: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Vernooij, CP - SPLXM
Sent: Thursday, November 25, 2010 6:21 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Philosophy question: repeat message ID on each
line of an MLWTO?
McKown, Johnjohn.mck...@healthmarkets.com wrote
On Sat, 27 Nov 2010 09:31:49 -0600, Joel C. Ewing jcew...@acm.org
wrote:
Having the message ID on each line would seem to me a lot of unnecessary
visual clutter and non-informational bytes to record. Are there any
cases where the mechanisms for recording syslog data don't result in all
lines
Can't say I noticed this improvement, but as Joel noted, the problem
tended to be intermittent.
Good to see another wrinkle ironed out.
Shane ...
On Sat, 27 Nov 2010 15:01:38 -0600
W. Kevin Kelley wrote:
With the Console
Restructure, connecting multi-line messages are buffered in a data
On Thu, 25 Nov 2010 08:28:51 -0500, John P. Baker
john.ba...@hfdtechs.com wrote:
John,
A lot of the messages that use different message ids are setup to display
the various messages conditionally and construct the WTO parameter list
dynamically.
Philosophically, I think that the approach that
I have no life. That's why I'm working from home on the major holiday here in
the U.S.
But I have noticed that some multiple line WTO messages repeat the message id
at the start of every line of the message, such as DFHSM's ARC0833I message,
whereas other, such as IEC205I, do not have any
McKown, John john.mck...@healthmarkets.com wrote in message
news:a6b9336cdb62bb46b9f8708e686a7ea005d5e05...@nrhmms8p02.uicnrh.dom.
..
I have no life. That's why I'm working from home on the major holiday
here in the U.S.
But I have noticed that some multiple line WTO messages repeat the
and The
MEGA Life and Health Insurance Company.SM
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Vernooij, CP - SPLXM
Sent: Thursday, November 25, 2010 6:21 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Philosophy question: repeat message ID
Re: the OPERLOG. Unless I totally misunderstood, a DASD logstream cannot be
shared between multiple systems. And it does not appear to me that I can make a
system unique OPERLOG, one for each system. So I can't use an OPERLOG at all
without a Coupling Facility and a parallel sysplex.
guide.
John P. Baker
Chief Software Architect
HFD Technologies
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf
Of McKown, John
Sent: Thursday, November 25, 2010 7:08 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Philosophy question: repeat message ID
On 11/25/2010 7:35 AM, McKown, John wrote:
Sorry, I was just curious about whether people thought having
a message id on each line of the message would be useful. Who
knows, someday I may have such a need and I'd like to have a
good idea what would be useful for others. I am not
suggesting that
10 matches
Mail list logo
