Hi Jeff,
Fair enough, I found how to have http://cr.yp.to/ezmlm.html
subscribe something other than the envelope or header from address.
If you think this would be useful for others, please consider sharing
either here, or we can put in the http://mail-archive.com/faq.html if
appropriate
Hi,
I'm waiting for some subscription confirmations to turn up at
http://www.mail-archive.com/archive@mail-archive.com/.
OK, I think it was the SPF softfail that's making the mailing list
discard my subscribe attempt.
$ dig +short mail-archive.com txt
v=spf1 a ptr a:sea.gmane.org
Fair enough, I found how to have http://cr.yp.to/ezmlm.html subscribe
something other than the envelope or header from address.
If you think this would be useful for others, please consider sharing either
here, or we can put in the http://mail-archive.com/faq.html if appropriate.
I was a bit
Hi,
I'm waiting for some subscription confirmations to turn up at
http://www.mail-archive.com/archive@mail-archive.com/. The latest as of
writing is
Reminder: Jessica Brown invited you to join Facebook...
Thu, 28 Jun 2012 20:21:22 -0700
Is it updating OK?
Cheers, Ralph
@jab.org
Subj: [Gossip] yahoo groups destroying mail-archive.com formatting
(unreadable) - can anything be done?
(well, I'm guessing it's because of yahoo groups...)
large sections (sometimes almost all) of the email ends up not being
displayed
for an example, start here and follow the thread
http
Hi,
I am using this first time,
Hello to everybody,
I want to add mailing list of one MSN technical group, how can i do
that? Please help me
--
Regards,
Mahesh Devjibhai Dhola
Empower yourself
Technical Leader
(ODT, Ahmedabad)
(+91 98257 21644)
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
I want to add mailing list of one MSN technical group, how can i do
that? Please help me
Mahesh,
I don't know anything about MSN. But if you are the administrator of a
mailing list, you just need to add archive@mail-archive.com as a
subscriber to the list.
Maybe MSN makes this complicated
On November 21, 2003 at 10:20, Dan Kegel wrote:
Some would argue that spam exists precisely because running a mail
server is so economical. Perhaps it should be more expensive.
Small ISPs and organizations can relay mail via their DSL provider's
servers, just like individuals do.
Patrick J. LoPresti wrote:
as the little guy can always use his ISP's
mail server.
If only it was that easy!
c.1998 I set up the filmscanners list using local s/w sending BCC through
my domain host/ISP, cix.co.uk.
c.1999 they asked me to make other arrangements as mail volume was
Jeff Breidenbach wrote:
Tony's counterargument about false
positives doesn't hold water, because if a list is running afoul of
blocklists, it is pretty much screwed anyway.
Help me out here please! How 'screwed'? I am not running an open relay
according to testing via
Tony Sleep wrote:
Jeff Breidenbach wrote:
Tony's counterargument about false
positives doesn't hold water, because if a list is running afoul of
blocklists, it is pretty much screwed anyway.
Help me out here please! How 'screwed'? I am not running an open relay
according to testing via
Ummm, why can't you just require a list to sign up for the service before
you accept any messages from it? Then most spam sent directly to m-a's inbox
would be automatically ignored.
--
Stephen Turner, Cambridge, UKhttp://homepage.ntlworld.com/adelie/stephen/
The question of whether a
Hi,
As a first step I would add a manual step to the subscription process.
So when someone submits an archive, they would need to include *their*
email address and they'd need to do the standard thing, click on a url
that's included in the email.
This, of course, involves some coding effort both
Patrick J. LoPresti wrote:
Presumably, all of the mail for any
particular list originates from the same mail server (or relatively
small collection of servers). And these are real mail servers, not
random machines with no maintainer. You can use this property to
advantage here, I think.
Patrick J. LoPresti wrote:
Presumably, all of the mail for any
particular list originates from the same mail server (or relatively
small collection of servers). And these are real mail servers, not
random machines with no maintainer. You can use this property to
advantage here, I think.
