> I merely asked why the official Windows binaries (at least those
> inGPG4Win) are not compiled with the already existing option
> "enable-large-secmem", which would allow keys up to 8192bit in batch
That option has only been introduced to satisfy the needs of a few
nerds and for helping with
>
> "Because I think it would be cool" is a good answer if you're the one
> writing the patch and volunteering to do long-term support of it. All
> other people need to be able to answer it.
>
Hello!
I suspect the tone of your reply and the fact that you put me near script
kiddies is due to the
> I know there are and have been fierce discussions about the useful
> length of RSA-Keys. I don't want to dive deeper into that, and I hope
> this special question has not been discussed recently:
If you're going to propose a change like that, you need to make a case
for it.
* Who currently is
Hi,
On 17/06/16 11:25, Mike Kaufmann wrote:
> The hint with the homedir did the trick - you are my hero!
Ah that's really great!
> gpgconf --kill gpg-agent
I read that in v2.1.13, gpgconf gains an option "--homedir" as well. So
starting with that release, I'd advise to include the --homedir
Hi,
> Any further ideas? I am despairing slowly but surely...
When I purposely enter the wrong passphrase, the PRESET_PASSPHRASE
command succeeds, but subsequently the pinentry will pop up to prompt
for the correct passphrase when I try to do anything with the key.
So you might have a mistake
On Fri, 10 Jun 2016 10:23, m.kaufm...@infotech.li said:
> Gibt es eine Möglichkeit, den KeyGrip aus dem KeyRing z.B. via
> --homedir zu ermitteln?
Example:
$ gpg --with-keygrip --with-fingerprint --with-colons -k 1e42b367
tru:o:1:1465230074:1:3:1:5
Robert J. Hansen rjh at sixdemonbag.org wrote on
Sat Sep 17 10:33:54 CEST 2011 :
I've yet to meet a Windows C/C++
developer who was unable to get MinGW set up, especially since
MinGW
moved to a much more convenient installer model
Apparently, the installer model is so good, that it installs
On 9/17/2011 3:51 AM, M.R. wrote:
I agree with you to some extent. I also happen to believe there are
ways of tamper-resistant distribution of binaries that require the
trust in the application provider and no one else; at least not
someone else in the distribution channel. In addition, the
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 09:06:20AM +1100, Ben McGinnes wrote:
Although I've received other email from the OP that did not include
the footer, so now I'm curious to know where it came from, especially
since he is using the GMail MX servers.
Hi Ben,
I exchanged a few emails off list with the
On Sat, 12 Mar 2011 01:40, k...@grant-olson.net said:
- GPG4WIN is the right package to install gpg2 on windows, so you've got
the right installer. It's a shame GPA doesn't work with a screen reader.
What is the problem with GPA? It is a plain gtk+ application and thus
should have the same
I use a screen reader called JAWS For Windows. The GUI is not screen
reader accessible, meaning I can not use the Arrow keys, Tab, Shift+Tab
and any other navigational keys to use the GPA utility like you can with
the mouse. I really hate that; people have no idea how much it annoys
me. I might
I think I made the mistake of using HTML format the first time then
learnt my signature failed to validate. I realised it was because of the
HTML check box being checked; thus, I have disabled that. I have also
disabled the text signature for replies.
On 14/03/2011 02:24 AM, Remco Rijnders wrote:
On Sun, 13 Mar 2011 15:28:02 -0700
Doug Barton do...@dougbarton.us articulated:
[snip]
This entire thread breaks down to a few simple principals of which the
most prominent one is if you are going to become a slave to the past.
While one's method may be more circuitous than another's is
On 3/14/2011 8:23 AM, Jerry wrote:
The point being that at some point you have to move on.
Yes, exactly. At some point *you* have to move on -- but you don't get
to say if, or when, other people decide to move on.
For the time being, a lot of people are still on platforms that use
outdated
On Mon, 14 Mar 2011 11:57, thaj...@gmail.com said:
I use a screen reader called JAWS For Windows. The GUI is not screen
reader accessible, meaning I can not use the Arrow keys, Tab, Shift+Tab
I see that you are talking about GPA for Windows. It is quite possible
that this is not up to what the
On Mon, 14 Mar 2011 13:23, gnupg.u...@seibercom.net said:
Perhaps a possible solution would be to freeze GNUPG at its present
state of development. Now, start the creation of a new branch that
Fortunately this is not required. GnuPG does not know about mail; it
does not even know about
On Mon, 14 Mar 2011 09:17:59 -0400
Robert J. Hansen r...@sixdemonbag.org articulated:
On 3/14/2011 8:23 AM, Jerry wrote:
The point being that at some point you have to move on.
Yes, exactly. At some point *you* have to move on -- but you don't
get to say if, or when, other people decide
On Mon, 14 Mar 2011 14:17, r...@sixdemonbag.org said:
Inline signatures /are/ standards. RFC 4880 is far newer than RFC 3156:
by your logic, 4880 should supersede 3156 and we should all move to the
current standard and abandon 3156 support.
