On March 29, 2005 at 13:26, Jeff Breidenbach wrote:
If someone can provide me a raw email message illustrating the
problem, I can try an look at it.
I've sent the raw message to Earl. In any case, the trial
configuration change on the rsync mailing list will continue.
It looks like a bug
On March 29, 2005 at 18:56, John Van Essen wrote:
But if mhonarc reflows long lines in normal plain text and uses pre
(when it could have allowed it to flow), it seems to be consistent to do
the same with (supposedly) flowed text.
The message cited did not have very long lines, at least the
If someone can provide me a raw email message illustrating the
problem, I can try an look at it.
I've sent the raw message to Earl. In any case, the trial
configuration change on the rsync mailing list will continue.
Cheers,
Jeff
___
Discussion list
On March 27, 2005 at 12:43, Jeff Breidenbach wrote:
d) use the m2h_text_plain::filter disableflowed setting
Ok. I've disabled reflow on rsync@lists.samba.org as a guinea pig.
John, please monitor new messages to the list for a few weeks and let
me know how it works out. If there are no bad
On Tue, 29 Mar 2005, Earl Hood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On March 27, 2005 at 12:43, Jeff Breidenbach wrote:
d) use the m2h_text_plain::filter disableflowed setting
Ok. I've disabled reflow on rsync@lists.samba.org as a guinea pig.
John, please monitor new messages to the list for a few
d) use the m2h_text_plain::filter disableflowed setting
Ok. I've disabled reflow on rsync@lists.samba.org as a guinea pig.
John, please monitor new messages to the list for a few weeks and let
me know how it works out. If there are no bad side effects, we can
consider a site-wide configuration
Jeff,
I'm a little slow on the reply...
On Sun, 13 Mar 2005, Jeff Breidenbach jeff@jab.org wrote:
Interesting, I'd never noticed that before. I'm looking at the raw
email received by The Mail Archive (note to self, it is #5525) and am
wondering why mhonarc decided not to use the usual pre
Interesting, I'd never noticed that before. I'm looking at the raw
email received by The Mail Archive (note to self, it is #5525) and am
wondering why mhonarc decided not to use the usual pre tag. I think it
is probably because the Content-Type on the message is asking for
reflow.
In some cases, consecutive spaces that are present in a plain text email
(as shown in the mail-archive html source) are not displayed because they
are within a tt container (instead of a pre container) and therefore get
condensed to a single space when rendered.
For an example, see:
