---
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Len Conrad
Gesendet: Dienstag, 13. März 2007 22:11
An: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Betreff: Re: AW: AW: [IMail Forum] Mail-Server on heavy load
It's Compaq DL-360
Hi,
We have a Compaq DL-360 (2 x 1,33 Ghz, 2 GB RAM) which worked pretty good
with about 120 Domains. 2 Weeks ago we added 99 Domains and since then, the
server is in under heavy load. The Queue Manager needs more CPU power, more
than expected. We have about 1 Mails local deliver per day and
@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: [IMail Forum] Mail-Server on heavy load
Hi,
We have a Compaq DL-360 (2 x 1,33 Ghz, 2 GB RAM) which worked pretty good
with about 120 Domains. 2 Weeks ago we added 99 Domains and since then, the
server is in under heavy load. The Queue Manager needs more CPU power, more
than
We have a Compaq DL-360 (2 x 1,33 Ghz, 2 GB RAM) which worked
pretty good with about 120 Domains. 2 Weeks ago we added 99 Domains
and since then, the server is in under heavy load. The Queue Manager needs
more CPU power, more than expected. We have about 1 Mails local
deliver per day and 3500
.
Anything over two seconds per message with all spam and virus filtering would
indicate a problem in your filtering configuration.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Martin Schaible
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2007 9:25 AM
Subject: [IMail Forum] Mail
13, 2007 9:25 AM
Subject: [IMail Forum] Mail-Server on heavy load
Hi,
We have a Compaq DL-360 (2 x 1,33 Ghz, 2 GB RAM) which worked pretty good
with about 120 Domains. 2 Weeks ago we added 99 Domains and since then, the
server is in under heavy load. The Queue Manager needs more CPU power, more
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Schaible
Sent: 13 March 2007 16:17
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: AW: [IMail Forum] Mail-Server on heavy load
Hi,
Thanks for tips.
We have Antivirus standard (Bitdefender), mxGuard with INVURI and
MessageSniffer. I cleaned up rules.ima for old
. That could potentially
save you a few cycles.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Martin Schaible
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2007 11:16 AM
Subject: AW: [IMail Forum] Mail-Server on heavy load
Hi,
Thanks for tips.
We have Antivirus standard
---
_
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von David Waller
Gesendet: Dienstag, 13. März 2007 17:28
An: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Betreff: RE: [IMail Forum] Mail-Server on heavy load
Martin,
It should handle 10,000 email easily and well tuned much more than
---
_
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Darin Cox
Gesendet: Dienstag, 13. März 2007 18:41
An: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Betreff: Re: [IMail Forum] Mail-Server on heavy load
invURIBL can use a lot of CPU. Does MXGuard have
be
used to reduce CPU load for certain tests.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Martin Schaible
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2007 12:19 PM
Subject: AW: [IMail Forum] Mail-Server on heavy load
Hi Darin,
We're using mxGuard to check the several DNSLBL. All
---
_
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Darin Cox
Gesendet: Dienstag, 13. März 2007 19:39
An: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Betreff: Re: [IMail Forum] Mail-Server on heavy load
It's Pete McNeil's (from Message Sniffer). It's
PROTECTED] nombre de Martin Schaible
Enviado el: martes, 13 de marzo de 2007 17:17
Para: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Asunto: AW: [IMail Forum] Mail-Server on heavy load
Hi,
Thanks for tips.
We have Antivirus standard (Bitdefender), mxGuard with INVURI and
MessageSniffer. I cleaned
in Cardiff 3904619
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Schaible
Sent: 13 March 2007 17:17
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: AW: [IMail Forum] Mail-Server on heavy load
Hi,
We do defrag the d drive every two hours with OO Defrag. Our baby-server
---
_
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von David Waller
Gesendet: Dienstag, 13. März 2007 18:57
An: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Betreff: RE: [IMail Forum] Mail-Server on heavy load
Martin,
The defrag could be adding
, 2007 12:57 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Mail-Server on heavy load
Martin,
The defrag could be adding to your disk i/o load unless it defrags very
quickly. Have you tried defragging every 24 hours instead? I'm not
questioning your motives as you may have very
OO Defrag is very quick and needs more or less no ressources. We
started defragmenting on a daily bases watching the disk acitivity
via SNMP. We started to defrag the disks every 6 hours and at the
end, 2 hours looked optimal. Maybe it sounds a bit like Voodoo, but
the disks have less to do
: Tuesday, March 13, 2007 12:57 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Mail-Server on heavy load
Martin,
The defrag could be adding to your disk i/o load unless it defrags very
quickly. Have you tried defragging every 24 hours instead? I'm not
questioning your motives
Betreff: Re: AW: [IMail Forum] Mail-Server on heavy load
OO Defrag is very quick and needs more or less no ressources. We
started defragmenting on a daily bases watching the disk acitivity
via SNMP. We started to defrag the disks every 6 hours and at the
end, 2 hours looked optimal. Maybe
@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: AW: [IMail Forum] Mail-Server on heavy load
Hi,
We're using the DNS from the ISP. In fact, this IMail server is also our own
second DNS. Better idea to use our own DNS-servers, which are available in
the local network?
Mit freundlichen Grüssen
/postmaster/freetrial.asp
--
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Schaible
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2007 1:21 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: AW: AW: [IMail Forum] Mail-Server on heavy load
Hi,
It's Compaq DL-360, which have
Betreff: RE: AW: [IMail Forum] Mail-Server on heavy load
No. Same array, diff partition, no gain. Do the defrag, use
your own DNS
servers, run sniffer in persistent mode. Make certain each
of the DNBS
blacklists you have configured are working and responsive.
Rest assured that mxGuard
:17 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: AW: [IMail Forum] Mail-Server on heavy load
Hi,
We're using the DNS from the ISP. In fact, this IMail server is also our own
second DNS. Better idea to use our own DNS-servers, which are available in
the local network?
Mit freundlichen
It's Compaq DL-360, which have only two disks. I don't see the benefit to
have the spool files on the same Array but in on a different partition.
Makes this really a difference?
When a partition has X amt of used space plus X+ amt of free space,
the defragging is much faster and more
---
_
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Michael Thomas -
Mathbox
Gesendet: Dienstag, 13. März 2007 21:57
An: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Betreff: RE: SPAM-WARN:RE: [IMail Forum] Mail-Server on heavy load
Hi,
One issue I can interject is recursion timeouts on MS
25 matches
Mail list logo