You are mixing the MIME standards with the OpenPGP
On 03/13/2011 05:42 AM, Jerry wrote:
Actually, it is a fine example of users/MUAs not correctly formatting
e-mail messages thereby forcing the use of a deprecated method.
[citation required]
--
. o . o . o . . o o . . . o .
. . o . o o o . o . o o . . o
o o o . o . . o o
On Sun, 13 Mar 2011 06:05:12 -0600
Aaron Toponce aaron.topo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Aaron,
On 03/13/2011 05:42 AM, Jerry wrote:
Actually, it is a fine example of users/MUAs not correctly formatting
e-mail messages thereby forcing the use of a deprecated method.
[citation required]
See
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Sunday 13 March 2011 at 12:56:53 PM, in
mid:20110313125653.03671...@abydos.stargate.org.uk, Brad Rogers
wrote:
On Sun, 13 Mar 2011 06:05:12 -0600 Aaron Toponce
aaron.topo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Aaron,
On 03/13/2011 05:42 AM, Jerry
On 03/13/2011 06:56 AM, Brad Rogers wrote:
On Sun, 13 Mar 2011 06:05:12 -0600
Aaron Toponce aaron.topo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Aaron,
On 03/13/2011 05:42 AM, Jerry wrote:
Actually, it is a fine example of users/MUAs not correctly formatting
e-mail messages thereby forcing the use of a
On Sun, 13 Mar 2011 08:19:58 -0600
Aaron Toponce aaron.topo...@gmail.com articulated:
On 03/13/2011 06:56 AM, Brad Rogers wrote:
On Sun, 13 Mar 2011 06:05:12 -0600
Aaron Toponce aaron.topo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Aaron,
On 03/13/2011 05:42 AM, Jerry wrote:
Actually, it is a
On 03/13/2011 08:57 AM, Jerry wrote:
Outlook Express has been replaced by Windows Mail, an improved e‑mail
program with enhancements such as junk e‑mail filtering and protection
against phishing messages.
Why are we even discussing a product that in not and has not been
available for quite
On Sun, 13 Mar 2011 09:21:36 -0600
Aaron Toponce aaron.topo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Aaron,
I'm just trying to figure out why people keep saying inline signatures
are deprecated, when no documented evidence has come forth showing the
Ah, I did indeed misunderstand what was intended.
I first
On 13/03/11 10:42 PM, Jerry wrote:
On Sun, 13 Mar 2011 16:21:43 +1100
Ben McGinnes b...@adversary.org articulated:
Yes, this is a fine example of why in-line still has a place in the
world.
Actually, it is a fine example of users/MUAs not correctly
formatting e-mail messages thereby
On Sun, 13 Mar 2011 10:57:16 -0400
Jerry gnupg.u...@seibercom.net wrote:
Hello Jerry,
Why are we even discussing a product that in not and has not been
That's my fault. A misunderstanding of what was being asked for.
--
Regards _
/ ) The blindingly obvious is
/
On 03/13/2011 07:57, Jerry wrote:
Outlook Express has been replaced by Windows Mail, an improved e‑mail
program with enhancements such as junk e‑mail filtering and protection
against phishing messages.
Why are we even discussing a product that in not and has not been
available for quite some
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Sunday 13 March 2011 at 3:54:28 PM, in
mid:4d7ce8b4.5090...@adversary.org, Ben McGinnes wrote:
Also, let's not continue the in-line is deprecated
argument, just because PGP/MIME may be better
(personally I agree that it is better).
On
On Sunday 13 March 2011, Ben McGinnes wrote:
On 13/03/11 7:24 AM, MFPA wrote:
Or simply use pgp-inline so that the disclaimer comes after the
signature.
Yes, this is a fine example of why in-line still has a place in the
world.
I disagree. This very mailing list demonstrates how to add a
On Sun, 13 Mar 2011 09:37:17 -0700
Doug Barton do...@dougbarton.us articulated:
On 03/13/2011 07:57, Jerry wrote:
Outlook Express has been replaced by Windows Mail, an improved
e‑mail program with enhancements such as junk e‑mail filtering and
protection against phishing messages.
Why
On 14/03/11 5:19 AM, Ingo Klöcker wrote:
On Sunday 13 March 2011, Ben McGinnes wrote:
On 13/03/11 7:24 AM, MFPA wrote:
Or simply use pgp-inline so that the disclaimer comes after the
signature.
Yes, this is a fine example of why in-line still has a place in the
world.
I disagree. This
On 03/13/2011 10:57 AM, Jerry wrote:
On Sun, 13 Mar 2011 08:19:58 -0600
Aaron Toponce aaron.topo...@gmail.com articulated:
On 03/13/2011 06:56 AM, Brad Rogers wrote:
On Sun, 13 Mar 2011 06:05:12 -0600
Aaron Toponce aaron.topo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Aaron,
On 03/13/2011 05:42 AM,
On 3/13/2011 1:02 PM, Jerry wrote:
On Sun, 13 Mar 2011 09:37:17 -0700 Doug Bartondo...@dougbarton.us
articulated:
On 03/13/2011 07:57, Jerry wrote:
Outlook Express has been replaced by Windows Mail, an improved
e‑mail program with enhancements such as junk e‑mail filtering
and protection
On 3/13/2011 4:02 PM, Jerry wrote:
So I am naive, then what are you? You CC'd me even though I
specifically stated that off-list replies are basically ignored. In
following with my basic procedure for unwanted e-mails like that, I
reported it as SPAM.
