FIXED]

2017-09-03 Thread John Ralls
> On Sep 3, 2017, at 11:01 AM, Rich Shepard wrote: > > On Sun, 3 Sep 2017, Geert Janssens wrote: > >> I'm glad you got it fixed locally ... > > Thanks, Geert. So am I! > >> You could run ldd on that library and see what it's trying to link to. If >> it's version

Re: Help needed: 2.6.17 not building on 32-bit systems [FIXED]

2017-09-03 Thread Geert Janssens
On zondag 3 september 2017 19:26:25 CEST Rich Shepard wrote: > Everyone: > > Found and fixed the problem!! > > Ran ldd on the not-found library (libgnc-gnome) and saw two missing > dependent libraries: > > libicuuc.so.51 => not found > libicudata.so.51 => not found > >

Re: Help needed: 2.6.17 not building on 32-bit systems

2017-09-03 Thread Rich Shepard
On Fri, 1 Sep 2017, John Ralls wrote: Do you still have the older version of GnuCash installed? If so you'll need to remove it. John, No. When gnucash-2.6.16 failed to load after the distribution upgrade I removed it. Since then I've not been able to build any version of gnucash. Rich

Re: Help needed: 2.6.17 not building on 32-bit systems

2017-09-03 Thread tjoen
On Sun, 2017-09-03 at 07:52 -0700, Rich Shepard wrote: > $ locate libgnc-gnome > /opt/SBo/gnucash-2.6.17/src/gnome/libgnc-gnome.la > /opt/SBo/gnucash-2.6.17/src/gnome/.libs/libgnc-gnome.so.0 > /opt/SBo/gnucash-2.6.17/src/gnome/.libs/libgnc-gnome.lai >

Re: Help needed: 2.6.17 not building on 32-bit systems

2017-09-03 Thread Robert Heller
At Sun, 3 Sep 2017 07:08:44 -0700 (PDT) Rich Shepard wrote: > > On Sat, 2 Sep 2017, John Ralls wrote: > > > It’s part of GnuCash. Any library that starts with libgnc or libgncmod is > > part of GnuCash. Its main external dependency is libgtk-x11.so though it > >

Re: Help needed: 2.6.17 not building on 32-bit systems

2017-09-03 Thread Rich Shepard
On Sun, 3 Sep 2017, Rich Shepard wrote: I don't have libgtk-x11.so here ... Correction: the library is installed: $ ll /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.* -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 963 Sep 10 2016 /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.la lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 27 Aug 19 18:39 /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so ->

Re: Help needed: 2.6.17 not building on 32-bit systems

2017-09-03 Thread Rich Shepard
On Sat, 2 Sep 2017, John Ralls wrote: It’s part of GnuCash. Any library that starts with libgnc or libgncmod is part of GnuCash. Its main external dependency is libgtk-x11.so though it has several others in the Gnome stack. John, I thought it was provided by gnucash. I don't have

Re: Help needed: 2.6.17 not building on 32-bit systems

2017-09-03 Thread Jean-David Beyer
On 09/02/2017 09:50 PM, Rich Shepard wrote: > On Sat, 2 Sep 2017, Rich Shepard wrote: > >> I believe resolving version incompatibilities will fix the problem. >> Perhaps that upgraded libicul18n libraries broke gnucash led me down this >> long path. That'll be the next tests if needed. > >  

Re: Help needed: 2.6.17 not building on 32-bit systems

2017-09-02 Thread John Ralls
> On Sep 2, 2017, at 6:50 PM, Rich Shepard wrote: > > On Sat, 2 Sep 2017, Rich Shepard wrote: > >> I believe resolving version incompatibilities will fix the problem. >> Perhaps that upgraded libicul18n libraries broke gnucash led me down this >> long path. That'll

Re: Help needed: 2.6.17 not building on 32-bit systems

2017-09-02 Thread Rich Shepard
On Sat, 2 Sep 2017, Rich Shepard wrote: I believe resolving version incompatibilities will fix the problem. Perhaps that upgraded libicul18n libraries broke gnucash led me down this long path. That'll be the next tests if needed. I've cleaned out the rest of the cruft from long ago. There

Re: Help needed: 2.6.17 not building on 32-bit systems

2017-09-02 Thread Rich Shepard
On Sat, 2 Sep 2017, John Ralls wrote: You're building too new a webkit. GnuCash 2.6.x requires the Webkit1 API which was removed after WebKitGtk-2.4.x. WebKitGtk-2.4.x uses autotools. GnuCash master uses the WebKit2 API and works with WebKitGtk-2.6.x. John, Thank you for clarifying.

Re: Help needed: 2.6.17 not building on 32-bit systems

2017-09-02 Thread John Ralls
> On Sep 2, 2017, at 5:38 AM, Rich Shepard wrote: > > On Sat, 2 Sep 2017, tjoen wrote: > >> This i how I did it: >> mkdir build >> cd build/ >> cmake -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release \ >> -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=/usr \ >> -DCMAKE_SKIP_RPATH=ON \ >>

Re: Help needed: 2.6.17 not building on 32-bit systems

2017-09-02 Thread Rich Shepard
On Sat, 2 Sep 2017, tjoen wrote: This i how I did it: mkdir build cd build/ cmake -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release \ -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=/usr \ -DCMAKE_SKIP_RPATH=ON \ -DPORT=GTK \ -DLIB_INSTALL_DIR=/usr/lib64 \ -DUSE_SYSTEM_MALLOC=ON \

Re: Help needed: 2.6.17 not building on 32-bit systems

2017-09-02 Thread tjoen
On Fri, 2017-09-01 at 10:56 -0700, Rich Shepard wrote: >There's another issue I need to resolve: apparently webkitgtk > developers > switched to using cmake from the former compile; make; make install > sequence. The SBo script does not do cmake; I've written to the list > and > webkitgtk

Re: Help needed: 2.6.17 not building on 32-bit systems

2017-09-01 Thread Rich Shepard
On Fri, 1 Sep 2017, Geert Janssens wrote: Good luck. With webkitgtk you're probably busy for a couple of hours... Geert, Sigh. Yes. It's a huge library. On the laptop with the Atom processor it took about 24 hours to build; took about 7 hours on this dual-core AMD II processor. There's

Re: Help needed: 2.6.17 not building on 32-bit systems

2017-09-01 Thread Geert Janssens
On vrijdag 1 september 2017 19:25:37 CEST Rich Shepard wrote: > On Fri, 1 Sep 2017, Geert Janssens wrote: > > I would expect that as well really. Are the proper development packages > > for > > icu installed ? > > Geert, > >Slackware does not do separate dev packages. Everything's in each

Re: Help needed: 2.6.17 not building on 32-bit systems

2017-09-01 Thread Rich Shepard
On Fri, 1 Sep 2017, Geert Janssens wrote: I would expect that as well really. Are the proper development packages for icu installed ? Geert, Slackware does not do separate dev packages. Everything's in each library package. Oh, wait! The 2.6 branch of gnucash is not even explicitly

Re: Help needed: 2.6.17 not building on 32-bit systems

2017-09-01 Thread Rich Shepard
On Fri, 1 Sep 2017, Rich Shepard wrote: Sure. In a couple of minutes. Had to play with the number of lines in each of three separate files to get the gzipped size < 3600 bytes. Concatenate the three parts in sequence to get the full file. Rich

Re: Help needed: 2.6.17 not building on 32-bit systems

2017-09-01 Thread Geert Janssens
On vrijdag 1 september 2017 18:42:50 CEST Rich Shepard wrote: > On Fri, 1 Sep 2017, Geert Janssens wrote: > > What do you mean with "hardcoded" ? Gnucash doesn't hardcode it as far as > > I > > know. Is it the slackware build script that does ? If so that one should > > be > > fixed. > > Geert, >

