Re: [Gossip] status report + look and feel questions

2004-11-25 Thread Fred H Olson
On Wed, 24 Nov 2004, Earl Hood wrote: On my lists I still find that requiring posts to come from subscribed addresses keeps virtually all spam from being distributed. I've had very few if any instances of spammers subscribing to a list to spam it. Does mail-archive.com archive lists to

Re: [Gossip] status report + look and feel questions

2004-11-24 Thread Earl Hood
On November 24, 2004 at 10:29, Fred H Olson wrote: On my lists I still find that requiring posts to come from subscribed addresses keeps virtually all spam from being distributed. I've had very few if any instances of spammers subscribing to a list to spam it. Does mail-archive.com archive

Re: [Gossip] status report + look and feel questions

2004-11-24 Thread Jeff Breidenbach
Fred, thanks for the feedback. Keep it coming if you have more. Does mail-archive.com archive lists to which anyone can post? Because the service is so big, we probably have the full range. Lists without spam problems, lists with spam problems, and (unfortunately) lists that ARE spam problems.

Re: [Gossip] status report + look and feel questions

2004-11-24 Thread Fred H Olson
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004, Jeff Breidenbach wrote wrt http://www.mail-archive.com/ : Recent changes have been mostly behind the scenes. Here's some of the highlights that haven't been mentioned yet on gossip: a) Improved spam filtering on the archives. Unfortunately there's so much junk

[Gossip] status report + look and feel questions

2004-11-22 Thread Jeff Breidenbach
Recent changes have been mostly behind the scenes. Here's some of the highlights that haven't been mentioned yet on gossip: a) Improved spam filtering on the archives. Unfortunately there's so much junk flying around the internet that we had to get a little more serious at filtering