Patrick J. LoPresti wrote:
Presumably, all of the mail for any
particular list originates from the same mail server (or relatively
small collection of servers). And these are real mail servers, not
random machines with no maintainer. You can use this property to
advantage here, I think.
Patrick J. LoPresti wrote:
Presumably, all of the mail for any
particular list originates from the same mail server (or relatively
small collection of servers). And these are real mail servers, not
random machines with no maintainer. You can use this property to
advantage here, I think.
Patrick J. LoPresti wrote:
Presumably, all of the mail for any
particular list originates from the same mail server (or relatively
small collection of servers). And these are real mail servers, not
random machines with no maintainer. You can use this property to
advantage here, I think.
Patrick J. LoPresti wrote:
Presumably, all of the mail for any
particular list originates from the same mail server (or relatively
small collection of servers). And these are real mail servers, not
random machines with no maintainer. You can use this property to
advantage here, I think.
Patrick J. LoPresti wrote:
Presumably, all of the mail for any
particular list originates from the same mail server (or relatively
small collection of servers). And these are real mail servers, not
random machines with no maintainer. You can use this property to
advantage here, I think.
Dan Kegel wrote:
Jeff Breidenbach wrote:
Running a serious spam filter on incoming mail is too computationally
expensive (there is a lot of mail!) but it is an otherwise good
suggestion. Unfortunately I know from my own inbox that a lot of spam
these days is specifically designed to get around
Thanks for all the ideas, I'll need some time to mull them over.
A quick comment on Pat's astute RBL suggestion - I already do use
a fairly gnarly setup for the Mail Transfer Agent, including use of
RBLs. It more or less matches Marc Merlin's setup for SourceForge
discussed here:
Jeff,
At first I thought this complaint was bogus (sorry roger), but I then
went to http://www.mail-archive.com/lists.html and clicked randomly on
lists and saw what's described here. Almost every list that I clicked on
had only a few messages and they all looked like spam.
So the problem is
Wow, this is really bad. Of the 23 new lists added to Mail-Archive
today, 22 seem to be bogus ones caused by inbound spam. I didn't
realize things were quite this out of control.
___
Gossip mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I have received many spam mails since few weeks. I have tried to remember the places
where I gave my mail address and I found 3 mailing-lists, including jakarta-struts and
jakarta-general which archives are managed by mail-archive.com.
When I look at Google for my mail address (which I
Everything looks great!!! Thanks, guys.
--
Louis Proyect, [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 11/12/2001
Marxism list: http://www.marxmail.org
___
Gossip mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://jab.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gossip
Thanks, Earl. I only hope the guys at mail-archive.com (hiya!) can put 2.5
back in as soon as they straighten out some of the performance issues. I
guess my other question is what would be the simplest way to re-build the
date index after they do that (taking notes, fellows?).
On Sat, 10 Nov
On November 10, 2001 at 00:04, Jeff Breidenbach wrote:
Version v2.5 avoids this problem since HEADER and FOOTER resources
are no longer supported.
I downgraded backed to mhonarc 2.4.9 to see if it would help with
performance problems.
Was there a difference?
In fact, the time sequence
is accessable off http://mail-archive.com/faq.html
(src/rcfile.int)
___
Gossip mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://jab.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gossip
.
Take a look at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/marxism%40lists.panix.com/maillist.html
And you'll see what I am talking about.
I am cc'ing the Mhonarc mailing list and Earl Hood, the guy who wrote Mhonarc.
This *may* have something to do with the performance degradation at
mail-archive.com.
Louis
I'm sorry for the spam we've had lately. I'm not happy with it but it seems
to be targeted at the lists since I started archiving this list at
mail-archive.com. I run two lists, one for GINA and one for AWE32 under
Linux, and both were hit by the last bomb.
Neal,
I'm the person who runs mail
31 matches
Mail list logo