Re: Help needed: 2.6.17 not building on 32-bit systems

2017-09-01 Thread John Ralls
> On Sep 1, 2017, at 9:31 AM, Rich Shepard wrote: > > On Fri, 1 Sep 2017, Maf. King wrote: > >> worked for me too try the direct link? >> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/page.cgi?id=browse.html=GnuCash > > Maf., > > That worked for me. While I have (had?) a bugzilla

Re: Help needed: 2.6.17 not building on 32-bit systems

2017-09-01 Thread Rich Shepard
On Fri, 1 Sep 2017, John Ralls wrote: Do you still have the older version of GnuCash installed? If so you'll need to remove it. John, No. Rich ___ gnucash-user mailing list gnucash-user@gnucash.org

Re: Help needed: 2.6.17 not building on 32-bit systems

2017-09-01 Thread Rich Shepard
On Fri, 1 Sep 2017, Geert Janssens wrote: What do you mean with "hardcoded" ? Gnucash doesn't hardcode it as far as I know. Is it the slackware build script that does ? If so that one should be fixed. Geert, I saw that in 2.6.16 and assumed it represented the library version on the system

Re: Help needed: 2.6.17 not building on 32-bit systems

2017-09-01 Thread Geert Janssens
On vrijdag 1 september 2017 18:31:56 CEST Rich Shepard wrote: > On Fri, 1 Sep 2017, Maf. King wrote: > > worked for me too try the direct link? > > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/page.cgi?id=browse.html=GnuCash > > Maf., > >That worked for me. While I have (had?) a bugzilla account, I needed

Re: Help needed: 2.6.17 not building on 32-bit systems

2017-09-01 Thread Rich Shepard
On Fri, 1 Sep 2017, Derek Atkins wrote: What URL is showing the error? Derek, http://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Bugzilla What is the exact error message? Unable to connect. Regards, Rich ___ gnucash-user mailing list gnucash-user@gnucash.org

Re: Help needed: 2.6.17 not building on 32-bit systems

2017-09-01 Thread Rich Shepard
On Fri, 1 Sep 2017, Maf. King wrote: worked for me too try the direct link? https://bugzilla.gnome.org/page.cgi?id=browse.html=GnuCash Maf., That worked for me. While I have (had?) a bugzilla account, I needed to create one for gnome's version. I wrote a detailed description and

Re: Help needed: 2.6.17 not building on 32-bit systems

2017-09-01 Thread Derek Atkins
Hi, On Fri, September 1, 2017 11:33 am, Rich Shepard wrote: > On Fri, 1 Sep 2017, John Ralls wrote: > >> It worked for me just now. > > John, > >Must be something upstream from me. I've tried firefox-52.3.0esr and > chromium-60.0.3112.78 on two different machines and both tell me I cannot >

Re: Help needed: 2.6.17 not building on 32-bit systems

2017-09-01 Thread Maf. King
On Friday, 1 September 2017 16:33:02 BST Rich Shepard wrote: > On Fri, 1 Sep 2017, John Ralls wrote: > > It worked for me just now. > > John, > >Must be something upstream from me. I've tried firefox-52.3.0esr and > chromium-60.0.3112.78 on two different machines and both tell me I cannot >

Re: Help needed: 2.6.17 not building on 32-bit systems

2017-09-01 Thread Rich Shepard
On Fri, 1 Sep 2017, John Ralls wrote: It worked for me just now. John, Must be something upstream from me. I've tried firefox-52.3.0esr and chromium-60.0.3112.78 on two different machines and both tell me I cannot access the gnucash wiki bug reports page. I can attach the small file to

Re: Help needed: 2.6.17 not building on 32-bit systems

2017-09-01 Thread John Ralls
> On Sep 1, 2017, at 6:32 AM, Rich Shepard wrote: > > On Fri, 1 Sep 2017, Rich Shepard wrote: > >>> Rather than sending the build log, open a bug and attach the build log. >> >> Will do. > > Clicking the 'bug reports' link on the left side of the gnucash.org home

