Re: [h2] Unique index or primary key violation in version 1.4.191

2016-02-17 Thread Blair Motchan
I have not tested the scenario with MVCC off because that is pretty much a non-starter for our performance requirements. It is kind of an odd bug because the application, the embedded h2 web console, and the h2 shell do not have a problem with the database file. Only other database viewers

Re: [h2] Unique index or primary key violation in version 1.4.191

2016-02-17 Thread Ryan How
I've been using MVCC with PageStore for years. LOBS don't work very well (but I didn't want them in the db anyway, so we don't use LOBS). Haven't had any issues with anything else though. Doesn't mean bugs don't exist though. You only get the issue with MVCC on though hey? On 17/02/2016 1:18

Re: [h2] Unique index or primary key violation in version 1.4.191

2016-02-16 Thread Noel Grandin
At some point in the future is all I can say, not anytime soon. My point was more that MVCC on PageStore is a dead end for us, so we're not going to expend any effort debugging problems with it. So if you want reliability, use PageStore without MVCC. -- You received this message because you are

Re: [h2] Unique index or primary key violation in version 1.4.191

2016-02-16 Thread Blair Motchan
Do you know of any timelines to disable MVCC support in PageStore? I don't see it listed in the roadmap http://www.h2database.com/html/roadmap.html but I do see that the removal of at least one PageStore feature is being called out. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to

Re: [h2] Unique index or primary key violation in version 1.4.191

2016-02-16 Thread Blair Motchan
I spent some time trying to recreate the issue with a simple table set up but was not able to. There must be something else in my database schema that is contributing to the problem. Interestingly enough, when I use the org.h2.tools.Shell to view my h2 database, I am able to connect to it

Re: [h2] Unique index or primary key violation in version 1.4.191

2016-02-16 Thread Blair Motchan
I'm working on creating a standalone test and will update once I have one. Thanks! On Tuesday, February 16, 2016 at 12:30:45 AM UTC-6, Noel Grandin wrote: > > Of course,it could also be that you've uncovered another tricky corner > case - in which case we need some kind of > standalone test

Re: [h2] Unique index or primary key violation in version 1.4.191

2016-02-15 Thread Noel Grandin
Of course,it could also be that you've uncovered another tricky corner case - in which case we need some kind of standalone test case to be able to debug it -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "H2 Database" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop

[h2] Unique index or primary key violation in version 1.4.191

2016-02-15 Thread Blair Motchan
I still get the following message using the latest version of the H2 jar via maven: [23505][23505] Unique index or primary key violation: "PRIMARY KEY ON .PAGE_INDEX"; SQL statement: I have a join table that seems to be the culprit - it uses a composite primary key with foreign key