Well, it's not exactly unsolicited,
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 04:56:11PM -0700, Aaron Toponce wrote:
On a side note, you may wish to re-evaluate your email signature.
Confidentiality notices are usually annoying to most recipients,
especially on mailing lists, where the email is publicly accessible on
the Internet for all to see.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Saturday 12 March 2011 at 11:29:34 AM, in
mid:348.1...@winter.webconquest.com, Remco Rijnders wrote:
And as a further side note... the GPG-signature failed
to validate, most likely due to the legalise bla-bla
signature being inserted in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Hi Jonathan,
I can not find an executable for 2.0.17 for Windows
http://gpg4win.org/download.html , but later you wrote that you installed
(and uninstalled) it already. In fact, gpg4win 2.1.0-rc2 comes with GnuPG
2.0.17. The 2.x series MUST
On 13/03/11 7:24 AM, MFPA wrote:
Or simply use pgp-inline so that the disclaimer comes after the
signature.
Yes, this is a fine example of why in-line still has a place in the world.
Regards,
Ben
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 03/11/2011 01:50 PM, Jonathan Ely wrote:
Hello. I use Enigmail, so of course I have GnuPG installed. I use 1.4.9
because [1] I can not find an executable for 2.0.17 for Windows, and [2]
I do not know how to configure the GPG-agent. Can somebody please assist
me with upgrading to 2.0.17 and
On 3/11/11 3:50 PM, Jonathan Ely wrote:
Hello. I use Enigmail, so of course I have GnuPG installed. I use 1.4.9
because [1] I can not find an executable for 2.0.17 for Windows, and [2]
I do not know how to configure the GPG-agent. Can somebody please assist
me with upgrading to 2.0.17 and
I found the problem.
The path as installed by gpg4win specifies c:\program
files\gnu\gnupg\pub, and that binary somehow shows that behavior.
Changing the path to c:\program files\gnu\gnupg\ solved that problem.
(Copying the message to the gpg4win list, as well...)
Just so I can make it clear,
On 11/2/06, Henry Hertz Hobbit [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
7-zip, like most zip programs encryption doesn't even come close
to the level of protection that you are getting with GnuPG. Even
if you are using the lowest level cipher GnuPG provides, it is a
quantum leap over the zip programs
On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 09:40:21AM -0600, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
The threshold just to
break AES128 is so immense that it may as well be a brick wall;
...at the moment.
One Xbox360 runs more FLOPS than the world's fastest supercomputer of
little more than a decade ago (a fact that I still
David SMITH wrote:
...at the moment.
Welcome to the Second Law of Thermodynamics! Enjoy your stay.
By the Second Law, every time a bit of information is erased you have to
pay the entropy tax of (kT * ln 2) J. Let's assume that for each key
you try, you have to erase 1000 bits of
On Fri, 2006-11-03 at 09:40 -0600, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
Ryan Malayter wrote:
When encrypting to a *.7z file, 7-zip uses AES-256 in CBC mode, with
a passphrase-to-key function based on SHA-256. This is actually
stronger than most cipher preferences on OpenPGP keys.
This may be just my
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA224
Was Wed, 1 Nov 2006, at 20:43:19 -0800 (PST),
when Robert Eden wrote:
My tool prompts the user for a pass-phrase (twice), places some
simple restrictions on the pass-phrase (10 characters, 3 words), and
opens up a dialog box. The user
1wing-angel wrote:
Hi,
I have a problem. I have 2 computers and I set one up with GnuPG(GPG) with a
key. I use Thunderbird to send and receive encrypted email with no problems.
The second computer is not set with any key. I want to setup the second
computer with with the Same email like
On Sat, 15 Jul 2006 21:43, Bob Henson said:
I read some days ago on the GPGee forum that a new Windows binary would
be released to correct the change in GPG 1.4.4 that broke GPGee. Is it
around/about to appear? I have some files encrypted using GPGee and
No. However, I released gpg4win 1.0.4
Werner Koch wrote
On Sat, 15 Jul 2006 21:43, Bob Henson said:
I read some days ago on the GPGee forum that a new Windows binary would
be released to correct the change in GPG 1.4.4 that broke GPGee. Is it
around/about to appear? I have some files encrypted using GPGee and
No. However,
Karl Berry wrote:
Greetings,
A colleague is stuck using Windows (XP), and prefers Eudora (she has
version 6.2.3.4, which I believe is the latest) to read mail. She only
needs to decrypt occasional gpg/pgp-signed messages. Any advice on the
easiest way to do this would be gratefully
Karl, I have been using Winpt on W2000 in conjunction with Eudora without
problems. I have not heard of problems with Windows XP. You are right, the
sourceforge version is out of date. Timo Shultz seems to maintain it separately
for some reason. Try http://wald.intevation.org/projects/winpt/
52 matches
Mail list logo