Re: Help needed: 2.6.17 not building on 32-bit systems

2017-09-01 Thread Rich Shepard
On Fri, 1 Sep 2017, Rich Shepard wrote: Rather than sending the build log, open a bug and attach the build log. Will do. Clicking the 'bug reports' link on the left side of the gnucash.org home page produces a '404 page not found' error. Will try again later. Rich

Re: Help needed: 2.6.17 not building on 32-bit systems

2017-09-01 Thread Rich Shepard
On Thu, 31 Aug 2017, John Ralls wrote: Guild is a guile script file that compiles scheme files into byte code. John, Thanks for that lesson. Rather than sending the build log, open a bug and attach the build log. Will do. But first, have you consulted the Slackware lists/fora to

Re: Help needed: 2.6.17 not building on 32-bit systems

2017-08-31 Thread John Ralls
> On Aug 31, 2017, at 4:24 PM, Rich Shepard wrote: > > On Thu, 31 Aug 2017, John Ralls wrote: > >> Please remember to copy the list on all replies. > > John, > > Thought I had as that's my normal practice; I apologize for missing this > time. > >> It's not

Re: Help needed: 2.6.17 not building on 32-bit systems

2017-08-31 Thread Rich Shepard
On Thu, 31 Aug 2017, Rich Shepard wrote: May I send the build log (200k) so someone who knows guile well might see the source of the error? Before I do so I'm creating a build.log on the 32-bit system which builds 2.6.17 and will then run 'diff -y' on the two files. That ought to show where

Re: Help needed: 2.6.17 not building on 32-bit systems

2017-08-31 Thread Rich Shepard
On Thu, 31 Aug 2017, John Ralls wrote: Please remember to copy the list on all replies. John, Thought I had as that's my normal practice; I apologize for missing this time. It's not reporting a dependency failure, at least not here. I read the errors as internal to the gnucash build

Re: Help needed: 2.6.17 not building on 32-bit systems

2017-08-31 Thread John Ralls
> On Aug 31, 2017, at 3:32 PM, Rich Shepard wrote: > > On Thu, 31 Aug 2017, John Ralls wrote: > >> There are some dependency-tree problems with CMake builds, so if that's >> what you're doing just keep re-running make until the build completes. > > John, > > Trying

Re: Help needed: 2.6.17 not building on 32-bit systems

2017-08-31 Thread Rich Shepard
On Thu, 31 Aug 2017, John Ralls wrote: There are some dependency-tree problems with CMake builds, so if that's what you're doing just keep re-running make until the build completes. John, I've run into this on a couple of other applications that now use CMake. Does Slackware not provide

Re: Help needed: 2.6.17 not building on 32-bit systems

2017-08-31 Thread John Ralls
> On Aug 31, 2017, at 10:45 AM, Rich Shepard wrote: > > Since the beginning of this year I've depended on gnucash for business and > personal bookkeeping. Version 2.6.16 was installed on my desktop > server/workstation which was running Slackware-14.1/32-bit. Two

Re: Help needed: 2.6.17 not building on 32-bit systems

2017-08-31 Thread Rich Shepard
On Thu, 31 Aug 2017, Rich Shepard wrote: Sure enough, that file's not there. Forgot to provide the gnucash dependents install here: gnucash-2.6.17 | +-goffice0.8-0.8.17 | +-libgnomecanvas-2.30.3 | +-libofx-0.9.11 | +-webkitgtk-2.4.11 | +-libwebp-0.5.2 Rich

Help needed: 2.6.17 not building on 32-bit systems

2017-08-31 Thread Rich Shepard
Since the beginning of this year I've depended on gnucash for business and personal bookkeeping. Version 2.6.16 was installed on my desktop server/workstation which was running Slackware-14.1/32-bit. Two weeks ago I upgraded the distribution to 14.2. Version 2.6.16 no longer loaded because of